The effect of derivative trading on volatility of underlying stocks: evidence from the NSE.
Sakthivel, P. ; Kamaiah, B.
Abstract
The present study empirically investigates the effect of futures
trading on volatility in Nifty as well as individual stocks by employing
both symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models. The Daily closing price of
Nifty index and twenty seven individual stocks are also collected from
January 1, 1997 to February 28, 2008. The results of GARCH reveal that
spot market volatility has declined after introduction of futures
trading. In case of individual stocks, there has been a reduction in
volatility of the individual stocks with the exception of seven stocks
namely, ABB, CIPLA, ITC, ICICI, INFOSYS, RANBAXY and SIEMENS. Further,
the introduction of futures trading has altered the asymmetric response
behavior of spot price volatility as well as individual stock
volatility. The study finally concludes that the introduction of the
derivative contracts have improved the market efficiency and reduced the
asymmetric information.
Keywords: GARCH, GJR GARCH, Futures Trading and leverage Effects
1. INTRODUCTION
It is an issue of interest as to how introduction of futures
trading affects volatility of underlying stocks, have made the issue
interesting for both exchanges and regulators. Introduction of futures
trading might increase spot market volatility due to low transaction
cost and high degree of leverage in futures market. The speculators in
derivative market attempt to influence the spot index underlying futures
contract, through excessive buying or selling of the underlying index
constituents, the volatility of these stocks could increase. The
excessive volatility in stock market significantly affects on
risk-averse investor, corporate capital investment decisions, leverage
decisions and consumption patterns .Therefore, it is important to study
the impact of futures trading on individual stocks volatility which has
considerable interest for regulator.
The introduction of derivatives trading has received considerable
attention. It has led to controversy over the effect of futures trading
on volatility underlying assets. Some studies supported the argument
that introduction of futures trading stabilizes spot market by
decreasing its volatility. This is due to migration of speculative
traders from spot to futures market. Futures' trading is expected
to improve market efficiency and reduce informational asymmetries. The
studies by Baldauf and Samtoni (1991) using the S&P 500 index in US,
Darram (2000) using the FITSE Mid 250 contract in UK, Bologna (2002)
using MIB 30 in Italy, and Raju and Kardnde (2003) using NSE 50 in
India, support this view. They have shown a decline in the spot market
volatility upon introduction of futures trading.
There are also studies which have supported that introduction of
futures trading increased spot market volatility thereby destabilizing
the market, as futures market promotes speculation and high degree of
leverage. Harris (1989), Lee and Ohk (1992), have supported the
destabilizing hypothesis. Thus, several of studies on introduction of
futures trading on stock market volatility have been inconclusive. In
the light of this background, the present study seeks to empirically
investigate whether introduction of futures trading decreases or
increases stock market volatility.
2. THE REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Pok and poshakwale (2004) examine the impact of the introduction of
futures trading on spot market volatility using data from both the
underlying and non-underlying stocks in the emerging Malaysian stock
market. They employed GARCH to capture time varying volatility and
volatility clustering phenomenon present in data. Their results show
that the onset of futures trading increases spot market volatility and
the flow of information to the spot market. Finally, the result shows
that that the underlying stocks respond more too recent news, while the
non-underlying stocks respond to more old news.
Golaka C Nath (2003) investigates behavior of stock Market
volatility after introduction of derivatives by employing GARCH model.
He considered 20 stocks randomly from the NIFTY and Junior NIFTY basket
as well as benchmark indices themself. He observed that for most of the
stocks, the volatility has come down in the post derivative period while
for only few stocks in the sample) the volatility in the post
derivatives has either remained more or less same or has increased
marginally.
Dennis and Sim (1999) examine share price volatility with the
introduction of individual share futures on the Sydney Futures Exchange
by employing GARCH model. The results suggest that share futures trading
has not had any significant effect on the volatility of the underlying
share price for most stocks. In only a small number of shares are there
evidence to suggest that share futures trading has had any effect. In
cases where there is an effect, the results are mixed, with increased
cash market volatility for two shares and decreased cash market
volatility for one other share. Finally, they concluded that the impact
of futures trading on cash market volatility is no greater than, and in
many cases less than, the impact of cash market trading itself.
Vipual (2006) investigates the effect of futures trading on
volatility in Nifty as well as in individual stocks using data period
between 1998 and 2004. He employed GARCH model to capture time varying
nature of volatility and volatility clustering phenomena present in the
data. The results show that introduction of derivatives trading has not
destabilized the stock market. This is largely attributed to reduced
persistence in the previous day's volatility. However, intraday
unconditional volatility of equity increases. This contradiction is
explained by increased correlation between prices of its constituent
shares caused by arbitrage transaction in the cash market.
Harris (1989) examines the impact of S&P 500 index futures and
options trading on the volatility of the firms' shares that
comprise the S&P 500. He reported no significant difference in the
volatility of the S&P 500 stocks vis-vis a control sample of 500
matching shares in the period 1975 through 1983 before the start of
trade in index options and futures. However, he reported that after
1983, there is a statistically significant increase in the volatilities
of firms in the S&P 500 index. However, the author suggested that
the change in volatility is "economically" insignificant and
that other factors could be responsible for the small increase.
Hodgson et al., (1991) study the impact of All Ordinaries Share
Index (AOI) futures on the Associated Australian Stock Exchanges over
the All Ordinaries Share Index. The study spans for a period of six
years from 1981 to 1987. Standard deviation of daily and weekly returns
is estimated to measure the change in volatilities of the underlying
Index. The results indicate that the introduction of futures and options
trading has not affected the long-term volatility, which reinforces the
findings of the previous U.S. studies. However, there was a problem of
confounding variables such as floating of Australian dollar in late
1983, deregulation of stock exchanges, foreign bank ownership and mutual
fund investment rules during 1984.
