文章基本信息

标题：Triple lead cephalic versus subclavian vein approach in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
本地全文：下载
作者：Julia Vogler ; Anne Geisler ; Nils Gosau 等
期刊名称：Scientific Reports
电子版ISSN：2045-2322
出版年度：2018
卷号：8
期号：1
页码：17709
DOI：10.1038/s41598-018-35994-0
语种：English
出版社：Springer Nature
摘要：; p = 0.001). There was no case of a pneumothorax in group of sCV, while two cases were observed using SV. Overall complication rate was similar (sCV: 13.0% vs. SV: 12.5%). de-novo CRT implantation using a triple cephalic vein approach is feasible. Procedure duration and complication rates were similar, while radiation dosage was higher in the sCV compared to the SV approach. Despite its feasibility in the clinical routine, controlled prospective studies with longer follow-up are required to elucidate a potential benefit with respect to lead longevity.