首页    期刊浏览 2025年01月19日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Are baby-boomers healthy enough to keep working? Health as a mediator of extended labour force participation.
  • 作者:Buckley, Jennifer ; O'Dwyer, Lisel ; Tucker, Graeme
  • 期刊名称:Australian Journal of Social Issues
  • 印刷版ISSN:0157-6321
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 期号:December
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Australian Council of Social Service
  • 摘要:Structural ageing of Australia's population means that baby-boomers (born 1946-65) are an important group for policy. They form an unusually large cohort; their socio-demographic characteristics differ substantially from previous generations; and the socio-economic context in which they will age has altered significantly over recent decades (Buckley 2008).
  • 关键词:Aged;Aging;Aging (Biology);Baby boom generation;Elderly workers;Labor force;Labor supply;Social participation

Are baby-boomers healthy enough to keep working? Health as a mediator of extended labour force participation.


Buckley, Jennifer ; O'Dwyer, Lisel ; Tucker, Graeme 等


Introduction

Structural ageing of Australia's population means that baby-boomers (born 1946-65) are an important group for policy. They form an unusually large cohort; their socio-demographic characteristics differ substantially from previous generations; and the socio-economic context in which they will age has altered significantly over recent decades (Buckley 2008).

One important impact of structural ageing is a reduction in forecast economic growth (Treasury 2010: ix). This change will stretch fiscal capacity, as expenditure related to aged care, pension provision and health will rise as the population ages (Productivity Commission 2005: xii). Interventions to manage these pressures stem from the three Ps: population, productivity and participation (Productivity Commission 2005; Treasury 2010). Increasing total labour participation rates is seen as critical as the aged dependency ratio will fall from 5:1 today to a projected 2.7:1 in 2050 (Treasury 2010: viii), due to fewer new entrants to the labour market and more workers aged 55 and over who are more likely to exit the work force or work part-time (Treasury 2010a: 11; Access Economics 2001).

The participation component of the three Ps framework involves re-engaging workers with low or no labour force participation and implementing policies to encourage older workers to delay their exit from the workforce and facilitate part-time work in retirement (Productivity Commission 2005; Treasury 2010). In terms of overall participation rates, a large 10 percentage point increase in the participation rate of male workers aged 55 years and over would yield at most a 2 percentage point increase in overall participation (Treasury 2002: 28). However, this increase would still have significant fiscal benefits in relation to government expenditure on age pensions and private retirement incomes (Treasury 2002; Casey et al. 2003: 11; Productivity Commission 2005). In addition, as work has been shown to offer both health and social benefits, extended workforce participation has the potential to improve health outcomes through facilitating active engagement, thus reducing government health expenditure and contributing to better quality of life for older people (Aquino et al. 1996; Dave et al. 2008).

The baby-boomer cohort currently forms the core of the mature age workforce; yet most work-related research focuses on older workers per se and does not differentiate between baby-boomers and preceding cohorts. The terms 'baby-boomers', 'mid-life', 'mature' and 'older' are sometimes used synonymously. This means that many studies are interpreted as representing baby-boomers, even when the study samples do not fit within conventionally defined dates for the Australian baby boom (1946-1965; 1946-1961). (1)

Accurate definition of cohorts and age groups is important, as factors influencing health, lifestyle choices, workability and work decisions of individuals from different cohorts vary according to the social context prevailing when they were born and as they matured (Ryder 1997). Cohort effects are particularly important given the dramatic changes in work participation by age since 1970. Table 1 shows significant falls in male participation and substantial increases for females in all older age groups. This reflects both changing socioeconomic conditions and the rise of the dual income household as well as improved opportunities for women in employment and education since the 1970s. A similar trend is evident in the United States (Poulos & Nightingale 1997: 16).

Research on the health of older Australians has focused on disability and disease prevalence and the 'burden' on the health system (AIHW 2006; Adams et al. 2008; Atlantis et al. 2009) while research on extending labour participation focuses on re-skilling, re-training, and workplace management (Dawe 2009; Lawton Smith 2009; De Luna et al. 2010). However, little Australian research examines the relationship between health and workforce participation in older workers. In addition, most of the data sets available to Australian researchers use self-report measures of chronic conditions and few contain clinically measured data (Gruszin & Szuster 2010). The effect of health on labour force participation has generally been assessed using summary health indicators such as self-rated health (Maurer et al. 2007), or by examining the impact of a single chronic condition such as diabetes (Brown et al. 2005) or mental health conditions (Butterworth et al. 2006). Relatively few Australian studies have compared the effects of different chronic conditions on labour force participation or examined the effect of multiple conditions.

This paper explores associations between health and employment status in a sample of South Australian baby-boomers. The aim is to provide insights into how baby-boomers' health status might mediate the success of work extension policies. This will provide a health perspective for work-related policies designed to retain or re-engage mature age workers. However, as health and work are both embedded in a social context we also examine how social change has influenced the labour force participation of baby-boomers and how this varies within the cohort. We address the following research questions:

* How does labour participation vary within the baby-boomer cohort and what are the factors associated with different levels of participation?

* What are the associations between health and employment status and do these vary by socio-demographic characteristics?

Literature review

Social change, policy change and labour market participation

As different age cohorts have experienced social, economic and political changes at different stages in their life course, labour market participation is also likely to vary by cohort. Although there is a substantial literature on the workforce participation of mature age workers, research describing patterns of labour force participation within the baby-boomer cohort is sparse. One exception is NATSEM's study which used HILDA data to show that men were more likely to be in full-time work and women to work part-time, although in the oldest subgroup of baby-boomers (aged 60-64) gender differences diminished, with part-time work becoming more common for men nearing retirement (Gong & McNamara 2011). Just over a third of all baby-boomers worked a standard week (35-40 hours) but men were more likely to work long paid hours (50 or more), while women were more likely to work fewer paid hours.

Poor health and labour market participation of ageing baby-boomers

Improvements in population health status are often cited to justify increasing the age for receiving the Age Pension and superannuation. However, assumptions that baby-boomers will have better health than their predecessors are generally based on mortality data and longer life expectancies (McDonald 2011: 34) rather than on empirical evidence of actual health status.

There is no consistent Australian evidence of either the compression or expansion of morbidity. Less severe disability has expanded slightly (AIHW 2006; Mathers 2007) while Schofield and colleagues (2007) used Australian National Health Survey (NHS) data to show that the proportion of persons aged 40-64 years reporting five or more long-term conditions has increased from 25 to 32 per cent between 1995 and 2005. Atlantis and colleagues (2009) reported significant increases in the prevalence of diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure for those aged 60 and over between 1989-90 and 2004-05. A third study comparing persons aged 53-62 in the 1989-90 NHS with baby-boomers aged 53-62 in the 2008-09 NHS found that the proportion of baby-boomers with obesity, diabetes, hearing loss, multiple conditions, and asthma was at least double that of their predecessors, while there were also substantial increases in arthritis, migraine, back problems, high cholesterol and alcohol risk (Buckley 2012).

