首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A comparison of breast cancer survival among young, middle-aged, and elderly patients in southern Iran using Cox and empirical Bayesian additive hazard models
  • 其他标题:A comparison of breast cancer survival among young, middle-aged, and elderly patients in southern Iran using Cox and empirical Bayesian additive hazard models
  • 作者:Samane Nematolahi ; Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi
  • 期刊名称:Epidemiology and Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:2092-7193
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:39
  • DOI:10.4178/epih.e2017043
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Taehan P'ibu Kwahakhoe
  • 其他摘要:OBJECTIVES A survival analysis of breast cancer patients in southern Iran according to age has yet to be conducted. This study aimed to quantify the factors contributing to a poor prognosis, using Cox and empirical Bayesian additive hazard (EBAH) models, among young (20-39 years), middle-aged (40-64 years), and elderly (≥ 65 years) women. METHODS Data from 1,574 breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2012 in the cancer registry of Fars Province (southern Iran) were stratified into 3 age groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival rates. Cox and EBAH models were applied to each age category, and the Akaike information criterion was used to assess the goodness-of-fit of the 2 hazard models. RESULTS As of December 2012, 212 women (13.5%) in our study population had died, of whom 43 were young (15.3%), 134 middle-aged (11.8%), and 35 elderly (22.3%). The 5-year survival probability by age category was 0.83 (standard error [SE], 0.03), 0.88 (SE, 0.01), and 0.75 (SE, 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Nottingham Prognostic Index was the most effective prognostic factor. The model based on Bayesian methodology performed better with various sample sizes than the Cox model, which is the most widely used method of survival analysis.
  • 其他关键词:Breast neoplasm ; Prognosis ; Additive hazards model ; Bayesian inference ; Cox regression analysis ; Iran
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有