New evidence for the origins of sedentism and rice domestication in the Lower Yangzi River, China.
Leping, Jiang ; Li, Liu
The Shangshan site
Shangshan is located at Qu'nancun in Pujiang county, Zhejiang
province. It is situated on a flat basin in the upper Puyang River, a
tributary of the Qiantang River (Figure 1). The site, 50m above sea
level, appears to be one of many small mounds in the basin, about 3-5m
higher than the surrounding ground; most of these mounds, however, have
been levelled to make agricultural lands in recent decades.
Archaeologists of the Zhejiang Institute of Archaeology discovered the
Shangshan site during a survey project in 2000.
Archaeologists excavated an area of 600[m.sup.2] in 2001. The
cultural deposits are about 80-100cm in thickness. The Neolithic
occupation, divided into five strata and measuring up to 60cm in
thickness, is superpositioned by a Shang-Zhong stratum (second-first
millennium BC) and a ploughed layer. Four AMS carbon (14) dates obtained
from charred plants tempered in the Neolithic pottery point to a period
around 10 000 cal. BP (Table 1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The site appears to have been a sedentary village. Within the
excavated area there were several dwellings and more than twenty ash
pits, round or nearly square in shape. The dwelling remains are composed
of rows of trenches or postholes. The earliest building, Building F2,
was unearthed from the lowest strata. It was a trench-style structure,
composed of a foundation surrounded by a U-shaped trench on the eastern,
northern and western sides. The better-preserved western trench measures
8.5m long, lm wide, and 10-26cm deep. The trenches on the three sides
were filled with soil in different colours. This type of structure seems
to be unique in the region.
Building F1, found in an upper stratum of the Neolithic period, is
a structure of 14m long and 6m wide, oriented along a
north-west-south-east axis. There are three parallel rows of postholes,
which are 27-50cm in diameter and 70-90cm in depth. In each row the
distance between postholes is about 1.6m, while the distance between
rows is 3m (Figure 2). Some of the postholes are constructed with small
stones on the side or base. Such a structural plan seems to resemble the
well-preserved pile-dwellings found at the Hemudu site (Zhejiang
Institute of Archaeology 2003), some 150km north-east of but 2000 years
later than Shangshan.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The Shangshan material assemblage includes stone balls, chipped
stone tools, large grinding slabs, rectangular-shaped stone pestle, and
red pottery tempered with charred plants. Due to the acid soil
conditions, most organic material has not been preserved.
The stone tool assemblage shows a transition from Palaeolithic to
Neolithic technologies. More than 100 stone balls, similar in size and
shape, were uncovered. They are made of river pebbles, 5-10cm in
diameter; while most show chipped and worn surfaces, some still have a
cortex. There are many chipped stone core and flake tools, showing
continuity of Palaeolithic traditions. Grinding slabs are 30-50cm in
width, with a concave surface, while pestles are made of pebbles, often
showing a convex surface on one side. These slab-and-pestle sets may
have been used together for processing food. Some perforated pebble
disks, which probably served as digging stick weights (Song & Zhou
1994), are made by hammer-dressing technique and worked from both sides.
The Neolithic technology is indicated by the presence of a few finely
polished stone axes and adzes, and whetstones (Figure 3).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Pottery appears to have been fired at a low temperature. The
fabrics are yellowish in colour, walls are thick, in some cases more
than 2cm in thickness, and the exterior surfaces seem to be covered with
red slip. Most pottery vessels are tempered with charred plants, but a
few with sand. Some potsherds show layers in cross-section, revealing
that slab-modelling technique was employed. Based on preliminary
analysis, 85 per cent of pottery vessels are flat-bottomed in shape,
while a few are round-bottomed and short ring-bottomed. The basin is the
dominant vessel form, with 30-50cm in rim diameter, 9.5-12.5cm in
height, and 10.5-24cm in base diameter; a ring-shaped loop is often
attached on the middle of the exterior vessel wall (Figure 4). Other
pottery forms include fu cooking vessels and guan jars. Most vessels
have plain surfaces, but a few are decorated with cord-marks and stamped
patterns. Cord-marks normally occur on the areas of loop, handle or
concave spots on vessel surface, which seem to be left out after the
larger part of the vessel was wiped to make a smooth surface. The
stamped patterns appear on basin rims.
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Pottery pastes are tempered with charred plants including rice
husks. Many plant remains in potsherds contain fan-shaped phytoliths
from rice stalks (Figure 5). A preliminary observation of the charred
rice husks in pottery fabrics suggests that the rice is shorter in
length but greater in width than wild rice (Figure 6), suggesting that
the Shangshan rice was probably already in an early stage of
domestication.
[FIGURES 5-6 OMITTED]
All previously discovered early Holocene sites, which yielded
pottery or rice remains dating to 10 000 years ago, are cave sites, such
as Yuchanyan in Hunan (Yuan 2002), Xianrendong and Diaotonghuan in
Jiangxi (Zhang 2002), and Zengpiyan in Guangxi (Institute of
Archaeology, CASS 2003). The Shangshan site is situated in the middle of
a flat basin, suggesting a new strategy of sedentary adaptation.