Analyses of the 2001 and 2004-05 NHS (Zhang et al. 2009), and Wave 1 HILDA Survey data (Cai & Kalb 2009) indicated that the impact of poor health on labour participation was stronger for workers aged 50 or more than for younger workers. Not surprisingly, the impact of health on labour participation was often much stronger for those with more than one condition (Schofield et al. 2007; Schofield et al. 2008; Park 2010). Zhang and colleagues (2009) found that, overall, the negative effects Of chronic conditions on labour force participation were more significant for males than females and that this was particularly the case for mental health conditions. Conversely, several studies have found the effect Of poor self-rated health (SRH) on labour force participation to be greater for women than men (Schofield et al. 2007; Cai & Cong 2009; Gilfillan & Andrews 2010). Due to the use of different health indicators and methods, it is difficult to compare findings regarding the impact of chronic conditions on labour force participation

Retirement decisions and transitions

The decision to retire or to continue in the workforce is influenced by a wide range of factors such as caring responsibilities, financial status, health, job satisfaction, gender, the labour force environment, lifestyle aspirations, government policy and the overall economic context (Quine et al. 2006; Everingham et al. 2007). Factors influencing the retirement decision vary by socio-economic status, which is correlated with the capacity to accumulate financial resources for retirement. Occupational type and work conditions contribute to factors which have a more direct impact on the retirement decision, such as job satisfaction, financial need and work/life stress (Knox 2003; Quine et al. 2006). Those with more neutral feelings about their work may choose to retire simply because they want more leisure and personal time (Onyx & Baker 2006).

Although socioeconomic status (SES) is one way of framing the retirement decision making process, Knox (2003) found that income alone had little impact on exit decisions. Discounting the impact of external factors, such as caring responsibilities, health problems, and preferences of spouses, a synthesis of the literature suggests that the retirement decisions of high income individuals who can afford to retire are likely to be based on whether anticipated satisfaction from increased leisure in retirement will exceed current job satisfaction. By contrast, low SES individuals' work exit decisions are more likely to be influenced by financial necessity than by choice (Quine et al. 2006; Everingham et al. 2007).

In the 1980s and 1990s, retirement was used as a mechanism to alleviate pressure on the labour market and facilitate the transfer of jobs across generations (Cornman & Kingson 1996). The comparatively lower participation levels of older male baby-boomers, when compared to those in the same age groups in 1970, can partly be traced to this policy (Jackson et al. 2006: 316). Many of the incentives for early retirement have been removed or are being reviewed as part of the Australian Government' strategies to increase participation in older workers (Productivity Commission 2005; Commonwealth of Australia 2008; 2009). The superannuation preservation age is being progressively increased to 60 years; payments primarily directed at mature age recipients, such as Widows Allowance and Mature Age Allowance have been phased out; and the eligibility criteria for the Disability Pension has been tightened (Carson & Kerr 2003; ABS 2010). In addition, eligibility for the Age Pension is being progressively increased to 67 years for both men and women (Commonwealth of Australia 2009).

Although women's labour force participation has risen dramatically in recent decades, interruptions caused by childbirth and other family commitments make it difficult for women to secure attractive part-time work opportunities in later life (Gilfillan & Andrews 2010). There is substantial evidence indicating that education is a strong mediator of workforce participation in older women (Quine et al. 2006; Everingham et al. 2607, Gilfillan & Andrews 2010), with better educated women likely to stay in the workforce longer even if they have caring responsibilities (Warner-Smith et al. 2006). Financial need (including the need to save for retirement) also drives many older women to continue working, especially for divorced women or single parents.

Poor health and retirement

The overall effect of poor health is to reduce labour force participation, but it also precipitates early retirement. The most commonly cited reason for retirement in the 45-54 age-group according to the 2011 ABS Retirement and Retirement Intentions Survey was ill-health/disability (men, 56 per cent; women, 28 per cent) (ABS 2011). Although the primary reason given for retirement in the 55-64 age group was access to retirement funds (48 per cent men; 33 per cent women), the proportion citing ill health/disability (23 per cent men; 19 per cent women) is still substantial. In addition, the 'access to retirement funds' option simply tells us that those ticking this option retired because they could, but it does not provide information about the factors which influenced this decision.

Using cross-sectional data from the ABS 2003 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers, Schofield and colleagues (2008. 448) found that 45.6 per cent of respondents aged 45-64 years who were not in the workforce, had left due to a chronic health condition while Cai and Kalb (2004: 13) used HILDA data to show that 39 per cent of men aged 50-64 and 21 percent of women aged 50-60 who were not employed, had ceased their last job due to their own illness or disability.

Only Zhang and colleagues (2009) included mental health as a chronic condition variable despite reports of an increase in prevalence of high psychological distress in the Australian population (AIHW 2008). This is an interesting omission, particularly as there is evidence to indicate that mental health conditions tend to co-occur with other chronic conditions (AIHW 2008, 2010; Holden et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2009: 101). This suggests that the increase in multi-morbidity consequent on an ageing population is likely to be accompanied by an increase in psychological distress, which also has implications for an ageing workforce.

The impact of the work environment on health

Although work generally has a beneficial effect on health (Price et al. 2002; Winefield et al. 2002) it can also contribute to stress, anxiety or depression, particularly where the workplace environment is characterised by stressors such as high demand, low control, and poor supervisor or co-worker support (Michie & Williams 2003; Skinner & Pocock 2008), with work environment stressors potentially leading to a premature departure from the workforce (Butterworth et al. 2006; Park 2010). Equally, it is well recognised that long work hours (48 or more) are associated with more work-life conflict, poorer health and negative impacts on social relationships (Caruso 2006; Pocock 2006). In addition, the impact of the work environment on health has been shown to differ by gender. Park (2010) found that for women, job strain (high demand/low control) was a significant predictor of early retirement, while for men, supervisor support in the workplace was more important.

Data and methodology

We draw on data from the North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), a population based biomedical cohort study of a representative cross section of urban-based adults (18-90 years old) (Grant et al. 2006; 2009). A key strength of this dataset is that it is based on medically and clinically diagnosed conditions rather than self-reported data. The conceptual framework of the NWAHS and the methods of selection have been described previously (Grant et al. 2006).

The analysis of variations in labour force participation within the cohort (Research question 1), and of the associations between health and employment status (Research question 2), is based on a sample of baby-boomers (1946-1965) drawn from Stage 2 (2004-06) of the NWAHS. Stage 2 included clinical follow-up visits and additional surveys, and was conducted between 2004 and 2006 (n=3,206; 79 per cent), with baby-boomers constituting 36.8 per cent of the sample (n=1,179). As previous research (Buckley 2011) shows that there are substantial health and socio-demographic differences between older (1946-1955) and younger (1956-1965) baby-boomers, our initial bivariate analyses were conducted separately for each of these two groups. In 2007 when the employment data was collected, older boomers were aged 52-61 and younger boomers were aged 42-51. We also examined the data by gender overall and, in some instances, within both older and younger baby-boomer sub-cohorts.

Variations in the level of labour force participation were assessed through employment status (full-time; part-time; casual; unemployed; retired; home duties; unable to work) and hours per week in paid work. 'Casual' workers may work full-time or part-time but do not have paid leave entitlements. The 'unable to work' category does not specify why the respondent was unable to work; hence identification with this category does not necessarily imply illness but could, for example, also relate to caring responsibilities. Variables used to assess the socio-economic characteristics associated with different levels of labour participation are listed in Table 4. The independent variables used to assess associations between health and employment status included: self-rated health (fair-poor; good-excellent); clinically measured and/or doctor-diagnosed chronic conditions; and multiple morbidity. Parameters for the chronic conditions used in this analysis are included in Appendix 1. Several of the conditions have been designated national health priority areas due to their significant contribution to the national burden of disease (AIHW 2010). Dependent variables included employment status and whether respondents were in the labour force (ILF) or not in the labour force (NILF).

Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) versions 15 and 17, and Pearson's chi-square test was used to determine statistically significant differences. The significance level for hypothesis tests was set at five per cent. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to test for associations between labour force participation and chronic conditions, and socio-demographic characteristics. Models were fitted using backward elimination of non-significant variables. Based on the bivariate analyses, we considered the following variables for inclusion in the model: income, pension status, age group or cohort, sex, living arrangements, educational attainment, marital status, country of birth and housing tenure. Chronic conditions considered for inclusion were: depression, arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, chronic kidney disease, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).

Income, pension status, chronic kidney disease and asthma were not included in the model. Most of the variations in income and pension status are explained by labour force participation; they are primarily consequences and not indicators of labour force participation and so were excluded from the model. Chronic kidney disease and asthma were excluded as they had a significance probability greater than .25 and hence did not meet the requirements set out by Hosmer and Lemeshow (2000).

We checked the effect of using cohort (1946-1945 and 1956-1965), five year age groups, and five year birth cohorts, as alternative predictors in the model. Using Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC) (Burnham & Anderson 2004), the best model was identified as the model containing five year age groups. As age was not linear in the logit, it could not be included in the model as a continuous predictor and was therefore included in the model as a categorical variable.

All relevant two way interactions were included in the model, and again, predictors were culled using backward elimination of non-significant terms.

Results

Research Question 1--labour force participation

Table 2 sets out the employment status of males and females in each baby boomer age cohort. It can be seen that older boomers (1946-1955) were less likely to be working full-time and were more likely to be retired, irrespective of gender. However, only older males were significantly more likely to be in the unable to work category. Older boomer males also approached significance for being more likely to be in part-time employment compared to younger boomer males (p =.055).

Table 3 shows that just over one-third of all baby-boomers worked a standard week (35-40 hours). Not unexpectedly, females worked far fewer paid hours than males, with only 14.7 per cent working more than 40 hours per week (Table 3). However, there was little difference in the hours worked by each cohort and although about five per cent more of the younger cohort worked between 41-49 hours, the proportion working extra long hours (50 or more per week) was substantial for both age cohorts (17 per cent). Extra long hours were primarily worked by males (27 per cent) rather than females (6.5 per cent).

Table 4 sets out the socio-economic characteristics associated with different employment categories in older workers and shows a distinct trend for social risk factors to increase in tandem with reduced attachment to the workforce. Not surprisingly, both full-time and part-time work are associated with more supportive living arrangements (marriage, family with children) and more resources in terms of education and income. Social disadvantage was most strongly associated with being casual, unemployed or unable to work, with the indicators of disadvantage increasing in that order. The majority of casual workers were female and had only a secondary education. Casual workers were the least disadvantaged of these three subgroups but were still significantly more likely than full-time or part-time workers to be renting and on a low income.

Those who were unemployed or unable to work were more likely than full-time or part-time workers to: live alone; be single; have an income of less than $20,000; be on a government pension; and to rent their house.

The results suggest respondents in casual employment and those who were unemployed or unable to work experienced both long term and multiple disadvantage, with more of these respondents in rental housing, with low levels of social support, and low incomes. The comparatively small numbers in these categories mean that results from more fine grained analysis cannot be regarded as definitive; however, bivariate analysis of unpublished NWAHS data does suggest that the degree of disadvantage associated with these employment categories is likely to be mediated by gender.

Table 4 shows that the majority of respondents in the home duties category were in the 1956-1965 age cohort and, as would be expected, the majority were female. Respondents in this category were more likely to have a secondary education at most and the proportion with a certificate/diploma or tertiary education was substantially smaller than for full-time or part-time workers. Figure 1 shows the distinct impact of education on employment patterns for women, with the proportion of women in the home duties category decreasing as education levels rise. A substantially higher proportion of tertiary educated women were employed full-time, with this particularly evident for older (1946-55) baby-boomer women who may well have reached the empty nest stage.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Figure 2 shows that these trends are largely confirmed by Census data. While there are some differences between Census and NWAHS data in relation to levels of education and full-time and part-time employment, the relationship between education and home duties is comparable.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Around 15 per cent of older boomers (1946-1955) had retired but there were virtually no retirees in the younger (1956-1965) age group. ABS Retirement Survey data collected in 2006-2007 (ABS 2008) shows a similar trend.

The majority of retirees from the NWAHS were married and were more likely to be living with a partner only and less likely to be living in a family with children, reflecting the fact that nearly all of the retired were earlier born baby-boomers (1946-1955) and hence more likely to have reached the empty nest stage. The retired were more likely to have an income of less than $20,000 per annum and 39.5 per cent were in receipt of some sort of government pension. However, they were substantially more likely to own their home outright, with this being the case for 82.9 per cent of this group (Table 4).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Research Question 2

Figure 3 shows the percentage of baby-boomers in each employment category (y axis) and the proportion in each category with either good-excellent or fair-poor self-rated health (SRH) (x axis). Apart from the home duties category, SRH tends to fall as work force attachment decreases, with the full-time employed most likely to have good-excellent SRH and those with an employment status of 'retired' or 'unable to work' most likely to have fair-poor SRH.

Around 20 per cent of respondents had fair-poor SRH and the majority of these (68.7 per cent) were in the labour force. However, the proportion of younger (1956-1965) baby-boomers with fair-poor SRH in the labour force (82 per cent) was substantially higher than the proportion of older (1946-1955) boomers (55.1 per cent). Figure 4 shows that in both age cohorts those with fair-poor SRH were less likely than those with good-excellent SRH to be in the labour force. For the 1946-1955 age cohort this did not vary by gender, however, in the younger cohort, males with fair-poor SRH were significantly more likely than females to be in the labour force (p=.008) (NWAHS 2011).

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Analysis of the whole cohort shows that there were no significant differences in employment status for respondents with asthma or kidney disease (Table 5). However, diabetes, arthritis, COPD, poor self rated health (SRH), and multiple conditions were all significantly associated with being retired or unable to work. Arthritis was also significantly associated with casual employment while those who were depressed were significantly more likely to be unemployed, casual, or unable to work.

When adjusted for sex, the odds of not being in the labour force (NILF) for older baby-boomers (1946-1955) were significantly higher for those who had COPD, depression, diabetes and arthritis but not for those with asthma, cardiovascular disease or kidney disease (Table 6). However, for the younger cohort (1956-1965), the odds of being out of the labour force were only significantly greater for those with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and COPD.

When adjusted for age, the odds of not being in the labour force were significantly higher for both males and females who had COPD, while the odds for those with depression or arthritis were only significantly higher for males, and the odds for those with diabetes were only significantly higher for females.

The results from the logistic regression (Table 8) indicate that workforce participation in the baby-boomer cohort was positively associated with being younger, male, having a tertiary education, and paying off a mortgage. Chronic conditions negatively associated with workforce participation were diabetes and COPD. We also tested for two-way interactions between sex and age and the chronic conditions, but the only interaction of significance was between sex and arthritis. The relationship between arthritis and non-participation in the workforce is stronger for males than females.