Figlewski (1981) examines impact of futures trading on Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA) market volatility. He found that
the volatility of the GNMA security market is related to several
factors, including futures trading. The amount of GNMA outstanding,
which proxies for cash market liquidity, is found to lower cash market
volatility, as does a lower average price for the GNMA. Futures trading
were found to increase GNMA security volatility, and Figlewski (1978)
suggested that the new traders in the GNMA market, because of the advent
of futures trading, were likely to add noise to GNMA securities trading.
Edwards (1,988) examines the volatility effects of the introduction
of share futures on percentage daily changes in the level of the S&P
500 index. He reported that the day-to-day volatility of the S&P 500
from 1972 through 1987 does not support the hypothesis that the
introduction of futures trading increased volatility in the stock
market. In fact, he reported that volatility in the stock market
decreased after futures trading began, although he does not directly
attribute the decrease to futures trading.
Chiang and Wang (2002) investigate the impact of inception of
Taiwan Index futures trading on spot price volatility. They suggested
that the trading of TAIEX futures had a major impact on spot price
volatility, while the trading of MSCI Taiwan did not. They used GJR
GARCH model to capture the asymmetric features in the data. The result
shows that the increase in asymmetric response behavior following the
beginning of the trading of two index futures reflects the fact that a
major proportion of the investors in TSE is of non-institutional
investors, generally un-informed and are inclined to over react to the
bad news. Meanwhile, the introduction of the TAIEX futures trading is
shown to improve the efficiency of information transmission from futures
to spot markets.
The above literature gives a mixed result about the effect of
futures on the volatility of the underlying market across the countries.
Most of the studies are related to the developed countries like the US
and UK. But, a very few studies have been conducted in developing
countries like India. In this context, it gives rise to further research
in this regard.
3. AN OVERVIEW OF THE NSE FUTURES MARKET
National stock exchange of India has introduced derivatives trading
in June 2000 with the introduction of index futures followed by stock
futures in November 2001. Since then, introduction of index futures and
individual stocks have shown a tremendous growth. Currently, turnover in
derivative products is much higher than the turnover in spot market.
National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) has also emerged the
fastest-growing bourse as the world's first largest derivative
exchanges in terms of total traded volumes in 2007.
The total derivatives turnover was Rs 5477 crore in November 2001.
Further, turnover of NSE's derivatives trading has increased to Rs
101925 crore in 2001-02 (daily average of Rs 410 crore) with stock
futures accounting for Rs 51515 crore. Again, total derivatives turnover
has increased in 2004-05 which was Rs 25, 46982 crore (Rs. 10107 crore
of daily average) with stock futures trading for Rs 14,840 56 crore. As
compared to the trading in stock futures in 2006 -07 at Rs. 38,30967
crore, has increased up to Rs 75,48563 crore in the comparable period of
2007-08- a rise of over 68 per cent. We can see growth of turnover in
index futures and stock futures from figure and table 1.
However, index futures are becoming increasingly popular, and thus
accounted for close to 45% of traded value in November 2007. The volume
of index futures at NSE on 30 November 2001 was about Rs 21483 crore and
the number of index futures contracts stood 10, 225 88. In 2007-08, the
volume of index futures increased to Rs. 38, 206, 67 crore and that of
contracts increased to 1, 565, 985, 79. Thus, derivatives contribute to
faster growth in National Stock Exchange of India (NSE). Against this
backdrop, it is important to study the effect of the futures
introduction on spot market volatility.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
4. DATA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1. Data Description
The data for present study are obtained from National Stock
Exchange of India (NSE). Daily closing prices of Nifty index and twenty
seven individual stocks are collected for the period January 1, 1997 to
February 28, 2008 to investigate the effect of index futures trading on
the volatility of the Nifty. In all 27 individual stocks were selected
out of 50 stocks, which formed the basis for introducing derivatives
from time to time in the Indian stock market as underlying stocks. These
individual stocks include ABB, ACC, BHEL, BPCL, CIPLA, DRREDDY, INFOSYS,
GAIL, GRASIM, HDFC, HDFC BANK, HCLTECH, HEROHONDA, ICICI BANK, ITC,
NATIONALU, M&M, ONGC, RANBAXY, RELIANCE, SAIL, SATYAM, SBI, SIEMNS,
SUN PHARMA, TATAPOWER, and WIPRO. However, the study could not cover all
individual stocks, because some of stocks were introduced as stocks
futures very recently.
4.2. Methodology
To examine the effect of futures trading on volatility in Nifty as
well as individual stocks, GARCH family techniques are employed. The
GARCH family techniques are expected to capture time varying volatility,
clustering volatility, leverage effects and mean reversion of present
data. The main advantage of the GARCH model is that it makes the
connection between information and volatility, since any changes in rate
of information arrival into the market would also change the volatility
in the market. Thus, unless information remains constant, which is
hardly the case, volatility must be varying even on daily basis. The
GARCH (1, 1) regression model is obtained by:
[R.sub.t] = [[PHI].sub.0] + [[PHI].sub.1] R.sub.t-1] +
[[epsilon].sub.t] [[epsilon].sub.t] | [[PSI].sub.t-1] ~ N (0, [h.sub.t])
(1)
[h.sub.t] = [[alpha].sub.0] + [[alpha].sub.1] +
[[epsilon].sup.2.SUB.T-1] + [[beta].sub.1] [H.SUB.t-1] (2)
where, [R.sub.t] is log return conditional on past information,
which is proxy [R.sub.t-1] and [[alpha].sub.0], [[alpha].sub.1] and
[[beta].sub.1] are the parameters to be estimated. [[PSI].sub.t-1] is
the information set time [t.sub.-1], [[epsilon].sub.t] is the stochastic
error conditional on [[PSI].sub.t-1] and is assumed to normally
distribution with zero mean and conditional (time varying) variance.