The material assemblage from Shangshan is also very similar to
those from other early Holocene sites in China, including slab-mould
techniques in pottery production, simply formed and low
temperature-fired pottery, perforated pebble disks, chipped stone tools,
and combinations of stone slabs and pestles. These material remains
suggest a subsistence mode relating to gathering and incipient
agriculture.
However, Shangshan shows cultural elements more advanced than those
cave sites. The construction of pile-dwellings established this
long-lasting architectural tradition in the Lower Yangzi River region.
The finely polished woodworking tools provide the earliest evidence for
ground stone tool technology associated with the development of
sedentism in open-air sites. The pottery tempered with charred plants is
the earliest example of this technology, as parallel examples did not
occur until some 1000 years later at Pengtoushan in the middle Yangzi
River region (Pei 1998).
Conclusion
The Yangzi River valley has been recognised as the area where rice
was first domesticated. In the 1970s, with the discoveries of several
rice-producing Neolithic sites dated to c. 7000 BE such as Hemudu,
Luojiajiao, Caoxieshan and Songze, many archaeologists suggested that
rice domestication first occurred in the Lower Yangzi River valley (Van
1982). In the 1990s, however, new finds of early rice remains dated to
10 000-8000 BP from Yuchanyan, Pengtoushan and Bashidang in Hunan led
archaeologists to switch their attentions to the Middle Yangzi River
region for the origins of rice domestication (Higham & Lu 1998; Pet
1998; Zhao 1998). The recent discovery of 10 000 year old rice remains
at Shangshan has renewed speculation about the area of earliest rice
domestication. It is likely, based on current evidence, that rice was
first domesticated in a broad area including both lower and middle
Yangzi River regions, and the beginning of rice cultivation was closely
associated with the emergence of sedentary villages with construction of
various types of dwellings.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Institute for Advanced Studies at La Trobe University for its generous support which made this collaborative project possible.
Received: 20 May 2005; Accepted: 14 July 2005
References
HIGHAM, C. & T.L.-D. Lu. 1998. The origins and dispersal of
rice cultivation. Antiquity 72: 867-77.
INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY, CASS. 2003. Guilin Zengpiyan. Beijing:
Wenwu Press.
PEI, A. 1998. Notes on new advancements and revelations in the
agricultural archaeology of early rice domestication in the Dongting
Lake region. Antiquity 72: 878-85.
SONG, Z. & G.X. ZHOU. 1994. Yuanshi juetubang shang de
chuankong zhongshi (The perforated weighting stones), in G.X Zhou, Y.
Zhang & X. Zhang (ed.) Zhongri Gurenlei yu Shiqian Wenhua Yuanyuan
Guanxi Guoji Xueshu Yantaohui Lunwenji (International Symposium
Relationship between Chinese and Japanese Ancient People and Prehistoric
Cultures): 254-62. Beijing: China International Radio Press.
YAN, W. 1982. Zhongguo Daozuo nongye de qiyuan (Origins of rice
cultivation in China). Nongye kaogu 1: 19-31,151.
YUAN, J. 2002. Rice and pottery 10 000 yrs. BP at Yuchanyan, Dao
county, Hunan province, in Y. Yasuda (ed.) The Origins of Pottery and
Agriculture: 157-66. New Delhi: Roll Books.
ZHANG, C. 2002. Early pottery and rice phytolith remains from
Xianrendong and Diaotonghuan sites, Wannian, Jiangxi province, in
Yoshinori Yasuda (ed.) The Origins of Pottery and Agriculture: 185-92.
New Delhi: Roli Books.
ZHAO, Z. 1998. The middle Yangtze region in China is one place
where rice was domesticated: phytolith evidence from the Diaotonghuan
cave, northern Jiangxi. Antiquity 72: 885-97.
ZHEJIANG INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY. 2003. Hemudu. Beijing: Wenwu
Press.
Leping Jiang (1) & Li Liu (2)
(1) Zhejiang Institute of Archaeology, China
(2) La Trobe University, Australia (Email:
[email protected])
Table 1. Carbon 14 dates from the Shangshan site
Context
of Material [sup.14]C Date BP
Sample# sample dated ([T.sub.1/2] = 5568)
BA02235 House Pottery 8740 [+ or -] 110
F2 temper
BA02236 Pit H31 Pottery 9610 [+ or -] 160
temper
BA02237 Stratum (6) Pottery 8620 [+ or -] 160
temper
BK02238 Stratum (3) Pottery 8050 [+ or -] 110
temper
Cal. BC Date
Sample# l[sigma] (68.2%) 2[sigma] (95.4%) Lab
BA02235 7960 (68.2%) 8250 (95.4%) Peking
7600 7550 University
BA02236 9220 (67.1%) 9400 (95.4%) Peking
8790 8450 University
BA02237 7950 (67.2%) 8250 (95.4%) Peking
7520 7300 University
BK02238 7180 (3.5%) 7350 (95.4%) Peking
7150 6660 University
7140 (61.6%)
6800
6790 (3.1%)
6750