Periodical literature bibliometric analysis: a case study of four international journals.
Sethi, Bipin Bihari ; Maharana, Bulu ; Mohanty, Barada Kanta 等
1. Background Study
The examination of the research publication and its contributions
is a buzzing area of research in the field of library and information
science. Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Citation Study, and Content
analysis are the concepts supplementary and complementary to each other
in their respective applications in the field in the domain of research
which are most familiar tools extremely and extensively used by the
scholars, researchers and academics across the globe. This technique has
been put forth over the present study to evaluate research productivity
at a global context to induce necessary inferences.
To avoid confusion it would be worthwhile to point out here that,
though the data undertaken from papers indexed in Science Direct
Bibliographic Database top 25 hottest papers of journals such as: 1st
"Language Sciences" (LS), 2nd "Linguistics and
Education" (L&E), and 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG),
under the time period 2005-2013, while the journal "Religion"
(Rgn) covers the time period 2005-2010, but the table no. 2 indicates
the actual year of publication of these papers in concerned source
journals.
2. Introduction:
Bibliometrics and scientometrics are the two closely related
approaches for measuring scientific publications and science in general,
respectively. In practice, much of the work that fall under this header
involves various types of citation analysis, which looks at how scholars
cite one another in publications. In the context of this toolkit,
bibliometrics are also one of the key ways of measuring the impact of
scholarly publications. 'Scientometrics' is often done using
bibliometrics which is a measurement of the impact of (scientific)
publications. Modern scientometrics is mostly based on the work of Derek
J. de Solla Price and Eugene Garfield. The latter founded the Institute
for Scientific Information which is heavily used for scientometric
analysis. Methods of research include qualitative, quantitative and
computational approaches. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientometrics/
accessed on 15.12.11).
Bibliometrics is a type of research method being used in LIS. It is
an emerging area of research in the LIS field. The quantitative analysis
and statistics to describe patterns of publication within a given field
of literature are utilized. Researchers use bibliometric methods of
evaluation to determine the influence of a single author or to describe
the relationship between two or more authors or works. Bibliometric
studies can also be used to study the regional patterns of research, the
extent of cooperation between research groups and national research
profiles. The main derivatives of bibliometrics are: publication counts,
citation counts, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, scientific
'mapping' and citations in patents. The word
'bibliometric' has been derived from the Latin and Greek words
'biblio' and 'metrics' which refer to the
application of mathematics to the study of bibliography (Thanuskodi,
2010, p.78).
The term bibliometrics was coined by Alan Pritchard in a paper
published in 1969, titled Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics? He
defined the term as "the application of mathematics and statistical
methods to books and other media of communication".
Bibliometrics is statistical analysis of written publications, such
as books or articles. Bibliometric methods are frequently used in the
field of library and information science, including scientometrics. For
instance, bibliometrics are used to provide quantitative analysis of
academic literature. Analysis and content analysis are commonly used
bibliometric methods. Many research fields use bibliometric methods to
explore the impact of their field, [3] the impact of a set of
researchers, or the impact of a particular paper. Bibliometrics also has
a wide range of other applications, such as in descriptive linguistics,
the development of thesauri, and evaluation of reader usage.
Historically bibliometric methods have been used to trace
relationships amongst academic journal citations. Citation analysis,
which involves examining an item's referring documents, is used in
searching for materials and analyzing their merit. [4] Citation indices,
such as Institute for Scientific Information's Web of Science,
allow users to search forward in time from a known article to more
recent publications which cite the known item. (Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliometrics)
3. Scope & Objective of the Study:
The scope of the study encompasses four international journals
viz., 1st "Language Sciences" (LS), 2nd "Linguistics and
Education" (L&E), and 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG),
and 4th "Religion (Rgn)" indexed at Science Direct Database
under the heading Top 25 Hottest Articles. The study accounts a total of
3300 papers adding 900 (Nine hundred) each from three journals, and 600
(Six hundred) from journal 'Religion' categorically. For
clarity it may be noted here that, data on the papers of journal
"Religion" from the year 2011-2013 are not available under the
heading top 25 hottest papers site of Science Direct Bibliographic
Database, for which the researcher excluded the period from the study.
The key objectives of the present study holds to acclaim the following
issues are as follows:
i. Nature of Authorship pattern of publication;
ii. Single Vs Multiple authored papers;
iii. Trace the Geographical Distribution/scattering of research
publication;
iv. Chronological Growth pattern of literature;
v. Most productive authors of top countries;
vi. Degree of collaboration of authors;
vii. Degree of citation of articles;
viii. Study of length of the papers and
ix. Understanding the changing trends in scholarly research output
4. Methodology Employed
The study specifically concentrates on the Bibliometric analysis is
one of the most widely used methods in Library and information science
research. It is an examination of the frequency, patterns, and graphs of
citations in articles. This study is aimed to discuss about the analysis
of the research output of four international journals indexed under
Science Direct on-line Database. The relevant sources and data are
collected from top 25 hottest papers site of above mentioned database.
Based on the available sources the following discussions were made.
Data on papers published in four journals such as: 1st
"Language Sciences" (LS), 2nd "Linguistics and
Education" (L&E), and 3rd 'Political Geography' (PG),
and 4th "Religion (Rgn)" were collected from each downloaded
records from Science Direct on-line Bibliographic Database and each data
were examined identically to find out the result. All papers included in
the analyses which are indexed under the top twenty five hottest papers
site of 1st three journals accounting 900 papers each, whereas the 4th
journal with 600 papers identically. Further, each items of information
processed by developing a database of 3300 down loaded records adding
essential fields viz. journal title, article title, 1st author, number
of authors, affiliation with institutions, country of origin
(considering 1st author), year of publication in source journal, number
of citations, length of papers and ranking pattern, etc. using the
MS-Excel spread sheet. It may be noticed here that, in case of 4th
journal "Religion" due to non-availability of data on papers
period from 2011-2015 in top 25 hottest papers site 300 records have
been excluded which caused a total 600 records considered under the
gamut of the present study. Since, reference counts are not freely
available with the abstract site the investigator did not able to
analyze the reference pattern of the papers. Finally, all relevant data
are then sorted, tabulated, and assimilated in a logical order to draw
inferences for the present research.
5. Review of Literature
Lipetz (1999) studied many bibliometric aspects of papers in JASIS
by examining volume of 1955, 1965, 1975, 1985 and 1995. One of his
findings revealed that the number of scholarly papers published per year
in JASIS has grown exponentially from 21 to 68.
Dutt, Garg & Bali (2003) analyzed 1317 papers published in the
first fifty volumes of the international journal of Scientometrics
during 1978 to 2001. They found that the U.S.A share of papers is
constantly declining while that of the Netherlands, India, France and
Japan is on the rise. The research output is highly scattered as
indicated by the average number of papers per institution.
