Radiocarbon Dating and Italian Prehistory.
Barker, Graeme
In 1988, in the aftermath of the re-structuring that followed the
classics review by the University Grants Commission, and of the
archaeology review that followed closely on its heels, a new Department
of Mediterranean Studies was established in Queen Mary and Westfield
College, London, incorporating members of staff of the classics
departments of Queen Mary College and Westfield College (then in the
process of amalgamation) and of the archaeology department of the
University of Lancaster. A particular strength of the Lancaster
department had been teaching and research in Italian archaeology, which
at that time was rather poorly represented in British universities (at
least by staff running field projects in Italy), and soon after the
inception of the Mediterranean Studies department at QMC its staff
established the Accordia Research Centre as a way of carrying the torch
forward, ACCORDIA standing for the Academic Coordination Centre for
Research into the Development of Italy from Antiquity. The stated aim of
Accordia was the encouragement of inter-disciplinary and
cross-disciplinary research on Italian antiquity, and the principal
mechanisms were intended to be research publications, the organization
of lectures and exhibitions, and the development of library holdings in
Italian antiquity building on the holdings in Italian archaeology
transferred with the staff from Lancaster to QMC. Without any
significant institutional support the operations had to be
self-financing, dependent on subscriptions from members. Set at about
[pounds]20 a year for a full member and a little over half that for
students, membership entitles subscribers to a copy of an annual
publication, The Accordia Research Papers, and a 25% discount on
supplementary volumes, as well as invitations to lecture receptions,
exhibition openings, and a newsletter.
The Department of Mediterranean Studies was never properly resourced,
and after a bitter battle it was eventually closed down and the staff
either re-deployed within QMC departments or transferred elsewhere
within the London university system. Accordia has moved with Dr Ruth
Whitehouse, the senior archaeologist of the QMC group, to the Institute
of Archaeology (University College). At this critical time in its
history it is appropriate to consider what Accordia has achieved so far
in its core programme, the publications on the shelf, and its prospects
for the future.
Accordia's publication programme was set up to provide a new
outlet for the publication of research on Italian antiquity, in the
belief that the breadth and variety of current research greatly
outstripped the capacity of existing publication venues. Certainly
Italian archaeology is not as well served by established regional
journals as British archaeology, especially in the south. There are well
established subject/period journals, such as the Bollettino di
Paletnologia Italiana, the Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche, Origini,
Studi Etruschi, and Archeologia Medievale, and the multi-period
Archeologia Laziale and Dialoghi di Archeologia (the latter perhaps
Italy's nearest equivalent to ANTIQUITY), but with the notable
exception of Archeologia Medievale (the newest on the scene) the recent
publication records of most of them have been characterized by lengthy
delays. In this context, for many British archaeologists working in
Italy the annual Papers of the British School at Rome have been the main
venue for publishing their research reports in reasonably accessible
format for their Italian colleagues, and the British School's
supplementary volumes (now formalized as their Archaeological Monographs
series) are an attractive venue for excavation and survey reports, and
edited studies, but certainly the Papers are heavily oversubscribed and
there is a similar queue of projects seeking publication as British
School monographs.
For Italian archaeologists, particularly those at the inception of
their careers, it is still harder to publish. A great deal of current
research and interim reports of field projects by Italian scholars is
published in sponsored exhibition catalogues and conference proceedings,
but the invitations to contribute to these tend inevitably to go to the
Great and the Good (sometimes known as the Barons!) and via them to
their acolytes. It is extremely difficult for young Italian
archaeologists to break into publication on their own. One of the
principal purposes of the series of UK Conferences on Italian
Archaeology (Lancaster 1977, Sheffield 1980, Cambridge 1984, QMC 1990,
Oxford 1992) has been to provide opportunities for such people to
publish outside a system characterized by academic clientship and rigid
period/area/discipline divisions, bringing their work to the wider
English-language readership at the same time. The Accordia Research
Papers were therefore established to provide an additional annual venue
for Italian as well as British scholars to publish current
archaeological research in English, to fill the gap between the
occasional Conferences on Italian Archaeology.
