首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月12日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Level of street involvement and health and health services use of Calgary street youth.
  • 作者:Worthington, Catherine A. ; Bruce J. MacLaurin
  • 期刊名称:Canadian Journal of Public Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:0008-4263
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 期号:September
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Canadian Public Health Association
  • 摘要:Health issues faced by street youth in Canada are of growing concern for public health, as homelessness and health become critical social issues. (1) The health risks of street-involved youth are many, and may arise from street environmental risks (including inadequate shelter, poor diet, and violence); (2,3) and risks resulting from street experiences, including those related to sexual activity (including survival/obligatory sex or prostitution) such as high rates of STIs (HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhoea, hepatitis B) and high-risk pregnancy; (4-6) substance use, such as drug overdoses, or hepatitis B, C, or HIV infection through sharing of needles or injection drug equipment; (7,8) and isolation and lack of social support, which may lead to mental health problems or exacerbation of mental health issues (including depression and suicide attempts). (4,9) While many street youth use hospital emergency and health clinics, they typically turn to these only when seriously injured or ill, and often cannot afford medicines. (10-12)
  • 关键词:Condoms;Health care industry;Health planning;Health risk assessment;Medical care;Public health;Teenagers;Youth

Level of street involvement and health and health services use of Calgary street youth.


Worthington, Catherine A. ; Bruce J. MacLaurin


Health issues faced by street youth in Canada are of growing concern for public health, as homelessness and health become critical social issues. (1) The health risks of street-involved youth are many, and may arise from street environmental risks (including inadequate shelter, poor diet, and violence); (2,3) and risks resulting from street experiences, including those related to sexual activity (including survival/obligatory sex or prostitution) such as high rates of STIs (HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhoea, hepatitis B) and high-risk pregnancy; (4-6) substance use, such as drug overdoses, or hepatitis B, C, or HIV infection through sharing of needles or injection drug equipment; (7,8) and isolation and lack of social support, which may lead to mental health problems or exacerbation of mental health issues (including depression and suicide attempts). (4,9) While many street youth use hospital emergency and health clinics, they typically turn to these only when seriously injured or ill, and often cannot afford medicines. (10-12)

A variety of definitions of street youth have been used, but most health research in Canada focuses on youth under 25 who face some degree of precarious housing (e.g., those "couch surfing" at friends' homes or in hotels) or absolute homelessness (those living outdoors, in abandoned buildings or shelters) over a given time period and who use street services. (4,13) A more inclusive perspective defines street-involved youth as young people under 25 who spend considerable amounts of time on the street, participate extensively in street lifestyle practices, and who may live or have lived independently of parents or guardians in marginal or precarious situations. (14) This approach acknowledges diversity among the street-involved youth population, and includes youth who may not be accessing services as well as youth who may be street-involved, but who have not lived on the street. This approach also considers factors that lead to street involvement, which typically include family conflict, violence or maltreatment, (15,16) individual issues (such as mental health issues and substance use), (4,17) or child welfare or educational systems issues. (18) Within the last decade, there has been a growing recognition in the literature that for youth, involvement with the street is episodic, and may follow one or repeated cycles of entry, equilibrium on the street, and extrication or disengagement. (15,19) Studies have thus recently begun to examine health risks, health outcomes, and street services use according to the levels and types of street involvement. (10,20) The objective of this study was to describe health risks, outcomes and health services use of Calgary street-involved youth and investigate differences in these by their level of street involvement in order to inform health and street services delivery.

METHODS

This study used a community-based research approach, and included a self-administered survey of street-involved youth. Community members (including 3 street-involved youth and representatives of 14 agencies) acted as research team members, and contributed to the development of study questions and survey and interview instruments, survey collection, and data interpretation. Community-based research promotes study community relevance and direct uptake of study results by agencies, and provides research training and skills-building for community members. (21) The study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board.

Study sample

Nonprobability, purposive sampling was used to achieve variation in the 371 survey participants in terms of gender, ethnic group, level and type of street involvement, and geographic location within the city. Research-trained youth outreach workers recruited survey participants from sites across the city, including indoor and outdoor gathering places, public transportation stations, agency locations and youth shelters. Targeted street-involved youth were 24 or younger, although youth up to age 29 were not excluded if they clearly identified and engaged with youth street practices. Study participants were required to be English speaking, and not under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of participation.

