文章基本信息

标题：Evaluating the impact of clinical librarians on clinical questions during inpatient rounds
本地全文：下载
作者：Riley Brian ; Nicola Orlov ; Debra Werner 等
期刊名称：Journal of the Medical Library Association
印刷版ISSN：1536-5050
出版年度：2018
卷号：106
期号：2
页码：175-183
DOI：10.5195/jmla.2018.254
语种：English
出版社：Medical Library Association
摘要：Objective The investigation sought to determine the effects of a clinical librarian (CL) on inpatient team clinical questioning quality and quantity, learner self-reported literature searching skills, and use of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Methods Clinical questioning was observed over 50 days of inpatient pediatric and internal medicine attending rounds. A CL was present for 25 days and absent for 25 days. Questioning was compared between groups. Question quality was assessed by a blinded evaluator, who used a rubric adapted from the Fresno Test of Competence in Evidence-Based Medicine. Team members were surveyed to assess perceived impacts of the CL on rounds. Results Rounds with a CL (CLR) were associated with significantly increased median number of questions asked (5 questions CLR vs. 3 NCLR; p <0.01) and answered (3 CLR vs. 2 NCLR; p <0.01) compared to rounds without a CL (NCLR). CLR were also associated with increased mean time spent asking (1.39 minutes CLR vs. 0.52 NCLR; p <0.01) and answering (2.15 minutes CLR vs. 1.05 NCLR; p =0.02) questions. Rounding time per patient was not significantly different between CLR and NCLR. Questions during CLR were 2 times higher in adapted Fresno Test quality than during NCLR ( p <0.01). Select participants described how the CL’s presence improved their EBM skills and care decisions. Conclusions Inpatient CLR were associated with more and improved clinical questioning and subjectively perceived to improve clinicians’ EBM skills. CLs may directly affect patient care; further study is required to assess this. CLs on inpatient rounds may be an effective means for clinicians to learn and use EBM skills.