A dummy variable is introduced into conditional variance equation
to cheek the effect of futures trading on volatility in Nifty as well as
in individual stocks volatility.
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)
Where, DF is the dummy variable taking the value of the zero before
futures introduction and 1 after the futures introduction. If the
co-efficient of the dummy is negatively significant it indicates that
the there is a decrease in the volatility associated with futures
introduction. If the co-efficient is positively significant it indicates
that there is increase in the volatility due to futures introduction.
The present study found that introduction of derivative trading has
resulted in reduction in cash market volatility. Hence, we tried to
investigate whether futures trading introduction is only factor
responsible for reduction in volatility of NSE 50 or macro economic
factors also affect market volatility. For this purpose, the study
included return from a surrogate S & P 500(USA) index and BSE 200
into GARCH mean equation to control the additional factors affecting the
market volatility. The following GARCH model is estimated.
[R.sub.t] = [[PHI].sub.0] + [[PHI].sub.1] [R.sub.t-1] +
[[theta].sub.1BSE200t-1] + [[theta].sub.2 s & p 500 t-1] +
[epsilon]t (4)
[[epsilon].sub.t] | [[PSI].sub.t-1] ~ N (0, [h.sub.t])
[h.sub.t] = [[alpha].sub.0] + [[alpha].sub.1]
[[epsilon].sup.2.sub.t-1] + [[beta].sub.1] + [h.sub.t-1] +
[[gamma].sub.1] DF (5)
Where [R.sub.t] is the spot price returns, the lagged S & P 500
index return is used to remove the effects of worldwide price movement
on volatility of Nifty. For example, if the Indian market is influenced
by US markets, this will be reflected through the lagged S & P 500
return. Here [[epsilon].sub.t] is the error in the conditional mean
equation and [[PSI].sub.t-1] is the set of information available at time
t-1.
Finally, the study employs GJR GARCH model to investigate whether
there is any change in asymmetric behavior of spot market volatility as
well as individual stocks volatility after introduction of futures
trading. The asymmetric behavior explains that bad news tends to have a
larger impact on volatility than good news. Back (1976) attributes this
behavior to the bad news which tends to drive down the stock price,
there by increasing the leverage of the stock and causing the stock
price to more volatile. Such an asymmetric impact of news on stock price
volatility is referred as leverage effect. This leverage effect is
captured by GJR GARCH model. The standard GRACH model assumes the bad
news and the good news to have same effect on conditional volatility.
However, GJR GARCH model developed by Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle,
(1993) showed how to allow for the effect of good news and bad news to
have different effects on conditional volatility. The following GJR
GARCH specification is estimated.
[h.sub.t] = [[alpha].sub.0] +
[[alpha].sub.1][[epsilon].sup.2.sub.t-1] + [[beta].sub.1][h.sub.t-1] +
[[gamma].sub.1][I.sub.t-1] [[epsilon].sup.2.sub.t-1] (6)
where, [I.sub.t-1] = 1 if [[epsilon].sub.t-1] < 0,
= 0 otherwise
5. EMPIRICAL RESULTS
The study conducted unit root tests to check the stationarity of
the both Nifty and individual stocks by employing Augmented
Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) models. Table I presents
the result of unit root test. The unit root test rejects null hypothesis
for all the series, implying that Nifty and individual stocks series are
stationary at first difference.
The descriptive statistics are given in Table 2 and 3 for Nifty
series for both pre-futures and post-futures period. The results show
that standard deviation has fallen from 0.01687 in the pre-futures
period to 0.0145 in the post-futures period. That the values of kurtosis
exceed more than three for Nifty series in both periods implies that
distributions of Nifty returns are leptokurtic or tailed. The negative
value of skewness for Nifty return indicates that the frequency
distribution of returns series is negatively skewed during both the
pre-futures as well as post-futures.
Table 2 and 3 also provide the descriptive statistics for all
individual stocks both period pre-futures and post-futures. The daily
mean returns for most of individual stocks are positive except in case
of ACC, BHEL, BPCL, HCL, GRASAM and M& M during the pre-futures
period. In case of post futures, the daily mean returns of 23 stocks are
also positive, but returns of four stocks are negatively reported
particularly stocks such as HEROHONDA, NATIONALU, SIEMENS and SAIL. The
overall result shows that mean return of most of individual stocks has
increased marginally from pre to post futures period. The standard
deviation of 20 individual stocks declined marginally in the
post-futures period as compared to the pre-futures period. However,
stocks such as ABB, CIPLA, ITC, ICICI, INFOSYS, RANBAXY and SIEMENS
reported the highest standard deviation during the post-futures period.
The skewness, kurtosis and JB test statistic also have been
reported in Table 2 and 3 The results show that the negative skewness
coefficient for most of individual stocks indicates that the frequency
distribution of the return series is negatively skewed or longer tails
to the left during both pre and post futures period. The kurtosis value
exceeds more than three for most of individual stocks, implying that
distributions of individual stocks returns are leptokurtic or tailed
both period. Further, the JB test shows that assumption of normality is
violated by log returns series of all stocks. The results of LB-Q,
[LB.sup.2]Q and LM tests are reported in table 4, which shows that
squared residuals are auto correlated in almost all stocks, thus
confirming the presence of ARCH effects in most of individual stocks.
The results of GARCH are presented in Table 5. The empirical
results show that all co-efficients in the conditional variance equation
are significant at 1 percent level of significance including the dummy
variable. The results show that the effect of introduction of index
futures trading on Indian stock market may have affected per se the
volatility of the Nifty. This is shown by the significance of the dummy
variable. Further, the measures of the effect due the introduction of
the futures trading (the value of the co-efficient y) have negative
sign, indicates that the onset of stock index futures results in
diminished stock market volatility.
