Workplace and workforce health information systems in healthcare: acknowledging the role of university researchers and highlighting the importance of health and safety committee capacity-building.
Spiegel, Jerry ; Lockhart, Karen ; Lochang, Justin 等
Dear Editor,
In the November/December 2008 issue of the CJPH, Gilligan and
Alamgir (1) provided an overview of the Workplace Health Information
Tracking and Evaluation ([WHITE.sup.[TM]]) database, produced through a
partnership between the Occupational Health and Safety Agency for
Healthcare (OHSAH), BC healthcare and BC healthcare unions on one hand,
and a university-based research program funded through the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research's Community Alliances for Health
Research (CAHR), Making Healthcare a Healthier Place to Work: A
Partnership of Partnerships, on the other. This database and other
products of this research collaboration, ranging from on-line learning
products to new guidelines to decrease infectious disease transmission,
indeed provide excellent examples of university-based researchers
partnering with decision-makers to "bridge the knowledge gap".
(2,3) Nevertheless, the lack of clarity in the Gilligan-Alamgir article
(1) both about the role of unions as well as about the important role of
university-based researchers in this partnership is lamentable. After
all, health and safety associations exist in the healthcare sector
across Canada as well as in other sectors in BC. What made OHSAH special
was not only its strong bipartite governance but precisely the
innovative decision to select a university-based researcher as its
Founding Executive Director, someone who had long advocated worker
involvement, (4) use of web technology (5) and establishment of data
systems to guide interventions, (6,7) heralding a groundbreaking
partnership.
The authors (1) noted the limited attention that has thus far been
devoted in [WHITE.sup.[TM]] to collecting information about workplace
conditions needed to guide actions by joint health and safety
committees, an important feature of the original ethos of OHSAH. (8) The
concept for a comprehensive database on occupational health for
healthcare, as previously developed by CAHR team members in Winnipeg, as
well as our experience in the early days of the CAHR in BC to monitor
and evaluate overhead lifts (9) and the Prevention and Early Active
Return-to-Work Safety program (10,11) made it clear that prevention
requires more than tracking injuries-it requires information to guide
actions to improve workplace conditions. Learning from the experience in
Manitoba, and in developing [WHITE.sup.[TM]] in partnership with OHSAH,
our research team has since developed another instrument, the
Occupational Health And Safety Information System (OHASIS), working
closely with research colleagues in Free State, South Africa as well as
management, government and labour. OHASIS is currently being piloted at
Pelonomi Hospital (12) with a focus not on claims management, but rather
on collecting data to improve conditions in the workplace, with a
well-developed module for workplace inspections. Most importantly, we
emphasize training health and safety committees to conduct incident
investigations and workplace assessments and to use OHASIS for primary
prevention.
In highlighting the importance of workplace health surveillance, it
is especially important that the need for independent research,
front-line worker capacity-building and the focus on prevention (7,12)
do not take a backseat to use by employers for absenteeism control or
claims management. Time will tell if investments in such databases
really make healthcare a healthier place to work-but having such
databases will certainly make that determination by independent
university researchers easier to accomplish.
Jerry Spiegel (
[email protected]), Karen Lockhart, Justin
Lochang, Joe Tremblay, Lyndsay Dybka, Annalee Yassi
Global Health Research Program, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia
REFERENCES
(1.) Gilligan T, Alamgir H. Bridging the knowledge gap: An
innovative surveillance system to monitor the health of British
Columbia's healthcare workforce. Can J Public Health
2008;99(6):478-82.
(2.) Tomlin K, Sidebottom C, Rideout K, de Boer HM, Yassi A.
Politics and partnerships: Challenges and rewards of partnerships in
workplace health research in healthcare. Int J Occup Environ Health
2004;10(4):467-75.
(3.) Yassi A, Ostry AS, Spiegel JM, Walsh G, de Boer HM. A
collaborative evidence-based approach to making healthcare a healthier
place to work. Hospital Q 2002;5(3):70-78.
(4.) Wands S, Yassi A. Let's talk back: A program to empower
laundry workers. Am J Indust Med 1992;22:703-9.
(5.) Government of Canada. Networks of Centres of Excellence.
Success Stories: Making Healthcare a Healthier Place to Work. Available
online at: http://www.nce.gc.ca/media/success/heal99203_e.htm (Accessed
January 25, 2009).
