Children and Family Service Center case study.
Tomlinson, Vickie ; Ward, Terry J. ; Smith, G. Robert, Jr. 等
CASE DESCRIPTION
Students often fail to understand that much of the FASB's work
does address not-for-profit entities. This case attempts to demonstrate
to students the differences between for-profit and notforprofit
organizations and how SFACs impact the theory underlying subsequent FASB standards on reporting. Thus, this case attempts to help students better
understand the basic principles and concepts that differ between
for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. This case specifically
addresses SFAC # 4 and SFASs 116 and 117.
This case was designed to be used in a graduate theory or financial
reporting class that has a nonprofit component. The case allows students
to see through basic research how nonprofits fundamentally differ from
for profit entities conceptually and theoretically.
An instructor could also use this case in an undergraduate
nonprofit class as a project to introduce students to parts of the
FASB's Conceptual Framework that relate to nonprofits, thus helping
students to understand the theory behind reporting in a nonprofit
environment. Thus, this case can be used in either undergraduate or
graduate classes depending on which of the requirements the instructor
wishes the students to complete.
CASE SYNOPSIS
In this case, you are asked to take the role of the Director of
Fiscal Operations of a not-forprofit organization, Children and Family
Service Center. The Trustees have hired you because of concerns that the
accounting records are not adequate. You are give ten areas of concern
and asked to answer various questions related to these concerns. Thus,
you attempt to determine the appropriate treatment for each item. This
case will help you to better understand the basic principles and
concepts that differ between for-profit and not-for-profit
organizations.
INSTRUCTORS' NOTES
Solutions to Requirements
1. Explain what makes a not-for-profit entity distinct from a
for-profit entity? You may wish to include in your discussion how
Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) # 4 distinguishes the
two types of entities.
According to SFAC # 4, the major distinguishing characteristics of
a not-for-profit entity from a for-profit entity are as follows:
Receipts of significant amounts of resources are from resource
providers who do not expect to receive either repayment or economic
benefits proportionate to the resources provided. These resource
providers are interested in the services the organization provides.
Operating purposes are not to provide goods and services at a
profit or profit equivalent. A not-for-profit's purpose is to use
resources to provide goods and services to its constituents and
beneficiaries, and it is generally prohibited from distributing assets
as dividends to its members, directors, officers, or others.
Absence of defined ownership interests that can be sold,
transferred, or redeemed, or that convey entitlement to a share of a
residual distribution of resources in the event of liquidation of the
organization (SFAC # 4, paragraph 6).
2. According to SFAS # 117, what is the primary purpose of
not-for-profit financial statements? Based on SFAC # 4, what are the
objectives of not-for-profit financial reporting? Compare these
objectives to the objectives of financial reporting for business
enterprises described in SFAC # 1. What are the similarities and
dissimilarities?
According to SFAS # 117, "the primary purpose of financial
statements is to provide relevant information to meet the common
interests of donors, members, creditors, and others who provide
resources to not-for-profit organizations" (SFAS # 117, paragraph
4). These users have the common interest in "assessing (a) the
services an organization provides and its ability to continue to provide
those services and (b) how managers discharge their stewardship
responsibilities and other aspects of their performance." According
to SFAC # 4, the objectives of financial reporting for nonbusiness
organizations are:
To provide information that is useful to present and potential
resource providers and other users in making rational decisions
about the allocation of resources to those
organizations (SFAC # 4, paragraph 35).
To provide information to help present and potential resource
providers and other users in assessing the services that a
nonbusiness organization provides and its
ability to continue to provide those services
(SFAC # 4, paragraph 38).
To provide information that is useful to present and potential
resource providers and other users in assessing how managers
of a nonbusiness organization have discharged their stewardship
responsibilities and about other aspects of their
performance (SFAC # 4, paragraph 40).
To provide information about the economic resources,
obligations, and net resources of an organization, and the
effects of transactions, events, and circumstances that
change resources and interest in those resources
(SFAC # 4, paragraph 43).
According to SFAC # 1, the objectives of financial reporting for
business enterprises are:
To provide information that is useful to present and
potential investors and creditors and other users in
making rational investment, credit, and similar decisions
(SFAC # 1, paragraph 34).