The present study examines whether futures trading is primarily
responsible for reduction in volatility of Nifty or market wide factors
affecting the stock market volatility (also see figures from 2 to 3).
The empirical results reported in Table 6 show that the dummy
co-efficient (-6.80) has taken negative value after adjusting for the
market wide factors, and it is significant even though the magnitude of
such effect has gone down considerably. Finally, the study concludes
that futures trading has significant role in reducing volatility of the
S&P CNX Nifty, but market wide factors do not affect volatility of
the spot market.
The study also investigates the impact of stock futures on
volatility of individual stocks. For this purpose a dummy variable is
included in the GARCH conditional variance equation; for which [D.sub.t]
takes the value zero and one for pre and post futures period
respectively. The dummy variable captures the effect of futures trading
on volatility of individual stocks. The results of analysis reported in
Table 7 show that coefficients of dummy variable for twenty individual
stocks are negative and significant. It indicates that volatility of
twenty individual stocks has marginally declined after introduction of
futures trading. However, stocks such as ABB, CIPLA, ITC, ICICI,
INFOSYS, RANBAXY and SIEMENS reports the higher volatility after
introduction of futures trading. This is due to the fact that
speculators might be participating heavily in these stocks.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Table 8 presents result of GJR GARCH model. It show that the
estimated coefficient of asymmetry ([gamma]) is positive and
significant, indicating that asymmetric effects are present in the spot
market, both during pre and post futures introduction. However, the
coefficient of asymmetry is small in post futures compared to pre
futures period. Overall, it can be said that introduction of derivative
trading has had a negligible impact in resolving the asymmetric response
of volatility to information in market.
The Table 9 and 10 provides result of GJR GARCH model for both pre
and post futures period. The results show that the coefficients of
asymmetry for most of individual stocks are found to be positive and
significant except in the case of GAIL, ONGC, and SAIL specifically
during pre futures period. In case of post futures period, asymmetric
effects are also present in the most of individual stocks. But, stocks
such as ABB, BHEL, DRREEDY, HDFC, NATIONALU and RELIANCE are free from
asymmetric effects.
6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
There has been a debate about how introduction of index futures
trading influence cash market volatility. The moot question has been
whether introduction of futures trading stabilizes or destabilizes stock
market volatility. The results reveal that spot market volatility has
declined after introduction of futures trading. In case of individual
stocks, there has been a reduction in volatility of twenty individual
stocks with the exception of ABB, CIPLA, ITC, ICICI, INFOSYS, RANBAXY
and SIEMENS. Further, introduction of futures trading has altered the
asymmetric response behavior both of spot price volatility as well
individual stock volatility. Overall, introduction of futures markets
improves the quality of information flowing to spot markets, and spot
prices accordingly reflect more promptly changes that occur in demand
and supply conditions. The finally results show that futures trading has
significant role in reducing volatility of the S&P CNX Nifty, but
market wide factors do not help to reduce the market volatility
References
Baldauf, Brad and G. J. Santoni, (1991), "Stock Price
Volatility: Some Evidence from an ARCH Model", Journal of Futures
Markets, Vol. 11, No. 2, 191-200.
Black, F. (1976), "Studies of Stock Price Volatility
Changes", Proceedings of the Meetings of the Business and Economics
Statistics Section, American Statistical Association press.
Bologna, P. & Cavallo, L. (2002), "Does the Introduction
of Stock Index Futures Effectively Reduce Stock Market Volatility? Is
the 'Future Effect' Immediate? Evidence from the Italian Stock
Exchange Using GARCH", Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12, No.2,
183-92.
Butter Worth, D. (2000), "The Impact of Introduction of Index
Futures Trading on Underlying Stock Index Volatility: In the Case of the
FISE Mid 250 Contracts", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.7, No.
1, 223-226.
Chiang, H. C., & C. Y., Wang (2002), "The Impact of
Futures Trading on the Spot Index Volatility: Evidence for Taiwan Index
Futures", Applied Financial Letters, Vol. 9, 381-385.
Dennis S. A. & A. B. Sim (1999), "Share Price Volatility
with the Introduction of Individual Share Futures on Sydney Futures
Exchange", International Review of Financial Analysis, 8, 153-163.
Edwards, F. R. (1988), "Does the Future Trading Increase Stock
Market Volatility?", Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1,
pp. 63-9.
Figlewski, S. (1981), "Futures Trading and Volatility in the
GNMA Market", Journal of Finance, Vol. 36, No. 1, 445-56.
Glosten, L. R., R. Jaganathan, and D. E. Runkle (1993), On the
Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal
Excess Returns on Stocks, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 4. 1779-1801.
Harris, L. (1989), "S & P 500 Spot Stock Price
Volatilities", Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, No.2, 1155-75.
Hodgson, A. & Nicholas, D. (1991), "The Impact of Index
Futures on Australian Share Market Volatility", Journal of Business
and Accounting, Vol. 12, No.l, 645-658.
Lee, S. B. & Ohk, K. Y. (1992), "Stock Index Futures
Listing and Structural Change in Time-Varying Volatility", The
Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 12, No. 1, 493-509.
Nath, G. C. (2003), "Behaviour of Stock Market Volatility
after Derivatives", NSE Working Paper.
Pok, Wee Ching & Poshakwale, Sunil (2004), "The Impact of
the Introduction of Futures Contracts on the Spot Market Volatility: the
Case of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange', Applied Financial Economics,
Vol. 14, No. 2, 143-154.
Raju M. T. & Karande K. (2002), "Price Discovery and
Volatility of NSE Futures Market". SEBI Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 1,
5-15.
Vipul (2006), "The Impact of the Introduction of the
Derivatives on Underling Volatility: Evidence from India", Journal
of Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 16, No. 9, 687-694.
