Rates of cancer incidence across terciles of the foreign-born population in Canada from 2001-2006.
Carriere, Gisele M. ; Sanmartin, Claudia ; Bryant, Heather 等
Understanding the potential impact of immigration trends on
Canada's public health program needs is increasingly important. In
2006, an estimated 6.2 million immigrants comprised 19.8% of
Canada's population, (1) and it is estimated that by 2031, 28% of
Canada's population will be foreign-born. (2) Current evidence on
cancer screening indicates lower rates of uptake among immigrant
populations, potentially leading to delayed detection and increase in
the risk of cancer-related deaths. (3-7) These risks may translate into
increases in cancer (8) and cancer-related health service utilization.
(9) Therefore, anticipating the relative cancer risks for this growing
subpopulation is important. However, there are data challenges hindering
our ability to fully understand the pattern of cancer risk among
Canada's immigrant population.
Evidence to date suggests that, overall in Canada, immigrants and
refugees experience lower risk for cancer generally (10,11) and lower
risk of death caused by cancer. (12,13) However, these reduced risks may
not extend to all cancers. Cohort-based research showed that,
nationally, immigrants experience a higher risk for liver, nasopharynx
and cervical cancers. (10) Furthermore, both cancer incidence and
mortality risk can differ according to country of birth (10-19) and time
since immigration so that, depending upon the cancer site and relative
risk within country of origin, cancer risk may increase to approach risk
similar to that of the host country, (19-23) or alternatively, decrease
for some cancer sites in comparison to that within the host country.
(22,23)
As the composition of Canada continues to change, (1) challenges to
providing comparable information regarding patterns of cancer risk among
immigrants at both the national and subnational level persist.
Currently, information needed to track cancer incidence by foreign-born
status is not available at the national level. The Canadian Cancer
Registry does not consistently report place of birth for all provinces
and territories. Studies have used record linkage to conduct cancer
surveillance. (10,11) However, data are not routinely available to
conduct national and comparable regional cancer surveillance by a
person's foreign-born status in order to track incidence in this
subpopulation. The objective of this study is to apply a standardized
area-based measure to examine whether or not estimated cancer incidence
rates among individuals living in given areas vary systematically
according to the concentration of foreign-born individuals living in the
same given areas. The presented results are relevant since this
standardized measure extends previous work, and enables reporting of
comparable subnational cancer incidence rates according to concentration
of foreign-born population, in addition to the reported national rates.
Furthermore, as the population composition changes over time, results
obtained using this method remain relevant to future research that may
continue to apply this publically accessible methodology to report
changes over time to incident cancer according to a standardized measure
of area concentration of foreign-born population.
METHODS
Data sources
Cancer incidence was calculated using 2001 to 2006 data from the
national Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR), a dynamic, person-oriented,
population-based database maintained by Statistics Canada. A file
containing records of incident invasive cancer cases was created using
the multiple primary coding rules of the International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC). (24) Cancers were classified based on the
International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition
(25) and grouped using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
(SEER) Program grouping definitions (coding available upon request to
author). (26) Non-melanoma skin cancers (basal and squamous) were not
included. (27) Incident cancer counts were compiled using CCR postal
codes that represented patients' usual place of residence at the
time of tumour diagnosis. Incidence patterns for eighteen types of
cancer were initially investigated; seven specific cancers were chosen
for this report given their population incidence (lung, female breast,
prostate, colorectal), and because distinctly reversed incidence
patterns were noted for nasopharynx, liver, and thyroid compared to
those found for other cancers.
In total, 895,838 records were extracted from the CCR from 2001 to
2006. Of those, 27,020 records were excluded (3%) due to missing or
invalid postal code information, or because the postal code indicated an
institutional address (e.g., hospitals) that was considered out-of-scope
for the study population.
Canadian population estimates and area-based estimates of the
foreign-born population, including nonpermanent residents, were taken
from the 2006 Census (20% sample) weighted to represent the Canadian
population. This socio-demographic information is aggregated and made
available at the dissemination area (DA) level, representing the
smallest areas for which census population characteristics data are
disseminated. (28) Population counts by percentage foreign-born terciles
are provided by region in the Appendix table.
