出版社:Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
摘要:The purpose of this study was to distinct the differences on 4 elements of sex, position, playing years, and competitive ability in causal attribution to win (CAW) and defeat (CAD). Causal attribution was measured by using 68 items for win and for defeat, respectively in 192 college soft-tennis players. The 12 factors explaining about 60% of total variance were interpreted in CAW and CAD. The discriminate analyses were performed, using 4 elements as criteria and 12 factors as explanatory variables. The main results were as follows: 1. The factor structures in CAW and CAD were considered to consist of some similar factors, because the names of 7 factors were the same and the higher similarity between them was found : mental stability and concentration, former coach and mastering skill,physical condition, goal and constitution of team, physical fitness relating coordination, concentrated practice, and weather condition. 2. Female players tended to attribute defeat to instability of mental and lack of concentration more than male players. Since there was no significant difference on sex except that factor, it was supposed that the remarkable differences on sex do not exist in CAW and CAD. 3. The back players tended to attribute win to stability and mental concentration,and defeat to goal and constitution of team more than net players. Since there was no significant difference on position except those, it was supposed that the remarkable differences on position do not exist in CAW and CAD. 4. Some remdrkable differences between players with longer playing years and players with shorter years were found in CAW and CAD. Players with longer playing years tended to attribute win to ability and defeat to mental weakness, but those with shorter years tended to attribute defeat to stable factor like physique. 5. There were some remarkable differences between superior players of competitive ability and inferior players in CAW and CAD. Superior players attributed their wins to more factors. They tended to attribute defeat to mental weakness. Inferior players tended to attribute defeat to stable factor like physique.
其他摘要:The purpose of this study was to distinct the differences on 4 elements of sex, position, playing years, and competitive ability in causal attribution to win (CAW) and defeat (CAD). Causal attribution was measured by using 68 items for win and for defeat, respectively in 192 college soft-tennis players. The 12 factors explaining about 60% of total variance were interpreted in CAW and CAD. The discriminate analyses were performed, using 4 elements as criteria and 12 factors as explanatory variables. The main results were as follows: 1. The factor structures in CAW and CAD were considered to consist of some similar factors, because the names of 7 factors were the same and the higher similarity between them was found : mental stability and concentration, former coach and mastering skill,physical condition, goal and constitution of team, physical fitness relating coordination, concentrated practice, and weather condition. 2. Female players tended to attribute defeat to instability of mental and lack of concentration more than male players. Since there was no significant difference on sex except that factor, it was supposed that the remarkable differences on sex do not exist in CAW and CAD. 3. The back players tended to attribute win to stability and mental concentration,and defeat to goal and constitution of team more than net players. Since there was no significant difference on position except those, it was supposed that the remarkable differences on position do not exist in CAW and CAD. 4. Some remdrkable differences between players with longer playing years and players with shorter years were found in CAW and CAD. Players with longer playing years tended to attribute win to ability and defeat to mental weakness, but those with shorter years tended to attribute defeat to stable factor like physique. 5. There were some remarkable differences between superior players of competitive ability and inferior players in CAW and CAD. Superior players attributed their wins to more factors. They tended to attribute defeat to mental weakness. Inferior players tended to attribute defeat to stable factor like physique.