P. SAKTHIVEL, Research Associate, Department of Economics, Gokhale
Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune- 411004, India, E-mail:
[email protected]
B. KAMAIAH, Professor of Finance, Department of Economics,
University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad-500046, India
Table 1
Turnover of NSE Derivatives Market
Year Index Futures Stock Futures
No. of Turnover No. of Turnover
contracts (Rs. cr.) contracts (Rs. cr.)
2010-11 108453857 2847122.36 125571212 3887252.1
2009-10 178306889 3934388.67 145591240 5195246.6
2008-09 210428103 3570111.40 221577980 3479642.1
2007-08 156598579 3820667.27 203587952 7548563.2
2006-07 81487424 2539574 104955401 3830967
2005-06 58537886 1513755 80905493 2791697
2004-05 21635449 772147 47043066 1484056
2003-04 17191668 554446 32368842 1305939
2002-03 2126763 43952 10676843 286533
2001-02 1025588 21483 1957856 51515
2000-01 90580 2365 -- --
Year Index Options
Notional
No. of Turnover
contracts (Rs. cr.)
2010-11 384835769 10790619.24
2009-10 341379523 8027964.20
2008-09 212088444 3731501.84
2007-08 55366038 1362110.88
2006-07 25157438 791906
2005-06 12935116 338469
2004-05 3293558 121943
2003-04 1732414 52816
2002-03 442241 9246
2001-02 175900 3765
2000-01
Sources: NSE website
Table 2
Unit Root Test Statistics
Name of the stock ADF in First PP in First
Difference Difference
Nifty Index -21.765 * -698.50 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
BSE 200 20.594 * -615.62 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
S&P 500 (USA) -19.915 * -938.54 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
ABB Ltd. -19.176 * -1043.60 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
ACC Ltd -21.176 * -832.32 *
(0.000) (0.0001)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd -23.2978 * -629.35 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
BPCL -24.006 * -814.07 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
CIPLA Ltd. -22.136 * -870.4 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. -21.175 * -617.41 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
GAIL (India) Ltd. -20.428 * -1170.64 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
GRASIM Ltd. -20.085 * -748.07 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
HCL Technologies Ltd. -21.125 * -510.78 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
HDFC Bank Ltd. -22.051 * 641.54 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. -19.931 * -595.09 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Housing Development Finance -25.394 * -1171.30 *
Corporation Ltd. (0.0000) (0.0001)
I T C Ltd. -20.398 * -452.01 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
ICICI Bank Ltd. -17.256 -745.24
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. -22.986 * -785.05 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. -22.882 * -627.62 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. -18.199 * -623.27 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. -21.961 * -842.46 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. -19.987 * -627.35 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 25.275 * -426.51 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. -20.594 * -266.39 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Siemens Ltd. -22.166 * -608.879 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
State Bank of India -21.250 * -815.75 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. -19.665 * -1502.57 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. -20.611 * -847.14 *
(0.0001) (0.0001)
Tata Power Co. Ltd -23.413 * -492.89 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Wipro Ltd -26.523 * -490.73 *
(0.0000) (0.0001)
Note: Figures in parentheses are P value. * Indicates that unit root
rejected null hypothesis at 1% level of significance.
Table 3
Descriptive Statistics on Nifty Index and Individual Stocks:
Pre Futures Introduction
Name of the stock Mean S-D Skewness
Nifty Index 0.00913 0.0168 -0.273
ABB Ltd. 0.00056 0.0257 -0.209
ACC Ltd -0.00232 0.0834 -0.813
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd -0.00864 0.0365 0.03
BPCL -0.00099 0.0433 -4.035
CIPLA Ltd 0.00052 0.0454 -0.671
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.00127 0.0412 -0.832
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.00066 0.0297 0.179
GRASIM Ltd. -0.00022 0.0363 0.632
HCL Technologies Ltd. -0.00385 0.0569 -2.646
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.00087 0.0276 0.318
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.00085 0.0237 -0.768
HDFC 0.00156 0.0773 -0.364
I T C Ltd. 0.00505 0.0387 0.008
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.00241 0.0652 -0.022
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.00089 0.0501 -5.205
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. -0.00144 0.0365 -0.086
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 0.00232 0.0134 0.777
ONGC Ltd 0.00208 0.0296 0.448
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.00086 0.0375 -0.052
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.00046 0.0287 0.313
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.00086 0.0724 0.0601
Siemens Ltd. 0.00115 0.0284 0.049
State Bank of India 0.00224 0.0291 0.271
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 0.00087 0.0415 0.66
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.00033 0.2011 -0.18
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.00079 0.0319 0.22
Wipro Ltd 0.00086 0.0612 -0.123
Name of the stock kurtosis J.B Test
Nifty Index 7.895 671.32
ABB Ltd. 6.481 939.56
ACC Ltd 64.09 16498.71
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 3.62 16.02
BPCL 67.26 189029
CIPLA Ltd 264.83 27872.2
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 84.67 45306.54
GAIL (India) Ltd. 4.68 178.15
GRASIM Ltd. 3.63 16.63
HCL Technologies Ltd. 33.05 29687.9
HDFC Bank Ltd. 5.16 350058
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 12.78 7458.2
HDFC 738.41 219338
I T C Ltd. 4.64 108.74
ICICI Bank Ltd. 89.23 875.26
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 72.93 201224