Definition of Foreign-born
"Foreign-born" refers to those who either 1) ever held
the legal status of immigrant to Canada, or 2) were a non-permanent
resident (NPR). NPRs are people from another country who, at the time of
the Census, held a work or study permit or were refugee claimants, or
who had applied for landed immigrant status but had not yet been
accepted, in addition to family members living with them in Canada. From
a health perspective, NPRs more closely resemble immigrants than
Canadian-born, so they were included in the foreign-born category.
Everyone else was considered to be non-foreign-born.
The concentration of foreign-born was calculated using the 2006
Census (20% sample) data at the DA level (n = 50,214). The foreign-born
percentage value was used to classify each DA into one of the following
terciles: low foreign-born (tercile 1: <27.0% foreign-born); medium
foreign-born (tercile 2: >27.0% to <51.8% foreign-born); and high
foreign-born (tercile 3: >51.8% foreign-born). The rationale and
methods used to establish the cut-off percentage values to define the
terciles are described in detail elsewhere. (29) Note that there were no
DAs with a high concentration of foreign-born in the Atlantic region.
Each cancer record was assigned a 2006 DA code based on postal code
of patients' residence at time of diagnosis by using Statistics
Canada's Postal Code Conversion File application (PCCF+) version
5F. (30) The DA code on the cancer record was then used to assign the
foreign-born tercile information. This process allowed each incident
cancer event to be classified as having occurred in an area with either
a low, medium or high concentration of foreign-born (Appendix Table).
Analysis
Counts of incident cancers, pooled within 2001-2006, represented
cancer incidence rate numerators. The 2006 Census dissemination area
population estimates (including institutional residents) by age and sex
were multiplied by six to estimate person-years at risk (the incidence
rate denominator). Rates were calculated per 100,000 population, with
the exceptions of nasopharynx, liver and thyroid cancers which were
calculated per million population. Rates were standardized using the
direct method to the age and sex structure of the 2006 national
population within all low foreign-born category areas (tercile l). The
following four categories of age-specific rates were used to produce
age-standardized results: <60 years, 60-69, 70-79 and >80.
Standard errors used to compute 95% confidence intervals for
age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) were derived using methods
published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
(31) Confidence intervals for small counts (<50) used methods from
Fay and Feuer. (32) Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) represent comparisons of
cancer rates of terciles 2 and 3 to that for the reference rate, tercile
1. Comparisons were conducted across terciles nationally, and within
each of the five regions. In the computation of IRR, denominators were
the rates of the reference group (tercile 1), numerators were those of
terciles 2 or 3; corresponding standard errors were used to calculate
confidence intervals to these ratios.
RESULTS
National cancer incidence patterns
At the national level (Table 1), the standardized incidence rates
for all cancer sites combined were significantly lower among individuals
living in areas with medium or high concentration of foreign-born
population (ASIR = 447 and 388 per 100,000 population, respectively)
compared to areas that had a low concentration of foreign-born
population (ASIR = 493). Systematic variation in incidence according to
concentration for foreign-born areas is apparent from resulting incident
rate ratios (IRR = 0.91, IRR = 0.79 for medium and high concentration
foreign-born areas, respectively). Lung, female breast, prostate and
colorectal cancer incidence rates followed a similar pattern of
variation, as did the sex-specific rates for lung and colorectal cancer
(Table 2 for males, Table 3 for females).
However, not all cancers followed this pattern. The ASIRs and IRRs
for cancers of the nasopharynx, liver and thyroid show an inverse
association in which incidence rates were significantly elevated within
high (tercile 3) and medium (tercile 2) concentration foreign-born
populated areas compared to areas with low concentration foreign-born.
The IRRs for these cancers within tercile 3 were 4.20, 2.00 and 1.81,
respectively, and for tercile 2, 1.83 (nasopharynx), 1.51 (liver), and
1.42 (thyroid). These significantly different, inverse patterns for
these cancers persisted for both males and females.