Mukherjee (2008) analyzed the authorship pattern of scientific
productions of the four most productive Indian academic institutions for
the eight-year -period from 2000 to 2007. The results show that among
four universities, the authors of Delhi University contributed the
highest number of articles, followed by Banaras Hindu University. There
is also an increasing tendency toward collaborative research among
Indian authors as well as more frequent collaboration with international
authors. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology are two of the most prolific
research areas in these four Indian universities. The average rate of
references per item is 28 and the citations received per item are 3.56.
Tian, Wen & Hong (2008) conducted a bibliometric analysis to
evaluate global scientific production of Geographic Information System
(GIS) papers from 1997 to 2006 in Science Citation Index. Results
indicated that GIS research steadily increased over the period and the
annual paper production in 2006 was about three times higher comparing
to 1997s paper productions.
6. Need of the study
There have been incessant studies on bibliometrics, scientometrics,
content analysis etc. which is most familiar among the researchers,
scholars, and academicians all over the globe in the field of Library
and information science (LIS). The trend has given new dimensions and
understanding to the domain of LIS research. However, the very study
trace this trend and aims at highlighting the aspects which would be
most useful and further encourage the researchers', scholars and
library practitioners in enriching their respective research activities
and professional exercises with designing a nuance platform to the hub
of given research.
7. Analysis and Interpretation of Data
The present study is based on the analysis of the collected data of
four international journals indexed under science direct database top 25
hottest papers link which has been represented in the tabular form for
the easy understanding of the theme, finding inferences. and meeting the
goal of the present research work.
The present study is undertaken pertaining papers indexed under
Science Direct Database top 25 hottest papers link during the period
2005-2013 (8 years) of four international journals namely 'Language
Sciences (LS)', 'Linguistic & Education (L&E)',
'Political Geography (PG)', and 'Religion (Rgn)'
accounts a total 3300 papers, 900 from each 1st, 2nd, and 3rd journals,
and 600 from 4th journal as a bibliometric dimention with the key
objectives to measure and find a nuanced approach to the strength and
weakness of scholarly research output.
To avoid confusion and for clarity it would be worthwhile to state
here that, on the basis of the year of publication in the source journal
the papers as shown in above table are classified and arranged. It is
determined from the that 2005 is the most prolific year for the journals
'Language Sciences', and 'Linguistics and Education'
from which a largest number of papers 139 (15.44%), 163 (18.11%) are
indexed under top 25 hottest papers site, while the papers of journal
'Political Geography' 254 (28.22%) of the year 2007 and the
journal 'Religion' 147 (24.5%) papers of the year 2004 took
place under top 25 hottest papers link are found quite significant.
Moreover, it is also explored that, the papers indexed under top 25
hottest papers link of all four journals covers the period of
publication in original journal categorically 19, 18, 20 and 13 years,
accounting papers 900 each as individual share in three journals, except
the journal 'Religion' which adds 600 papers to the domain.
The above table shows that the maximum number of papers published in the
1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th journals, 139 (15.44%), 163 (18.11%), 254
(28.22%), and 147 (24.5%) during the years 2005, 2005, 2007, and 2004
and the minimum papers (one) in the years 1988, 1995, 1992, and 1985
respectively. The journals on an average has contributed to the top 25
hottest papers domain 47.36, 50, 45 and 46.15 research papers per year.
It is clear from the above analysis that the percentage of single
authored papers is more than that of multi-authored papers. In order to
shed more light over the pattern of collaboration the present analysis
is undertaken. To determine the extent of collaboration in quantitative
terms, the formula given by K. Subramanyam is used. The formula is as
follows: C =Nm/Nm+Ns Where, C=Degree of Collaboration, Nm=Number of
Multi Authored Contributions, NS= Number of Single Authored
Contributions. From the data, it has been found that about 700 (77.78%),
680 (75.56%), 651 (72.33%), and 508 (84.66%) papers have been produced
solely by single authors, while remaining frequency 200 (22.22%), 220
(24.44%), 249 (27.66%), and 92 (15.33%) papers Produced in collaboration
in all four journals as confirms the above table. Since, the degree of
collaboration or value of 'C' in the present study is found
0.22, 0.24, 0.29, and 0.15 in all four journals, it is seemingly clear
that single authorship is very common trend in these journals, which is
dominant over multi pattern. Nonetheless, it is expounded that, the
total number of authors involved in research productivity are 1214,
1229,1279, and 795 in producing papers 900 each in 1st three journals
and 600 in 4th journal as the study denotes categorically.
The table- 7.4 shows the top 15 most productive authors identified
from four international journals i. e. 'Language Sciences',
'Linguistics and Education', 'Political Geography'
and 'Religion' with publications range 14 47, 12-27, 19-35 and
10-29 respectively. Yuh-Fang Chang is the most productive author
affiliated to institution 'National Chung Hsing University ',
Angela Creese affiliated to institution 'University of
Birmingham', Arturo Escobar affiliated to institution
'University of North Carolina' and Henry Munson associated to
institution 'University of Maine' identically in 4 journals
with publications 47, 27, 35 and 29, which accounts about 5.22%, 3%,
3.88% and 4.83% of the total publications found quite encouraging.
Moreover, the top 15 authors account about 349 (38.77%), 281 (31.22%),
384 (42.66%) and 239 (39.83%) papers in separate journals out of total
publications undertaken for the present study. Besides, to track the
publication trend of top second author it is explored that, the author
Cliff Goddard affiliated to 'University of New England', Vera
F utierrezClellen affiliated to 'San Diego State University',
Michael K. Goodman associated to 'University of California'
and Philip A. Mellor amalgamated with 'University of Leeds'
reports 42 (4.67%), 25 (2.78%), 34 (3.83%) and 25 (4.16%)papers to their
credit, followed by top 3rd ranking authors Lyle Campbell, Constant
Leung, Philippe Le Billon, and Steven Engler being teamed up with the
institutions such as: University of Canterbury, King's College
London, School of Geography, and University of Leeds Contributed papers
41 (4.56%), 24 (2.67%), 34 (3.83%) and 24 (4%) to their respective
journals as the above table connotes. A glance at table 4 emphatically
indicates that, average papers per author is 4.20, 4.36, 4.54 and 3.89
found quite closer to each another in four different journals, while
average papers per institution is 5.88, 5.92, 5.32 and 7.5 observed
which is more than the average contribution of papers per author, but in
the same category 1st three journals average institutional value is
quite closer to each other, although 4th journal leads a gap among
others as the study prompts.