To provide information to help present and potential
investors and creditors and other users in assessing the
amounts, timing, and uncertainty of prospective cash
receipts from dividends or interest and the proceeds from
the sale, redemption, or maturity of securities or loans
(SFAC # 1, paragraph 37).
To provide information about the economic resources of an
enterprise, the claims to those resources, and the effects
of transactions, events, and circumstances that
change its resources and claims to those resources
(SFAC # 1, paragraph 40).
Both sets of objectives focus on providing information that would
be useful in deciding whether to provide resources to an entity.
However, the two sets of objectives reflect different interests of the
respective resource providers; investors and creditors seek monetary
repayment of, and a return on, resources they provide. Nonbusiness
resource providers expect no, or disproportionate, benefits to the
resources provided.
One of the primary objectives of financial reporting in SFAC # 4
was providing information to assess how managers have discharged their
stewardship responsibilities. This objective is important in
not-for-profit organizations because these organizations are not profit
oriented and are dependent upon the continuing support of resource
providers. However, in SFAC # 1, this objective is viewed as less
important in financial reporting for business entities.
The objectives regarding economic resources of an enterprise are
very similar. The main distinguishing difference is in the terminology
that reflects one of the distinguishing characteristics of nonbusiness
organizations-the lack of ownership interests entitled to a residual
distribution in the event of liquidation.
3. SFAS # 117 requires that the net assets of nonprofit
organizations be classified in one of three ways. Identify these three
classifications and briefly distinguish between them.
The classifications required by SFAS # 117 were first identified in
SFAC # 6. These classifications are: permanently restricted; temporarily
restricted; and unrestricted. Permanently restricted net assets result
from:
contributions of assets where donors impose limitations that expire
as time passes or may be fulfilled by other organization actions,
other asset changes subject to similar limitations, and
where donors require reclassifications from (or to) other
classes of net assets (SFAC # 6, paragraph 92).
These assets include endowments whose term lasts indefinitely and
other certain assets that must be maintained or used in a certain way.
The assets will be restricted so long as the organization has custody of
those assets. Temporarily restricted net assets result from:
contributions of assets where donors impose limitations
that expire as time passes or may be fulfilled by other
organization actions,
other asset changes subject to similar limitations, and
where donors require reclassifications from (or to) other
classes of net assets (SFAC # 6, paragraph 93).
These assets include term endowments where the term lasts for a
specific period or expires once certain requirements are met.
Unrestricted net assets result from:
all revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that are not
changes in permanently or temporarily restricted net assets,
and
reclassifications from (or to) other classes of net
assets (SFAC # 6, paragraph 94).
All assets are assumed unrestricted unless there are specific donor
limitations.
4. Based on SFAC # 6 and SFAS # 116, explain the difference between
a donor-imposed gift restriction and a conditional promise to give. How
is a conditional promise to give reported on the financial statements?
According to SFAS # 116, a donor-imposed gift restriction is a
donor stipulation that specifies a use for a contributed asset that may
be temporary or permanent (SFAS # 116, paragraphs 11 through 16). The
donor has already transferred the asset to the organization, but the
asset must be used according to the specific use set by the donor.
However, the use must fall within the broad limits resulting from the
nature of the organization, the environment in which it operates, and
the purposes specified in its articles of incorporation or bylaws or
comparable documents.
A conditional promise to give depends on the occurrence of a
specified future and uncertain event. The donor does not transfer the
gift to the donee until the conditions on which the promise depends are
substantially met.
Recipients of conditional promises to give are to disclose the
following in the financial reports:
The total of the amounts promised.
A description and amount for each group of promises
having similar characteristics, such as amounts of promises
conditioned on establishing new programs, completing
a new building, and raising matching gifts by a specified date.
5. Following the enumerated items in this case, prepare the journal
entries necessary to reclassify net assets at December 31, 2001 into the
various classes required by SFAS # 117. Explain the reason for each
reclassification and the reason for each nonreclassification.
1) SFAS # 116, paragraph 14, requires that a donor's
restriction to restrict use of an asset be explicit or clearly evident
as an implicit stipulation. It is impossible for the CFSC to determine
the nature of the restriction in this case. Since the accounts were
established before any accounting standard addressed the concept of
donor restrictions, and since no documentation on the purpose of the
accounts can be found, it may be assumed that the accounts represent
unrestricted net assets.
