文章基本信息

标题：Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
本地全文：下载
作者：Øystein Sørbye ; Hanne-Sofie J. Dahl ; Tracy D. Eells 等
期刊名称：BMC Psychology
印刷版ISSN：2050-7283
出版年度：2019
卷号：7
期号：1
页码：1-8
DOI：10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician’s theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7 ., January 18, 2007.
关键词：Case formulations;Psychodynamic;Reliability