Use of vitamin and mineral supplements among Canadian adults.

Guo, Xiaoyan ; Willows, Noreen ; Kuhle, Stefan 等

In recent years, there has been increased consumption of vitamin and mineral supplements in industrialized nations. (1-4) At the same time, there has been growing attention to the potential role of vitamin and mineral supplements in augmenting total nutrient intake, improving health and ameliorating disease risk. (5-7) There have also been concerns that some consumers who take supplements may exceed the Upper Tolerable Limit for certain nutrients. (7,8) International studies have reported prevalences ranging from 36% (9) to 52%, (4) and have identified age, female gender and higher socio-economic status (4,9-11) to be associated with vitamin and mineral supplement use. In Canada, only a few studies but no population-based ones have examined the use of supplements, whereas such information is critical to inform policy decision-makers, stakeholders and the public.

Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine the prevalence of vitamin and mineral supplement use among adults and its association with demographic and lifestyle factors. To this end, we accessed data from the Canadian Community Health Survey, cycle 2.2 (CCHS 2.2), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of Canadian residents of all ages. (12)

METHODS

Design and sampling strategy

Data from the General Health Component of the CCHS 2.2 were used. The General Health Component contained information on respondents' physical activity, self-reported chronic disease, smoking status, alcohol consumption, fruit/vegetable consumption, household food security, socio-demographic characteristics, and vitamin and mineral supplement consumption. (12)

A single member in each of 35,107 households was surveyed using a complex multistage sampling strategy to select households and respondents. Excluded from the survey were persons living on Indian reserves or Crown lands, persons living in institutions, fulltime members of the Canadian Forces and residents of some remote regions, and persons living in the Territories. The target population covered by the survey represents approximately 98% of the population of the 10 provinces. The overall survey response rate was 76.5%. Detailed descriptions of the survey design, sample and interview procedures are available elsewhere. (12)

Inclusion/Exclusion criteria

Respondents 19 to 70 years of age were included in the current analysis. Pregnant women and respondents with missing responses to the question about vitamin and mineral supplement use in the past month were excluded. Missing values were treated as a separate covariate category where possible. However, individuals with missing data for physical activity, fruit/vegetable consumption, self-reported chronic disease, and smoking status had to be removed from the analysis as Statistics Canada does not allow release of information on subsets with n<10 for the CCHS in order to avoid respondent information disclosure. The final sample size was 15,553 respondents.

Outcome

The primary outcome was the period prevalence (hereafter referred to as 'prevalence') of self-reported consumption of vitamin and mineral supplements. Respondents were asked, "In the past month, did you take vitamins/minerals?". Respondents who answered "yes" were defined as "vitamin and mineral supplement users" and those who answered "no" were defined as "vitamin and mineral supplement non-users" in this study.

Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors

The following variables were considered as covariates in the analysis based on previous information from the literature: age; gender; physical activity (active, moderate, inactive); fruit and vegetable daily consumption (<5x/day, [less than or equal to] 5x/day), self-reported chronic disease (yes/no), smoking status (non-smoker, current smoker, former smoker), alcohol consumption (<1x/month, 1-3x/month, [less than or equal to] 1x/week), household income adequacy (takes into account both the number of people in the household and the total household income from all sources in the 12 months before the interview; lowest, lower middle, upper middle, highest), highest household education (secondary school or less, post-secondary school/college, university), household food insecurity (based on a revised interpretation of the responses to the United States Household Food Security Survey Module developed by Health Canada's Office of Nutrition Policy and Promotion in consultation with experts in nutrition and food security; (13) yes/no).

Consistent with Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), specific age/sex categories recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) (14) were used in the analysis (males 19-30 years, females 19-30 years, males 3150 years, females 31-50 years, males 51-70 years, females 51-70 years).

Statistical analysis

Associations between socio-demographic and lifestyle factors and vitamin and mineral supplement use were examined using cross-tabulations and logistic regression analysis. Backward selection procedure was employed to build the parsimonious multiple regression model, and the Likelihood-Ratio test was used to exclude nonsignificant covariates (p>0.05) from the model. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported.

The coefficients of variation for the prevalence estimates for the outcome and the covariates indicated acceptable sampling variability (<16%) as per Statistics Canada policy. (15) All estimates were obtained using sampling weights provided by Statistics Canada to account for design effect and non-response bias. Standard errors were estimated using a bootstrapping procedure. (12) Stata 9 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses.