Discussion

Variations in baby-boomers' labour force participation Our analysis of workforce participation shows that just over one-quarter of baby-boomers are marginally attached or not attached to the workforce. Consistent with findings from NATSEM (Gong & McNamara 2011), we found that only around one-third of employed baby-boomers worked a standard week (35-40 hours) and that extra long hours (50 or more) were worked by nearly 30 per cent of males, irrespective of age sub-cohort. Consistent with the literature on retirement intentions and decisions (Knox 2003; Jackson et al. 2006; Onyx & Baker 2006; Quine et al. 2006; Everingham et al. 2007), the results presented in Table 6 suggest that early retirees can be broadly divided into two main subgroups, those who have reasonable means and choose to retire early and those who may not be particularly well off and retire involuntarily. Approximately a quarter of retirees had a household income of $60,000 or more and, in line with Onyx and Baker (2006), the desire for increased leisure may well have been a key factor in their retirement decision. However, around half of the retirees had a household income of $40,000 or less and about 40 per cent were in receipt of a government pension, suggesting that the labour force exits of individuals in this group were involuntary. This view is supported by the fact that respondents were 61 or younger at the time of the survey, and hence were not eligible for an Age Pension. Consequently, those on a government pension must have been in receipt of some other form of assistance such as a Disability Pension, Mature Age Allowance or Carer's Payment.

Variations in associations between health status and labour force participation

Consistent with previous research we found a strong association between poor health and reduced labour force participation. In line with Cai and Kalb (2009) and Zhang (2009) we found this association to be stronger for older baby-boomers (52-61 years).

The role of poor health in triggering an individual's exit from the labour force is likely to be mediated by a wide range of inter-related structural and individual level factors (Brown & Vickerstaff 2011: 531-532). Not surprisingly, age is a key factor, with our findings consistent with previous studies, such as AIHW (2009) and NATSEM (Gong & McNamara 2011), which show a stronger association between poor health and workforce exits for older (1946-1955) baby-boomers than for younger (1956-1965) baby-boomers. The much higher labour force participation of younger baby-boomers with fair-poor SRH is likely to be influenced by two factors. First, most of the chronic conditions examined in this study are age related and occur with increasing frequency and severity as individuals grow older (AIHW 2010: 287). Therefore, younger baby-boomers are likely to be in the early stages of chronic disease and may find work easier to manage than those with more advanced conditions. Second, younger baby-boomers may have greater motivation to stay in the workforce despite ill health for several reasons: they have bad less time to accumulate the assets necessary for a comfortable retirement (Buckley 2011: 229); they are less likely to be able to access an alternative income such as superannuation (Kelly 2009); and they are more likely to have children living at home (NWAHS 2011).

Limitations and future research

This study has a number of limitations. First, the relatively small cell sizes in the casual, unemployed, and unable to work categories makes a detailed and robust analysis of gender differences within these groups difficult. Second, the cross-sectional nature of the study means that causality cannot be determined. However, with the exception of depression, being out of the workforce is unlikely to be the cause of the chronic conditions examined in this study. Finally, we do not know from the available data why people are unable to work. The reasons may include illness, disability or caring responsibilities.

Given that between 10 and 20 per cent of baby-boomers suffer from either depression and/or some other form of psychological distress or mental illness (Buckley 2011: 414), it will be important for future research to explore the causal linkages between mental health conditions and work, and how factors such as gender, psychological make-up and work and home environments might mediate these linkages. Identifying gender differences in the underlying causes of depression could usefully inform initiatives aimed at reducing depression in older workers, given the finding that males not in the labour force were more likely to be depressed than females not in the labour force and females in the labour force were more likely to be depressed than males in the labour force. This is particularly the case if the cause of depression is linked to having or not having work, or is linked to the way in which work is experienced, or to issues associated with the work-home interface. Although a cross-sectional design means that we cannot establish the causal direction between depression and work, Winefield (1995: 196) points out that causality is likely to work both ways; some individuals are likely to become unemployed because they are anxious or depressed while others may become psychologically distressed as a consequence of losing their job. Previous research has found the financial stress and social exclusion associated with precarious employment and unemployment to be key contributing factors to depression (Winefield 1995: 187; Price et al. 2002). This resonates with our data which shows that respondents in casual work, or who were unemployed, experienced greater disadvantage than those in secure employment, and they were also more likely to be depressed.

Implications

As the health of the current cohort of older workers appears to be worse than that of previous cohorts, the practicality of enforcing participation through policies which make it difficult to retire is questionable. Calls to further increase the access age for the Age Pension and superannuation to age 70 (Daley et al. 2012: 53) may well cause hardship and possibly contribute to poorer health in the long term.

Baby-boomers' exits from the labour force due to ill health, prior to reaching Aged Pension eligibility age of 65, have already begun to occur. A large proportion (44.9 per cent) of those who rated their own health as fair or poor in the cohort born between 1946 and 1955 are not in the labour force, equating to 9.9 per cent of this group. However, as the odds of not being in the labour force for those with poor health increases with age, and the health of younger boomers appears to be on a similar trajectory to that of their older counterparts (Buckley 2011: 192), it is reasonable to expect that a similar proportion of the younger age cohort will also leave the labour force over the next decade.

Poor health in older workers and their consequent reduced participation levels means that the expected fiscal benefits in relation to government expenditure on age pensions, and in relation to private retirement incomes, may be less than anticipated (Treasury 2002; Productivity Commission 2005). The direct costs to the community are also considerable, with Schofield and colleagues estimating that reduced labour participation due to poor health reduces GDP by around $12 billion per annum (Schofield et al. 2008). Individuals who retire involuntarily due to poor health are also likely to have poorer outcomes in retirement (Quine et al. 2007) and have had less opportunity to accumulate the financial assets that cushion this stage of life.

An obvious policy implication arising from this study is the need to use both primary and secondary prevention strategies to improve health in older workers. Early diagnosis of chronic conditions should be implemented and/ or maintained because timely care reduces morbidity and improves function. For secondary prevention it will be important to prioritise the development and uptake of effective self-management programmes to minimise the impact of chronic conditions. Given the substantial proportion of baby-boomers with fair-poor health who continue to work, it: will be important to develop both primary and secondary prevention programmes specifically for the workplace, as this is a prime site for intervention. Workplace health initiatives would be further facilitated by engaging outside expertise such as employer representative organisations and allied health organisations. Overall, there is a need to increase health literacy in this cohort as ABS data (2006) show this to be lower in baby-boomers than in younger age groups.

Individual level strategies, such as diet and physical activity interventions for weight loss; and cognitive behavioural therapy and/or drug treatments for depression, will continue to be important (Schofield et al. 2008: 449-450). We must also refine our knowledge of workplace factors which influence health, and develop strategies which minimise their negative effects and enhance their positive effects. For example, certain workplace conditions, such as shift work, weekend work and variable work schedules, have been shown to have a detrimental impact on health while others, such as flexible work conditions, have a positive effect (Costa et al. 2006; Magee et al. 2010). Flexible work conditions, such as working from home and flexible hours, may be particularly important in enabling chronically ill older workers to maintain their participation and avoid further deterioration in their health. Future research and future health initiatives must account for variations in work strain, work-family conflict and work-life imbalance, and in health status and early exits, by age and gender (Pocock et al. 2007; Park 2010; Buckley 2011).

