文章基本信息

标题：絶対筋力におよぼす静的および動的筋力トレーニングの影響
其他标题：The Effect of Static and Dynamic Strength Training on Absolute Muscle Strength
本地全文：下载
作者：福永哲夫 ; 杉山允宏
期刊名称：体育学研究
印刷版ISSN：0484-6710
电子版ISSN：1881-7718
出版年度：1978
卷号：22
期号：6
页码：343-349
DOI：10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003392586
语种：Japanese
出版社：Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
摘要：The purpose of this study was to observe the difference of training effect on the absolute muscle strength between static and dynamic strength training. The subjects were 14 adult males of whom 7 were exposed to static training and others to dynamic training. All subjects were trained every day for 12 weeks except Sundays. Training intensity was two-thirds of maximum isometric strength in static training group (S-group) and two-thirds of one repetition maximum (1RM) in dynamic training group (D-group). In S-group muscle strength was exerted statically for 1O seconds on the right angle of the elbow joint. In D-group the elbow joint was flexed between 75 and 105 degrees of the angle of elbow joint with the rhythm of one repetition in two seconds using audiovisual metronome, and it was repeated five times in a set. All training exercises for both groups were given three sets in a day. The cross-sectional area of elbow flexor muscle was measured at the extended position of the elbow joint before and after training by means of ultrasonic method, and the absolute muscle strength was calculated. The results were as follows: 1)Maximum isometric strength significantly increased (p < 0.001) by 25.9±4.2% (mean ± standard error) in S-group and 30.7±3.8% in D-group. No significant difference of strength increase was observed between dynamic and static training group. 2)The dynamic strength, measured as 1RM significantly increased (p < 0.001) by 22.7±1.1% in S-group and by 33.1±4.0% in D-group. The increase of 1RM in D-group was significantly higher than that in S-group. 3)1RM was about 70% of isometric maximum strength, which value was not affected by both training programs. 4)Cross-sectional area of muscle increased significantly by 5.4±1.4% (p < 0.01) in S-group and 3.2±1.3% (p < 0.05) in D-group. No significant difference in increase of muscle area was observed between S- and D-group. 5)Absolute muscle strength increased by training up to about 9.7kg/cm^2 (muscle area measured at extended position of elbow joint) in both training groups.
其他摘要：The purpose of this study was to observe the difference of training effect on the absolute muscle strength between static and dynamic strength training. The subjects were 14 adult males of whom 7 were exposed to static training and others to dynamic training. All subjects were trained every day for 12 weeks except Sundays. Training intensity was two-thirds of maximum isometric strength in static training group (S-group) and two-thirds of one repetition maximum (1RM) in dynamic training group (D-group). In S-group muscle strength was exerted statically for 1O seconds on the right angle of the elbow joint. In D-group the elbow joint was flexed between 75 and 105 degrees of the angle of elbow joint with the rhythm of one repetition in two seconds using audiovisual metronome, and it was repeated five times in a set. All training exercises for both groups were given three sets in a day. The cross-sectional area of elbow flexor muscle was measured at the extended position of the elbow joint before and after training by means of ultrasonic method, and the absolute muscle strength was calculated. The results were as follows: 1)Maximum isometric strength significantly increased (p < 0.001) by 25.9±4.2% (mean ± standard error) in S-group and 30.7±3.8% in D-group. No significant difference of strength increase was observed between dynamic and static training group. 2)The dynamic strength, measured as 1RM significantly increased (p < 0.001) by 22.7±1.1% in S-group and by 33.1±4.0% in D-group. The increase of 1RM in D-group was significantly higher than that in S-group. 3)1RM was about 70% of isometric maximum strength, which value was not affected by both training programs. 4)Cross-sectional area of muscle increased significantly by 5.4±1.4% (p < 0.01) in S-group and 3.2±1.3% (p < 0.05) in D-group. No significant difference in increase of muscle area was observed between S- and D-group. 5)Absolute muscle strength increased by training up to about 9.7kg/cm^2 (muscle area measured at extended position of elbow joint) in both training groups.