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 4.04 44.47
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 9.56 68953.2
ONGC Ltd 6.22 522.41
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 94.42 341913
Reliance Industries Ltd. 4.64 108.74
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 219.46 1906.17
Siemens Ltd. 5.63 533.59
State Bank of India 4.37 88.857
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 10.16 4739.27
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 821.41 511845
Tata Power Co. Ltd 5.70 304.56
Wipro Ltd 309.45 502378
Table 4
Descriptive Statistics on Nifty Index and Individual Stocks:
Post Futures Introduction
Name of the stock Mean S-D Skewness
Nifty Index 0.00062 0.0145 -0.875
ABB Ltd. 0.00069 0.0612 -0.726
ACC Ltd 0.00106 0.0225 -0.497
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 0.00173 0.0299 -0.714
BPCL 0.00062 0.0265 0.019
CIPLA Ltd. 0.00076 0.0513 -23.59
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.00099 0.0274 -10.65
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.00098 0.0286 -0.099
GRASIM Ltd. 0.00145 0.0201 0.197
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.00038 0.0332 -0.078
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.00145 0.0227 0.314
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. -0.00097 0.0198 0.256
HDFC 0.00088 0.0276 -0.876
1 T C Ltd. 0.00075 0.0685 -35.25
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.00758 0.0726 0.238
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.00726 0.0631 -0.199
M& M Ltd. 0.00013 0.0297 -0.791
National Aluminum Ltd. -0.00478 0.0128 -0.052
ONGC. 0.0008 0.0254 -0.297
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.00838 0.0496 0.946
Reliance Industries Ltd 0.00141 0.0215 -1.697
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.00067 0.0323 -0.0076
Siemens Ltd. -0.0011 0.0728 -0.176
State Bank of India 0.00149 0.0223 -0.411
Steel Authority of India Ltd. -0.00333 0.0358 0.436
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.00131 0.1965 -0.281
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.00147 0.0259 -0.512
Wipro Ltd 0.00073 0.0439 -0.174
Name of the stock kurtosis J.B Test
Nifty Index 9.26 3083.0
ABB Ltd. 546.11 88939.36
ACC Ltd 7.39 1342.75
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 178.99 2060076
BPCL 8.93 2321.35
CIPLA Ltd. 690.21 313165.7
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 273.96 484161.3
GAIL (India) Ltd. 19.34 12394.44
GRASIM Ltd. 6.819 5892.36
HCL Technologies Ltd. 167.93 14616.97
HDFC Bank Ltd. 21.82 16761.56
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 78.24 548.24
HDFC 258.86 43471.81
1 T C Ltd. 134707 1208.63
ICICI Bank Ltd. 29.21 5689.27
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 563.70 2085.59
M& M Ltd. 185.71 2206.57
National Aluminum Ltd. 185.7 2206.51
ONGC. 44.41 98232.2
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 272.43 482912.4
Reliance Industries Ltd 28.18 4262.39
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 134.54 115188.9
Siemens Ltd. 392.88 45927.59
State Bank of India 7.09 1161.95
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 6.62 157.06
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 356.59 37456.01
Tata Power Co. Ltd 13.425 7172.03.
Wipro Ltd 344.73 62458.53
Table 5
Results of LB-Q and ARCH Test on Nifty Index and Individual Stocks
Name of the stock LB-Q(12) LB(2)Q(12) LM(6)
Nifty index 589.453 347.254 246.521
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
ABB Ltd. 24.592 36.897 24.007
(0.012) (0.001) (0.003)
ACC Ltd 26.145 36.004 42.564
(0.003) (0.000) (0.000)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 40.599 8.783 57.852
(0.000) (0.942) (0.000)
BPCL 28.688 32.342 24.235
(0.000) (0.000) (0.0001)
CIPLA Ltd. 533.581 184.491 12.214
(0.0000) (0.000) (0.235)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 22.344 20.016 23.562
(0.031) (0.062) (0.006)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 35.300 859.63 687.381
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
GRASIM Ltd. 52.965 630.45 262.24
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 46.334 3.602 25.883
(0.000) (0.990) (0.002)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 24.593 500.03 479.726
(0.007) (0.000) (0.000)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 14.612 21.561 6.007
(0.263) (0.000) (0.562)
Housing Development Finance 4.499 2.362 17.576
Corporation Ltd. (0.975) (0.996) (0.253)
I T C Ltd. 12.261 0.0259 8.027
(0.099) (1.00) (0.640)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 26.452 96.251 32.145
(0.001) (0.000) (0.000)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 12.554 23.032 16.013
(0.402) (0.001) (0.020)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 48485 24.562 0.112
(0.000) (0.020) (0.991)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 19.279 212.12 122.65
(0.082) (0.000) (0.000)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 28.051 28.252 14.225
(0.000) (0.000) (0.127)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 93.340 7.267 0.027
(0.000) (0.524) (0.999)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 10.863 56.891 50.632
(0.785) (0.000) (0.000)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 10.547 56.851 6.263
(0.865) (0.000) (0.496)
Siemens Ltd. 29.106 40.986 0.067
(0.003) (0.000) (0.999)
State Bank of India 44.194 758.235 261.331
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 38.217 423.51 249.85
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 599.96 98.457 1092.92
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 59.817 358.12 524.94
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
Wipro Ltd 78.806 42.561 29.039
(0.000) (0.000) (0.001)
Note: LB-Q (k) and LB2-Q (k) are the portmanteau Ljung-Box Q test
statistics for testing the
Table 6
The Effect of Nifty Futures on Spot Price Volatility with
GARCH (1,1) Model
Nifty Closing Returns
Parameters Coefficients Significance
Constant 0.00415 7.534 *
ARCH (1) 0.1291 16.484 *
LARCH (1) 0.8227 93.968 *