Regional cancer incidence patterns
At the regional level (Table 1), significantly lower colorectal
cancer incidence rates occurred within tercile 3 compared to tercile 1
(Prairies IRR = 0.63, Ontario IRR = 0.75, Quebec IRR = 0.83, British
Columbia IRR = 0.84). For female breast cancer (Table 3), significantly
lower incidence rates occurred within tercile 3 areas compared to
tercile 1 for the Prairie regions (IRR = 0.71), Ontario and British
Columbia (IRR = 0.79), and Quebec (IRR = 0.82). Significantly lower
incidence for prostate cancer (Table 2) occurred within tercile 3 areas
for the Prairie regions (IRR = 0.56), British Columbia (IRR = 0.74),
Quebec (IRR = 0.77) and Ontario (IRR = 0.78). Lower lung cancer rates
occurred within tercile 3 (Ontario IRR = 0.65, Quebec IRR = 0.66,
British Columbia IRR = 0.70, Prairies IRR = 0.83). For discussion
purposes, characteristics of overall populations who resided within
geographical areas classified as % foreign-born terciles are presented
in Table 4.
DISCUSSION
Cancer surveillance using an area-based approach can be used to
report cancer rates among individuals living in areas with varying
concentration of foreign-born populations according to a standard, hence
comparable, concentration measure of this subpopulation. Lower incidence
occurred generally for areas with a high versus low concentration of
foreign-born population. These findings extend the work of others (10)
by providing subnational analyses and are consistent with
individual-level based analyses which also found lower rates of most
cancers among immigrant groups. (10-12) Exceptions to the reported
pattern were found for liver, thyroid and nasopharynx cancers where more
elevated incidence occurred within these same high concentration
foreign-born areas. These national findings are similar to what had been
reported for liver cancer using area-based information for Ontario. (33)
Lower cancer rates among areas with a high concentration of
foreign-born may be partially explained by the composition of immigrants
residing in these areas. There is great heterogeneity among Canadian
immigrants within these areas, and health determinant behaviours
likewise may vary greatly among immigrants according to place of birth.
(16) Yet findings suggest that many of the source countries of
immigrants to Canada, such as China, India, and the Philippines, (1)
have lower incidence rates of cancer in general (15) by comparison to
Canadian individuals. Furthermore, immigrants may carry reduced risk
that may continue for several years following immigration. While the
concentration of foreign-born from Asia for example, varies greatly
across terciles, and across different regions (Table 4), higher
concentrations of Asian foreign-born individuals who may carry reduced
cancer risk (15) tended to be located primarily within tercile 3. For
example, 37.7% of the population in tercile 3 reported an Asian
birthplace, compared to 1.9% in tercile 1. This may explain, in part,
why reported ASIRs for all cancers, and by type, are generally lowest
within the high concentration foreign-born tercile. According to
international data, cancer incidence (all sites excluding non-melanoma
skin cancer) among Asia's population was lower at 153.6 (per
100,000, age-standardized) compared to that for Canada (296.6). (15)
Conversely, liver cancer incidence is reportedly four times higher in
Asian males (21.4 per 100,000) compared to Canadian males (5.2 per
100,000). (15) Differential cancer risk exposure in the birth country
may explain, in part, the elevated ASIRs for liver cancer observed in
areas with high compared to low concentrations of foreign-born
individuals. Higher rates of liver cancer among Asian immigrant
populations have been reported to be potentially associated with a
greater prevalence of known liver cancer risk factors. (34,35) The
presented trends may also suggest explanations for regional differences
of cancer incidence observed in Canada. In particular, the results
suggest an explanation for lower cancer rates generally among high
foreign-born terciles in British Columbia and the Prairies. The more
concentrated foreign-born populated areas for these regions are
comprised of greater proportions of immigrants from Asia than were found
in the concentrated foreign-born areas in Quebec, for example (Table 4).
As stated, immigrants from Asia may carry comparatively less risk for
cancer incidence in general. (15)
Differences in cancer rates derived using this area-based approach
may partially be explained by variation in other population
characteristics that are spatially distributed in similar ways. Since
immigrants for the most part settle within urban areas, (1,36) rural
populations are exclusively represented within low or medium
foreign-born areas. It is possible, therefore, that differences in
cancer rates among individuals living in areas with high versus low
concentration foreign-born partially reflect health differences between
rural and urban populations. Rural populations experience increased
prevalence for smoking behaviours, (37,38) overweight or obese, (38)
which are recognized risk factors for some cancers. (39) Population
research has shown that Canada's immigrants are generally less
likely to smoke. (40) If foreign-born persons are less likely to access
primary care, or to participate in cancer screening, as mentioned, then
this may have partly contributed to decreased detection of cancer
incidence in these areas. Finally, education levels also vary by
foreign-born terciles with higher prevalence of post-secondary education
among individuals living in areas having high and medium concentration
of foreign-born (Table 4). Potential relationships between cancer
incidence, education and concentration foreign-born population require
further investigation. As well, in future, since national and provincial
person-level information is not readily available to address the issue
of comparative cancer risk among Canada's immigrant population,
this area-based method provides a standardized surveillance tool that
could be used to report changes to cancer incidence according to area
foreign-born concentration over time.
