文章基本信息

标题：Social Branding to Decrease Smoking Among Young Adults in Bars
本地全文：下载
作者：Pamela M. Ling ; Youn Ok Lee ; Juliette Hong 等
期刊名称：American journal of public health
印刷版ISSN：0090-0036
出版年度：2014
卷号：104
期号：4
页码：751-760
DOI：10.2105/AJPH.2013.301666
语种：English
出版社：American Public Health Association
摘要：Objectives. We evaluated a Social Branding antitobacco intervention for “hipster” young adults that was implemented between 2008 and 2011 in San Diego, California. Methods. We conducted repeated cross-sectional surveys of random samples of young adults going to bars at baseline and over a 3-year follow-up. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate changes in daily smoking, nondaily smoking, and binge drinking, controlling for demographic characteristics, alcohol use, advertising receptivity, trend sensitivity, and tobacco-related attitudes. Results. During the intervention, current (past 30 day) smoking decreased from 57% (baseline) to 48% (at follow-up 3; P = .002), and daily smoking decreased from 22% to 15% ( P < .001). There were significant interactions between hipster affiliation and alcohol use on smoking. Among hipster binge drinkers, the odds of daily smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30, 0.63) and nondaily smoking (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.42, 0.77) decreased significantly at follow-up 3. Binge drinking also decreased significantly at follow-up 3 (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.78). Conclusions. Social Branding campaigns are a promising strategy to decrease smoking in young adult bar patrons. Tobacco companies 1 and public health authorities 2–5 recognize young adulthood as a critical time when experimenters either quit or transition to regular tobacco use. Young adults are also aspirational role models for youths. 1,6,7 Tobacco companies devote considerable resources to reaching young adults to encourage tobacco use, 1,8–11 and young adults have a high prevalence of smoking. 12 In California in 2011, young adults had the highest smoking prevalence of any age group, and the Department of Health estimated that 32% of California smokers started smoking between the ages of 18 and 26 years. 13 Although they are more likely to intend to quit and successfully quit than older adults, 14–17 young adults are less likely to receive assistance with smoking cessation. 18,19 Although there are few proven interventions to discourage young adult smoking, 20 cessation before age 30 years avoids virtually all of the long-term adverse health effects of smoking. 21 Tobacco companies have a long history of using bars and nightclubs to reach young adults and to encourage smoking. 1,6,9–11,22–24 Bar attendance and exposure to tobacco bar marketing is strongly associated with smoking. 25 The 1998 Master Settlement Agreement and Food and Drug Administration regulations that limit tobacco advertising to youths, explicitly permit tobacco marketing in “adult only” venues, including bars and nightclubs. 26,27 Aggressive tobacco marketing may actually be more intensive in smoke-free bars: a 2010 study of college students attending bars found that students in the community with a smoke-free bar law were more likely to be approached by tobacco marketers, offered free gifts, and to take free gifts for themselves than in communities without a smoke-free bar law. 28 Bars and nightclubs also attract young adults who are more likely to exhibit personality traits such as sensation seeking, 29 increasing their risk 30 independently of receptivity to tobacco advertising; tobacco promotional messages resonate with these personality traits. 8,31 Tobacco marketing campaigns are tailored to specific segments of the population defined by psychographics (e.g., values, attitudes, shared interests, such as tastes in music and fashion, and friend groups) and demographic criteria, and they aim to create positive smoker images, identities, and social norms for smoking. 1,8 Tobacco marketing campaigns also focus on young adult trendsetters to leverage peer influence to promote smoking. 6,10 In contrast to the tobacco companies’ efforts, most young adult health interventions take place in colleges or health centers rather than social environments. 32–39 Bars and nightclub venues represent an opportunity to reach those at highest risk for long-term smoking morbidity and mortality. 40 We evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention to decrease cigarette smoking by countering tobacco industry marketing strategies targeting young adults attending bars and nightclubs in the San Diego, California, “hipster” scene. Because tobacco and alcohol use are strongly linked, 41,42 we also examined the effects of the intervention on alcohol use and among binge drinkers. We found a significant decrease in smoking in the community where the intervention took place, including significant decreases among nondaily smokers and binge drinkers, as well as a significant decrease in binge drinking.