文章基本信息

标题：Comparative effectiveness research for the clinician researcher: a framework for making a methodological design choice
本地全文：下载
作者：Cylie M. Williams ; Elizabeth H. Skinner ; Alicia M. James 等
期刊名称：Trials
印刷版ISSN：1745-6215
电子版ISSN：1745-6215
出版年度：2016
卷号：17
期号：1
页码：406
DOI：10.1186/s13063-016-1535-6
语种：English
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：Comparative effectiveness research compares two active forms of treatment or usual care in comparison with usual care with an additional intervention element. These types of study are commonly conducted following a placebo or no active treatment trial. Research designs with a placebo or non-active treatment arm can be challenging for the clinician researcher when conducted within the healthcare environment with patients attending for treatment. A framework for conducting comparative effectiveness research is needed, particularly for interventions for which there are no strong regulatory requirements that must be met prior to their introduction into usual care. We argue for a broader use of comparative effectiveness research to achieve translatable real-world clinical research. These types of research design also affect the rapid uptake of evidence-based clinical practice within the healthcare setting. This framework includes questions to guide the clinician researcher into the most appropriate trial design to measure treatment effect. These questions include consideration given to current treatment provision during usual care, known treatment effectiveness, side effects of treatments, economic impact, and the setting in which the research is being undertaken.
关键词：dissent and dispute ; health economics ; hospital ; patient safety ; research design