Smoking low-cost cigarettes: disparities evident.
Diemert, Lori M. ; Cohen, Joanna E. ; Bondy, Susan J. 等
Dear Editor:
The availability of low-cost cigarettes undermines tobacco
control's most effective measure to reduce smoking prevalence:
keeping cigarette prices high by raising tobacco taxes. (1) The discount
cigarette market share has grown considerably since 2003, (2) with
discount cigarettes selling for $10-$15 less per carton than premium
brands. Contraband cigarettes--cigarettes sold illegally--are even
cheaper than discounts. (3) There is an urgent need to understand who is
smoking these reduced-price cigarettes. We compiled baseline data from
the Ontario Tobacco Survey, a population-based telephone survey of
Ontario adults. (4)
Smokers' usual brand of cigarettes was categorized as premium,
discount or contraband according to a list of discount cigarette brands
(5) and known contraband cigarettes in Ontario. Differences in the
characteristics of premium, discount and contraband cigarette smokers
were examined using Chi-square tests and multinomial regression models.
Analyses were adjusted for the complex survey design.
The proportions of users smoking premium, discount and contraband
cigarettes were 60%, 30% and 10%, respectively. Discount cigarette
smokers were more likely to be older, female, have made more lifetime
quit attempts, and were more addicted to cigarettes compared to premium
cigarette smokers (p<0.0001; Table 1); only perceived addiction was
not significant in the adjusted model (Table 2).
Contraband cigarette smokers were more likely to reside in rural
areas, be older, female, have less than high school education, have made
more lifetime quit attempts, were more addicted to cigarettes, and had
no intention to quit compared to premium smokers (Table 1). Age and
perceived addiction were not significant in the adjusted model (Table
2). Compared to discount smokers, contraband cigarette smokers were more
likely to reside in rural areas, be more addicted and less likely to
intend to quit (Table 2).
In Ontario, 40% of smokers are smoking low-cost cigarettes, with 1
in 10 seeking illegal sources of cigarettes. This is significant and
reduces the impact of tobacco control interventions in Ontario.
While young adults are more sensitive to cigarette price, they are
also more susceptible to advertising and branding, (6) which may explain
why they were less likely to smoke discount brands than older adults.
Women were more likely to smoke both discount and contraband cigarettes,
consistent with previous research indicating they are more price
sensitive than men. (7) It was also expected that smokers with greater
nicotine addiction smoked cheaper sources of cigarettes, consistent with
findings of number of cigarettes smoked from previous studies. (7,8)
While an earlier study reported that those purchasing low or untaxed
sources had higher levels of education, (9) we found contraband brand
use associated with lower levels of education.
There is substantial use of low-cost cigarettes, presenting a
challenge for tobacco control in Ontario. Socio-economic disparities are
evident among discount and contraband cigarette smokers. Minimum price
laws and tax increases can counter the growing discount market;
licensing, tax agreements with First Nations communities and enhanced
enforcement are some evidence-based policies to manage contraband
tobacco.10 To optimize the public health benefits of tobacco control
initiatives and help reduce health disparities, these and other
innovative solutions that address the issue of low-cost cigarettes are
needed.
Acknowledgements: This research was conducted by the Ontario
Tobacco Research Unit, which receives funding from the Ontario Ministry
of Health Promotion and Sport. The authors acknowledge Dr. K. Stephen
Brown, Dr. Paul McDonald, Mr. J. Charles Victor and the Survey Research
Centre at the University of Waterloo for their contributions to the
Ontario Tobacco Survey. The authors also thank Ms. Rita Luk for her
significant contributions in coding cigarette brand data.
REFERENCES
(1.) Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking. In: Culyer
AJ, New-house JP (Eds.), Handbook of Health Economics. New York, NY:
Elsevier, 2000;1539-627.
(2.) Non-Smokers' Rights Association. Backgrounder on the
Canadian Tobacco Industry and Its Market: 2009-10 Edition. March 2010.
Available at: http://www.nsra-adnf.ca/cms/file/pdf/Backgrounder2009_10.pdf (Accessed April 27, 2010).
(3.) Royal Canadian Mounted Police. 2008 Contraband Tobacco
Enforcement Strategy. 2008. Available at:
http://pub.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/pubs/tobac-tabac/
tobacco-tabac-strat-2008-eng.htm (Accessed June 9, 2010).