Between 1990 and 1994 Accordia has published nine volumes, all about
200 pages in length in A4 size with card covers, the format favoured by
most non-commercial archaeological publishing in the UK. Three volumes
of the Research Papers have in fact been published (Volume 1 in 1990,
Volume 2 in 1991, and Volume 3 in 1992), each edited by Edward Herring,
Ruth Whitehouse & John Wilkins. Accordia has also published the four
volumes of papers stemming from the Fourth Conference of Italian
Archaeology, two in 1991 and two in 1992. All of these volumes have been
edited by the same team as the Research Papers. Accordia published its
first monograph in 1992 (Ruth Whitehouse's Underground religion:
cult and culture in prehistoric Italy) and has just co-published with
the British School at Rome Radiocarbon dating and Italian prehistory,
edited by Robin Skeates & Ruth Whitehouse, the proceedings of a
conference on this topic held at the School in 1991 accompanied by a
gazetteer of all the Italian 14C dates on prehistoric archaeological
material.
Each of the three volumes of the Accordia Research Papers contains
eight papers, 19 of them in the field of archaeology, four in history,
and one in linguistics. Many papers are collaborative, linking British
and Italian scholars -- the 24 papers are the work of 28 British, 25
Italian and two scholars of other nationalities. Period coverage is
appropriately broad -- there are six papers on prehistory, five on
protohistory and Etruscan archaeology, six on Roman Italy, and four on
medieval Italy (the latter a reflection of the success of Archaeologia
Medievale in dominating the market, as it publishes much in English as
well as Italian). There are also three multi-period papers, the annual
reports of an Anglo-Italian collaborative project linking, in
particular, the Department of Mediterranean Studies and archaeologists
of the University of Padua, the Alto-Medio Polesine field survey. In
fact, 14 of the 24 papers have been written wholly or partly by
Department of Mediterranean Studies staff or their students, a dominance
by the 'home team' that is a common and perhaps inevitable
feature of many new journals, but a measure of the success of Accordia
in the future will be its ability to attract broader representation. In
addition to the annual reports of the Alto-Medio Polesine project, many
of the papers are Accordia lectures, and whilst the promise of
publication is an important strength for a major lecture series, some of
the lectures published in the Accordia Research Papers are inevitably
presentations of in-progress research published accessibly elsewhere.
Six of the eight papers of the first volume are based on Accordia
lectures held at QMC in 1988 and 1989. The paper by Ruth Whitehouse
(Caves and cult in neolithic southern Italy) was a precursor for the
ideas discussed at length in her book on the same topic published by
Accordia two years later, and the paper by Simon Stoddart (The political
landscape of Etruria), based on his Ph.D research on Etruscan
territoriality, develops ideas discussed briefly in his Etruscan Italy
book with Nigel Spivey published in 1990 by Batsford. There is a short
paper by Daniele Manacorda (the inaugural lecture of the Accordia
series) that is a useful summary in English of his major excavations in
the Crypta Balbi in Rome, a study by John Wilkins on Nation and language
in ancient Italy: problems of the linguistic evidence (or
'linguistic evidence' as the headers unfortunately put it!) --
and an Accordia lecture by Richard Hedges on British archaeologists in
Italy (Glyn Daniel, the Great Divide, and the British contribution to
Italian archaeology). The most substantial paper of the volume is the
translation into English of an important pottery report by Hugo Blake
& Francesco Aguzzi (Eleventh century Islamic pottery at Pavia, north
Italy: the Torre Civica bacini) published a year earlier in Italian in a
less accessible venue, a book on Pavia published by an Italian bank.
The second volume has two papers summarizing aspects of unpublished
theses, by Keri Brown (A passion for excavation: labour requirements and
possible functions of the 'villaggi trincerati' of the
Tavoliere, Apulia), and Edward Herring (Socio-political change in the
south Italian and classical periods: an application of the peer polity
interaction model). There are two papers based on Accordia lectures
given in 1990, one written with typical gusto by Nigel Spivey on The
power of women in Etruscan society, and an assessment of Pompey's
character and representation in the ancient sources by Michael Edwards,
together with a paper by Ross Balzaretti publishing his post-doctoral
work during the tenure of a British School at Rome scholarship -- for
which PBSR would have been the expected venue -- on History, archaeology
and early medieval urbanism: the north Italian debate. The main paper is
an excellent report by David Gadd & Bryan Ward-Perkins summarizing
in English the spectacular results of excavations of waterlogged
medieval remains in Ferrara in advance of their full publication in
monograph form in Italian.
