Late Pliocene Oldowan excavations at Kanjera South, Kenya. (Special section).
Plummer, Thomas ; Ferraro, Joseph ; Ditchfield, Peter 等
The appearance of Oldowan sites c. 2.5 million years ago signals
one of the most important adaptive shifts in human evolution. Large
mammal butchery, stone artefact manufacture and novel transport and
discard behaviours led to the accumulation of the first recognized
archaeological debris. Although the earliest instances of these
behaviours are 2.5 million years ago, most of what we know about Oldowan
palaeoecology and behaviour is derived from localities more than half a
million years younger, particularly c. 1.8 million-year-old sites from
Bed I Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania (Potts 1988). Sites from Kanjera South,
Homa Peninsula, southwestern Kenya, yield dense concentrations of
artefacts in association with the oldest (c. 2.2 million years)
substantial sample of archaeological fauna known thus far from Africa.
This study is the first to use a wide range of traditional and
innovative techniques to investigate Oldowan hominin behaviour and site
formation processes before 2 million years ago.
The sedimentary sequence at Kanjera South is approximately 12 m
thick (FIGURE 1). It consists of six beds, from oldest to youngest KS-1
to KS-6 (Behrensmeyer et al. 1995; Ditchfield et al. 1999). The basal
KS-1 to KS-3 sands and silts, the target layers of our excavations, were
deposited by low aspect channels at the margin of a small lake or playa.
They exhibit weak to moderate pedogenesis. KS-4 clays were deposited
during a lake transgression while KS-5 and KS-6 sands and silts reflect
a return to fluvial deposition.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Excavations in 1996, 1997 and 2000 uncovered rich concentrations of
artefacts and fossils in KS-1 to KS-3. Two large excavations
(Excavations 1 and 2; 100 sq. m and 15 sq. m, respectively) and three
smaller ones (Excavations 5-7, each 4 sq. m) were placed along a 70-m
transect of outcrop (Plummer et al. 1999). While artefacts and fauna
were recovered in each of the excavations, object density was highest in
Excavations 1 and 2, suggesting that the concentrations in these sites
were above average background densities. At Excavation 1, artefacts were
found in association with a taxonomically diverse faunal assemblage in
KS-1 and KS-2 (FIGURE 2-4). At Excavation 2, Bed KS-3 yielded a complete
hippopotamus pelvis with five articulated vertebrae, a canine and two
ribs in tight spatial association with five flakes, possibly
representing a hippopotamus butchery site. Taxonomically diverse faunal
samples with associated artefacts were found below the hippopotamus
bones in KS-1 and KS-2.
[FIGURES 2-4 OMITTED]
Stable carbon isotopic values from palaeosol carbonates from the
archaeological layers are more strongly positive than any Miocene or
Pliocene East African samples, suggesting that hominin activities at
Kanjera South were carried out in an open (>75% [C.sub.4] grass)
setting (Plummer et al. 1999). A palaeocommunity incorporating large
tracts of secondary grassland (dry grasslands where factors such as
grazing impede woody growth) is suggested by high proportions of
alcelaphine antelopes and equids in the archeological fauna. In
contrast, faunal and isotopic evidence suggest that the earliest
archeological occurrences at Bed I Olduvai formed under much more wooded
conditions (Plummer & Bishop 1994; Sikes 1994). Hominin marrow
processing and carnivore damage to bone, as well as several artefact and
fossil conjoins, have been identified during preliminary laboratory
analysis of the Excavation I fauna. Small mammal hunting is suggested by
the relatively high proportion of size class 1 and 2 mammals, many of
which were immature (FIGURE 4). This contrasts with the Bed I Olduvai
sites, where medium (size class 3) mammals were the most common and are
thought to have been obtained largely through scavenging. Hominins at
Kanjera South utilized a wider variety of lithic raw materials than
found at most Oldowan sites, some of which (chert, quartz, quartzite)
must have been transported from outside the immediate vicinity of the
deposits since they are not present in the local clast population.
On-going research at Kanjera will refine our understanding of the
palaeoenvironmental setting, rigorously test the hypothesis of small
mammal hunting, assess hominin utilization and curation of artefacts by
raw material type and synthesize this information with research
elsewhere to reconstruct more completely the behavioural ecology of the
first archaeological hominins.
Acknowledgements. We respectfully thank the Office of the
President, Republic of Kenya, and M.G. Leakey and G. Abungu of the
National Museums of Kenya for permission and support in conducting the
Kanjera field and laboratory studies. The Kanjera excavations were
conducted through the cooperative agreement between the National Museums
of Kenya and the Smithsonian Institution. Funding from the L.S.B. Leakey
Foundation, the National Geographic Society, the National Science
Foundation and the Wenner-Gren Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
References
BEHRENSMEYER, A.K., R.B. POTTS, T. PLUMMER, L. TAUXE, N. OPDYKE
& T. JORSTAD. 1995. The Pleistocene locality of Kanjera, Western
Kenya: stratigraphy, chronology and paleoenvironments, Journal of Human
Evolution 29: 24774.
DITCHFIELD, P., J. HICKS, T. PLUMMER, L.C. BISHOP & R.B. POTTS.
1999. Current research on the late Pliocene and Pleistocene deposits
north of Homa Mountain, southwestern Kenya, Journal of Human Evolution
36: 123-50.
PLUMMER, T. & L.C. BISHOP. 1994. Hominid paleoecology at
Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania as indicated by antelope remains, Journal of
Human Evolution 27: 47-75.
PLUMMER, T., L.C. BISHOP, P. DITCHFIELD & J. HICKS. 1999.
Research on Late Pliocene Oldowan Sites at Kanjera South, Kenya, Journal
of Human Evolution 36: 151-70.
POTTS, R.B. 1988. Early hominid activities at Olduvai. New York
(NY): Aldine de Gruyter.
SIKES, N. 1994. Early hominid habitat preferences in East Africa:
paleosol carbon isotopic evidence, Journal of Human Evolution 27: 25-45.
RICHARD POTTS, Plummer, Department of Anthropology, Queens College,
CUNY, Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
[email protected] Ferraro, Department
of Anthropology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
[email protected]
Ditchfield, Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8
1RJ, England.
[email protected] Bishop, Biological & Earth
Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, England.
[email protected] Ports, Human Origins Program, Department of
Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560, USA. Potts.
[email protected]