(4.) Diemert L, Victor JC, Chaiton M, Bondy SJ. Ontario Tobacco
Survey Technical Report 1: Baseline Data. Toronto, ON: Ontario Tobacco
Research Unit, April 2010.
(5.) Non-Smokers' Rights Association. Backgrounder on the
Canadian Tobacco Industry and Its Market: 2007-08 Edition. March 2008.
Available at: http://www.nsra-adnf.ca/cms/file/pdf/Backgrounder2007_2008.pdf (Accessed April 27, 2010).
(6.) Biener L, Albers AB. Young adults: Vulnerable new targets of
tobacco marketing. Am J Public Health 2004;94(2):326-30.
(7.) Leatherdale ST, Ahmed R, Barisic A, Murnaghan D, Manske S.
Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths
in Canada: Are they smoking premium, discount or native brands? Tob
Control 2009;18(6):466 73.
(8.) Hyland A, Bauer JE, Li Q, Abrams SM, Higbee C, Peppone L, et
al. Higher cigarette prices influence cigarette purchase patterns. Tob
Control 2005;14(2):86 92.
(9.) Hyland A, Laux FL, Higbee C, Hastings G, Ross H, Chaloupka FJ,
et al. Cigarette purchase patterns in four countries and the
relationship with cessation: Findings from the International Tobacco
Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.
Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii59-64.
(10.) Sweeting J, Johnson T, Schwartz R. Anti-contraband policy
measures: Evidence for better practice. Ontario Tobacco Research Unit,
Special Report Series, June 2009.
Lori M. Diemert, BSc *
Joanna E. Cohen, PhD *, ([dagger]), ([double dagger])
Susan J. Bondy, PhD *, ([dagger])
Russell C. Callaghan, PhD ([dagger]), ([double dagger])
Roberta Ferrence, PhD *, ([dagger]), ([double dagger])
John Garcia, PhD *, ([section])
Robert Schwartz, PhD *, ([dagger])
Peter Selby, MD *, ([double dagger])
* Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, ON
([dagger]) Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of
Toronto, Toronto, ON
([double dagger]) Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto,
ON
([section]) Department of Health Studies and Gerontology,
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Correspondence: Dr. Joanna E. Cohen, Ontario Tobacco Research Unit,
33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, E-mail:
[email protected]
Table 1. Characteristics of Premium, Discount and Contraband
Cigarette Smokers *
Characteristic All Respondents Premium
PREVALENCE
n % ([double n
([dagger]) dagger]) ([dagger])
OTS Sample 3696 100 2047
Age (years, grouped)
18-29 773 27.4 504
30-44 1175 34.3 655
45-59 1233 27.2 630
60+ 496 11.1 247
Sex
Women 2047 47.1 1026
Men 1649 52.9 1021
Education
Less than high school 637 15.2 316
High school and some college 1603 43.5 924
Completed college 1450 41.3 804
Rurality
Urban 2684 82.6 1497
Rural 936 17.4 505
Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Low (0-2) 1179 37.5 784
Moderate (3-4) 1395 36.1 725
High (5-6) 1076 26.4 508
Quit intention
No, Don't know 2176 60.2 1208
Yes 1519 39.8 839
Lifetime number of quit attempts
None 577 18.0 371
One 839 23.5 491
Two or more 2274 58.5 1181
Perceived addiction
Not at all addicted 218 7.6 160
Somewhat addicted 1034 31.4 643
Very addicted 2429 61.1 1237
Characteristic Premium Discount
PREVALENCE 60.2 30.1
% ([double n % ([double
dagger]) ([dagger]) dagger])
OTS Sample 100 1183 100
Age (years, grouped)
18-29 32.1 191 20.1
30-44 34.1 379 35.0
45-59 24.2 432 31.7
60+ 9.6 175 13.2
Sex
Women 41.8 734 55.1
Men 58.2 449 44.9
Education
Less than high school 13.1 204 16.8
High school and some college 43.8 501 44.2