The third volume includes a useful study of unpublished collections
of prehistoric stone axes and their implications for models of exchange
(Robert Leighton), a stimulating paper on gender representation and
interpretation in Italian prehistory by Ruth Whitehouse, a comparison of
pottery chronologies and 14C dates for the South Italian Iron Age
(Edward Herring), and a rigorous analysis (originally an MA
dissertation, remarkably) by M. Carmen Vida Navarro of the artefactual and biological evidence for gender in the Pontecagnano iron age
cemetery. Maurizio Harari discusses aspects of Etruscan art in relation
to Greek art, there is a substantial paper developed from an Accordia
lecture by Francesca Longo Auricchio on The contribution made by the
Herculaneum Papyri to our knowledge of Epicurean philosophy, and a study
by Thomas Wiedemann of Descent, succession-lists and genealogies in
classical culture.
The four volumes of papers from the Fourth Conference of Italian
Archaeology are the best produced of the Italian Archaeology conference
series, and their 66 papers are a convincing demonstration of the high
level of archaeological research activity in Italy, including a number
of collaborative Anglo-Italian field projects. The first two volumes are
subtitled The archaeology of power, with the papers organized into five
sub-themes: The spatial organisation of power and Power and ideology in
volume 1, and Status of individuals, Trade and exchange and Social
change in volume 2. The second two volumes are sub-titled New
developments, the papers divided under sub-themes of Methodological and
scientific developments, Multi-period studies and Prehistory in volume 3
and The classical period and The post-Roman period in volume 4.
Inevitably many of the papers could as easily fit under different
sub-themes from the one where they have been placed. Of the 66 papers,
15 are on prehistory, 14 on protohistory and Etruscan archaeology, 18 on
the classical period, 12 on medieval archaeology, and 7 (all field
surveys) are multi-period. 55 of the 84 authors are Italian and 20
British, the rest being Dutch (3), American (2), Australian (1),
Brazilian (1), French (1) and German (1). The dominance of Italian and
British speakers at the conference is a reflection of the very strong
Anglo-Italian research network that has built up over the years -- there
are archaeologists from most of the northern EU countries currently
working in Italy, but without the diversity of regional, period and
discipline interests that underpins the work of British archaeologists
in Italy.
It is invidious to pick out particular papers of the 66, but the
range of approaches and level of activity by British and Italian
individual scholars and teams are very striking. For example, inferences
about social relations in the Archaeology of power volumes are drawn
variously from inter-site and intra-site variability discerned in
Neolithic and Bronze Age caves (Whitehouse) and open settlements (Brown;
Tusa), Bronze Age nuraghi (Trump), Iron Age hillforts (Cazella; Attema)
and cemeteries (Domanico & Miari; De Santis; Suano; Zifferaro),
Etruscan ritual sites (Edlund-Berry), classical cities (Laurence),
medieval fortification systems (Andrews; Christie) and churches
(Maccabruni), and ploughzone survey data (De Guio; Perkins; Potter), as
well as from Sardinian bronzes (Tronchetti), Etruscan metalwork
(Giardino, Belerdelli and Malizia), archaic pottery (Beijer) and
metalwork (Kohler & Naso), and Roman inscriptions (Lomas),
architectural reliefs (Strazzulla) and silverwork (Painter). Trade and
exchange are approached in volume 2 through studies of Iron Age
metalwork (Pearce; Bartoloni) and pottery (Herring) and Roman pottery
(Fontana), and in volume 3 by provenance studies of obsidian (Bigazzi,
Meloni, Oddone & Radi), polished axes (Leighton & Dixon),
Neolithic pottery (Skeates) and metalwork (Caneva & Giardino), and
by medieval faunas (Clark). There are interim reports of new field
surveys near Rome (Enei; Arnoldus Huyzendveld, Gioia & Pascucci), in
the Rieti basin (Coccia & Mattingly), on the southern (Pearce,
Calandra & Diani) and northern (Tozzi & Harari) sides of the Po
valley, and in Friuli in the far northeast (Cassani), and the range of
new excavations reported briefly in volumes 3 and 4 likewise covers the
full chronological spread from Palaeolithic to medieval.
Ruth Whitehouse's Underground religion: cult and culture in
prehistoric Italy has already been reviewed in detail in ANTIQUITY (67
(1993): 686-7), and it suffices to say here that it is one of the two
most important monographs on Italian prehistory published in English in
recent years, alongside Anna-Maria Bietti-Sestieri's study of the
Osteria dell'Osa cemetery published in 1993 by Cambridge University
Press (reviewed in ANTIQUITY June 1994 (68: 448-51)). Radiocarbon dating
and Italian pre-history also deserves to be reviewed separately, but
again it fills an important gap and its gazetteer is likely to be a key
data base over the next decade.