The Renewed, the Destroyed, and the Remade: The Three Thought Worlds of the Iroquois and the Huron, 1609-1650.
Carson, James Taylor
The Renewed, the Destroyed, and the Remade: The Three Thought
Worlds of the Iroquois and the Huron, 1609-1650, by Roger M. Carpenter.
East Lansing, Michigan, Michigan State University Press, 2004. xxii, 179
pp. $27.95 US (paper).
The Renewed, the Destroyed, and the Remade explores how ritual
remade the new world that confronted the Wendat and the Haudenosaunee
after the arrival of Europeans on the shores of Turtle Island. Much has
already been written about the creation of the fur trade, the
Haudenosaunee's destruction of Wendake, and the rise of the Great
League of Peace and Power as an important player in colonial New France
and New England. Carpenter's contribution is to explain the
contours of this familiar history in reference to ritual practice
whereby the Wendat lost themselves in a world renewed and remade by the
Haudenosaunee's pursuit of captives and furs.
The problem is that the story has been told so often that it is
hard to discern the depth of Carpenter's contribution. To be sure,
his focus on ritual draws our attention away, though not entirely, from
the economics of the fur trade, and, instead, focuses our gaze on the
seasonal rhythms and rites of life among the two peoples. In many ways,
however, Carpenter seems trapped by the ethnographic foundation on which
the study is based. When he discusses innovations in hunting and
warfare, he seems uncomfortable with how to assess change over time.
Carpenter concludes, for example, that "the behavior of many Huron
at [a] 1636 feast demonstrated that the commercial value of beaver pelts
now began to take precedence over the practice of properly caring for
the dead" (p. 89). The juxtaposition of an ascending economic
rationality and a descending commitment to ritual, however, strikes me
as overly simplistic. One wonders how the Wendat understood and
explained such a change of priorities.
Carpenter locates one possible answer in oral history. Before the
fur trade, Beaver wanted to be treated with respect, but, after the
trade began, Beaver grew angry as hunters treated him and his kin as
commodities rather than as beings. Postcontact stories about Beaver,
Carpenter suggests, positioned him as a malevolent presence who deserved
to be hunted. What the author suggests was a new ethic that rationalized
commercial hunting, however, strikes me as more of an illustration of
how far the people had strayed from their values. In this way, to my
mind, the later stories indicted, rather than justified, hunters'
behaviour.
While I enjoy differences of interpretation, the tone of certain
parts of the book troubled me. One of the most striking
characterizations that Carpenter uses is the designation
"prescientific" for the people he studies (p. 30).
Anthropologists and others have demolished the utility of terms like
"preliterate" and the same ought to apply here.
"Prescientific" connotes an ethnocentric distinction between
the alleged primitiveness of the Wendat and Haudenosaunee and the
sophistication or, perhaps, even the truth, of modern Western knowledge.
Such is the case when Carpenter likens the practice of the vision quest
to "a hallucination" (p. 32). Similarly, he concludes that a
group of warriors who had attacked a Jesuit outpost "amused
themselves by slowly torturing [the priests] to death" (p. 124). To
call the ritual killing of captives an amusement or to compare the
vision quest to a narcotic delusion made me wonder how an author who
claims to take ritual seriously could at the same time dismiss such
practices so easily.
A last point about tone involves the book's intended audience.
Here and there Carpenter writes things like "as
twenty-first-century Americans, we think primarily ..."--Canadians
encounter such things as a matter of course, so perhaps such a phrase is
little cause for concern--but I wondered about how Wendat and
Haudenosaunee people today might respond to being excluded as readers
from a book about them. Along this line, the author overlooks Georges E.
Sioui's Huron-Wendat: The Heritage of the Circle (Vancouver, 1999).
In addition to offering an interpretation of Wendat history through
ritual practice, Sioui also offers a careful critique of the term Huron.
Carpenter's book would have also benefited from a consideration of
Taiaike Alfred's study of modern Haudenosaunee ritual, Peace,
Power, and Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto (Oxford, 1999). A
fuller engagement with modern aboriginal authors would have sharpened
the book's contribution.
In short, the book works as an undergraduate introductory text, but
it does not move the historiography forward in any clear way.
James Taylor Carson
Queen's University