首页    期刊浏览 2025年03月03日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA CART KONVENSIONAL, BAGGING DAN RANDOM FOREST PADA KLASIFIKASI OBJEK: HASIL DARI DUA SIMULASI
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Yogo Aryo Jatmiko ; Septiadi Padmadisastra ; Anna Chadidjah
  • 期刊名称:MEDIA STATISTIKA
  • 印刷版ISSN:1979-3693
  • 电子版ISSN:2477-0647
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-12
  • DOI:10.14710/medstat.12.1.1-12
  • 出版社:MEDIA STATISTIKA
  • 摘要:The conventional CART method is a nonparametric classification method built on categorical response data. Bagging is one of the popular ensemble methods whereas, Random Forests (RF) is one of the relatively new ensemble methods in the decision tree that is the development of the Bagging method. Unlike Bagging, Random Forest was developed with the idea of adding layers to the random resampling process in bagging. Therefore, not only randomly sampled sample data to form a classification tree, but also independent variables are randomly selected and newly selected as the best divider when determining the sorting of trees, which is expected to produce more accurate predictions. Based on the above, the authors are interested to study the three methods by comparing the accuracy of classification on binary and non-binary simulation data to understand the effect of the number of sample sizes, the correlation between independent variables, the presence or absence of certain distribution patterns to the accuracy generated classification method. Results of the research on simulation data show that the Random Forest ensemble method can improve the accuracy of classification.
  • 关键词:CART; Bagging; Random Forest; Classification
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有