期刊名称：Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
电子版ISSN：1948-822X
出版年度：2017
卷号：8
期号：2
页码：279-303
DOI：10.1086/691464
出版社：Society for Social Work and Research
摘要：Objective: This paper is a resource for applied researchers and journal reviewers who wish to learn more about propensity score methods, especially recent published recommendations for selecting and balancing covariates before conducting treatment effect analysis. Method: We reviewed and synthesized methodological studies of propensity score analysis from multiple disciplines in an effort to distill a cogent and defensible set of recommendations for research practice. Results: Selection of covariates for propensity score methods requires good understanding of empirical evidence and theory related to confounders of treatment assignment and the outcome, as well as clarity about the temporal relations among confounders, treatment, and outcome as measured in the data set in use. Some variables are not appropriate for inclusion in a propensity score model, and some data sets do not include sufficient variables for propensity score analysis. Achieving balance in the model covariates after conditioning on the propensity score should be an iterative process where models are respecified until proper balance is obtained. Important steps for propensity score methods include reporting results from iterative modeling and balance checks, and then defending the final sample conditioned on the propensity score before analysis of treatment effects. These steps are often overlooked in published research. Conclusion: Propensity score methods can be useful tools for reducing bias due to observed confounders. To credibly reduce bias, however, researchers must execute recommended practice for selecting and balancing covariates.
Loading...
