首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Coping and return to work: Measurement and theoretical issues
  • 其他标题:Coping and return to work: Measurement and theoretical issues
  • 作者:Magnus Odéen ; Lars Ole Kristensen ; Holger Ursin
  • 期刊名称:Norsk epidemiologi
  • 印刷版ISSN:0803-2491
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:19
  • 期号:2
  • DOI:10.5324/nje.v19i2.588
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Norsk forening for epidemiologi - The Norwegian Epidemiological Association
  • 摘要:Sick leave and early departure from the workforce have serious adverse effects on both individuals and society. Motivation and coping are both important when attempting to return to work. In this article, we wanted to test if either of two coping instruments could predict return to work. Response outcome expectancies as defined in the Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress (CATS) (Ursin & Eriksen, 2004) were measured by the CODE scale (Eriksen et al., 1997) and general self-efficacy was measured by the generalized self-efficacy scale (GSE) (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995). The instruments were tested in one group of rehabilitation patients (N= 135) and one group of disability pensioners (N=85), who participated in return to work interventions in randomised controlled trials. None of the instruments could predict return to work at any point of measurement. Less than 10% of the theoretical range of the scales was used. The scales appear to measure a concept that is more stable than their underlying theory predicts, and they can not predict an important outcome. Results indicate that caution is advised when making inferences from these instruments to their underlying theories.
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有