文章基本信息

标题：Constitutional Interpretation of Romania: Post modernity
其他标题：Constitutional Interpretation of Romania: Post modernity
本地全文：下载
作者：RATHNASWAMY, P. ; Nedelea, Marilena Oana
期刊名称：The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration
印刷版ISSN：2344-3847
出版年度：2017
卷号：17
期号：1
页码：176-182
语种：English
出版社：Editura Universitatii Ştefan cel Mare din Suceava
摘要：Austria had in 1920 Constitutional Court followed by Italy in 1946, Germany in 1949, Romania in 1989, South Africa in 1991, and Ethiopia in 1995. Each Constitution has its provisions on the constitutional interpretation. Romania has its own provisions and it is considered here its legality and the best possible measures and recommendations for future. Judicial power is vested in judiciary to interpret constitution, laws, and actions of other organs of government. Judicial review is the function resulted upon judicial power. Political body joins through the appointment of its members in the judicial review and it limits the independence of judiciary. It also reduces the values of separation of powers. Challenges and opportunities of growth and development do influence the spirit of separation of powers and judicial independence. The principle of inherent judicial power in judiciary inducts upon the constitutional interpretation. Thus, the principles of constitutional interpretation are varying in Romania and other similar constitutional courts of Germany, Ethiopia, and Italy but not in South Africa.