Completed college 43.1 476 39.0
Rurality
Urban 84.2 873 83.6
Rural 15.8 285 16.4
Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Low (0-2) 44.8 334 30.4
Moderate (3-4) 33.1 496 41.2
High (5-6) 22.1 344 28.4
Quit intention
No, Don't know 59.6 638 57.3
Yes 40.4 545 42.7
Lifetime number of quit attempts
None 21.6 137 12.3
One 24.2 241 21.8
Two or more 54.2 804 65.9
Perceived addiction
Not at all addicted 9.8 46 4.4
Somewhat addicted 35.1 303 27.8
Very addicted 55.2 828 67.8
Chi-square
Test for
Association,
Characteristic Contraband p-value
PREVALENCE 9.7 <0.0001
n % ([double
([dagger]) dagger])
OTS Sample 466 100
Age (years, grouped)
18-29 78 21.1 <0.0001
30-44 141 33.2
45-59 171 31.7
60+ 74 14.0
Sex
Women 287 55.4 <0.0001
Men 179 44.6
Education
Less than high school 117 22.9 0.0016
High school and some college 178 40.0
Completed college 170 37.1
Rurality
Urban 314 70.2 <0.0001
Rural 146 29.8
Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Low (0-2) 61 15.2 <0.0001
Moderate (3-4) 174 38.6
High (5-6) 224 46.2
Quit intention
No, Don't know 330 72.8 0.0002
Yes 135 27.2
Lifetime number of quit attempts
None 69 13.5 <0.0001
One 107 24.5
Two or more 289 61.9
Perceived addiction
Not at all addicted 12 3.7 <0.0001
Somewhat addicted 88 19.9
Very addicted 364 76.5
* OTS Baseline data, Cohorts 1-6
([dagger]) Unweighted sample size. Numbers may not
sum to full sample due to missing values.
([double dagger]) Weighted estimates. Estimates may
not sum to 100% due to rounding.
Table 2. Factors Associated With Smoking Discount and Contraband
Cigarettes Among Ontario Adult Smokers: * Relative risks and
confidence intervals from simultaneously adjusted,
multinomial regression models
Discount Contraband
Characteristic vs. Premium vs. Premium
Cigarettes Cigarettes
RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Age (continuous, per year) 1.01 (1.01-1.02) 1.00 (0.99-1.01)
Sex
Women Reference Reference
Men 0.60 (0.49-0.74) 0.53 (0.39-0.71)
Education
Less than high school Reference Reference
High school and some college 0.89 (0.65-1.22) 0.69 (0.48-0.99)
Completed college 0.81 (0.60-1.11) 0.77 (0.52-1.14)
Rurality
Urban Reference Reference
Rural 0.85 (0.68-1.05) 1.75 (1.28-2.40)
Heaviness of Smoking
Index (continuous) 1.13 (1.05-1.22) 1.47 (1.33-1.63)
Quit intention
No, Don't know Reference Reference
Yes 1.15 (0.93-1.42) 0.63 (0.45-0.86)
Lifetime number of
quit attempts
None Reference Reference
One 1.48 (1.05-2.10) 1.62 (1.02-2.60)
Two or more 1.87 (1.38-2.54) 1.78 (1.18-2.69)
Perceived addiction
Not at all addicted Reference Reference
Somewhat addicted 1.40 (0.82-2.37) 0.97 (0.36-2.61)
Very addicted 1.48 (0.84-2.64) 0.98 (0.37-2.57)
Characteristic Contraband vs. Discount
Cigarettes
RR (95% CI)
Age (continuous, per year) 0.99 (0.98-1.00)
Sex
Women Reference
Men 0.88 (0.64-1.19)
Education
Less than high school Reference
High school and some college 0.77 (0.52-1.14)
Completed college 0.95 (0.63-1.44)
Rurality
Urban Reference
Rural 2.07 (1.50-2.86)
Heaviness of Smoking
Index (continuous) 1.30 (1.17-1.46)
Quit intention
No, Don't know Reference
Yes 0.55 (0.39-0.76)
Lifetime number of
quit attempts
None Reference
One 1.10 (0.66-1.83)
Two or more 0.95 (0.61-1.49)
Perceived addiction
Not at all addicted Reference
Somewhat addicted 0.69 (0.23-2.08)
Very addicted 0.66 (0.22-1.97)
* Weighted models adjusted for the complex sampling of the OTS
and year of data collection; bold text indicates significance