Survey instrument and data collection

The self-administered survey instrument (70 questions in booklet format) was designed to capture demographic characteristics; life experiences; street experiences; perceived physical, mental and emotional health; social, employment and educational activities; coping strategies and social support; future goals; and use of and opinions about health and street services. Survey items were based on questions used in previous surveys of street youth in Canada, (22-24) and were modified to fit the local context and street language. The brief social support scale constructed for this study used 7 items from the MOS-SSS deemed most relevant for street-involved youth, and drew from tangible, affection, positive social interaction and emotional/informational subscales of the MOS-SSS. (25) (Internal consistency for this scale among this sample was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93).) The survey instrument was pretested with 24 street-involved youth.

In all, 371 surveys were collected by trained outreach workers over a seven-month period (June 2005-January 2006). Participating youth were offered a Calgary street survival guide, condom and lubricant packet, refreshments, and a choice of transit tickets/coffee shop gift certificates.

Data entry and statistical analysis

Sixteen surveys were excluded due to inadequate completion (less than 50% complete), for a final sample of 355 surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics, and three categories of street involvement were created for analyses: youth who indicated they were currently living on the street (of whom 48% reported they spent the last night in a shelter, 15% outside, 12% couch surfing/at a friend's house, 6% camping, 5% on the move; 12% other); those who indicated they did not currently live on the street but had lived on the street in the past (street-involved, lived on the street in past); and those youth who indicated they spent time on the street but had never lived on the street (street-involved, never lived on the street). Logistic regression analyses (SPSS 16.0) were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted (for sex, ethnocultural group and age group) odds ratios (OR) for each health and health service use factor by level of street involvement. Three trans-gendered youth were excluded from the adjusted analyses that controlled for sex, ethnocultural group and age group. Given the cross-sectional nature of the data and sample size, these regression results were checked for robustness by running the logistic regression models (unadjusted and adjusted) with collapsed levels of street involvement (two categories: currently living on the street; not currently living on the street).

RESULTS

Survey participant characteristics, their health factors, and health services use are detailed in Table 1. Seventy-six percent (280 respondents) had lived on the street at some point, and 182 (52%) reported they had lived on the street in another city. Pregnancy involvement did not differ significantly by sex (52% for females; 46% for males), but a significantly larger percentage of females (33%) than males (20%) reported survival/obligatory sex (i.e., sex in exchange for food or shelter).

Health risks, health outcomes and health services use of participating street-involved youth by level of street involvement are displayed in Table 2. Significant and consistent health and health risk outcomes were seen by level of street involvement in terms of reported general and physical health, mental health, sexual health, and health risks for both unadjusted and adjusted models. For example, youth who had lived on the street in the past (adjusted OR 3.1), or were currently living on the street (adjusted OR 3.2) were 3 times more likely than youth who had never lived on the street to report attempting suicide. The one exception was condom use (always) which did not differ significantly among the three groups.

For health services use, results were more variable. Use of hospitals and walk-in clinics did not differ significantly by level of street involvement; however, there were significant differences in use for other health services, with those currently living on the street 80% less likely (adjusted OR 0.2) than street-involved youth who had never lived on the street to use a physician during business hours, and 10 times more likely (adjusted OR 10.1) to use street mobile clinics. There were significant differences from those who had never lived on the street for both other groups (currently living on the street and lived on the street in the past) in terms of those who did not use health services and those who had received HIV or STI testing. For all but self-reported health, regression results remained consistent when the regressions were run with two levels of street involvement (currently living on street compared with not currently living on street; results not shown).

