首页    期刊浏览 2025年03月01日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:What data do practitioners use and why? Evidence from Germany comparing schools in different contexts
  • 作者:Denise Demski ; Kathrin Racherbäumer
  • 期刊名称:Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
  • 印刷版ISSN:2002-0317
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:3
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:82-94
  • DOI:10.1080/20020317.2017.1320934
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Co-Action Publishing
  • 摘要:ABSTRACT Poor performance in international student assessment has led to calls to enhance evidence-based practice in the German educational system. Yet indications about the extent to which German practitioners use data is limited, and little is known about factors influencing data-driven school improvement. Using data from three studies and comparing schools in different circumstances, we examined the perceived usefulness and the application of 13 different sources of information that can inform teachers’ and school leaders’ practice by means of standardised questionnaires. The results showed that practitioners attributed little usefulness to a standards-based reform and consequently hardly used these data. Instead, they claimed to prefer process-oriented information sources, such as student feedback. A comparison of the different samples indicated that data use might be lower in schools in challenging circumstances. In face-to-face interviews, a considerable proportion of the interviewees mentioned little data use due to a lack of time. Furthermore, problems in recontextualising evidence and adapting it to personal needs were mentioned. Some practitioners also stated shortcomings in the quality and validity of the data, which was particularly true for findings from school inspections and standardised testing of students.
  • 关键词:Data use ; evidence-based practice ; school improvement ; school context ; mixed-methods study
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有