Roll Out the Bulldozers.
Cunningham, Stephen
The conventional wisdom said starting a heavy equipment operation
course for high school students was impossible. But effort,
determination and community involvement made it happen.
In the fall of 1999, Prosser School of Technology, an area
vocational center in New Albany, Ind., started its first heavy equipment
operation program. The program, endorsed by 11 area superintendents, has
grown into an exemplary one that can fulfill the community's need
for trained operators of heavy construction equipment.
Through classroom and practical experiences, students receive
training and practice in several heavy equipment occupations. The
two-year curriculum includes heavy equipment maintenance, Commercial
Driver's License preparation, as well as a national heavy equipment
operators certification curriculum produced by the Associated Builders
and Contractors (ABC). By using ABC's 450-hour training curriculum,
students may earn national certification. A variety of equipment such as
bulldozers, backhoes, front-end loaders, dump trucks, trackhoes,
graders, and so forth are being used for hands-on instruction. Each
student is expected to get about 200 hours of seat time operating
equipment during the program. The equipment operation training includes
not only the hands-on work, but also instruction on sewers, water lines,
roads, building-site preparations and other excavating project
installations.
When not operating equipment, students assist with grade
measurements and other necessary tasks on the construction site.
Students are evaluated on both what they know and what they can do.
How the program developed
We knew from the outset, three years ago, that a heavy equipment
course would be expensive and would require classroom and working space
not available within the existing building and site. And, as with other
new programs, we encountered resistance from faculty members who viewed
it as a threat to their programs because they had declining enrollments.
But our small local advisory committee--made up of employers and school
personnel--overcame the obstacles by documenting requests from
prospective students and employers and by securing the support of area
businesses.
The program began to take shape in the fall of 1996, when three
local contractors attended a Prosser meeting to generate ideas for
recruitment of students from our local Catholic high school. After this
meeting, they approached me with the idea of starting an equipment
operations program. They emphasized the need and the high-wage
opportunities for heavy equipment operators. While confirming their
information on local and national needs, we found there is indeed a
great shortage of trained operators in the United States and that our
students could be making $18 to $25 per hour within three to five years
after completing the program. We surveyed potential students and
identified a great deal of interest, especially from our rural high
schools. With this information in hand, we formed an advisory committee
to identify a curriculum, find a training site (facility), and solve the
problem of locating equipment. We had no budget or money available to
start the program.
After reviewing several postsecondary curriculums in heavy
equipment operation, the committee chose the one from Associated
Builders and Contractors. Our local ABC chapter initially planned to
purchase the books and curriculum for us, then later found they could
not do so. The solution to this obstacle was to secure Perkins III grant
money to buy the curriculum materials.
We then located a small classroom, which was being used for
storage, in a local school's transportation facility, and planned
to use the 25 acres behind that classroom building to operate equipment.
A few local employers agreed to supply us with equipment. Some of the
employers assisted me in presenting the program plan to superintendents
of the school districts in southern Indiana, and they approved our plan.
Before we could implement the plan, however, our operation site was
designated for soccer fields.
During this time period, our enrollment was phenomenal--36 students
signed up for the new program. We divided them into two groups, 18 in
morning classes and 18 in afternoon classes. This was both good and bad!
We has just one teacher and two cars for teaching the commercial
driver's education course to 18 students at a time. Our dilemma was
now too many students and not enough teachers and equipment. We also
realized how difficult it was going to be to locate an instructor with
the experience we needed.
As the beginning of school approached in 1999, we hired an
excellent teacher, Doug Sabens, who was operating his own excavating
business. We were fortunate that he was experienced on all types of
equipment and set very high performance standards for the students.
Community and employer assistance
Fortunately, other parts of the program began to fall into place as
we received help in overcoming the obstacles. Another employer stepped
forward and made us an offer: He had 100 acres he would let us use to
operate equipment and would furnish the materials for building a
classroom/lab training facility if we supplied the labor. We agreed to
have students in our building trades program build the training
facility. Those things we could not do in-house, the employer would
subcontract to an outside contractor. This solved our classroom/lab
problem, and the building is now under construction. Students in the
heavy equipment class have completed the site preparation and have
poured the footers for the new training facility.
A third employer recommended that we call a meeting of all the
excavating companies and equipment dealers in the area to request their
help. Our primary purpose was to seek donations of equipment and
schedule its use for every school day of the year. We also asked for
guest speakers, equipment training programs, field trips to equipment
companies, site locations to visit, construction jobs for students to
do, volunteers to be mentors for our students, and cash donations. We
explained our needs to the companies and dealers and indicated that we
had to find solutions.
It was a phenomenal meeting! The local equipment dealers did not
want the excavating companies to donate equipment, so each of the
dealers signed our calendar, indicating they would make available a
small bulldozer, backhoe and front-end loader every day school was in
session. This equipment has been there every day. In fact, some of the
local contractors bring in additional equipment, so some days we have
five or six pieces of equipment to operate. The advisory committee
believes there is no substitute for in-seat, hands-on training in
equipment operation.
That meeting also generated more than $5,000 in cash donations, as
well as opportunities for field trips and guest speakers. The
contractors have located many real jobs for our classes, such as
installing 180 feet of storm drainage pipe, preparing a building site,
excavating a catch basin, building a burme, breaking up and moving large
piles of dirt, and grading of fill sites. We have a road project with
sewer installation and a clearing project in the works.
We believe actual work, not simulated work, is important to add
realism to the training. During the program's development, we
started a newsletter to keep employers and other interested parties
informed. Each issue includes a request for training sites where
students can do real work. The notice also says, "We may be able to
bring our equipment, as well as using yours, to work on construction
projects. Remember, our instructor will act as your foreman, and we have
had no complaints concerning quality! School insurance covers our
instructor and students."
The contractors providing these projects are amazed at our
student's skill attainments and the thoroughness with which we have
completed our projects. In fact, five or six students already have
developed sufficient skills to be employable.
A good outlook for the future
Our future lies in the support of advisory committee members who
will evaluate our program and its products (the graduates). Next year we
plan to add a track hoe, large bulldozers, dump trucks and a grader to
our heavy equipment training. We also plan to complete and move into our
new training facility during 2001. We are sure that additional obstacles
will come up. But as long as the advisory committee and school personnel
work as a team, our obstacles will become opportunities for positive
program growth.
Stephen Cunningham, Ph.D., is director of area vocational services
for Prosser School of Technology, New Albany, Ind.