首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月03日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Education and patient preferences for treating type 2 diabetes: a stratified discrete-choice experiment
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ellen M Janssen ; Daniel R Longo ; Joan K Bardsley
  • 期刊名称:Patient Preference and Adherence
  • 印刷版ISSN:1177-889X
  • 电子版ISSN:1177-889X
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:11
  • 页码:1729-1736
  • DOI:10.2147/PPA.S139471
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Dove Medical Press Ltd
  • 摘要:Purpose: Diabetes is a chronic condition that is more prevalent among people with lower educational attainment. This study assessed the treatment preferences of patients with type 2 diabetes by educational attainment. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a national online panel in the US. Treatment preferences were assessed using a discrete-choice experiment. Participants completed 16 choice tasks in which they compared pairs of treatment profiles composed of six attributes: A1c decrease, stable blood glucose, low blood glucose, nausea, treatment burden, and out-of-pocket cost. Choice models and willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates were estimated using a conditional logit model and were stratified by educational status. Results: A total of 231 participants with a high school diploma or less education, 156 participants with some college education, and 165 participants with a college degree or more completed the survey. Participants with a college degree or more education were willing to pay more for A1c decreases ($58.84, standard error [SE]: 10.6) than participants who had completed some college ($28.47, SE: 5.53) or high school or less ($17.56, SE: 3.55) ( p ≤0.01). People with a college education were willing to pay more than people with high school or less to avoid nausea, low blood glucose events during the day/night, or two pills per day. Conclusion: WTP for aspects of diabetes medication differed for people with a college education or more and a high school education or less. Advanced statistical methods might overcome limitations of stratification and advance understanding of preference heterogeneity for use in patient-centered benefit–risk assessments and personalized care approaches.
  • 关键词:preference heterogeneity; stated-preference methods; preference heterogeneity; willingness-to-pay; choice experiment; educational attainment
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有