CONCLUSION

Survey participants showed similar characteristics to street-involved youth surveyed in other Canadian cities in terms of demographics (approximately two thirds male, with an over-representation of Aboriginal youth) and similar health and health risk experiences to other samples of North American street-involved youth--with high levels of reported abuse or neglect, experience of street violence, childhood mental health conditions, attempted suicide, pregnancy, involvement in survival/obligatory sex or prostitution, drug and alcohol use, and low/inconsistent condom use. (4,13) Our results for health services use are also consistent with the small number of existing North American studies, and show fairly low levels of formal health services use, with the exception of walk-in clinics (66%) and HIV or STI testing (69%). (10,26,27)

To our knowledge, our study is the first Canadian survey study to examine street youth health and services use by level of street involvement. Our results show clear differences according to level of street involvement--with those who had not lived on the street showing better health outcomes than those who were currently living on the street or those who had lived on the street in the past--and are consistent with the small body of emerging research. (20,28) Our results for differences in health services use by level of street involvement show some differences by level of street involvement, and this is also consistent with existing international research. (10,27,29) Most notable in our results was the lower likelihood that youth currently living on the street would use a physician during regular office hours, and higher likelihood of use of street mobile clinics, services that are targeted to street-involved individuals.

Like most studies conducted with street youth, in addition to some measurement error that may result from self-report data, our study faces two key limitations. Street-involved youth are a difficult population to access, and thus we do not claim our sample is representative of Calgary street-involved youth. However, our sample was recruited from a wide variety of targeted locations by street outreach workers with considerable rapport with youth (including 11% youth who had not accessed any street services in the past three months), and thus the sample was more broadly based than many previous studies which predominantly utilized agency-based samples. In addition, as our study was cross-sectional, we present associational data, and are not claiming that living on the street in and of itself--or itself alone--produces poorer health outcomes and higher health risks. While clear differences exist by level of street involvement, street involvement itself is a product of complex, multiple risks, including family violence, mental health/drug use issues, previous difficulties in the educational system, and child welfare services involvement, all of which may contribute to poor health practices and elevated risks for poor health outcomes. There is very little longitudinal research that has examined health risks and outcomes for street youth or homeless adults--this small body of work suggests that the relationships between homelessness and poor health outcomes (e.g., mental illness) and health risks (e.g., injection drug use) is bidirectional. (30)

Given the results of this study, it is clear that youth with different levels of street involvement may access different types of services. Thus, public health and other service providers need to be cognizant of their role in providing prevention, safety or stabilization services for youth at different stages of street life. Barriers to health services for street-involved youth are many, and include accessibility issues, lack of medical coverage and prescription costs, and perhaps most importantly, health care professional attitudes. (11,12) Public health plays a critical role in providing services for street-involved youth, but many other sectors need to be engaged as well, including mental health and addictions, education, child welfare, and correctional services.

Acknowledgements: This study was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (CBR68751) and an establishment grant from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). C. Worthington is a CIHR New Investigator and an AHFMR Population Health Investigator. We thank the many youth who participated in the study, Calgary youth and health agency staff on the research team for their contributions to the study, and the street outreach workers who acted as research assistants. Particular thanks go to the Project Coordinator, Dawn Dittmann, and to AIDS Calgary Awareness Association, the lead community agency partner on this study. Thanks also go to Nedra Huffey, Eric Berndt, and San Patten, all of whom acted as research partners over the course of the study, and to M.C. Auld who reviewed the statistical analyses.

Received: February 17, 2009

Accepted: June 24, 2009

REFERENCES

(1.) Turnbull J, Muckle W, Masters C. Homelessness and health. CMAJ 2007;177(9):1065-66.

(2.) Dachner N, Tarasuk V. Homeless "squeegee kids": Food insecurity and daily survival. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1039-49.

(3.) Gaetz S. Safe streets for whom? Homeless youth, social exclusion, and criminal victimization. Can J Criminol Criminal Justice 2004;46(4):423-55.

(4.) Boivin JF, Roy E, Haley N, Galbaud du Fort G. The health of street youth: A Canadian perspective. Can J Public Health 2005;96(6):432-37.

(5.) Public Health Agency of Canada. Sexually Transmitted Infections in Canadian Street Youth: Findings from Enhanced Surveillance of Canadian Street Youth, 1999-2003. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Health, HP5-14/2006, 2006.

(6.) Weber AE, Boivin JF, Blais L, Haley N, Roy E. HIV risk profile and prostitution among female street youths. J Urban Health 2002;79(4):525-35.