Geographical analysis of papers is another vital factor which is
ever intended in bibliometrics studies of research output as the table
number 5 discloses above is undertaken for the present work. Out of
four, in three journals i. e. 1st 'Language Sciences', 2nd
'Linguistics and Education', and 4th 'Religion' the
highest number 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%), and 231 (38.5%)papers has
been contributed by USA, while in the journal 'Political Geography1
major contributor is UK with 396 (44%) papers. Hence, it is ascertained
that, USA is the most productive country in the field of research output
across the globe. In 1st journal Australia, UK, France, Taiwan, posed
second, third, fourth and fifth place having 111 (12.33%),94 (10.44%),83
(9.22%),and 55 (6.11%) contributions respectively. As regard to 2nd
journal the countries such as: UK, Australia, Canada, and Spain achieved
second, third, fourth and fifth rank contributing 165 (18.33%), 134
(14.88%), 52 (5.77%), 37 (4.11%) to their credit. With respect to 3rd
journal it is noticed that USA, Norway, Australia, and Ireland got
second, third, fourth and fifth rank with 275 (30.55%), 48 (5.33%), 33
(3.67%), and 32 (3.56%) papers as their research output. Moreover, in
concern to 4th journal it is found that UK, Canada, Netherlands, and
Norway schedules their rank producing 102 (17%), 71 (11.83%), 48 (8%),
and 20 (3.33%) research papers in the respective journal. Although, UK
achieved 1st rank in 3rd journal it might be moot having 2nd rank, in
2nd and 4th journals following USA. However, resultantly it might be
worthwhile to say here that USA and UK both are most prolific countries
among other top contributors of the globe. In concluding phase the
researchers would like to focus over the number of country contributors
in different journals as the table shows that, fifteen countries
involved in research contribution in 1st two journals, followed by
seventeen countries in 3rd journal, while the highest twenty one
countries associated with 4th journal respectively.
As shown in Table 7.6, the top twenty institutional contributors of
four journals contribute to the respective journal more than fifty
percent of total citation and among those journals the 3rd
journal's top twenty institutions found proficient having highest
number of papers 575 (63.88%), followed by 2nd journal's top twenty
institutional contributors with papers 474 (53.66%), 1st journal's
top twenty institutional contributors with 465 (51.66%), and 4th
journal's top twenty institutional contributors adds 309 (51.5%)
papers identically. Moreover, the results as indicated above National
Chung Hsing University of Taiwan, University of California from Canada,
University of Durham from UK and University of Maine of USA are most
productive institutions in four different journals accounting 47
(5.40%), 62 (6.89%), 65 (7.48%) and 30 (5%) papers as their
contribution, among which University of Durham (UK) is best one. As
regards to institutions, which ranks 2nd with respect to their
contribution are University of New England (Australia), University of
British Columbia and University of California (USA), and University of
Leeds (UK) adds 42 (4.83%), 36 (4%), 51 (5.89%), and 28 (4.66%) papers
individually to different four journals, among those University of
California (USA) is best one with highest share. Furthermore, with
respect to 3rd ranking institutions it is ascertained that, University
of Canterbury (New Zealand), University of Technology (China), Durham
University (UK) and Mount Royal College (Canada) reserved their
positions with 41 (4.71%), 36 (4%), 39 (4.49%), and 24 (4%) papers to
different journals, among which University of Canterbury (New Zealand)
is the best one having grand share. Moreover, the above table can be
viewed as recognizing the remaining top seventeen institutional
contributors those who contributed with a range 13-47, 13-62, 13-65, and
10-30 papers in four different journals as the study unearths. In
concern to total number of institutions involved in research
contribution it is determined that, 150, 127, 156, and 71 institutional
contributors involved in research output in four different journals
respectively undertaken for the present study.
8: Results and Findings
Overall, findings of this study reported that:
i. The Degree of author collaboration is from range 0.15 to 0.29
found in four journals i.e. Majority of researchers prefers to
contribute their papers individually rather than collaborated.
ii. Besides, it might be ascertained from the study that, 2005 is
the most prolific year during which the highest 139 (15.44%) and 163
(18,11%) number of papers published in 1st and 2nd journal (source
journal) has been indexed under top 25 hottest papers database, while
254 (28.22%) papers from 3rd journal of the year 2007, followed by 147
(24.5%) papers of 2004 from 4th journal took place under the same
database is found significant. iii. On the basis of the year of
publication of papers in four source journals 45 to 50 papers on an
average per year took place in top 25 hottest papers database.
iv. The followings are most interesting to say here that, the
authors Yuh-Fang Chang, Angela Creese, Arturo Escobar, Henry Munson, are
most prolific contributors to respective four journals having highest
number of papers such as: 47 (5.22%), 27 (3%), 35 (3.88%), 29 (4.83%) to
their credit of total contribution.
v. Geographical analysis of papers is another vital factor in
quantitative analysis of research output determines the most productive
countries, as the present study explores USA is the most dominating
region having highest contribution i. e. 208 (23.11%), 354 (39.33%), 231
(38.5%) in 1st, 2nd, and 4th journals and UK in 3rd journal with 396
(44%)papers respectively. vi. National Chung Hsing University (Taiwan),
University of California (Canada), University of Durham (UK) and
University of Maine (USA) are most dominating institutional contributors
in four different journals accounting maximum number of papers such as:
47 (5.40%), 62 (6.89%), 65 (7.48%) and 30 (5%) as their research
productivity the study unearths.
vii. Applying Chi-Square test it is concluded that, there is
significant variation in the average factors of research papers of four
journals.
viii. Applying Chi-Square ([x.sub.2]) test using Formula [x.sub.2]
(o-e)2/e it is ascertained that: the citation pattern of papers of all
four journals are significantly varied from each other.
ix. Chi-Square ([x.sub.2]) test applied over Pagination pattern of
papers and resultantly found that, the pagination patterns of papers of
all four journals are significantly varied from each other.
9: Conclusion
This study served to develop a greater understanding of the
characteristics of scholarly publications over multiple years.
Additionally, by comparing the four different journals' research
output, the present study confirms the characteristics, features, and
patterns of research papers from various angles to reflect the strength
and weakness at the arena of global research. Since the vast majority of
papers are found single authored, the authors' collaboration is
dominated in research practices the study explores. Furthermore, the
study discovers, USA is the most productive geographical region,
followed by UK from the geographical and institutional
contributors' point of view. As the data collected for the present
research encompasses a definite period requires further research all
over the globe in succeeding decades adding more journals and years of
publication of papers under the gamut of new research work. As a
concluding remark the investigators earnestly hope and expect the study
would be a promising platform for the forthcoming researchers, scholars
and library practitioners for their research and day-to-day library
activities to promote and support the practices.
Bipin Bihari Sethi
Sambalpur University, Odisha, India
[email protected]
Dr. Bulu Maharana
Sambalpur University, Odisha, India
[email protected]
Barada Kanta Mohanty
Librarian, KIIMS, Cuttack, Odisha, India
[email protected]
References:
(1.) Dutt, B., Garg, K.C., & Bali, A. 2003. Scientometrics of
the international journal Scientometrics.Scientometrics, Vol. 56, no.1:
81 93.
(2.) Sethi, B B and Panda, K. C. 2014. Measuring Research
Excellence with two journals in Social Sciences: A Scientometric sketch.
Library Philosophy and Practice, paper 1051. (Available at:
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1051)
(3.) Lipetz, B-A. 1999. Aspects of JASIS authorship through five
decades. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, Vol.50, no. 11: 994-1003.