Dummy -6.69E -4.396 *
* Indicates 1 % significance at 1 % level
Table 7
Controlling the Market Wide Factors LARCH (1, 1)
Mean Equation
Parameters Co-efficient Significance
constant 0.000827 3.634 *
Nifty 0.133 7.013 *
BSE 200 0.032 2.203 *
S&P 500 (US) 0.366 1.810 *
Variance Equation
Constant 0.000164 7.753 *
ARCH (1) 0.131 16.252 *
LARCH (1) 0.822 97.244 *
Dummy -6.800 -4.310 *
* Indicates significance at 1 per cent level
Table 8
Effect of Futures Trading on Individual Stocks Volatility
with GARCH (1, 1) Model
Name of the stock Constant ARCH(1)
ABB Ltd. 0.00019 0.027
(11.371) (10.344)
ACC Ltd 0.00140 0.226
(16.289) (13.225)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. 0.00042 0.522
(10.144) (19.101)
BPCL 0.00055 0.424
(12.379) (24.360)
CIPLA Ltd 0.00396 0.962
(142.913) (12.554)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 6.18E-05 0.131
(5.622) (5.343)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.00374 0.152
(8.856) (13.865)
GRASIM Ltd. 0.52261 0.090
(12.567) (11.592)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.00374 0.151
(6.531) (8.588)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.00485 0.229
(9.585) (20.956)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.23185 0.272
(5.704) (6.642)
Housing Development 0.00588 0.142
Finance Corporation Ltd. (7.169) (4.754)
1 T C Ltd. 0.00313 0.243
(7.637) (12.686)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.00058 0.125
(6.487) (9.856)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.00056 0.201
(7.169) (2.323)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 2.10824 0.107
(4.611) (5.041)
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. 0.00011 0.146
(4.031) (12.812)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.00013 0.124
(6.847) (8.310)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.00179 0.165
(9.211) (4.326)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.00179 0.287
(9.614) (26.337)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.00128 0.835
(13.782) (42.633)
Siemens Ltd. 0.29354 0.332
(5.956) (10.841)
State Bank of India 3.35E-05 0.091
(5.986) (9.989)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 5.59E-05 140
(9.591) (15.933)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.00417 0.264
(3.320) (12.768)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 6.32E-05 0.130
(6.799) (12.791)
Wipro Ltd 0.00123 0.365
(7.172) (4.267)
ABB Ltd. 0.430 0.81923
(18.356) (5.164)
ACC Ltd 0.772 -1.00013
(56.079) (-16.625)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. 0.393 -0.00273
(13.220) (-8.050)
BPCL 0.319 -0.92796
(12.008) (-8.098)
CIPLA Ltd 0.032 0.99137
(12.008) (14.627)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.530 -1.74326
(7.937) (-2.719)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.805 -5.58045
(64.640) (-9.171)
GRASIM Ltd. 0.882 -0.38475
(103.572) (-5.685)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.849 -8.64071
(72.067) (-6.230)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.719 -3.68054
(50.641) (-4.881)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.561 -0.89417
(13.641) (-2.906)
Housing Development 0.401 -0.00540
Finance Corporation Ltd. (4.845) (-7.719)
1 T C Ltd. 0.588 0.12558
(28.321) (2.561)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 7.541 0.00546
(29.471) (5.875)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.746 1.86593
(5.183) (3.461)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 0.710 -0.22014
(13.790) (-12.746)
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. 0.809 -6.76251
(68.002) (-2.422)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.710 -1.90618
(21.480) (-0.261)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.153 0.94451
(0.517) (8.845)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.517 -8.83631
(19.887) (-6.197)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.081 -0.00059
(3.138) (-7.790)
Siemens Ltd. 0.621 0.83063
(38.046) (2.815)
State Bank of India 0.870 -1.43522
(70.137) (-4.117)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 0.838 -1.2470
(100.521) (-1.594)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.708 -0.7155
(77.256) (3.226)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.817 -3.5125
(55.881) (-5.236)
Wipro Ltd 0.630 -0.00080
(12.673) (-4.491
Note: Figures in parentheses are t values
Table 9
The Asymmetric Effects of Futures Trading on Volatility of Nifty
with GJR GARCH (1, 1)
Pre Futures Introduction
Parameter Co-efficient Significance
[[alpha].sub.0] 0.0061 4.83 *
[[alpha].sub.1] 0.0742 5.61 *
[[beta].sub.1] 0.8815 2.33 *
[[gamma].sub.1] 0.3907 7.62 *
Post Futures Introduction
[[alpha].sub.0] 2.0017 8.06 *
[[alpha].sub.1] 0.1259 0.56 *
[[beta].sub.1] 0.7295 25.81 *
[[gamma].sub.1] 0.1294 8.82 *
* indicates significance at 1 per cent level
Table 10
Result of GJR GARCH (1, 1) Model: Pre Futures Introduction
Name of the stock Constant ARCH(1)
ABB Ltd. 0.00012 0.258
(10.567) (8.247)
ACC Ltd 0.00026 0.1708
(5.310) (3.285)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. 0.00021 0.024
(3.100) (1.002)
BPCL 0.00861 0.316
(5.416) (7.564)
CIPLA Ltd. 0.00080 0.367
(6.307) (6.042)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.00107 0.261
(2.637) (7.461)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 3.45E-05 0.154
(6.860) (7.963)
GRASIM Ltd. 7.79E-05 0.091
(3.436) (3.015)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.00163 120
(4.476) (1.360)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 3.45E-05 0.179
(8.326) (7.586)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.00014 0.245
(5.236) (4.268)
HDFC 0.00437 0.799
(3.257) (2.698)
1 T C Ltd. 3.30E-05 0.068
(3.770) (3.819)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.00025 0.178
(6.235) (9.587)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.51156 0.224
(4.229) (11.274)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 0.000184 0.131
(3.683) (3.223)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 0.00117 0.258
(8.794) (7.589)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.000373 0.148