Given the significant impact that chronic disease has on labour participation and productivity (Schofield et al. 2008; AIHW 2009), and that chronic disease is associated with age, it is in employers' interest to create and maintain a healthy work environment. New health promotion and prevention initiatives must be tailored to a variety of work environments and to the needs of workers in diverse occupations. There are still substantial gaps in our knowledge about the most effective and efficient ways to intervene (Dugdill et al. 2008; Anderson et al. 2009). However, the evidence suggests that healthy workplace initiatives should focus on both the physical and the psychosocial work environment (Siegrist et al. 2009). It will also be important to continue to fund initiatives such as the 'Work life balance strategy' developed by Safework SA (n.d.), which increases employer awareness of how work policies, practices and demands impact on employees' health, and which assist them to develop and negotiate work arrangements that are health enhancing rather than detrimental.

Conclusion

Although the majority of baby-boomers report good-excellent health, a significant minority do not. This is not surprising, given the high proportion of boomers who are overweight or obese (74.8 per cent) and who do not exercise at an adequate level (68.4 per cent) (Buckley 2011: 418). This paper has shown that, if current trajectories continue, poor health will limit the proportion of baby-boomers who are capable of extending their working lives or who are able to stave off retirement until they can access the Age Pension, particularly as the minimum age at which people become eligible for the Pension has recently been raised to 67 years. If baby-boomers and subsequent generations are to work for longer it will be necessary to improve our understanding of how work environments and conditions influence health across the life course, particularly given the marked changes to the nature of work and the social context in which it occurs (Costa et al. 2004). This will need to occur in tandem with the development, implementation and evaluation of workplace health promotion and prevention initiatives if we are to create working environments capable of facilitating better health and improving and extending participation.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Linkage grant (Grant No. LP0990065). Title: Australia's Baby-boomer Generation, Obesity and Work--Patterns, Causes and Implications.

References

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2003) South Australia's Baby Boomers: A Profile, Cat. No. 4149.4.55.001

--(2006) Health Literacy, Australia, Cat. No. 4233.0, Canberra.

--(2008) Retirement and Retirement intentions, Australia July 2006 to June 2007, Cat. No. 62380.

--(2010) Australian Social Trends, Cat. no. 4102.0.

--(2011) Retirement and Retirement Intentions, Australia July 2010 to June 2011, Cat. No. 62380.

Access Economics Pty Ltd. (2001) Population ageing and the economy, Canberra, Publications Production Unit (Public Affairs, Parliamentary and Access Branch) Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care.

Adams, R., Tucker, G., Hugo, G., Hill, C. & Wilson, D. (2008) 'Projected future trends of hospital service use for selected obesity-related conditions.' Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 2133-141.

AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) (2006) Life Expectancy and Disability in Australia 1988 to 2003. Cat. No. DIS 47.

--(2008) Australia's Health 2008, Cat. No. AUS 99.

--(2009) Chronic Disease and Participation in Work, Cat. No. PHE 109.

-- (2010) Australia's Health 2010, Cat. No. AUS 122.

Anderson, L.M., Quinn, T.A., Glanz, K., Ramirez, G., Kahwati, L.C., Johnson, D.B., Buchanan, L.R., Archer, W.R., Chattopadhyay, S., Kalra, G.P., Katz, D.L. & Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2009) 'The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37 (4), 340.

Aquino, J., Russell, D., Cutronoa, C. & Altmaier, E. (1996) 'Employment status, social support, and life-satisfaction among the elderly', Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43 (4), 480-89.

Atlantis, E., Lange, K. & Wittert, G. (2009) 'Chronic disease trends due to excess body weight in Australia', Obesity Reviews, 10 (5), 543-53.

Brown, H.S., Pagan, J.A. & Bastida, E, (2005) 'The impact of diabetes on employment: genetic IVs in a bivariate probit', Health Economics, 14 (5), 537-44.

Brown, P. & Vickerstaff, S. (2011) 'Health subjectivities and labor market participation', Research on Aging, 33 (,5), 529-50

Buckley, J. (2008) 'Baby boomers, obesity, and social change', Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 2 (20), 73-82.

Buckley, J. (2011) Ageing in the 21st century -are baby boomers prepared? A study of preparation for later life in a context of social change, PhD thesis, University of Adelaide (unpublished) http://library.adelaide.edu.au/ item/1740389

Buckley, J. (2012) Ageing baby boomers: tsunami or windfall, Fact Sheet No. 1/Media Event, prepared on behalf of the Project Team, Australia's Baby Boomer Generation: Obesity and Work--Patterns, Causes, and Implications, Science Exchange, 26 September http://www.adelaide.edu.au/ apmrc/research/

Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. (2004) 'Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection', Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 261-304.

Butterworth, P., Gill, S. C., Rodgers, B., Anstey, K.J., Villamil, E. & Melzer, D. (2006) 'Retirement and mental health: analysis of the Australian national survey of mental health and well-being.' Social Science & Medicine, 62 (5), 1179-91.

Cai, L. & Cong, C. (2009) 'Effects of health and chronic diseases on labour force participation of older working-age Australians', Australian Economic Papers, 48 (2), 166-82.

Cai, L. & Kalb, G. (2004) 'Health status and labour force participation: Evidence from the HILDA data', Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 4/04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.

Carson, E. & Kerr, L. (2003) "'Stakeholder welfare" and the "Pivot Generation": the challenge of policy shifts and intergenerational dependencies for Australian baby-boomers', Just Policy, 29, 3-14.

Caruso, C. (2006) 'Possible broad impacts of long work hours', Industrial Health, 44 (4), 531-36.

Casey, B., Oxley, H., Whitehouse, E., Antolin, P., Duval, R. & Leibfritz, W. (2003) 'Policies for an ageing society: recent measures and areas for further reform', OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 369, Paris, OECD Publishing.

Cornman, J. & Kingson, E. (1996) 'Trends, issues, perspectives and values for the aging of the baby boom cohorts', Gerontologist, 36 (1) 15-26.

Costa, G., Akerstedt, T., Nachreiner, E, Baltieri, E, Carvalhais, J., Folkard, S., Dresen, M.F., Gadbois, C., Gartner, J., Sukalo, H.G., Harma, M., Kandolin, I., Sartori, S. & Silverio, J. (2004) 'Flexible working hours, health, and well-being in Europe: Some considerations from a SALTSA project', Chronobiology International, 21 (6), 831-44.

Costa, G., Sartori, S. & Akerstedt, T. (2006) 'Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being', Chronobiology International, 23 (6), 1125-37.

Commonwealth of Australia. (2008) Ageing and Aged Care, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, [Online]: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ main/publishing.nsf/Content/BFE-46F21A3241ECBCA2574BE001A6E06/$ File/Ageing_and_Aged_Care.pdf

--(2009) Secure and Sustainable Pensions, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia http://www.aph.gov.au/budget/2009-10/content/glossy/pension/ download/pensions_overview.pdf

Daley, J., McGannon, C. & Ginnivan, L. (2012) Game-changers: Economic reform priorities for Australia, Melbourne, Grattan Institute http://grattan. edu.au/static/files/assets/bc719f82/Game_Changers_Web.pdf

Dave, D., Rashad, R. & Spasojevic, J. (2008) 'The effects of retirement on physical and mental health outcomes', Southern Economic Journal, 75 (2), 497-523.

Dawe, S. (2009) 'Older "workers and VET', Series: At a Glance, Canberra, National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

De Luna, X., Stenberg, A. & Westerlund, O. (2010) Can adult education delay retirement from the labour market? Working Paper 2010: 2, Uppsala, Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.

Dugdill, L., Brettle, A., Hulme, C., McCluskey, S. & Long, A.E (2008) 'Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review', International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 1 (1), 20-40.

Everingham, C., Warner-Smith, P. & Byles, J. (2007) 'Transforming retirement: re-thinking models of retirement to accommodate the experiences of women', Women's Studies International Forum, 30 (6), 512-22.