This study has several limitations. This area-based analysis does
not provide cancer incidence information about foreign-born persons per
se, but instead, describes cancer events occurring within geographies
populated by differing concentrations of foreign-born as determined by
the 2006 Census. Rate denominators used 2006 population estimates and
did not adjust for population growth over the reference period. Nor did
denominators account for institutional population as rate numerators
did, the likely impact of which may have been conservative estimation of
incidence rates. Length of residence and age at immigration were not
controlled for in this area-based analysis. Despite evidence to suggest
foreign-born carry reduced incident cancer risk upon arrival, (15) risk
may increase over time to the degree that risk among foreign-born
individuals resembles that of the Canadian-born population, (19,22,23)
possibly in particular with regard to risks for lung and colorectal
cancers. Risk convergence for these cancers to host country has been
observed for second-generation persons, and those who migrated at young
ages. (41) If effects of reduced cancer risk are conferred by factors
related to having been foreign-born, then had information been available
to directly measure this at the individual level, the magnitude of
variation in area cancer incidence according to concentration
foreign-born could possibly be greater than these results suggest. Our
results may demonstrate conservative differences since, even within
high-concentration foreign-born areas, Canadian-born persons comprised
36% of the population, therefore reported ASIRs reflect composite cancer
risks for both foreign- and non-foreign-born population groups. Any
effects of reduced cancer risk among the foreign-born may have been
attenuated accordingly. Area-based concentration of additional
population characteristics known to be relevant to health, including
percentage area low income and educational attainment, varied greatly
across foreign-born terciles but were not adjusted for. These other
unadjusted factors may operate as confounders. For example, prevalence
for low income was greater for tercile 3 areas, therefore if low income
was associated with increased cancer risk, this could confound any
protective effects associated with increased concentration of
foreign-born population. Information regarding cancer risk health
behaviours, such as smoking status, was not available. The descriptive
associations described are not interpreted as causal; an experimental
methodology was not applied.
Population estimates adjusted for net undercount on the Census were
not available for dissemination areas. The 2006 Census collected no
information on the place of birth or foreign-born status of residents of
institutional collective dwellings (such as nursing homes), therefore
calculations to produce foreign-born percentages used to classify areas
did not include the institutional population. Finally, interpretation of
regional differences needs to consider that variations to registry
reporting practices across the 13 provinces and territories may have
contributed to a small extent to noted regional variation to cancer
incidence. (42)
CONCLUSIONS
Application of an area-based method creates the opportunity for
regular population cancer incidence surveillance to produce standardized
cancer incidence estimates at national and regional levels among the
foreign-born population. Results from this area-based analysis resemble
incidence patterns previously produced using individual-level records
and are interpreted as suggestive evidence of associations between the
characteristic of living in an area with a high concentration of
foreign-born and decreased cancer risk generally, with the reverse being
the case for at least three specific cancers. This area-based method
provides a surveillance tool that uses a standardized measure of
foreign-born population concentration that could be used to report
changes to cancer incidence according to area foreign-born concentration
over time. The tool could also inform health services planning such as
the development of public education planning regarding cancer screening
as the Canadian population becomes increasingly diverse.
