首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月04日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Potencialidad y viabilidades de los procesos de evaluación por pares abierto: el caso de "Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales"
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Dara Medina Chirino ; Juan Manuel García González ; Rafael Grande
  • 期刊名称:Teknokultura
  • 印刷版ISSN:1549-2230
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:14
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:35-56
  • DOI:10.5209/TEKN.55575
  • 语种:Spanish
  • 出版社:Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas
  • 摘要:Evaluation processes of scientific and academic journals have been transformed in recent years due to the increase in both the number of journals and the volume of papers received. Furthermore, the use of Internet has generated a strong openness of science, with more and more open access journals. Editorial teams have had to adapt to this new setting and decide on an evaluation model. In this context, this paper presents the case of the evaluation system of the Spanish journal Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales . This journal proposes an open peer review in which both authors and reviewers are known each other during all the evaluation process. We use a precoded semi-open questionnaire in order to analyze the opinion of both authors and reviewers about this type of evaluation. We conclude that there is an acceptance of the model of review by the two groups, although there are some slight differences by age, sex, and type of contribution.
  • 其他摘要:Evaluation processes of scientific and academic journals have been transformed in recent years due to the increase in both the number of journals and the volume of papers received. Furthermore, the use of Internet has generated a strong openness of science, with more and more open access journals. Editorial teams have had to adapt to this new setting and decide on an evaluation model. In this context, this paper presents the case of the evaluation system of the Spanish journal Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales . This journal proposes an open peer review in which both authors and reviewers are known each other during all the evaluation process. We use a precoded semi-open questionnaire in order to analyze the opinion of both authors and reviewers about this type of evaluation. We conclude that there is an acceptance of the model of review by the two groups, although there are some slight differences by age, sex, and type of contribution.
  • 关键词:revistas;proceso editorial;evaluación por pares abierta;evaluación por doble ciego;periódicos;processo editorial;avaliação por pares aberta;avaliação por duplo-cego
  • 其他关键词:journals; editorial process; open peer review; double blind peer review
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有