期刊名称:Jurnal Kependidikan (Penerbit: LPPM UNY bekerjasama dengan MPPI)
印刷版ISSN:0125-992X
出版年度:2011
卷号:41
期号:1
语种:English
出版社:LPPM UNY
摘要:Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:.1pt; mso-para-margin-right:4.8pt; mso-para-margin-bottom:0cm; mso-para-margin-left:1.0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-indent:-1.0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} The purpose s of this study are : (1) to find out which between the study model s can give the best mathematics learning result s; (2) to find out which student creativity categor ies can give the best mathematics learning result ; (3) to find out the interaction between the study models and student creativit ies towards the result s of learning. The re sult s of learning in this case are limited to the subject of Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung. The study uses a quasi-ex perimental design by using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell sizes. The p opulation of the study refers to all students of Grade IX in the junior high schools in District Area 04 of the Sub-Province of Wonogiri sampled into three class es of two school s through stratified and cluster random sampling. Data are colllected by documentation, questionnaire, and test s . Results of analys e s with 0.05 level of significan ce and continued by double c ompara t i on test show: 1) The g uided discovery model and cooperative learning give the same learning result s but are better than the conventional model. (2) S tudent s with a higher creativity level in mathematics have better results than student s with a lower creativity level . (3) At the high creativity category level , student s show better results in guided discovery model than cooperative learning and cooperative learning is better than the conventional model. At the low and medium creativity level, guided discovery model and cooperative learning model give the same learning result s but better than the conventional model. Besides , in the guided discovery model, student s with high creativity level do better than students with medium creativity level and students with medium creativity level have the same results as students with low creativity level . As with the cooperative learning model and conventional model , student s with high, medium, and low creativity models show the same learning result s