文章基本信息

标题：Measuring quality in primary healthcare – opportunities and weaknesses
本地全文：下载
作者：Eva Arvidsson ; Rob Dijkstra ; Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš 等
期刊名称：Slovenian Journal of Public Health
印刷版ISSN：0351-0026
电子版ISSN：1854-2476
出版年度：2019
卷号：58
期号：3
页码：101-103
DOI：10.2478/sjph-2019-0013
出版社：Walter de Gruyter GmbH
摘要：The easy access to data from electronic patient records has made using this type of data in pay-for-performance systems increasingly common. General practitioners (GPs) throughout Europe oppose this for several reasons. Not all data can be used to derive good quality indicators and quality indicators can’t reflect the broad scope of primary care. Qualities like person-centred care and continuity are particularly difficult to measure. The indicators urge doctors and nurses to spend too much time on the registration and administration of required data. However, quality indicators can be very useful as starting points for discussions about quality in primary care, with the purpose being to initiate, stimulate and support local improvement work. This led to The European Society for Quality and Patient Safety in General Practice (EQuiP) feeling the urge to clarify the different aspects of quality indicators by updating their statement on measuring quality in Primary Care. The statement has been endorsed by the Wonca Europe Council in 2018.
关键词：primary healthcare ; quality improvement ; quality indicators ; healthcare ; reimbursement mechanisms ; peer group education ; quality circles ; primarno zdravstveno varstvo ; izboljševanje kakovosti ; kazalniki kakovosti ; zdravstvena oskrba ; mehanizmi financiranja