The current research was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta.

RESULTS

The prevalence of vitamin and mineral supplement use among adult Canadians ages 19-70 years was 40.1%. Gender and age differences were observed in that more females than males took supplements (48.1% vs. 32.2%) and older persons were more likely to take supplements than younger persons: 51% (51 to 70 years) vs. 38% (31 to 50 years) and 31% (19 to 30 years).

In both the univariate and multiple regression analysis, respondents with less healthy lifestyle behaviours or of lower socioeconomic status were generally less likely to be vitamin and mineral supplement users. Respondents from food-insecure households were as likely to use supplements as those from food-secure households after adjusting for socio-economic status. Respondents with a self-reported chronic disease were more likely to be vitamin and mineral supplement users than those without a chronic condition; this association was only statistically significant in the univariate analysis. Detailed results from the univariate and full adjusted model are presented in Table 1. Presence of a chronic condition, alcohol consumption, and household food security were not retained in the parsimonious model. Odds ratios from the parsimonious model were very similar to those from the full model (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The current study showed that 40% of adult Canadians reported having used vitamin or mineral supplements in the previous month. Vitamins and mineral supplements were more commonly used by individuals with healthy lifestyle behaviours or of higher socio-economic status, women and adults beyond the age of 50. Only a few Canadian studies have examined vitamin and mineral supplement use. However, due to limitations in sample representativeness and comprehensiveness, their findings may not be generalizable. (8,16-19) The 1997/98 Food Habits of Canadians study interviewed 1,543 Canadian adults aged 18-65 randomly selected from five geographic regions across Canada and reported that 41% of the respondents used supplements. (8) The Baseline Natural Health Products Survey Among Consumers collected information on the use of natural health products in 2,004 adult Canadians in 2005. (19) The reported usage of natural health products in that survey was 71%, and the most commonly used product was vitamins (57%), indicating that 40.5% of survey respondents used vitamins, which is comparable to the 40% prevalence in the present study. (19) As in our study, users of natural health products tended to have a higher level of education and household income, and were more likely to be female. (19) In the US, the prevalence of vitamin and mineral supplement use in the month prior to the interview was reported to be 42% among participants of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). (2)

The current study, consistent with patterns presented in previous studies, demonstrated that females, older people, and those with a socio-economically advantaged background were more likely to use vitamin and mineral supplements. (2,3,10,11,19-23) Studies in the United States and Europe have shown that physical activity is positively associated with vitamin and mineral supplement use. (9) Our results confirm these findings in a Canadian setting. Additionally, in agreement with previous research, (10) we found that persons who had a higher fruit and vegetable intake were more likely to take vitamin and mineral supplements.

Results from the Baseline Natural Health Products Survey have shown that personal health concerns and the desire to maintain and promote personal health are primary motivation in Canadians for use of natural health products. (19) Ervin and colleagues (2) pointed out the role of recommendation by family and friends, media, advertisement, and health professionals on the consumption of supplements. Other reasons might include the desire to improve athletic performance (24) or to increase energy, (2) or the scientific evidence on association of higher intake of certain nutrients with decreased risk for certain diseases. (2) While some researchers have found a positive association between supplement use and self-reported health status, (2,25) others have found no significant association (26) or a negative one. (27) Bender et al. (28) found that individuals who had one or more health problems were more likely to take supplements, however, after controlling for socio-economic factors, this significant positive relationship disappeared. The findings of Bender et al. are similar to our results from the CCHS 2.2 indicating that the negative association between having a self-reported chronic condition and supplement use is affected by socioeconomic factors.

So far, no studies have assessed the relationship between income-related household food insecurity and the use of vitamin and mineral supplements. The univariate analysis showed that household food insecurity is inversely associated with vitamin and mineral supplement use. However, after adjusting for income and education, this association vanished, indicating that the relationship is confounded by socio-economic status.

The strengths of the present study can be attributed to the features of CCHS 2.2 that include a large representative sample size, the population-based design, and a high response rate. Our findings from the CCHS 2.2 could, therefore, represent Canadian estimates of vitamin and mineral supplement use. The study is limited by the lack of an exact definition of a vitamin and mineral supplement in the CCHS 2.2 questionnaire and the absence of more detailed data on the frequency and type of the supplement intake. Respondents might have had different understandings of the question, and this might have led to the under- or over-reporting of supplement usage. Also, self-reported responses are prone to reporting bias and to error. The current paper used fruit and vegetable intake as a proxy for diet quality as fruits and vegetables contribute significantly to an individual's dietary intake of fibre, vitamin A, folate, iron and potassium. (29) Future studies should compare a broader range of dietary factors between users and non-users of supplements.