Gilfillan, G. & Andrews, L. (2010) Labour force participation of women over 45, Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper, Canberra.

Gong, H. & McNamara, J. (2011)Workforce participation and non-participation among baby-boomers in Australia: a profile from HILDA data, Canberra, NATSEM, University of Canberra.

Grant, J., Chittleborough, C., Taylor, A., Dal Grande, E., Wilson, D., Phillips, A., Cheek, J., Price, K., Gill, T. & Ruffin, R. (2006) 'The North West Adelaide Health study: detailed methods and baseline segmentation of a cohort along a chronic disease continuum', Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 3 (4), 1-14.

Grant, J. F., Taylor, A. W., Ruffin, R.E., Wilson, D.H., Phillips, P.J., Adams, R.J.T., Price, K. & the North West Adelaide Health Study Team (2009) 'Cohort profile: the North West Adelaide health study (NWAHS)', International Journal of Epidemiology, 38 (6), 1479-86.

Gruszin, S. & Szuster, F. (2010) Literature review: review of health status and labour force productivity and participation data with regard to chronic disease, Adelaide, Public Health Information Development Unit, the University of Adelaide.

Holden, L., Scuffham, P., Hilton, M., Vecchio, N. & Whiteford, H. (2010) 'Psychological distress is associated with a range of conditions affecting working Australians', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34 (3), 304-10.

Hosmer, D. & Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

Jackson, N., Walter, M. & Felmingham, B. (2006), 'Will Australia's baby boomers change their retirement plans in line with government wishes?', paper presented to the 13th Biennial Australian Population Conference 'Population, Policy and Australia's Destiny, Adelaide, 5-8 December.

Kelly, S. (2009) Don't stop thinking about tomorrow: the changing face of Retirement--the past, the present and the future, Income and Wealth Report No. 24 http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/files/download?id=1011

Knox, G. (2003) 'Retirement intentions of mature age workers', paper presented to the Australian Social Policy Conference, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 9-11 July.

Lawton Smith, H. (2009) 'Skill shortages, demographic aging, and training implications for skill-based economies', The Professional Geographer, 61 (1), 59-69.

Magee, C., Caputi, P., Stefanic, N. & Iverson, D. (2010) 'Occupational factors associated with 4-year weight gain in Australian adults', Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 52 (10), 977-81.

Mathers, C. (2007) 'The health of older Australians'. In A. Borowski, S. Encel & E. Ozanne (eds), Longevity and Social Change in Australia, Sydney, UNSW Press.

Maurer, J., Klein, R. & Vella, E (2007) Subjective health assessments and active labor market participation of older men: evidence from a semiparametric binary choice model with nonadditive correlated individual-specific effects, IZA Discussion Paper No. 3257, Bonn, The Institute for the Study of Labor.

McDonald, P. (2011) 'Employment at older ages in Australia: determinants and trends'. In T. Griffin & F. Beddie (eds.) Older Workers: Research Readings, Adelaide, NCVER.

Michie, S. & Williams, S. (2003) 'Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review', Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(1), 3-9.

NWAHS (North West Adelaide Health Study) (2011) NWAHS Stage 2 database, 2004-06. Adelaide, University of Adelaide, [unpublished data analysed by Buckley].

Onyx, J. & Baker, E. (2006) 'Retirement expectations: gender differences and partner effects in an Australian employer-funded sample', Australasian Journal on Ageing, 25 (2), 80-3.

Park, J. (2010) 'Health factors and early retirement among older workers', Statistics Canada, Cat no. 75-001-X.

Pocock, B. (2006) The Labour Market Ate My Babies. Work, Children and a Sustainable Future, Sydney, Federation Press.

Pocock, B., Skinner, N. & Williams, P. (2(107) 'Work-life in Australia: outcomes from the Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI) ', Adelaide, Centre for Work + Life, University of South Australia.

Poulos, S. & Nightingale, D.S. (1997) The Aging Baby Boom: Implications for Employment and Training Programs, prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Washington DC, The Urban Institute.

Price, R., Nam Choi, J. & Vinokur, A. (2002) 'Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health', Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7 (4), 302-12.

Productivity Commission (2005) Economic Implications of an Ageing Australia, Research Report, Canberra.

Quine, S., Bernard, D. & Kendig, H. (2006) 'Understanding baby-boomers' expectations and plans for their retirement: findings from a qualitative study', Australasian Journal on Ageing, 25 (3), 145-50.

Quine, S., Wells, Y., de Vaus, D. & Kendig, H. (2007) 'When choice in retirement decisions is missing: Qualitative and quantitative findings of impact on well-being', Australasian Journal on Ageing, 26 (4), 173-9.

Ryder, N. (1997) 'The cohort as a concept in the study of social change'. In M. Hardy (ed.), Studying Aging and Social Change: Conceptual and Methodological Issues, Beverly Hills and London, Sage Publications. Safework SA (n.d.) Work life balance, http://www.safework.sa.gov.au/ worklifebalance/wlb_home.jsp?id=100001

Schofield, D.J., Passey, M.E., Earnest, A., Gloor, I.C. & Shrestha, R. (2007) 'Are we getting healthier as we grow older?', Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1114 (1), 230-40.

Schofield, D.J., Shrestha, R., Passey, M., Earnest, A. & Fletcher, S. (2008) 'Chronic disease and labour force participation among older Australians', Medical Journal of Australia, 1819 (8), 447-50.

Siegrist, J., Benach, J., McKnight, A. & Goldblatt, P. (2009) Employment arrangements, work conditions and health inequalities, London, Marmot Report.

Skinner, N. & Pocock, B. (2008) Work, life and workplace culture: the Australian Work and Life Index 2008, Adelaide, Centre for Work + Life, Hawke Institute, University of South Australia.

Treasury (2002) Intergenerational Report 2002-03, Canberra ,Department of Treasury; Australian Government.

--(2010a) Intergenerational Report 2010--Australia to 2050. Future Challenges, Canberra, Department of Treasury, Australian Government.

Warner-Smith, P., Everingham, C. & Ford, J. (2006) 'Mid-age women's experiences of work and expectations of retirement', Just Policy, 40, 4553.

Winefield, A.H. (1995) 'Unemployment: its psychological costs'. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (eds) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1995, Volume 10, London, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Winefield, A.H., Montgomery, B., Gault, U., Muller, J., O'Gorman, J., Reser, J. & Roland, D. (2002) 'The psychology of work and unemployment in Australia today: an Australian psychological society discussion paper', Australian Psychologist, 37 (1), 1-9.

Zhang, X., Zhao, X. & Harris, A. (2009) 'Chronic diseases and labour force participation in Australia', Journal of Health Economics, 28(1), 91-108.