(5.819) (7.100)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.000849 0.113
(1.253) (1.235)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 8.29E-05 0.108
(4.882) (0.374)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.000372 0.150
(4.672) (2.467)
Siemens Ltd. 0.000258 0.149
(6.261) (8.715)
State Bank of India 0.005371 0.109
(3.875) (3.650)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 3.89E-05 0.127
(8.300) (14.686)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 5.75E-05 0.117
(9.557) (5.057)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.000841 0.111
(3.761) (4.817)
Wipro Ltd 0.000042 0.148
(4.267) (2.661)
Name of the stock GARCH(1) Leverage
Effect (1)
ABB Ltd. 0.568 0.5684
(18.415) (3.435)
ACC Ltd 0.447 0.6172
(14.949) (11.164)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. 0.750 0.0212
(10.427) (6.021)
BPCL 0.603 0.0084
(2.163) (5.0487)
CIPLA Ltd. 0.0632 0.4621
(27.011) (3.537)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.588 0.7450
(4.113) (7.455)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.812 -0.0005
(53.131) (-0.301)
GRASIM Ltd. 0.848 0.6150
(26.614) (4.991)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.341 0.1131
(2.371) (3.097)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.760 0.8812
(46.660) (2.863)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.712 0.0785
(56.873) (2.874)
HDFC 0.199 0.4932
(2.597) (2.0258)
1 T C Ltd. 0.889 0.8162
(36.628) (3.634)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 6.987 0.0257
(38.173) (4.268)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.775 0.3654
(68.720) (3.075)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 0.711 0.3260
(10.800) (2.675)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 5.841 0.0741
(41.457) (3.457)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.840 -0.0004
(50.703) (-0.054)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.575 0.0011
(1.754) (4.020)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.728 0.9382
(18.514) (3.195)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 6.001 0.500
(8.464) (27.687)
Siemens Ltd. 0.822 1.0104
(64.800) (6.582)
State Bank of India 0.820 0.9209
(24.390) (4.632)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 0.869 -0.0692
(127.43) (-1.436)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.725 1.4615
(143.66) (30.901)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.806 0.4130
(22.974) (9.266)
Wipro Ltd 0.589 0.9514
(12.613) (3.662)
Note: Figures in parentheses are t value
Table 11
Result of GJR GARCH (1,1) Model: Post Futures Introduction
Name of the stock Constant ARCH(1)
ABB Ltd. 0.000122 0.049
(0.823) (0.095)
ACC Ltd 0.000261 0.103
(4.990) (7.356)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 0.000166 0.258
(11.020) (5.128)
BPCL 2.56E-05 0.043
(5.359) (4.528)
CIPLA Ltd. 6.55E-05 0.253
(15.192) (11.576)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.000504 0.090
(7.021) (0.211)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 4.56E-05 0.078
(5.181) (3.959)
GRASIM Ltd. 0.00266 0.124
(7.219) (9.303)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.000384 0.948
(3.097) (3.453)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.000101 0.110
(3.097) (3.144)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.00041 0.358
(5.241) (6.221)
HDFC 0.000508 0.0215
(0.607) (1.421)
I T C Ltd. 0.003049 0.116
(0.806) (0.245)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.00051 0.257
(3.478) (5.487)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.00012 0.115
(0.903) (5.831)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 0.00010 0.225
(1.131) (1.544)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 0.00897 0.157
(5.741) (9.256)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.000220 0.039
(4.750) (1.656)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.000370 0.009
(12.482) (2.632)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.00012 0.338
(9.625) (21.900)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.00014 0.014
(1.711) (2.955)
Siemens Ltd. 8.74E-05 0.275
(2.202) (4.276)
State Bank of India 1.89E-05 0.066
(4.969) (4.953)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 0.00012 0.080
(2.306) (2.066)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.06206 0.064
(1.050) (2.089)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 2.85E-05 0.128
(5.517) (7.839)
Wipro Ltd 0.00125 0.142
(2.971) (2.202)
Name of the stock GARCH(1) Leverage
Effect (1)
ABB Ltd. 0.593 -0.0002
(1.204) (-0.110)
ACC Ltd 0.819 0.6842
(42.791) (3.333)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 0.313 -0.0006
(9.775) (-0.211)
BPCL 0.905 0.9494
(89.230) (3.826)
CIPLA Ltd. 0.5431 0.3913
(18.898) (6.861)
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 0.579 -0.0117
(19.609) (-0.267)
GAIL (India) Ltd. 0.7893 0.5746
(2.662) (5.811)
GRASIM Ltd. 0.799 0.4001
(40.746) (3.017)
HCL Technologies Ltd. 0.046 0.9273
(0.611) (9.871)
HDFC Bank Ltd. 0.571 0.862
(11.951) (7.251)
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 0.586 0.0587
(29.251) (4.235)
HDFC 0.584 -0.0237
(0.860) (-0.919)
I T C Ltd. 0.568 0.9175
(1.213) (0.247)
ICICI Bank Ltd. 0.524 0.0517
(12.745) (3.457)
Infosys Technologies Ltd. 0.582 0.1178
(1.282) (4.6323)
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 0.915 0.0020
(13.800) (3.413)
National Aluminum Co. Ltd. 0.752 -0.0001
(24.783) (-0.327)
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. 0.562 0.1139
(6.226) (7.0287)
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 0.969 0.3004
(51.962) (6.010)
Reliance Industries Ltd. 0.442 -0.0071
(13.316) (-0.237)
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. 0.898 0.9115
(14.947) (2.333)
Siemens Ltd. 0.529 0.0756
(19.425) (6.106)
State Bank of India 0.875 0.4273
(57.478) (2.886)
Steel Authority of India Ltd. 0.722 0.6950
(8.641) (2.075)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 0.585 0.0216
(2.497) (2.015)
Tata Power Co. Ltd 0.800 0.1025
(42.594) (3.013)
Wipro Ltd 0.728 0.9145
(14.567) (3.426)
Note: Figures in parentheses are t value