摘要:Decision making for collaborative urban heritage is very complicated due to the involvement of many parties with many goals and concerns. In such situation where the designer, project manager, facility manager and others are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solutions, a decision support is required to evaluate and rank the solution. This paper presents a conceptual model of decision support for collaborative urban heritage with three different conditions on adaptive value, economics value, and spatial value. The research objectives are to find a theoretical basis and research approach for decision support methodology and to develop a decision model for technical solution options. The methodology is started with theoretical approach through literature review to develop the model of collaborative criteria that is shared-understanding, best design achievement, and integration. It is also used to develop the model of urban heritage selection that is economic value, adaptive value, and spatial value. The model are then analyzed by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in order to find the best fit model of decision support for developing the urban heritage area. The result of the decision model is verified in a case study.
其他摘要:Decision making for collaborative urban heritage is very complicated due to the involvement of many parties with many goals and concerns. In such situation where the designer, project manager, facility manager and others are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solutions, a decision support is required to evaluate and rank the solution. This paper presents a conceptual model of decision support for collaborative urban heritage with three different conditions on adaptive value, economics value, and spatial value. The research objectives are to find a theoretical basis and research approach for decision support methodology and to develop a decision model for technical solution options. The methodology is started with theoretical approach through literature review to develop the model of collaborative criteria that is shared-understanding, best design achievement, and integration. It is also used to develop the model of urban heritage selection that is economic value, adaptive value, and spatial value. The model are then analyzed by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in order to find the best fit model of decision support for developing the urban heritage area. The result of the decision model is verified in a case study.