首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月29日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Reliability analysis of the objective structured clinical examination using generalizability theory
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Juan Andrés Trejo-Mejía ; Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola ; Ignacio Méndez-Ramírez
  • 期刊名称:Medical Education Online
  • 电子版ISSN:1087-2981
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:21
  • 期号:1
  • DOI:10.3402/meo.v21.31650
  • 摘要:Abstract Background The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a widely used method for assessing clinical competence in health sciences education. Studies using this method have shown evidence of validity and reliability. There are no published studies of OSCE reliability measurement with generalizability theory (G-theory) in Latin America. The aims of this study were to assess the reliability of an OSCE in medical students using G-theory and explore its usefulness for quality improvement. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) Faculty of Medicine in Mexico City. A total of 278 fifth-year medical students were assessed with an 18-station OSCE in a summative end-of-career final examination. There were four exam versions. G-theory with a crossover random effects design was used to identify the main sources of variance. Examiners, standardized patients, and cases were considered as a single facet of analysis. Results The exam was applied to 278 medical students. The OSCE had a generalizability coefficient of 0.93. The major components of variance were stations, students, and residual error. The sites and the versions of the tests had minimum variance. Conclusions Our study achieved a G coefficient similar to that found in other reports, which is acceptable for summative tests. G-theory allows the estimation of the magnitude of multiple sources of error and helps decision makers to determine the number of stations, test versions, and examiners needed to obtain reliable measurements.
  • 关键词:OSCE ; reliability ; generalizability theory ; clinical competence ; Mexico
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有