(4.) Mukherjee, B. 2008. Scholarly literature from selected
universities of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh: A pilot study. LIBRES, Vol.18,
no. 1. Retrieved from http://libres.curtin.edu.au/libres18n1/Mukherjee
Final rev.pdf
(5.) Subramanyam, K. 1982. Bibliometric Study of Research
Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, Vol.6, no.1:
33-38.
(6.) Thanuskodi, S.2010. Journal of Social Science: A Bibliometric
Study. Journal of Social Science, Vol.24, no. 2: 77-80.
(7.) Tian, Y., Wen, C., & Hong, S. 2008. Global scientific
production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006.
Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 2: 65-74.Available online at
www.sciencedirect.com
(8.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliometrics
(9.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientometrics/
? Corresponding author. 917377136122 (M) ;. E-mail address:
[email protected] (B. B.Sethi).
Table-7.1: State of the Art of Study
Area Number Name of Period of No. of
of of Journal Coverage Papers
Study Jr.
Arts & 1 Language Sciences 2005-13 900
Humanities 2 Linguistics and 2005-13 900
Education
3 Political 2005-13 900
Geography
4 Religion 2005-10, three 600
years data
(2011,2012 & 2013)
not available
Total 2 * 8 Years except 3300
journal 'Religion'
Area Number Percentage C. F. C. P.
of of
Study Jr.
Arts & 1 27.27 900 27.27
Humanities 2 27.27 1800 54.54
3 27.27 2700 .8181
4 18.18 3300 99.99
Total 2 100 3300 100
Table-7.2: Chronological Analysis of Papers
on the basis of Year of Publication in Source
Journal
Journals
1. Language 2. Linguistics
Sciences and Education
Sl Ye No. % Avg Sl Ye No. % Avg
No ar of per No ar of per
pap Yea pap Yea
ers r ers r
1 19 1 0. 1 19 1 0.
88 11 95 11
2 19 8 0. 2 19 3 0.
95 88 96 33
3 19 5 0. 3 19 4 0.
96 55 98 44
4 19 1 0. 4 20 25 2.
98 11 00 77
5 20 44 4. 5 20 27 3
00 88 01
6 20 3 0. 47. 6 20 66 7.
01 33 36 02 33 50
pap pap
7 20 10 1. ers 7 20 30 3. ers
02 11 03 33
8 20 49 5. 8 20 74 8.
03 44 04 22
9 20 46 5. 9 20 163 18.
04 11 05 11
10 20 139 15. 10 20 89 9.
05 44 06 88
11 20 66 7. 11 20 36 4
06 33 07
12 20 99 11 12 20 99 11
07 08
13 20 58 6. 13 20 88 9.
08 44 09 77
14 20 102 11. 14 20 58 6.
09 33 10 44
15 20 94 10. 15 20 64 7.
10 44 11 11
16 20 82 9. 16 20 36 4
11 11 12
17 20 49 5. 17 20 36 4
12 44 13
18 20 38 4. 18 20 1 0.
13 22 14 11
19 20 6 0. To 18 900 10
14 66 ta Ye 0
l ar
To 19 900 10 s
ta Ye 0
l ar
s
Gr Gr 18 900 10
an an 0
To To
ta ta
l l
Journals
Sl 3. Political Sl 4. Religion
No Geography No
Ye No. % Ye No. Avg
ar of ar Of per
Pap Pap Yea
ers ers r
1 19 1 0. 1 19 1 0.
92 11 45 85 16 46.
pap 15
2 19 5 0. ers 2 19 10 1. pap
95 56 97 66 ers
3 19 8 0. 3 19 14 2.
96 89 99 33
4 19 3 0. 4 20 19 3.
97 33 01 16
5 19 5 0. 5 20 4 0.
98 56 02 66
6 19 8 0. 6 20 57 9.
99 89 03 5
7 20 10 1. 7 20 147 24.
00 11 04 5
8 20 69 7. 8 20 96 16
01 67 05
9 20 33 3. 9 20 45 7.
02 67 06 5
10 20 23 2. 10 20 58 9.
03 56 07 66
11 20 91 10. 11 20 63 10.
04 11 08 5
12 20 118 13. 12 20 45 7.
05 11 09 5
13 20 131 14. 13 20 41 6.
06 56 10 83
14 20 254 28. To 13 600 100
07 22 ta Ye
l ar
15 20 61 6. s
08 78 Gr 13 600 100
an
16 20 14 1. To
09 56 ta
l
17 20 27 3
10
18 20 25 2.
11 78
19 20 7 0.
12 78
20 20 7 0.
13 78
To 20 900 10
ta Ye 0
l ar
s
Gr 20 900 100
an
To
ta
l
Table-7.3: Authorship pattern &
Degree of Collaboration of papers
of Four (4) Journals
Language
Sciences
Sl. Author Total No Degree %
No ship No of of colla-
pattern Of pap boration
of Auth ers
papers ors
1 Single 700 700 77.
author 78
2 Two 242 121 0. 13.
authors 22 44
3 Three 189 63 7
authors
4 Four 20 5 0.
authors 56
5 Five 25 5 0.
authors 56
6 Six 38 6 0.
authors 67
& More
Grand 12 90 100
Total 14 0
Lingui-
stics
and
Educa-
tion
Sl. Author Total No Degree %
No ship No of of colla-
patte- Of pap- boration
rn Authors ers
of
papers
1 Single 680 680 75.
author 56
2 Two 272 136 0. 15.
author 24 11
3 Three 207 69 7.
author 67
4 Four 36 9 1
author
5 Five
author
6 Six 25 5 0.
authors 56
& More
9 1 0.
11
Grand
Total
Grand 12 900 100
Total
29
Political
Geography
Sl. Author Total No Degree %
No pattern No of of
ship Of papers Colla-
of Authors boration
papers
1 Single 651 651 72.
author 33
2 Two 366 183 0.29 20.
authors 33
3 Three 84 28 3.
authors 11
4 Four 76 19 2.
author 11
s
Five 50
5 authors 10 1.
11
More 52
6 than 9 1
five
authors
Grand 12
Grand Total 79 900 100
Total
Religion
Sl. Author Total No Degree of %
No ship No of of Colla-
pattern Of Pap- boration
of Authors ers
papers
1 Single 508 508 84.
author 66
2 Two 136 68 0.15 11.
authors 35
3 Three 15 05 0.
authors 83
4 Four 08 02 0.
author 3
s 3
5 Five 05 01 0.
authors 16
6 More 123 16 2.
than 66
five
authors
Grand 795 600 100
Total
Table-7.4: Top 15 Authors with Institutional
Affiliation of Four (4) Journals
Journals
Sl. Language Sciences
N Nam Aff No % A A
o e ili of v v
of ati pa g g
Aut on pers . .
hor to Papers Pap
Insti per per
tution Author per
Inst
1 Yuh Nat 47 5
- ion .
Fan al 2
g Chu 2
Cha ng
ng Hsi
ng
Uni
ver
sit 4 5
y . .