2) One of the requirements for an asset to remain restricted is
that the asset be under the control of the entity from which the
donation was made. Since the Institute for Family Services no longer
exists, it may be interpreted to mean that these monies are no longer
restricted. To confirm this, the entity should attempt to gain the
signatures on the Authorization for Termination of Accounts.
3) The will stipulated the principal amount be restricted for a
specific purpose-college scholarships. The will did not stipulate the
earnings from this fund also be restricted for this purpose. Kate cannot
determine that no student resident of CFSC would ever attend college;
some may attend if funds were available. Therefore, since the restricted
use is within the nature and purposes of CFSC, the corpus amount would
need to be reclassified to temporarily restricted net assets.
Dr. Unrestricted Net Assets $50,000
Cr. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets $50,000
As the funds are used for college scholarships, an entry would be
made to release temporarily restricted net assets by debiting
Temporarily Restricted Net Assets and crediting Unrestricted Net Assets.
4) According to SFAC # 6, paragraph 96,
"Donors need not explicitly limit uses of contributed assets
for a not-for-profit organization to classify the increase in net assets
as restricted if circumstances surrounding those receipts make clear the
donor's implicit stipulation of restricted use. For example, use of
contributed assets is restricted despite absence of a donor's
explicit stipulation about use if the assets are received in a
fund-raising drive declared to be for a specific purpose . . ."
Therefore, the journal entry needed is:
Dr. Unrestricted Net Assets $800,000
Cr. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets $800,000
According to SFAS # 116, paragraph 9, "Contributions of
services shall be recognized if the services received (a) create or
enhance nonfinancial assets or (b) require specialized skills, are
provided by individuals possessing those skills, and would typically
need to be purchased if not provided by donation." Therefore, an
additional journal entry needed is:
Dr. Diagnostic Treatment Center, Bristol, TN $20,000
Cr. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets $20,000
According to SFAC # 6, paragraph 115,
"Restrictions are removed from temporarily restricted net
assets when stipulated conditions expire or are fulfilled by the
organization. . . Purpose-restricted net assets generally become
unrestricted when the organization undertakes activities pursuant to the
specified purpose, perhaps over several periods, depending on the nature
of donors' stipulations. The resulting reclassifications increase
unrestricted net assets, often at the same time that the activities that
remove the restrictions result in expenses that decrease unrestricted
net assets. Temporarily restricted net assets may become unrestricted
when an organization incurs liabilities to vendors or employees as it
undertakes the activities required by donor stipulations."
Therefore, an additional journal entry needed is:
Dr. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets $120,000
Cr. Unrestricted Net Assets $120,000
It does not matter that more was raised than needed for the
project. Once the project is completed, the remaining balance of gifts
temporarily restricted for this purpose will be transferred to
Unrestricted Net Assets.
5) No journal entry is required for this board designation of
endowments. Board designations are not the same as donor restrictions.
SFAS # 117 discusses this issue as part of unrestricted net assets
(paragraph 116). The standard allows disclosure of board designations in
the notes or on the face of the financial statements. However, these
designations would be shown as a component on unrestricted net assets.
When the Statement of Financial Position is prepared, the net
unrestricted net asset amount, shown as a "Board-designated
Endowment", should be $9,455,350 (the $10,305,350 investment
account, less the restricted amounts in journal entries 3 ($50,000) and
4 ($800,000) above).
6) SFAS # 116, paragraph 16, addresses the issue of what may be
done with long-lived assets that have no donor restrictions. This land
is clearly restricted as to use. The covenants restrict the CFSC from
ever selling the land or using it for a purpose consistent with the
purpose of the organization. Therefore, it should be recorded as
permanently restricted.