(7.) Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Street Youth and Substance Use: Findings from Enhanced Surveillance of Canadian Street Youth, 1999-2003. Ottawa: Minister of Health, HP5-23/2007, 2007.

(8.) Roy E, Boudreau JF, Leclerc P, Boivin JF, Godin G. Trends in injection drug use behaviors over 10 years among street youth. Drug Alcohol Dependence 2007;89:170-75.

(9.) Kidd SA. Factors precipitating suicidality among homeless youth: A quantitative follow-up. Youth & Society 2006;37(4):393-422.

(10.) Carlson JL, Sugano E, Millstein SG, Auerswald CL. Service utilization and the life cycle of youth homelessness. J Adolesc Health 2006;38:624-27.

(11.) Ensign J, Bell MA. Illness experiences of homeless youth. Qual Health Res 2004;14(1):1239-54.

(12.) Geber GM. Barriers to health care for street youth. J Adolesc Health 1997;21:287-90.

(13.) Public Health Agency of Canada. Street Youth in Canada: Findings from Enhanced Surveillance of Canadian Street Youth, 1999-2003. Ottawa: Minister of Health, HP5-15/2006, 2006.

(14.) Brannigan A, Caputo T. Studying Runaways and Street Youth in Canada: Conceptual and Research Design Issues. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services, 1993.

(15.) Adlaf EM, Zhanowicz YM. A cluster-analytic study of substance problems and mental health among street youths. Am J Drug & Alcohol Abuse 1999;25(4):639-60.

(16.) Hyde J. From home to street: Understanding young people's transitions into homelessness. J Adolescence 2005;28:171-83.

(17.) Martijn C, Sharpe L. Pathways to youth homelessness. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:1-12.

(18.) Thompson SJ, Zittel-Palamara KM, Maccio EM. Runaway youth utilizing crisis shelter services: Predictors of presenting problems. Child & Youth Care Forum 2004;33(6):387-404.

(19.) Auerswald CL, Eyre SL. Youth homelessness in San Francisco: A life cycle approach. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1497-512.

(20.) Greene JM, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. Substance use among runaway and homeless youth in three national samples. Am J Public Health 1997;87(2):229-36.

(21.) Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998;19:173-202.

(22.) Brannigan A, Caputo T. Runaways and Street Youth in Canada in the 1990's, Revised Final Report. Calgary, AB: Brannigan and Caputo, Social Science Consulting, June 1992.

(23.) Clarke M, Cooper M. Homeless Youth: Falling Between the Cracks. Calgary: Youth Alternative Housing Committee, August 2000.

(24.) Janus MD, McCormack A, Burgess AW, Hartman C. Adolescent Runaways: Causes and Consequences. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 1987.

(25.) Sherbourne C, Stewart A. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991;32(6):705-14.

(26.) De Rosa CJ, Montgomery SB, Hyde J, Iverson E, Kipke M. HIV risk behavior and HIV testing: A comparison of rates and associated factors among homeless and runaway adolescents in two cities. AIDS Education and Prevention 2001;13(2):131-48.

(27.) Klein JD, Woods AH, Wildson KM, Prospero M, Greene JM, Ringwalt CL. Homeless and runaway youths' access to health care. J Adolesc Health 2000;27:331-39.

(28.) Milburn NG, Stein JA, Rice E, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Mallett S, Rosenthal D, et al. AIDS risk behaviors among American and Australian homeless youth. J Soc Issues 2007;63(3):543-65.

(29.) Ensign J, Santelli J. Shelter-based homeless youth. Health and access to care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151(8):817-23.

(30.) Wong YLI, Piliavin I. Stressors, resources, and distress among homeless persons: A longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med 2001;52(7):1029-42.