(6.) Yassi A. Utilizing data systems to develop and monitor
occupational health programs in a large Canadian hospital. Methods of
Information in Medicine 1998;37:125-29.
(7.) Spiegel J, Yassi A. Occupational disease surveillance in
Canada: A framework for considering options and opportunities. Can J
Public Health 1991;82(5):294-99.
(8.) Yassi A, Ostry AS, Hatter B, de Boer HM. Joint health and
safety committee education and the value of bipartite cooperation in the
healthcare sector in British Columbia, Canada. Int J Occup Environ
Health 2005;11(3):305-12.
(9.) Spiegel JM, Yassi A, Ronald LA, Tate RB, Hacking P, Colby T.
Implementing a resident lifting system in an extended care hospital.
Demonstrating cost-benefit. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurses J
2002;50(3):128-34.
(10.) Badii M, Keen D, Yu S, Yassi A. Evaluation of a comprehensive
integrated workplace-based program to reduce occupational
musculoskeletal injury and its associated morbidity in a large hospital.
J Occup Environ Med 2006;48(11):1159-65.
(11.) Ouellette V, Badii M, Lockhart K, Yassi A. Worker
satisfaction with a workplace injury prevention and return-to-work
program in a large Canadian hospital: The importance of an integrated
approach. Work 2007;28(2):175-81.
(12.) Spiegel J, Yassi A, Rees D, Kielkowski D, Ross M, Ndelu L.
Tool, Weapon or White Elephant? A Canadian-South African Collaboration
to explore how information systems can be harnessed to help make health
care a healthier place to work. Am College Occupat Environ Med, Int
Commission on Occupat Health. Vancouver, BC, 2007.
Authors' Response
We thank Dr. Spiegel, Dr. Annalee Yassi (who was the Founding
Executive Director of OHSAH, but is no longer with the organization) and
the other co-authors of this letter to the editor, for reinforcing the
importance of active surveillance systems and research-stakeholder
collaboration in advancing occupational health. A few of the issues
raised in the letter require further clarification.
As pointed out in the paper and reinforced in the letter by
Spiegel, Yassi et al., OHSAH and its staff work very closely with all of
its stakeholders, which include health care employers and health care
unions; in fact its very structure and foundation as a bipartite agency
ensures this. Many of its projects are jointly developed with
researchers from the Universities in BC, Canada and outside Canada. Most
of OHSAH's scientists are engaged at the local universities to some
degree. The acknowledgement in our paper identifies the support we have
received from our stakeholders and partner organizations toward
developing this tool. The collaboration from our stakeholders, academia,
government and our national and international colleagues is core to
everything that we do and continues to make OHSAH a very unique and
special organization.
While ideas and concepts for the development of surveillance
systems may have been investigated in Canada and many other places in
the world, the design and development of the Workplace Health Indicator
Tracking and Evaluation Database (WHITE) was undertaken after a careful
review of British Columbia's specific needs, which not only
included the creation of a system to monitor incidents and to guide
decision making for improved workplace conditions, but also case
management, healthcare worker health history and education and training
records. The letter's reference to previous work in Winnipeg being
the driving factor for WHITE's design is not accurate.
As to the current work undertaken by Spiegel, Yassi et al. in South
Africa, it is good to see that the WHITE system has inspired other
jurisdictions to undertake their own work in injury surveillance
systems. It is also personally satisfying to one of us (Tony Gilligan)
since he was part of the first delegation to visit South Africa to share
BC experiences and discuss the initial ideas. As expected, the
circumstances, requirements and use of an injury surveillance system and
associated database in South Africa are very different than those of BC.
Later in their letter, Spiegel, Yassi et al. suggest that WHITE
focuses on claims management. This is incorrect. WHITE and associated
data analysis capabilities are a fully featured system that supports
injury surveillance, risk assessment, OHS education and training and
compliance with regulatory requirements.
The seeds sown during OHSAH's collaboration with its
stakeholders in developing and implementing the WHITE database in BC
continue to flourish with large and varied projects making use of this
valuable resource. And with ongoing updates and revisions to the
underlying system, it can exploit lessons learned and adapt to
ever-changing circumstances. It is expected that new versions of WHITE
will further inform the design of similar systems nationally and
internationally, as it did in South Africa.
Tony Gilligan, Hasanat Alamgir Occupational Health and Safety
Agency for Healthcare in BC