Endnotes

(1) 1961 is sometimes used as the cut-off date because this is the year in which fertility peaked. However, we have used the dates adopted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) which fits with census collection years and thus facilitates data comparison (Buckley 2010: 12-15; ABS 2003)
Table 1: Changes in participation rates of older workers, 1970-2006

                           Per cent participation

Age group      May 1970          June 1999         January 2006

            Males   Females   Males   Females   Males   Females

55-59        91.5     28.7    72.9     44.1     72.7     54.0
60-64        79.2     14.9    46.9     17.6     54.6     31.9
65+          23.2      3.6     9.7      3.2     10.8      3.7

Source: ABS Labour Force Surveys (1970; 1999; 2006)

Table 2: Employment status of males and females in each baby boomer
age cohort

                                   Males

Employment status (a)   1946-55   1956-65
                         n=236     n=277    P value

                           %         %

Full-time                62.8      86.0       .000
Part-time                 7.2       3.4       .055
Casual                    5.2       5.6       .827
Unemployed                3.7       3.2       .751
Retired                  13.3        .3       .000
Home Duties                .0        .8       .502
Unable to Work            7.1       1.1       .000

                                  Females              All baby

Employment status (a)   1946-55   1956-65              boomers
                         n=259     n-285    P value    1946-65
                                                        n=1058

                           %         %                    %

Full-time                32.0      44.3       .003       43.7
Part-time                25.4      29.4       .288       16.6
Casual                    8.4       9.6       .630        7.3
Unemployed                2.6       1.1       .204        2.6
Retired                  17.5        .6       .000        7.5
Home Duties               8.2      11.3       .227        5.3
Unable to Work            5.1       3.8       .474        4.1

(a) Volunteers (n=5) and students (n=3) excluded due to low numbers.

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007.

Table 3: Hours per week in paid work by age cohort and gender

                      Age cohort          Gender          All
                                                          baby
                                                         boomers
Hours in paid
work               1946-55   1956-65   Males   Females   1946-1965

0 hours worked         8.2       5.5     6.5       6.7         6.6
1 hour or more        91.7      94.5    93.5      93.3        93.4
Total                  342       494     435       401         836
1-15                   8.9       7.2     3.7      12.4         7.9
16-24                 10.6       9.2     2.8      17.3         9.7
25-34                 15.9      14.5     7.6      23.1        15.1
35-39                 19.6      20.7    20.7      19.8        20.3
40 hours             17-5       15.6    19.8      12.7        16.4
41-49                 10.8      15.4    18.4       8.2        13.6
50 hours or more      16.7      17.4    27.0       6.5        17.1
Total n                314       464     404       374         778

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007.

Table 4: Socio-economic characteristics by employment status

Variable                    Full-time   Part-time     Casual

Cohort
1946-55 Cohort               38.8 **       47.4       142.6
195665 Cohort                61.2 **       52.6        57.4
Total                          596         174          74
Gender
Male                         64.8 **     14.0 **      37.5 *
Female                       35.2 **      860 **      62.5 *
Total                          596         174          74
Living Arrangements
Family with children          50.3        55.1 *       46.0
Step family & children         3.3          .9         6.4 *
Sole parent/shared parent      5.0         4.8         7.3
Living alone                  11.1         6.3 *      11.9
Living with partner only      26.2 *       30.7       19.4
Living with other adults       4.2         2.1         8.9
Total                          595         174          74
Education
Secondary                     39.1 **     49.3        60.1 *
Trade/apprenticeship          19.3 **      5.5 **     10.5
Certificate/Diploma           24.0        31.1 *      20.0
Bachelor or higher            17.6 **     14.1         9.4
Total                          557         159          69
Marital Status
Married/Partner               80.1        86.0 *      73.7
Separated/Divorced            12.5         8.0        12.8
Widowed                        1.3 *       3.4         3.8
Never Married                  6.1         2.6 *       9.6
Total                          595         174          74
Government Pension
Yes                            3.6 **      11.4        19.2
No                            96.4 **      88.6        80.8
Total                          557         160          67
Income
Up to $20,000                  1.1 **      12.7        18.7 *
$20,001,440,000               17.4 *       19.2        32.0 *
$40,001-$60,000               28.2         29.6        24.4
$60,001,480,000               26.1 **      21.2        12.5
$80,0014100,000               13.3 *       11.1         6.2
More than $100,000            13.9 **      5.3          6.2
Total                          549         153          69
Country of Birth
Australia                     71.7 *       65.9        72.3
UK/Ireland                    17.4         19.7        23.2
Other                         10.9         14.3        4.6 *
Total                          596         174          74
Housing Tenure
Mortgage                       53.1 **     44.7      141.9
Outright owner                 37.7 **     45.4       37.3
Renter                         9.2 *        9.9       20.7 *
Total                           596         174          74

Variable                    Un-employed    Retired    Home duties

Cohort
1946-55 Cohort                 56.2        96.8 **       37.5
195665 Cohort                  43.8         3.2 **       62.5
Total                           27           79           54
Gender
Male                           63.4         40.1          4.1 **
Female                         36.6         59.9         95.9 **
Total                           27           79           54
Living Arrangements
Family with children           32.7         21.6 **      58.0
Step family & children          0.0          0.0         1.0
Sole parent/shared parent      30.7          1.3 *      14.5 *
Living alone                   26.5 *       11.0         1.8 *
Living with partner only       23.1         61.5 **      20.4
Living with other adults        9.0          4.7          5.2
Total                           27           78           54
Education
Secondary                      55.5         57.5 *      76.8 **
Trade/apprenticeship           14.8         14.8         2.2 *
Certificate/Diploma            24.0         18.2         13.6
Bachelor or higher             15.8          9.6          7.3
Total                           23           73           46
Marital Status
Married/Partner                55.3 *       87.4         83.1
Separated/Divorced             23.3          5.9         4.2
Widowed                        11.5          5.3         7.2 *
Never Married                  20.0 *        1.4          5.4
Total                           27           79           54
Government Pension
Yes                           42.9 **      39.5 **      36.2 **
No                            57.1 **      60.5 **      63.8 **
Total                           25           73           45
Income
Up to $20,000                 34.1 **      19.9 *        14.4
$20,001,440,000                22.0         29.0        40.3 **
$40,001-$60,000                31.1          247         20.4
$60,001,480,000                11.5         12.6         11.1
$80,0014100,000                 0.0          9.8          7.8
More than $100,000              1.3          4.1          6.1
Total                           23           70           45
Country of Birth
Australia                      71.5         55.6 *       73.1
UK/Ireland                     10.8         30.4 *        5.3 *
Other                          117.8        14.0         21.7 *
Total                           27           79           54
Housing Tenure
Mortgage                       47.8          9.5 **      43.2
Outright owner                 26.6         82.9 *       46.5
Renter                        25.5 *         7.6         10.4
Total                           27           78           54

Variable                    Unable to
                               work
Cohort
1946-55 Cohort                 68.4 **
195665 Cohort                  31.6 **
Total                           44
Gender
Male                           45.2
Female                         54.8
Total                           44
Living Arrangements
Family with children           30.2 *
Step family & children          1.2
Sole parent/shared parent       7.5
Living alone                   29.2 **
Living with partner only       24.6
Living with other adults        7.3
Total                           44
Education
Secondary                      42.9
Trade/apprenticeship           20.5
Certificate/Diploma            20.2
Bachelor or higher             16.3
Total                           39
Marital Status
Married/Partner                56.7 **
Separated/Divorced             28.9 **
Widowed                         1.3
Never Married                  13.1 *
Total                           44
Government Pension
Yes                            68.0 **
No                             32.0 **
Total                           40
Income
Up to $20,000                  67.4 **
$20,001,440,000                 9.4
$40,001-$60,000                13.5
$60,001,480,000                 7.9 *
$80,0014100,000                 1.8
More than $100,000              0.0 *
Total                           37
Country of Birth
Australia                      58.9
UK/Ireland                     22.4
Other                          18.8
Total                           44
Housing Tenure
Mortgage                       30.8 *
Outright owner                 32.8
Renter                         36.4 **
Total                           44

*p<.05; **p<.001 Tests examine differences between observed
and expected cell proportions.