2 Cli Uni 42 4 2 8
ff ver . 0 8
God sit 6
dar y 7
d of
New
Eng
lan
d
3 Lyl Uni 41 4
e ver .
Cam sit 5
pbe y 6
ll of
Can
ter
bur
y
4 Pau And 33 3
l rew .
Mat s 6
ych Uni 7
u ver
sit
y
5 Chr LEA 23 2
ist PLE .
oph 5
e UMR 5
Par
iss
e
6 Ann Aus 20 2
a tra .
Wie lia 2
rzb n 2
ick Nat
a ion
al
Uni
ver sit y
7 Ana Mon 19 2
Deu ash .
mer Uni 1
t ver 1
sit
y
8 Chr Uni 18 2
ist ver .
oph sit 0
er y 0
S. of
But Wal
ler es
Swa
nse
a,
9 Tal Col 17 1
bot leg .
J. e 8
Tay of 9
lor Wil
lia
m
and
Mar
y,
1 Nao Ame 16 1
0 mi ric .
S an 7
Bar Uni 7
on ver
sit
y,
1 Ewa Uni 15 1
1 Dub ver .
row sit 6
ska y 6
of
She
ffi
eld
,
1 Fie Ghe 15 1
2 ke nt .
Van Uni 6
der ver 6
Guc sit
ht y,
1 Mig Uni 15 1
3 uel ver .
Cas sid 6
as ad 6
Gom de
ez Cad
iz,
1 Nig Uni 14 1
4 el ver .
Lov sit 5
e y 5
of
Cap
e
Tow
n
1 Phi The 14 1
5 lip Ope .
Sea n 5
rge Uni 5
ant ver
sit
y
T 15 15 34 3
o Aut Aff 9 8
t hor ili .
a s ate 7
l d 7
Ins
tit
uti
ons
O 197 136 54 6
t Aut Aff 9 1
h hor ili
e s ate
r d
s Ins
tit
uti
ons
G 212 151 89 1
r +Da +Da 8+ 0
a ta ta 2= 0
n not abo 90
d ava ut 0
T ila Ins
o ble t.
t 02= not
a 214 ava
l *(U ila
niq ble
ue in
Aut 02
hor pap
s) ers
=15
3
Journals
Sl. Linguistics and Education
N Name Affi N % A A
o of liat o. v v
Auth ion o g g
or to f . .
Inst pap Pap Pap
itut ers ers ers
ion per per
Aut Inst
hor
1 Ange Univ 2 3
la ersi 7
Cree ty
se of
Birm
ingh
am
4 5
. .
2 Vera San 2 2 3 9
F Dieg 5 . 6 2
utie o 7
rrez Stat 8
- e
Clel Univ
len ersi
ty
3 Cons King 2 2
tant 's 4 .
Leun Coll 6
g ege 7
Lond
on
4 J.R. Univ 2 2
Mart ersi 2 .
in ty 4
of 4
Sydn
ey
5 Rich Univ 2 2
ard ersi 1 .
Barw ty 3
ell of 3
Bris
tol
6 Mary Univ 2 2
J ersi 0 .
Schl ty 2
eppe of 2
grel Cali
l forn
ia
7 Ross Univ 2 2
Form ersi 0 .
an ty 2
of 2
Tech
nolo
gy
8 Tina Shar 1 2
Shar pe 9 .
pe Cons 1
ulti 1
ng
(NSW)
9 Jame Univ 1 1
s ersi 7 .
Paul ty 8
Gee of 9
Wisc
onsi
n at
Madi
son
1 Tarj Univ 1 1
0 a ersi 7 .
Niku ty 8
la of 9
Jyva
skyl
a
1 Susa Univ 1 1
1 n ersi 6 .
Hood ty 7
of 8
Tech
nolo
gy
1 Vale Univ 1 1
2 rie ersi 6 .
Hobb ty 7
s of 8
Shef
fiel
d,
1 Patr Univ 1 1
3 icia ersi 3 .
A ty 4
Duff of 4
Brit
ish
Colu
mbia
1 Aria Univ 1 1
4 Razf ersi 2 .
a ty 3
of 3
Illi
nois
1 Jame Stat 1 1
5 s e 2 .
Coll Univ 3
ins ersi 3
ty
of
New
York
T 15 15 2 3
o Auth Affi 8 1
t ors liat 1 .
a ed 2
l Inst 2
itut
ions
O 191 137A 6 6
t Auth ffil 1 8
h ors iate 9 .
e d 7
r Inst 7
s itut
ions
G 206 152 9 1
r Auth Affi 0 0
a ors liat 0 0
n * (Un ed
d ique Inst
T Auth itut
o ors) ions
t
a
l
Journals
Sl. Political Geography
N Na Affi N % A A
o me liat o. v v
of ion o g g
Au to f . .
thor Ins pap Pap Pap
tit ers ers ers
uti per per
on Aut Inst
hor
1 Ar Univ 3 3
tu ersi 5 .
ro ty 8
Es of 8
co Nort
ba h
r Caro
lina
4 5
. .
2 Mi Univ 3 3 5 3
ch ersi 4 . 4 2
ae ty 7
l of 7
K. Cali
Go forn
od ia
ma
n
3 Ph Scho 3 3
il ol 4 .
ip of 7
pe Geog 7
Le raph
Bi y
ll
on
4 Ha Univ 3 3
rr ersi 2 .
ie ty 5
t of 5
Bu Durh
lk am
el
ey
5 Ma Univ 2 3
tt ersi 7
he ty
w of
B. Wash
Sp ingt
ar on,
ke
6 Jo Univ 2 2
n ersi 5 .
Ba ty 7
rn of 7
et Melb
t ourn
e,
7 Lo Univ 2 2
ui ersi 5 .
se ty 7
Am of 7
oo Durh
re am,
8 Ra , 2 2
fa Indi 5 .
el ana 8
Re Univ 5
uv ersi
en ty
y
9 Cl Univ 2 2
io ersi 4 .
na ty 7
dh of 7
Ra Esse
le x,
ig
h
1 Ra Inte 2 2
0 gn rnat 4 .
hi iona 6
ld l 6
No Peac
rd e
as Rese
arch
Inst
itut
e,
1 No Mane 2 2
1 el hest 1 .
Ca er 3
st Univ 8
re ersi
e ty,
1 Ja New 2 2
2 so Mexi 0 .
n co 2
Ac Stat 5
kl e
es Univ
on ersi
ty
1 Pa Dubl 2 2
3 dr in 0 .
ai City 2
g Univ 5
R. ersi
Ca ty,
rm
od
y
1 Li Nati 1 2
4 ly onal 9 .
