文章基本信息

标题：Effect of different molecular species of phosphatidylcholine on the clearance of emulsion particle lipids.
本地全文：下载
作者：S J Robins ; J M Fasulo ; G M Patton 等
期刊名称：JLR Papers In Press
印刷版ISSN：0022-2275
电子版ISSN：1539-7262
出版年度：1988
卷号：29
期号：9
页码：1195-1203
语种：English
出版社：American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
摘要：Studies were performed to assess the effect of changes in the molecular species composition of phosphatidylcholine (PC) on the clearance of emulsion particles that were made to approximate chylomicrons in size and lipid composition. Emulsions were prepared with free [14C]cholesterol, [3H]cholesteryl oleate, triolein, and one of four single PCs that differed in hydrophilic strength (as assessed by the relative rate of elution of these PCs from a reverse phase column). Emulsions were injected as an intravenous bolus into unanesthetized rats and the clearance of lipids was determined at 2-min intervals for 10 min. All emulsion lipids were cleared from the serum in parallel and in an order that closely corresponded to the relative hydrophilic strength of the particular PC that was administered. Fractional rates of clearance, calculated from log-linear plots, were 2- to 10-fold greater for all lipids for the emulsion that was made with the most hydrophilic PC compared to the least hydrophilic PC. Although hepatectomy, performed in acutely anesthetized animals, generally slowed the clearance of lipids, hepatectomy did not abolish differences in the clearance of triolein or specific PCs from emulsions prepared with the most and least hydrophilic PCs. These results indicate that a change in the composition of emulsion particle PCs, independent of any other change in the lipid composition of these particles, can significantly change the metabolism of the whole emulsion particle in the live animal. More specifically, these studies show that the rate of clearance of all emulsion lipids closely corresponds to the hydrophilic strength of the PCs that occupy the emulsion particle surface.( TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)