Catherine A. Worthington, MSc, PhD, RSW, Bruce J. MacLaurin, MSW

Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB

Correspondence and reprint requests: Catherine Worthington, Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Tel: 403-220-8507, Fax: 403-282-7269, E-mail: [email protected]
Table 1. Self-reported Characteristics of 355 Calgary Street
Youth Who Completed the "Youth, Health and the
Street" Survey

Characteristic                         Number        Percent of
                                      of Youth         Survey
                                                   Respondents *

Personal Characteristics
Sex
  Male                                   214            61%
  Female                                 137            39%
Transgender                                3             1%
Age
  [less than or equal to] 19             182            51%
  20-24                                  151            43%
  [greater than or equal to] 25           21             6%
Ethnic group
  White/European background              216            61%
  Aboriginal/Metis                        90            25%
  Other (Black, Asian, mixed)             42            12%
Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never lived
    on street                             71            20%
  Street-involved, lived on
    street in past                       117            33%
  Currently living on the street         163            46%
Reason began spending time on
    street ([dagger])
  Friends were on the street             131            37%
  Buy or use drugs or alcohol            115            32%
  Somewhere to go when skipping/
    not in school                         63            18%
  Travel                                  57            16%
  Earn money                              70            20%
  Parent(s)/guardian(s) asked
    me to leave                          116            33%
  Parent(s)/guardian(s) too strict        43            12%
Ever experienced abuse or neglect        243            69%
Lived on the street in another city      182            52%

Health Factors
General and Physical Health
  Self-reported health
    Excellent                             65            18%
    Very good                             95            27%
    Good                                 112            32%
    Fair                                  62            18%
    Poor                                  21             6%
  Diagnosed childhood physical
    condition                             86            24%
  Experienced street violence            254            72%
Mental Health
  Attempted suicide                      132            37%
  Diagnosed childhood mental
    health condition                     118            33%
  Social support (0-28)
    ([double dagger])                            mean 16.6 (sd 7.9)
Sexual Health
  Pregnancy (been pregnant/caused
    pregnancy)                           162            46%
  Engaged in survival/obligatory
    sex                                   86            24%
  Asked to be involved in
    prostitution                          70            20%
Health Risks
  Always use condoms ([section])          83            25%
  Drug or alcohol use in last
    two weeks                            329            93%
  Ever injected drugs                     73            21%

Health Services Use
Do not use medical services               59            17%
Hospital                                  82            23%
Walk-in clinics                          223            66%
Doctor during business hours              67            19%
Street mobile clinic (bus/van)            45            13%
HIV or STI test (ever)                   245            69%

* percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding and item
non-response
([dagger]) responses not mutually exclusive

([double dagger]) scale created by summing responses on 7 items
from the MOS-SSS (25) (scores 0 [none of the time]--4 [all of
the time]): "How often is each of the following available from
anyone if you need it: ... someone to listen to you when you
need to talk, ...someone to give you advice in a crisis, ...
someone who shows you love and affection, ... someone to have a
good time with, ...someone to take you to the doctor if you need
it, ... someone you can talk to about your problems, ...
someone who makes you feel wanted"

([section]) Excludes 23 youth (7%) who indicated they had
never had sex (vaginal/anal intercourse)

Table 2. Association of Street Involvement and Health
Factors among 355 Calgary Street Youth in Logistic
Regression Analyses *

                                    General and Physical Health

                                        Self-reported Health
                                       Fair or Poor ([dagger])

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (reference)   1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            1.3 (0.6-2.9)     1.1 (0.5-2.5)
  Currently living on
    the street                    1.9 (0.9-3.9)     2.3 (1.1-5.0)

                                           Mental Health

                                         Attempted Suicide

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            3.6 (1.8-7.2)     3.2 (1.6-6.6)
  Currently living on
    the street                    2.5 (1.3-4.9)     3.1 (1.5-6.2)

                                           Sexual Health

                                           Been Pregnant/
                                         Caused Pregnancy

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            3.4 (1.7-6.7)     3.5 (1.7-7.1)
  Currently living on
    the street                    4.9 (2.5-9.4)     4.8 (2.4-9.7)

                                           Health Risks

                                            Always Use
                                              Condoms

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            0.6 (0.3-1.2)     0.6 (0.3-1.2)
  Currently living on
    the street                    0.6 (0.3-1.1)     0.6 (0.3-1.3)

