文章基本信息

标题：Searching for Personal Territory in a Human-Computer Interaction Design Studio
本地全文：下载
作者：Micah Gideon Modell ; Colin M Gray
期刊名称：Higher Education Pedagogies
电子版ISSN：2375-2696
出版年度：2011
卷号：6
期号：2
页码：54-78
DOI：10.11120/jebe.2011.06020054
出版社：Taylor and Francis Ltd
摘要：The literature regarding studio-based education suggests that personal space is an integral component of a studio-based pedagogy ( Brandt et al., 2010; Demirbaş and Demirkan, 2000 Brandt C. , Cennamo K. C. , McGrath M. , Vernon M. , Douglas S. & Reimer Y. ( 2010 ). DIY ethic of the design studio — past, present & future. IDSA Education White Papers. URL: http://www.idsa.org/diy-ethic-design-studio-past-present-future Demirbaş O. O. & Demirkan H. ( 2000 ). Privacy dimensions: A case study in the interior architecture design studio . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (1), 53 - 64 . URL: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272494499901482 ). However, the extant studio designed for a Human-Computer Interaction design (HCI/d) programme at the Masters level examined in this study does not offer any apparent provision for such space. This study aimed to determine if and how students in a studio-based HCI/d programme create and maintain personal space in a publicly accessible studio that does not explicitly provide space dedicated to individuals. The results of this study indicated a tendency toward group territoriality, with individual territoriality as a non-normative behaviour. These groups were generally ad hoc in construction, which presents a number of possible curriculum features by which students loosely form groups. The student’s personal computer and other personal items often indicated individual boundaries as well. The faculty design focused on integration of faculty and student spaces, public display of student work and studio-based classes. At this early stage, there are gaps between implementation and design. Opportunities for further research are explored.
关键词：Studio ; Territoriality ; Personal Space