Ko Univ 1
ng ersi 8
ty
of
Sing
apor
e
1 Ma Univ 1 2
5 xw ersi 9 .
el ty 1
l of 8
T. Oxfo
Bo rd
yk
of f
T 15 15 3 4
o Au Affi 8 2
t th liat 4 .
a or ed 6
l s Inst 6
itut
ions
O 18 154 5 5
t 3 Affi 1 7
h Au liat 6 .
e th ed 3
r or Inst 3
s s itut
ions
G 19 169 9 1
r 8 Affi 0 0
a Au liat 0 0
n th ed
d or Inst
T s itut
o ions
t
a
l
Journals
Sl. Religion
N Nam Affi N % A A
o e liat o v v
of ion . g g
Aut to O . .
hor Inst f Pap Pap
itut pap ers ers
ion ers per per
Aut Inst
hor
1 Hen Univ 2 4
ry ersi 9 .
Mun ty 8
son of 3
Main
e
3 7
. .
2 Phi Univ 2 4 8 5
lip ersi 5 . 9
A. ty 1
Mel of 6
lor Leed
s
3 Ste Moun 2 4
ven t 4
Eng Roya
ler l
Coll
ege
4 Ter Flor 2 3
ry ida 2 .
Rey Inte 6
rnat 6
iona
l
Univ
ersi
ty
5 Bil Scho 1 2
l ol 6 .
Ash of 6
cro Engl 6
ft ish,
6 Chr Univ 1 2
ist ersi 5 .
oph ty 5
er Coll
Par ege
tri Ches
dge ter,
7 Bro Univ 1 2
n ersi 3 .
Tay ty 1
lor of 6
Wisc
onsi
n,
8 Mic Univ 1 2
hae ersi 3 .
l ty 1
Sta of 6
usb Berg
erg en,
9 Sus , 1 2
an Univ 3 .
Rai ersi 1
ne ty 6
of
Albe
rta,
1 Win Univ 1 2
0 nif ersi 3 .
red ty 1
Fal of 6
ler Chic
s ago,
Sul
liv
an
1 Eli Univ 1 2
1 zab ersi 2
eth ty
Moh of
kam Nijm
sin egen
g-
den
Boe
r
1 Ian Univ 1 2
2 Rea ersi 2
der ty
of
Manc
hest
er,
1 Yuv Colu 1 2
3 al mbia 2
Ner Univ
ia ersi
ty
and
New
York
Sta
e
Psyc
ric
Inst
itut
e,
1 E. 101 1 1
4 Tyl Nort 0 .
er h 6
Gra Univ 6
ham ersi
ty
Aven
ue
1 Jus Oxfo 1 1
5 tin rd 0 .
L. Univ 6
Bar ersi 6
ret ty
t
T 15 15 2 3
o Aut Affi 3 9
t hor liat 9 .
a s ed 8
l Inst 3
itut
ions
O 139 65 3 6
t Aut Affi 6 0
h hor liat 1 .
e s ed 1
r Inst 6
s itut
ions
G 154 80 6 1
r Aut Affi 0 0
a hor liat 0 0
n s ed
d Inst
T itut
o ions
t
a
l
Table-7.5: Geographical Analysis of Papers
Published, in Four (4) Journals
Journals
Sl. No. 1.Language Sciences
Name of No.of %
Country papers
1 USA 208 23
2 Australia 111 12
3 France 94 10
4 UK 83 9.2
5 Taiwan 55 6.1
6 South Africa 41 4.6
7 Belgium 38 4.2
8 Spain 29 3.2
9 The Netherlands 28 3.1
10 Hong Kong 24 2.7
11 Germany 18 2
12 Israel 18 2
13 Singapor e 16 1.8
14 Iran 16 1.8
15 Canada 12 1.3
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
Top 15 791 88
Countries with Countries
corresponding collectively
papers contribute
Other Data on 109 12
country of
origin of papers
not available
Total * 900 100
Journals
Sl. No. 2.Linguistics
and Education
Name of Country No. of %
papers
1 USA 354 39.33
2 UK 165 18.33
3 Australia 134 14.88
4 Canada 52 5.77
5 Spain 37 4.11
6 China 32 3.55
7 Singapore 26 2.88
8 Finland 18 2
9 The Netherlands 14 1.55
10 New Zealand 11 1.22
11 Hungary 11 1.22
12 Hong Kong 10 1.11
13 Belgium 8 0.88
14 Africa 2 0.22
15 Sweden 1 0.11
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
Top 15 Countries 875 97.2
Countries with collectively
corresponding contribute
papers
Other Data on country 25 2.78
of origin not
available
Total * 900 100
Journals
Sl. No. 3.Political
Geography
Name of Country No. of %
papers
1 UK 396 44
2 USA 275 30.6
3 Norway 48 5.33
4 Australia 33 3.67
5 Ireland 32 3.56
6 Canada 29 3.22
7 Singapore 29 3.22
8 Israel 7 0.78
9 Switzerland 6 0.67
10 Sweden 3 0.33
11 Turkey 3 0.33
12 Germany 2 0.22
13 Netherla nds 2 0.22
14 Estonia 1 0.11
15 Hong Kong 1 0.11
16 newsland 1 0.11
17 Russian Federation 1 0.11
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
Top 17 Countries 869 96.6
Countries with collectively
corresponding contribute
papers
Other Data on country 31 3.44
of origin not
available
Total * 900 100
Journals
Sl. No. 4.Religion
Name of Country No. of %
papers
1 USA 231 38.5
2 UK 102 17
3 Canada 71 11.83
4 The Netherlands 48 8
5 Norway 20 3.33
6 Australia 18 3
7 Italy 11 1.83
8 Denmark 10 1.66
9 Egypt 9 1.5
10 Israel 8 1.33
11 Wales 8 1.33
12 Finland 5 0.83
13 Switzerland 4 0.66
14 Germany 3 0.5
15 News land 3 0.5
16 Philippines 3 0.5
17 Sweden 3 0.5
18 Taiwan 2 0.33
19 Czech Republic 1 0.16
20 France 1 0.16
21 Japan 1 0.16
Top 21 Countries 562 93.66
Countries with collectively
corresponding contribute
papers
Other Data on country 38 6.33
of origin not
available
Total * 600 100
Table-7.6: Top 20 Productive
Institutions/Institutional
Contributors'
Journals
Sl. 1.Language Sciences
No.
Name of Name of No. %
Institution Country of
Papers
1 National Chung Taiwan 47 5.4
Hsing University
2 University of Australia 42 4.83
New England
3 University New 41 4.
of Canterbury Zealand 71
4 Andrews USA 32 3.68
University
5 Ghent Belgium 28 3.22
University
6 Monash Australia 27 3.1
University
7 University South 25 2.87
of Cape Town Africa
8 Leaple, mR France 23 2.64
9 Max Planck The 22 2.53
Institute for Netherlands
Psycholinguistics
10 The University HongKong 20 2.3
of Hong Kong
11 Australi Australia 19 5.14
an National
University
12 College and USA 18 3.22
of William
Mary
13 University UK 18 3.22
of Wales
Swansea
14 American USA 16 1.84
University
15 Baikal Russia 16 1.84
National
University
of Economics
and Law
16 University UK 16 1.84
of Sheffield
17 The Open UK 14 1.61
University
18 University Spain 14 1.61
dad de
Cadiz
19 University USA 14 1.61
of California
20 National Singapore 13 1.49
University
of Singapore
Total 4 65 51.66
Publication
of
20
Institutions
Others 130 * 432 48
Institutions
Total Data not * 03 0.33
Available
on Inst.