Source: NWAHS Stage 2,2004-06; NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007

Table 5: Percentage of each employment status category with
selected chronic conditions, baby boomers 1946-65

Chronic condition(CC)     % of
                         sample    Total    Full-time   Part-time
                         with CC     n          %           %

Diabetes                   5.9     0.973      4.2 *        4.5
Arthritis                 19.0      1021     14.3 **      15.1
Cardio                     4.0      1018       3.6         2.0
Depression                12.9      1021     9.0 **       12.8
COPD                       6.3      972      4.0 **        6.2
Asthma                    15.0      679       13.9        117.3
Kidney Disease             5.5      959        4.8        6,.3
Fair/Poor SRH             20.1     1049 *    14.6 **      16.2
CCs [greater than          4.4      928      1.9 **        9.8
  or equal to] 3 (a)

Chronic condition(CC)                                       Home
                         Casual       Un-      Retired     duties
                            %      employed       %          %

Diabetes                   6.7       14.9       11.3 *      12.0
Arthritis                31.0 **     28.8      40.3 **      15.6
Cardio                     7.6         0         14.1       3.3
Depression               22.7 **    28.71 *      12.9       15.5
COPD                      10.1         0       16.2 **      8.4
Asthma                    20.5       21.4        12.1       10.2
Kidney Disease             8.2        2.8        7.7        6.5
Fair/Poor SRH             28.4       31.4      34.4 **      23.3
CCs [greater than          8.0        3.0       9.2 **      3.9
  or equal to] 3 (a)

Chronic condition(CC)    Unable to
                           work
                             %

Diabetes                  18.1 *
Arthritis                 40.5 **
Cardio                    14.5 *
Depression                39.7 **
COPD                      15.8 **
Asthma                     17.6
Kidney Disease              3.1
Fair/Poor SRH             60.5 **
CCs [greater than         20.3 **
  or equal to] 3 (a)

(a) Multiple CCs variable includes: diabetes, asthma, cardio,
COPD, depression, kidney disease, arthritis.

* p value<.05; ** p value<.001

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007; NWAHS Stage 2,2004-06.

Table 6: Sex adjusted odds ratios for reporting not in labour
force by chronic condition and age cohort

                               1946-55

Chronic       (1) ILF       (2) NILF    P Val   ORs
condition
               n      %     n     %

Depression    339    7.8   121   17.6   0.007   2.36(1.27-4.38)

Arthritis     339   22.1   121   38.3   0.002   2.04(1.30-3.21)

Diabetes      339    6.9   121   14.4   0.009   2.43(1.24-0.75)

Asthma        339   17.6   121   12.5   0.283   070(0.37-1.34)

Cardio        337    6.1   120    6.7   0.356   1.55(061-3.89)

Kidney
disease       334    7.4   121    8.2   0.972   0.99(0.45-2.151

COPD          339    5.7   121    128   0.015   2.46(1.19-5.05)

                             1956-65

Chronic      (1) ILF      (2) NILF    P Val     ORs
condition
             n     %      n    %

Depression   470   13.2   44   15.9    0.859   1.08(0.45-2.61)

Arthritis    470   11.1   44   15.4    0.332   1.57(0.63-3.88)

Diabetes     470    2.8   44   13.7   <0.001   8.74(2.67-28.61)

Asthma       470   13.7   44   11.3    0.343   0.58(0.19-1.79)

Cardio       470    1.6   44    5.9    0.043   6.38(1.05-39.43)

Kidney
disease      457    3.9   43   12.5    0.441   0.46(0.06-3.32)

COPD         470    4.3   44     13    0.034    3.10(1.09-8.8)

                                Total

Chronic      (1) ILF      (2) NILF     P Val    ORs
condition
             n     %      n     %

Depression   809   11.0   164    171   0.008   2.01(1.21-3.36)

Arthritis    809   15.7   165   32.3   0.029   1.61(1.05-2.46)

Diabetes     809    4.5   165   14.2   <0.001  3.06(1.64-5.69)

Asthma       809   13.4   165   10.8   0.218   0.70(0.39-1.24)

Cardio       806    3.5   164    6.5   0.190   1.79(0.75-4.25)

Kidney
disease      791    5.4   164    6.7   0.291   0.67(0.31-1.42)

COPD         809    4.9   165   12.9   0.001   2.95(1.57-5.54)

(1) In the labour force; (2) Not in the labour force

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007; NWAHS Stage 2, 2004-06

Table 7: Age adjusted odds ratios for reporting not in labour
force by chronic condition and gender

                                    Males

Chronic     (1) ILF       (2) NILF
condition

             n      %      n      %    P Val               OR

Depress     431    8.3     52   20.8   .000    5.20(2.06-13.1)
Arthritis   431   13.9     52   35.2   .004    2.87(1.41-5.84)
Diabetes    431    5.9     52   18.8   .067    2.31(0.94-5.65)
Asthma      431   14.1     52   10.3   .673    0.81(0.29-2.20)
Cardio      429    4.9     52    9.8   .959    1.03(0.35-3.07)
Kid Dis     422    3.2     52    4.4   .924    0.93(0.20-4.31)
COPD        431    3.9     52   10.4   .040    3.43(1.06-11.1)

                                  Females

Chronic     ILF (a)      NILF (b)      P Val               OR
condition

             n      %      n      %

Depress     378   13.9    112   15.5     349   1.35(0.72-2.53)
Arthritis   378   17.7    112   30.9   .398    1.26(0.74-2.15)
Diabetes    378    2.9    112   12.1   .003    3.81(1.57-9.23)
Asthma      378   16.7    112   13.0   .221    0.65(0.32-1.30)
Cardio      378    1.8    112    5.0   .064    4.63(0.91-23.5)
Kid Dis     367    7.9    112    7.7   .286    0.63(0.27-1.48)
COPD        378    5.9    112   14.0   .008    2.73(1.29-5.75)

(a) In the labour force; (b) Not in the labour force

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CATI), 2007; NWAHS Stage 2, 2004-06

Table 8: Multivariate logistic regression for labour force
participation in the baby boomer (1946-1965) cohort

95% CI                       P Value     ORs       95% CI

                                                Lower    Upper

Age                             .000    1.0

55-59 (reference group)
38-39                           .003    5.12   1.718    15.233
40-44                           .000    7.00   3.783    12.950
45 49                           .000    5.73   3.264    10.052
50-54                           .000    3.45   2.104     5.666

Sex (female)                    .000     .28    .168     .470

Education                       .037    1.0
Bachelor degree or
  higher (reference group)
Certificate/diploma             .862    1.07    .523     2.170
Trade/Apprenticeship            .151     .56    .253     1.235
Secondary education             .077     .57    .308     1.063

Housing                         .006    1.0
Renter/other
  (reference group)
Owner/joint owner               .784    1.08    .609     1.928
Mortgage                        .017    2.11   1.140     3.905

Chronic conditions
Arthritis                       .007    .122    .027      .549
Diabetes                        .005    .39     .205      .742
Chronic Obstructive             .012    .418    .215      .813
  Pulmonary Disorder
Interactions
Sex by arthritis                 .019    2.930   1.198     7.166

(a) p value is based on Likelihood Ratio Tests

Source: NWAHS TFU Survey 2 (CAT), 2007; NWAHS Stage 2, 2004-06
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有