Given the high prevalence of supplement use by Canadians, it is important to evaluate the contribution of vitamin and mineral supplement use to the nutritional adequacy and well-being of Canadians. Although it is recommended that adequate nutrition be maintained through a well-balanced diet, many people do not get enough nutrients from food to ensure optimal health (30-32) and would benefit from the use of vitamin and mineral supplements. Unfortunately, as shown in the current study, individuals who would likely benefit the most from vitamin and mineral supplement use are less likely to use them. On the other hand, individuals with an adequate diet who take supplements may inadvertently exceed the recommended upper intake limit for some nutrients, which may result in toxicity. (33) Future studies should examine the role of vitamin and mineral supplement use in relation to nutrient adequacy and health.

In summary, consumption of vitamin and mineral supplements is common in Canadian adults, and is positively associated with higher socio-economic status and healthier lifestyle behaviours. This study not only provides an enhanced understanding of estimates of vitamin and mineral supplement use, but also provides baseline data for further epidemiologic investigations that need adequate estimates of prevalence rates in different strata to assess the role of supplements in nutrition and health. Furthermore, this study presents data of public health significance that warrants further exploration, and also provides data that can be used to develop evidence-based health policy and programs.

Acknowledgements: This research was funded through Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research salary support to Drs. Willows and Veugelers, Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research establishment funds to Dr. Veugelers made available as a student stipend to Ms. Guo, and a Canada Research Chair to Dr. Veugelers. The authors thank Ms. Shirley Loh from the Statistics Canada Research Data Centre at the University of Alberta for her support.

Received: December 4, 2008

Accepted: April 15, 2009

REFERENCES

(1.) Millen AE, Dodd KW, Subar AF. Use of vitamin, mineral, nonvitamin, and nonmineral supplements in the United States: The 1987, 1992, and 2000 National Health Interview Survey results. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104(6):942-50.

(2.) Ervin RB, Wright JD, Kennedy-Stephenson J. Use of dietary supplements in the United States, 1988-94. Vital Health Stat 11. 1999;244:i-iii, 1-14.

(3.) Slesinski MJ, Subar AF, Kahle LL. Trends in use of vitamin and mineral supplements in the United States: The 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95(8):921-23.

(4.) Rock CL. Multivitamin-multimineral supplements: Who uses them? Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85(1):277S-279S.

(5.) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Multivitamin/ mineral supplements and chronic disease prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85(1):257S-264S.

(6.) Mares-Perlman JA, Klein BE, Klein R, Ritter LL, Freudenheim JL, Luby MH. Nutrient supplements contribute to the dietary intake of middle- and older-aged adult residents of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. J Nutr 1993;123(2):176-88.

(7.) Murphy SP, White KK, Park S, Sharma S. Multivitamin-multimineral supplements' effect on total nutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85(1):280S-284S.

(8.) Troppmann L, Gray-Donald K, Johns T. Supplement use: Is there any nutritional benefit? J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102(6):818-25.

(9.) Harrison RA, Holt D, Pattison DJ, Elton PJ. Are those in need taking dietary supplements? A survey of 21 923 adults. Br J Nutr 2004;91(4):617-23.

(10.) Briefel RR, Johnson CL. Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr 2004;24:401-31.

(11.) Balluz LS, Okoro CA, Bowman BA, Serdula MK, Mokdad AH. Vitamin or supplement use among adults, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 13 states, 2001. Public Health Rep 2005;120(2):117-23.

(12.) Canadian Community Health Survey - Nutrition (CCHS). Available online at:http://www.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey& SDDS=5049&lang= en&db=IMDB&dbg=f&adm=8&dis=2 (Accessed March 17, 2009).

(13.) Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 2.2, Nutrition (2004): Income-Related Household Food Security in Canada. Available online at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/surveill/nutrition/commun/income_food_secsec_ alim-eng.php (Accessed March 17, 2009)

(14.) Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes, 1st ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.