Grand Total* 900 100
Journals
Sl. 2.Linguistics
No. and Education
Name of Name No. %
Institution of Country Of
Papers
1 University Canada 62 6.89
of California
2 University of USA 36 4
British Columbia
3 Univer China 36 4
sity of
Technology
4 King's Canada 35 3.89
College London
5 San Diego Spain 31 3.44
State University
6 University USA 28 3.11
of Sydney
7 University USA 27 3
of Birmingham
8 University USA 25 2.78
of Bristol
9 University Australia 23 2.56
of London
10 University USA 22 2.44
of Sheffield
11 Sharpe USA 19 2.11
Consulting
(NSW),
12 University Spain 18 2
of Jyvaskyla
13 University USA 17 1.89
of Wisconsin
at Madison
14 Arizona USA 14 1.56
State University,
15 National USA 14 1.56
Institute
of Education
16 University UK 14 1.56
of Leeds
17 University UK 14 1.56
of New England
18 Columbia Canada 13 1.44
University
19 Northern UK 13 1.44
Arizona
University
20 University at USA 13 1.44
Autono made
Barcelona
Total Total 474 52.7
Publication
Publication of 20
of Institutions
20
Institutions
Others 107 * 401 44.6
Institutions
Total Total Data not 25 2.77
Available
on
Inst
Grand Grand * 900 100
Total Total
Journals
Sl. 3.Political
No. Geography
Name Name of No. of %
of Country Papers
Institution
1 University UK 65 7.48
of Durham
2 University USA 51 5.89
of California
3 Durham UK 39 4.
University 49
4 School UK 39 4.49
of Geography
5 International Norway 36 4.18
Peace Research
Institute
6 University of USA 35 4.09
North Carolina
7 University USA 34 3.94
of Washington
8 Manchester UK 29 3.34
University
9 National Singapore 29 3.34
University
of Singapore
10 University UK 26 2.99
of Essex
11 Indian USA 25 2.88
a University
12 University Australia 25 2.88
of Melbourne
13 Dublin Ireland 23 2.64
City
University
14 University UK 23 2.64
of Oxford
15 New Mexico USA 21 2.47
State
University
16 Lancaster UK 19 2.19
University
17 University UK 15 1.72
of Portsmouth
18 University UK 14 1.62
of London
19 University UK 14 1.62
of Southampton
20 University USA 13 1.49
of Wisconsin
Total Total 575 63.88
Publication
Public 20
ation of Institutions
of
20
Institutions
Others 136 * 293 32.55
Institutions
Total Data not * 32 3.55
Available
on Inst. (13)
Grand Grand Total Insti 900 100
Total tutions
-169
Journals
Sl. 4.Religion
No.
Name Name of No. Of %
of Institution Country Papers
Institution
1 University USA 30 5
of Maine
2 University UK 28 4.66
of Leeds
3 Mount Canada 24 4
Royal
College
4 Florida USA 22 3.66
International
University
5 Faculty The 19 3.16
of Humanities Netherlands
6 School Australia 16 2.66
of English
7 University Norway 16 2.66
of Bergen
8 University UK 15 2.5
College Chester
9 University The 14 2.33
of Amsterdam Netherlands
10 University USA 14 2.33
of Chicago
11 University USA 13 2.16
of Wisconsin
12 Columbia USA 12 2
University
and New York
State
Psychiatric
Institute
13 University Canada 12 2
of Alberta
14 University UK 12 2
of Manchester
15 University The 12 2
of Nijmegen Netherlands
16 North Canada 10 1.66
University
Avenue
17 Oxford UK 10 1.66
University
18 University of USA 10 1.66
California
Riverside
19 University Canada 10 1.66
of Ottawa
20 University USA 10 1.66
of Tennessee
Total Total 309 51.5
Publication Publication
of of 20
20 Institutions
Institutions
Others 51 * 245 40.8
Institutions
Total Data not * 46 7.66
available
on Inst. (9)
Grand Total Grand Total: Insti * 600 100
tutions
-80
Table-7.7: Average Factors
Journals
Sl Factors
No. Language Linguistics Political Religion
Sciences and Geography
Education
1 Avg. 08 10.12 94.77 28.26
Citations
per Paper
2 Avg. Papers 4.20 4.36 4.61 4.08
per Unique
Author
3 Avg. Authors 1.34 1.36 1.42 1.28
per Paper
(All Authors)
4 Avg. Authors 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.24
per Paper
(Unique
Authors)
5 Avg. Page 23.70 19.35 21.33 17.28
length per
paper
6 Avg. Papers 47.36 50 45 46.15
per Year
(considering
year of
publication
of papers in
source
journal)
7 Avg. Papers 5.88 5.92 5.32 7.5
per
Institution
(Unique)
8 Avg. Papers 23.07 47.36 50 28.57
per Country
(Unique)
Total 113.77 138.69 222.66 133.36
Sl Factors
No. Total O' E' [sup.X.2])
Table Table Calculated
Value (CV)
1 Avg. 141.15 08 26.39 12.81
Citations
per Paper
2 Avg. Papers 17.25 4.20 3.22 0.29
per Unique
Author
3 Avg. Authors 5.4 1.34 1.00 0.11
per Paper
(All Authors)
4 Avg. Authors 0.89 0.22 0.16 0.02
per Paper
(Unique
Authors)
5 Avg. Page 81.66 23.70 15.26 4.66
length per
paper
6 Avg. Papers 188.51 47.36 35.24 4.16
per Year
(considering
year of
publication
of papers in
source
journal)
7 Avg. Papers 24.62 5.88 4.60 0.35
per
Institution
(Unique)
8 Avg. Papers 149 23.07 27.85 0.82
per Country
(Unique)
Total 608.48 10.12 32.17 15.11
4.36 3.93 0.04
1.36 1.23 0.01
0.22 0.20 0.002
19.35 18.61 0.02
50 42.96 1.15
5.92 5.61 0.01
47.36 33.96 5.28
94.77 51.65 35.99
4.61 6.31 0.45
1.42 1.97 0.15
0.21 0.32 0.03
21.33 29.88 2.44
45 68.98 8.33
5.32 9.00 1.50
50 54.52 0.37
28.26 30.93 0.23
4.08 3.78 0.02
1.28 1.18 0.008
0.24 0.19 0.01
17.28 17.89 0.02
46.15 41.31 0.56
7.5 5.39 0.82
28.57 32.65 0.50
** [sup.X.2]
(CV) =
96.27
Hy: H0: There is no variation in average factors of research papers of
four (4) journals.
