出版社:International Institute for Science, Technology Education
摘要:Consciousness could be thought of as the problem to which propositions belong and concomitantly correspond as they indicate particular responses ,signify instances of general solutions, with its essential configurations, rational representations conferential extrinsicness, interfacial interference, syncopated justices, heterogeneous variations testimonies,apodeictic knowledge of ideological tergiversation,sauccesful reality,sleaty sciolisms,tiurated vaticinations,anchorite aperitif anamensial alienisms and manifest subjective acts of resolution . Consciousness in its organization of singular points, series and displacements, is doubly generative; it not only engenders the logical propositions with its determinate dimensions but also its correlates. The equivocality, ambiguity, in the synchronicity of the problem and proposition both in the sets and subsets of the ontological premises and logical boundaries, “error in perception” arises in the field of consciousness. Far from indicating the subjective and provisional state of empirical knowledge consciousness refers to an ideational objectivity or to a structure constitutive of space and time, the knowledge and the known, the proposition and its correlates. The question of “question” in consciousness does not bear any resemblance to the proposition which subsumes it, but rather it determines its own conditionalities and representationalitiesof and assigns them to its constituents in various permutations and combinations, that are done with corporate signification, personalized manifestation, individual denotation and organizational individuation. Consciousness is only the shadow of the problem projected or rather constructed based on empirical propositions. It is the same ‘illusion’ which does not allow it to be reduced to any empirical thesis or antithesis for that matter. Retroactive movement of consciousness based on morphemes, semitones and relational openness leads to disintegration of external relations and dysfunctional fissures in the personality domains of resolvability are relativistic in the self determination of the consciousness problem. Consciousness makes signification as the condition of truth and proposition as the conditional truth; it is necessary that we should not vie the condition as the one who is conditioned, lest the biases of internationality and subject object conflict arise. Witness consciousness is the best answer to the problems that we face in science. Static genesis sets right the “aham brahasmi” (I AM Brahman) and “from Brahman we came” problem. Consciousness thus is neutral but never the double of the propositions which express it. “Events” have critical points like say liquids have, or water has. in all its pristine glory and primordial mortification consciousness is just “knowledge”, expressed in bytes, visual field capacity is also expressed. We make an explicit assumption that the storage is measured based on the number of bytes and that ASCII is used. Further assumption in gratification deprivation is that gratification increases in arithmetic progression, and deprivation in geometric progression. More you think, more you get angry. The still more you think you go mad. Repetitive actions and thoughts which are themselves actions are assumed to be recorded. by a hypothertical”neuron DNA”. We thus record everything in the general ledger of the universe. And lo! The grand design simulated by someone, with people like us with Tamás, rajas (dynamism) and sattva (the transcendental form of Tamás and rajas) react. The height’ is the murder, mayhem calypso and cataclysm. the depth is “non reaction ability”. With this we state that this universe is s grand design simulated and we are really playing our roles to fit in a virtual drama.