(15.) Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey 2004: User Guide. Cat. No. 82M0024GPE. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Industry, 2005.

(16.) Huang SS, Johnson K, Pipe AL. The use of dietary supplements and medications by Canadian athletes at the Atlanta and Sydney Olympic Games. Clin J Sport Med 2006;16(1):27-33.

(17.) McKenzie J, Keller HH. Vitamin-mineral supplementation and use of herbal preparations among community-living older adults. Can J Public Health 2001;92(4):286-90.

(18.) Schenkel TC, Stockman NKA, Brown JN, Duncan AM. Evaluation of energy, nutrient and dietary fiber intakes of adolescent males. J Am Coll Nutr 2007;26(3):264-71.

(19.) Health Canada. Baseline Natural Health Products Survey Among Consumers. Available online at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/pubs/natur/eng_cons_ survey-eng.php (Accessed March 17, 2009).

(20.) Ervin RB, Kennedy-Stephenson J. Mineral intakes of elderly adult supplement and non-supplement users in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Nutr 2002;132(11):3422-27.

(21.) Koplan JP, Annest JL, Layde PM, Rubin GL. Nutrient intake and supplementation in the United States (NHANES II). Am J Public Health 1986;76(3):287-89.

(22.) Slesinski MJ, Subar AF, Kahle LL. Dietary intake of fat, fiber and other nutrients is related to the use of vitamin and mineral supplements in the United States: The 1992 National Health Interview Survey. J Nutr 1996;126(12):30018.

(23.) Subar AF, Block G. Use of vitamin and mineral supplements: Demographics and amounts of nutrients consumed. The 1987 Health Interview Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132(6):1091-101.

(24.) Dorsch KD, Bell A. Dietary supplement use in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005;17(5):653-57.

(25.) Gray SL, Hanlon JT, Fillenbaum GG, Wall WE, Bales C. Predictors of nutritional supplement use by the elderly. Pharmacotherapy 1996;16(4):715-20.

(26.) Read MH, Graney AS. Food supplement usage by the elderly. J Am Diet Assoc 1982;80(3):250-53.

(27.) Read MH, Bock MA, Carpenter K, Medeiros D, Ortiz M, Raab C, et al. Health beliefs and supplement use: Adults in seven western states. J Am Diet Assoc 1989;89(12):1812-13.

(28.) Bender MM, Levy AS, Schucker RE, Yetley EA. Trends in prevalence and magnitude of vitamin and mineral supplement usage and correlation with health status. J Am Diet Assoc 1992;92(9):1096-101.

(29.) Hoerr SL, Tsuei E, Liu Y, Franklin FA, Nicklas TA. Diet quality varies by race/ethnicity of Head Start mothers. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108(4):651-59.

(30.) Hallfrisch J, Muller DC. Does diet provide adequate amounts of calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc in a well-educated adult population? Exp Gerontol 1993;28(4-5):473-83.

(31.) Nesheim MC. What is the research base for the use of dietary supplements? Public Health Nutr 1999;2(1):35-38.

(32.) Block G, Cox C, Madans J, Schreiber GB, Licitra L, Melia N. Vitamin supplement use, by demographic characteristics. Am J Epidemiol 1988;127(2):297309.

(33.) Marra MV, Wellman NS. Multivitamin-mineral supplements in the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program: Not a one-size-fits-all quick fix. Am J Public Health 2008;98(7):1171-76.

Xiaoyan Guo, MSc, [1] Noreen Willows, PhD, RD, [2] Stefan Kuhle, MD, MPH, [1] Gian Jhangri, PhD, [1] Paul J. Veugelers, PhD [1]

[1.] School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB

[2.] Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB

Correspondence: Dr. Paul Veugelers, Professor, School of Public Health, Population Health Intervention Research Unit, University of Alberta, 6-50 University Terrace, 8303112 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Tel: 780-492-9095, Fax: 780-492-5521, E-mail: [email protected].

Disclaimer: This analysis was based on the Statistics Canada CCHS 2.2 master file which contains anonymized data collected in 2004/2005. The responsibility for the use and interpretation of these data is solely that of the authors. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Statistics Canada.

