出版社:Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística - UFSC
摘要:The aim of this study was to analyze the arguments rated by judges to form an understanding of the meaning of moral damage - which is equivalent to a legal phenomenon that can be compensated. To achieve this goal, in an exploratory study, was examined the Case no. 0000192-11.2011.5.04.0001 delivered by the Fourth Chamber of the Regional Labor Court of the Fourth Region (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) which deals with moral damages. The arguments were sampled and analyzed from the perspective of New Rhetoric of Perelman and Olbrecht-Tyteca. Normal 0 21 false false false PT-BR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}