If the land had not been recorded in the accounting records of the
entity, the following entry should be made:
Dr. Land $20,000
Cr. Permanently Restricted Net Assets $20,000
7) SFAS # 116, paragraph 14, clearly requires reporting this type
of donation as restricted net assets. Therefore, the entry to correct
the receipt is:
Dr. Unrestricted Net Assets $25,000
Cr. Permanently Restricted Net Assets $25,000
SFAS # 117, paragraph 22, requires that changes in fair values of
investments be reported as increases or decreases in unrestricted net
assets, unless the use of the change in value is restricted by the
donor. In this case, the donor said that interest and dividends were to
be used for ongoing operations. Thus, these amounts would be reported as
changes in unrestricted net assets. Therefore, the loss on the
investment should also be reported as a change in unrestricted net
assets.
8) SFAS # 116, paragraph 22, states that conditional promises to
give should be recognized when the conditions are substantially met.
Clearly, this situation exists. Assuming that the donor has not yet been
notified, the following entries should be made:
For the amount due from the businessman:
Dr. Promises Receivable $30,000
Cr. Permanently Restricted Net Assets $30,000
For the amounts already received from the "matching
donors" and the amount to be reclassified by the CFSC:
Dr. Unrestricted Net Assets $30,000
Cr. Permanently Restricted Net Assets $30,000
9) According to SFAS # 116 paragraph 20, not-for-profit
organizations "shall report the contribution income as an increase
in either temporarily or permanently restricted net assets if the
underlying promise to give is donor restricted." According to
paragraph 15, "Receipts of unconditional promises to give with
payments due in future periods shall be reported as restricted support
unless explicit donor stipulations or circumstances surrounding the
receipt of a promise make clear that the donor intended it to be used to
support activities of the current period."
In addition, according to SFAS # 116, "Recipients of
unconditional promises to give shall disclose the following:
The amounts of promises receivable in less than one year, in one to
five years, and in more than five years.
The amount of the allowance for uncollectible promises receivable.
Therefore, the journal entry needed is:
Dr. Pledges Receivable $5,000
Cr. Allowance for Uncollectible Pledges $500
Cr. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets $4,500
According to SFAS # 116, paragraph 155, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) decided to permit contributions with restrictions
that are met in the same reporting period to be reported as unrestricted
support provided that an organization reports consistently from period
to period and discloses its accounting policy. Therefore, the gifts of
$15,000 would not need to be reclassified to Temporarily Restricted Net
Assets because the stipulation has been fulfilled during the same year
that the gifts were received.
10) According to SFAS # 116, paragraph 7, "A donor-imposed
condition on a transfer of assets or a promise to give specifies a
future and uncertain event whose occurrence or failure to occur gives
the promisor a right of return of the assets transferred or releases the
promisor from its obligation to transfer assets promised."
Therefore, the gift must be returned to the donor. The journal entry
needed is:
Dr. Unrestricted Net Assets $10,000
Cr. Gifts payable due to unfulfilled condition $10,000
6. SFAS # 117 further requires certain financial statements be
prepared for nonprofit entities. Identify these financial statements and
briefly describe what is reported in each. Based on the data provided in
the case and the journal entries prepared in question five, prepare an
adjusted Statement of Financial Position.
Three financial statements are required of all nonprofit
organizations. These three statements are as follows.
Statement of Financial Position. This financial statement reports
in three broad categories: assets, liabilities, and net assets. The net
asset classifications were discussed in a previous question. The
standard does not require that assets and liabilities be reported in the
same classifications.
Statement of Activities. This financial statement reports the
revenues, expenses, gains, and losses of the nonprofit entity. These
elements must be reported by net asset classification. In addition, the
standard requires that reclassifications between the classes of net
assets be reported.
Statement of Cash Flows. This statement follows the guidelines of
SFAS # 95, The Statement of Cash Flows, with some modifications,
including: requiring that donor-restricted contributions be reported as
cash flows investing activities; and interest and dividends that are
part of donor restrictions not be reported as cash flows operating
activities.
A fourth financial statement, Statement of Functional Expenses, is
required of all voluntary health and welfare organizations. This
statement is to be prepared as a matrix showing natural classifications
of expenses (salaries, rent, depreciation, etc.) by functional activity.
This information may be presented by other nonprofit entities in the
notes to the financial statements.
Vickie Tomlinson, Tennessee Children's Home, Inc., Retired
Terry J. Ward, Middle Tennessee State University
G. Robert Smith, Jr.,Middle Tennessee State University