Table 1. Prevalence and Determinants of
Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Use among
Canadians Aged 19-70

Determinants            Distribution in the        Prevalence of
                          Population (%)          Vitamin/Mineral
                            Supplement                Use (%)

Age-sex groups
  19-30 years      M           12.3                    27.9
                   F           11.3                    34.5
  31-50 years      M           23.2                    29.2
                   F           22.9                    46.4
  51-70 years      M           14.9                    40.2
                   F           15.4                    60.5
Physical activity
  Active                       18.4                    47.9
  Moderate                     25.3                    42.3
  Inactive                     56.3                    36.5
Fruit & vegetable
  daily consumption
  <5 servings/day              69.1                    37.0
  [greater than or             30.9                    46.8
    equal to]5
      servings/day
Chronic condition
  Yes                          38.5                    44.5
  No                           61.5                    37.3
Smoking status
  Non-smoker                   47.4                    41.3
  Current smoker               26.8                    32.8
  Previous smoker              25.8                    45.3
Alcohol
  <once/month                  16.6                    40.9
  1-3 times/month              19.8                    40.4
  [greater than                45.8                    40.9
    or equal to]
      once/week
  Missing                      17.8                    36.8
Household food
  security
  Secure                       90.7                    40.8
  Insecure                      8.9                    33.3
  Missing                       0.4                    26.4
Highest household
  education
  Secondary school             17.9                    33.4
  or less
  Post-secondary               44.7                    40.3
  school/college
  University                   35.3                    43.8
  Missing                       2.1                    29.9
Household income
  adequacy
  Lowest                        7.9                    32.9
  Lower middle                 17.0                    34.1
  Upper middle                 32.8                    38.5
  Highest                      34.0                    46.8
  Missing                       8.3                    37.9

Determinants              Odds Ratio (95%      Confidence Interval)
                            Unadjusted         Adjusted ([dagger])
                                                 (Full Model)

Age-sex groups
  19-30 years      M     1                       1
                   F     1.36 (1.09-1.70)        1.40 (1.12-1.75)
  31-50 years      M     1.07 (0.85-1.33)        1.06 (0.84-1.34)
                   F     2.24 (1.79-2.79)        2.24 (1.77-2.83)
  51-70 years      M     1.74 (1.41-2.14)        1.66 (1.32-2.09)
                   F     3.96 (3.20-4.90)        4.13 (3.25-5.24)
Physical activity
  Active                 1                       1
  Moderate               0.79 (0.67-0.94)        0.75 (0.63-0.90)
  Inactive               0.62 (0.54-0.73)        0.64 (0.54- 0.76)
Fruit & vegetable
  daily consumption
  <5 servings/day        1                       1
  [greater than or       1.50 (1.31-1.71)        1.18 (1.03-1.36)
    equal to]5
      servings/day
Chronic condition
  Yes                    1                       1
  No                     0.74 (0.66-0.84)        0.89 (0.77-1.02)
Smoking status
  Non-smoker             1                       1
  Current smoker         0.69 (0.60-0.80)        0.85 (0.73-1.00)
  Previous smoker        1.17 (1.01-1.37)        1.10 (0.93-1.30)
Alcohol
  <once/month            1                       1
  1-3 times/month        0.98 (0.81-1.18)        1.08 (0.87-1.33)
  [greater than          1.00 (0.84-1.19)        1.05 (0.86-1.27)
    or equal to]
      once/week
  Missing                0.84 (0.69-1.03)        0.86 (0.70-1.06)
Household food
  security
  Secure                 1                       1
  Insecure               0.73 (0.60-0.87)        1.03 (0.83-1.29)
  Missing                0.52 (0.18, 1.52)       0.72 (0.27-1.92)
Highest household
  education
  Secondary school       1                       1
  or less
  Post-secondary         1.35 (1.16-1.58)        1.37 (1.17-1.61)
  school/college
  University             1.56 (1.33-1.82)        1.41 (1.18-1.69)
  Missing                0.85 (0.57-1.28)        0.88 (0.57-1.35)
Household income
  adequacy
  Lowest                 1                       1
  Lower middle           1.05 (0.82-1.36)        1.04 (0.79-1.37)
  Upper middle           1.27 (1.02-1.59)        1.23 (0.95-1.60)
  Highest                1.79 (1.44-2.23)        1.62 (1.24-2.12)
  Missing                1.24 (0.94-1.64)        1.17 (0.86-1.59)

Note: The estimates represent population
estimates as they were weighted to the
Canadian population.

([dagger]) Full model included all covariates.

([double dagger]) Parsimonious model included
only significant covariates