摘要:In this article, we highlight the relations between knowledge and interpretation in a discursiveapproach. We start from the affirmation that the defense of a centrality of knowledge in thecurriculum tries to block the interpretation and the multiple readings of the curricular texts,antagonizing with discursive approaches. For criticism of this position, we connect interpretationand reading with translation-deconstruction in Derrida and with criticism of the universalfoundations in Laclau. We thus reaffirm a position contrary to a normative notion of curriculumtheory (or any theory), which is intended to define the grounds that support the correct reading to becarried out in curriculum policy. Finally, we advocate a radical investment in interpretive processesin the curriculum.