文章基本信息

标题：A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses
本地全文：下载
作者：Magnus Land ; Biljana Macura ; Claes Bernes 等
期刊名称：Environmental Evidence
印刷版ISSN：2047-2382
电子版ISSN：2047-2382
出版年度：2017
卷号：6
期号：1
页码：25
DOI：10.1186/s13750-017-0104-0
语种：English
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：Systematic reviews and systematic maps, regarded as a gold standard for syntheses of documented research evidence, are increasingly used to inform decisions in environmental management. To increase their relevance and uptake, systematic reviews and maps can be planned with the help and engagement of stakeholders, i.e. organisations and individuals involved in and affected by environmental policy-making and practice. We report on the emprically tested five-step approach that the Mistra Council for Evidence-based Environmental Management (EviEM) is using to engage stakeholders and incorporate their views and opinions in the prioritisation and planning of reviews, including (1) stakeholder identification; (2) identification of policy- and practice-relevant topics; (3) framing and prioritisation of review questions; (4) establishment of the specific scope of a review; and (5) a public review of a draft review protocol. We provide examples from EviEM’s reviews and describe various challenges and valuable lessons learnt from the engagement process, hoping that this will be useful reading not only for reviewers, but also for stakeholders who plan to participate in the engagement process.
关键词：Knowledge needs ; Participation ; Priority setting ; Public review process ; Question formulation ; Scoping ; Stakeholder identification ; Review co-design ; Systematic review ; Systematic map