                                         Health Services Use

                                              Do Not Use
                                          Medical Services

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)
Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            4.8 (1.4-16.8)    5.5 (1.6-19.4)
  Currently living on
    the street                    6.1 (1.8-20.6)    4.8 (1.4-16.6)

                                           Walk-In Clinics

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            0.7 (0.4-1.4)     0.7 (0.3-1.3)
  Currently living on
    the street                    0.8 (0.4-1.5)     0.7 (0.4-1.4)

                                    General and Physical Health

                                         Diagnosed Childhood
                                         Physical Condition

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            2.6 (1.2-6.0)     2.5 (1.1-5.8)
  Currently living on
    the street                    2.2 (1.0-4.8)     2.8 (1.2-6.5)

                                           Mental Health

                                         Diagnosed Childhood
                                          Mental Condition

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            3.3 (1.6-7.1)     3.3 (1.5-7.1)
  Currently living on
    the street                    2.2 (1.1-4.5)     2.8 (1.3-6.1)

                                           Sexual Health

                                          Survival/Obligatory
                                                 Sex

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            6.3 (2.3-16.9)    6.1 (2.2-17.0)
  Currently living on
    the street                    4.9 (1.9-13.1)    5.3 (1.9-14.9)

                                             Health Risks

                                           Drugs/Alcohol Use
                                             Past 2 Weeks

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street            1.0 (ref)        1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past             2.0 (0.7-5.6)    1.9 (0.7-5.3)
  Currently living on
    the street                    12.2 (2.6-58.1)   7.9 (1.6-39.2)

                                         Health Services Use

                                               Hospital

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)
Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            1.7 (0.8-3.3)     1.9 (0.9-4.0)
  Currently living on
    the street                    0.8 (0.4-1.5)     0.9 (0.4-1.8)

                                     Use Street Mobile Clinic

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)          1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            2.8 (0.6-13.3)     2.7 (0.6-13.2)
  Currently living on
    the street                    9.0 (2.1-38.5)    10.1 (2.3-45.0)

                                    General and Physical Health

                                          Experienced Street
                                              Violence

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            6.1 (3.0-12.2)    7.5 (3.6-15.9)
  Currently living on
    the street                    6.5 (3.4-12.6)    5.0 (2.5-9.9)

                                           Mental Health

                                    Low Social Support ([section])

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            1.4 (0.7-2.6)     1.4 (0.7-2.7)
  Currently living on
    the street                    2.7 (1.5-5.2)     2.8 (1.4-5.6)

                                           Sexual Health

                                        Asked to Be Involved
                                         in Prostitution

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            4.5 (1.6-12.4)    4.7 (1.6-14.0)
  Currently living on
    the street                    4.1 (1.5-11.1)    6.7 (2.2-20.4)

                                             Health Risks

                                           Ever Injected
                                               Drugs

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street            1.0 (ref)        1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past             4.7 (1.4-16.6)   4.7 (1.3-16.6)
  Currently living on
    the street                    10.0 (3.0-33.3)   8.7 (2.5-29.8)

                                         Health Services Use

                                            Doctor during
                                        Regular Business Hours

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)
Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            0.6 (0.3-1.1)     0.5 (0.3-1.1)
  Currently living on
    the street                    0.2 (0.1-0.4)     0.2 (0.1-0.4)

                                       Ever had HIV/STI Test

                                     Crude OR        Adjusted OR
                                     (95% CI)          ([double
                                                       dagger])
                                                       (95% CI)

Level of street involvement
  Street-involved, never
    lived on the street           1.0 (ref)         1.0 (ref)
  Street-involved, lived on
    the street in past            2.3 (1.2-4.3)     2.1 (1.1-4.1)
  Currently living on
    the street                    4.0 (2.1-7.5)     3.0 (1.5-5.9)

* All data are self-report; sample size for each model will
vary by item non-response

([dagger]) Reference category: good/very good/excellent
self-reported health

([double dagger]) Adjusted for age (19 or younger, 20-24, 25
or older), gender (male/female: 3 transgendered youth excluded
due to small cell size), and ethnocultural group (White,
Aboriginal/Metis, Other)

([section]) Social support scale (see footnote Table 1)
dichotomized: low--score 21 or under; high--22-28


联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有