Chi-Square ([x.sup.2]) Formula: [x.sup.2] = [(o-e).sup.2]/e applied
Degree of Freedom (V) = 21 ; Calculated Value (CV) = 96.27 ; Tabulated
Value (TV) at 0.050 or 95 % level of significance is = 32.7
Chi-Square test applied over the data in the table no.7 with heading
Average Factors". Since, x2 calculated value is 96.27 which is greater
than [x.sup.2] tabulated value 32. 7, so the null hypothesis stands
false or rejected. Hence, it is concluded that, there is significant
variation in the average factors of research papers of four journals.
Table-7.8: Citation Pattern of Publication
Journals
S l
N o Language Linguistics
Sciences and
Education
Cita No. % C. Citat No.
tion of F. ion of
Pattern papers Pattern papers
1 1-25 853 94.8 853 1-25 734
2 26-50 37 4.11 890 26-50 57
3 51- 5 10 1.11 900 51-75 22
4 Grand 900 100 900 Data 87
Total not
available
5 * * * * Grand 900
Total
6 * * * * * *
7 * * * * * *
8 * * * * * *
9 * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
S l Journals
N o Language Political
Sciences Geography
Cita % C. Cita No. %
tion F. tion of
Pattern Pattern papers
1 1-25 81.6 734 1-25 167 18.56
2 26-50 6.33 791 26-50 191 21.22
3 51- 5 2.44 813 51-75 176 19.56
4 Grand 9.67 900 76-100 94 10.44
Total
5 * 100 900 101-125 59 6.56
6 * * * 126-150 7 0.78
7 * * * 151-175 53 5.89
8 * * * 176-200 * *
9 * * * 201 and 130 14.44
above
* * * * No Citation 23 2.56
Data
Grand Total 900 100
S l
N o Language Religion
Sciences
Cita C. Cita No. % C.
tion F. tion Of F.
Pattern Pattern papers
1 1-25 167 1-25 508 64.7 508
2 26-50 358 26-50 5 0.83 513
3 51- 5 534 51-75 4 0.66 517
4 Grand 628 76-100 11 1.83 528
Total
5 * 687 101-125 3 0.5 531
6 * 64 126-150 * * *
7 * 747 151-175 1 0.16 532
8 * * 176-200 * * *
9 * 877 201 and 6 1 538
above
* * 900 No 62 10.3 600
Citation
Data
900 Grand 600 100 600
Total
Table-7.8.1: Application of Chi-Square
"O" "E" [X.sup.2]
Table Table Calculated
Value (CV)
853 616.90 90.36
37 79.09 22.39
10 57.81 39.53
00 28.63 28.63
00 16.90 16.90
00 1.90 1.90
00 14.72 14.72
00 00 00
00 37.09 37.09
00 46.90 46.90
734 616.90 22.22
57 79.09 6.16
22 57.81 22.18
00 28.63 28.63
00 16.90 16.90
00 1.90 1.90
00 14.72 14.72
00 00 00
00 37.09 37.09
87 46.90 34.28
167 616.90 328.10
191 79.09 158.34
176 57.81 241.63
94 28.63 149.25
59 16.90 104.87
07 1.90 13.68
53 14.72 99.54
00 00 00
130 37.09 232.73
23 46.90 12.17
508 411.27 22.75
05 52.72 43.19
04 38.54 30.95
11 19.09 3.42
03 11.27 6.06
00 1.27 1.27
01 9.81 7.91
00 00 00
06 24.72 14.17
62 31.27 30.19
Calculated Value
(CV)=1982.72
Hy: H0: There is no variation among the journals in citation
pattern of their papers. Degree of Freedom (V)=27 ; [X.sup.2]
Calculated Value (CV)=1982.72; Tabulated Value (TV) 0.050 or
95 % level of significance is 40.11 Applying Chi-Square
([X.sup.2]) test using Formula [X.sup.2] [(o-e)].sup.2]/e it is
ascertained that:
At (0.050) 95% level of significance X2 tabulated
value is 40.11, while calculated value is 1982.72.
As calculated value of X2 is greater than tabulated
value the hypothesis stands false or rejected which
means the citation pattern of papers of all four
journals are significantly varied from each other.
Table-7.9: Pagination Pattern of Papers
Sl. Language Sciences
No. Patten of No. % C.F.
Pagination of
papers
1 1-5 20 2.22 20
2 6-10 60 6.67 80
3 11-15 242 26.89 322
4 16-20 186 2.06 508
5 21-25 140 15.56 648
6 26-30 83 9.22 731
7 31 and 169 18.78 900
above
Grand Total 900 100 900
Sl. Linguistics and Education
No. Patten of No. % C.F.
Pagination of
papers
1 1-5 18 2 18
2 6-10 15 1.67 33
3 11-15 297 33 330
4 16-20 273 30.33 603
5 21-25 150 16.67 753
6 26-30 66 7.33 819
7 31 and 81 3.44 900
above
Grand Total 900 100 900
Sl. Political Geography
No. Patten of No. % C.F.
Pagination of
papers
1 1-5 18 2 18
2 6-10 59 6.56 77
3 11-15 75 8.33 152
4 16-20 207 23 359
5 21-25 3 10 34.44 669
6 26-30 166 18.44 835
7 31 and 65 7.22 900
above
Grand Total 900 100 900
Sl. Religion
No. Patten of No. % C.F.
Pagination of
papers
1 1-5 38 6.33 38
2 6-10 84 14 122
3 11-15 172 28.66 294
4 16-20 141 23.5 435
5 21-25 99 16.5 534
6 26-30 47 7.83 581
7 31 and 19 3.16 600
above
Grand Total 600 100 600
Table-7.9.1: Application of Chi-Square (x2) test over table (9)
"O" "E" X2 Calculated
Table Table Value (CV)
Hy: H0: Pagination pattern of
papers of all four journals are
20 25.63 1.23 not significantly different.
60 59.45 0.005
242 214.36 3.56 Degree of Freedom (V)=18 ; X2
186 220.09 5.28 Calculated Value (CV)=536.628;
140 190.63 13.44 Tabulated Value (TV) at 0.050 or
83 98.72 2.50 95 % level of significance is
169 91.09 66.63 28.87
15 59.45 33.23
297 214.36 31.85 Applying Chi-Square (x2)
273 220.09 12.71 test using Formula x2 (o-e)2/e
150 190.63 8.65 it is ascertained that:
6 6 98.72 10.84
81 91.09 1.11 At(0.050) 95 % level of
18 25.63 2.27 significance X2 tabulated value
59 59.45 0.003 is 28.87, while calculated value
75 214.36 90.60 is 536.628. As calculated value
207 220.09 0.77 of X2 is greater than tabulated
310 190.63 74.74
166 98.72 45.85
65 91.09 7.47
38 17.09 25.58
84 39.63 49.67
172 142.90 5.92 value for which the hypothesis
141 146.72 0.22 stands false or rejected that
99 127.09 6.20 means the pagination patterns of
47 65.81 5.37 papers of all four journals are
19 60.72 28.66 significantly varied from each
Calculated other.
Value (CV)=
536.628