期刊名称:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
印刷版ISSN:0027-8424
电子版ISSN:1091-6490
出版年度:2009
卷号:106
期号:20
页码:8262-8266
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0902973106
语种:English
出版社:The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
摘要:Morphologically-defined mammalian and molluscan genera (herein "morphogenera") are significantly more likely to be monophyletic relative to molecular phylogenies than random, under 3 different models of expected monophyly rates: {approx}63% of 425 surveyed morphogenera are monophyletic and 19% are polyphyletic, although certain groups appear to be problematic (e.g., nonmarine, unionoid bivalves). Compiled nonmonophyly rates are probably extreme values, because molecular analyses have focused on "problem" taxa, and molecular topologies (treated herein as error-free) contain contradictory groupings across analyses for 10% of molluscan morphogenera and 37% of mammalian morphogenera. Both body size and geographic range, 2 key macroevolutionary and macroecological variables, show significant rank correlations between values for morphogenera and molecularly-defined clades, even when strictly monophyletic morphogenera are excluded from analyses. Thus, although morphogenera can be imperfect reflections of phylogeny, large-scale statistical treatments of diversity dynamics or macroevolutionary variables in time and space are unlikely to be misleading.
关键词:biogeography ; body size ; macroecology ; macroevolution ; systematics