Appendix A. Population in 2006 * by tercile of the foreign-born
population, by sex, by province or region, Canada
Total Low Foreign-born (tercile 1)
All All Males Females
Population in 2006
Canada 31,169,185 22,097,060 10,841,655 11,255,405
Atlantic 2,274,315 2,263,740 1,097,640 1,166,100
Quebec 7,480,310 6,269,040 3,070,670 3,198,370
Ontario 12,077,010 6,814,775 3,334,985 3,479,790
Prairies 5,227,955 4,375,040 2,169,425 2,205,615
British Columbia 4,009,085 2,273,955 1,117,665 1,156,290
Medium Foreign-born (tercile 2)
All Males Females
Population in 2006
Canada 5,734,465 2,786,780 2,947,685
Atlantic 10,575 5060 5515
Quebec 906,290 435,645 470,645
Ontario 2,918,810 1,415,475 1,503,335
Prairies 798,685 395,585 403,100
British Columbia 1,100,105 535,015 565,090
High Foreign-born (tercile 3)
All Males Females
Population in 2006
Canada 3,337,660 1,619,380 1,718,280
Atlantic -- -- --
Quebec 304,980 147,800 157,180
Ontario 2,343,425 1,136,265 1,207,160
Prairies 54,230 27,295 26,935
British Columbia 635,025 308,020 327,005
* Counts include all ages. National figures include the
two northern territories and Nunavut.
--Not applicable, no high % foreign-born population
dissemination areas existed for this jurisdiction.
Source: 2006 Census (20% sample), Statistics Canada.
Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge the importance of
Canada's provincial and territorial cancer registrars who submit
cancer records to Statistics Canada to compile the Canadian Cancer
Registry. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer provided additional
funding for this work.
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
REFERENCES
(1.) Chui T, Tran K, Maheux H. Immigration in Canada: A Portrait of
the Foreign-Born Population, 2006 Census, Census year 2006. Catalogue
Number 97-557XIE. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, 2007.
(2.) Malenfant EC, Lebel A, Martel L. Projections of the Diversity
of the Canadian Population 2006 to 2031. Catalogue No. 91-551-X 2010.
Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2007.
(3.) Khadilkar A, Chen Y. Rates of cervical cancer screening
associated with immigration status and number of years since immigration
in Ontario, Canada. J Immigr Minor Health 2013;15(2):244-48.
(4.) Shields M, Wilkins K. An update on mammography use in Canada.
Health Rep 2009;20(3):1-14.
(5.) Wilkins K, Shields M. Colorectal cancer testing in
Canada-2008. Health Rep 2009;20(3):1-10.
(6.) Lofters AK, Gozdyra P, Lobb R. Using geographic methods to
inform cancer screening interventions for South Asians in Ontario,
Canada. BMC Public Health 2013;13(395) doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-395.
Available at: http://biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/395 (Accessed June
4, 2013).
(7.) Lofters AK, Moineddin R, Hwang SW, Glazier RH. Predictors of
low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada.
BMC Women's Health 2011;11:20 doi:10.1186/1472-6874-11-20.
Available at: http//biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/11/20 (Accessed June 4,
2013).
(8.) Ellison LF, Wilkins K. Canadian trends in cancer prevalence.
Health Rep 2012;23(1):1-10.
(9.) Li D. Hospitalizations 2006-2008 in a British Columbia
population-based cohort of three-year breast cancer survivors.
Presentation to the 2013 Annual Conference of the Canadian Association
for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, BC, May 28, 2013.
(10.) McDermott S, DesMeules M, Lewis R, Gold J, Payne J, Lafrance
B, et al. Cancer incidence among Canadian immigrants, 1980-1998: Results
from a national cohort study. J Immigr Minor Health 2011;13:15-26.
(11.) DesMeules M, Gold J, Kazanjian A, Manuel D, Payne J,
Vissanjee B, et al. New approaches to immigrant health assessment. Can J
Public Health 2004;95(3):122-26.
(12.) Ng E. Longitudinal Health and Administrative Data Research
Team. Insights Into the Healthy Immigrant Effect: Mortality by Period of
Immigration and Place of Birth. Catalogue 82-622-X, No. 8. Ottawa:
Statistics Canada, 2011.
(13.) Sheth T, Nair C, Nargundkhar M, Anand S, Yusuf S.
Cardiovascular and cancer mortality among Canadians of European, south
Asian and Chinese origin from 1979 to 1993: An analysis of 1.2 million
deaths. CMAJ 1999;161(2):132-38.
(14.) McCracken M, Olsen M, Chen MS, Jemal A, Thun M, Cokkinides V,
et al. Cancer incidence, mortality and associated risk factors among
Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese
ethnicities. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(4):190-205.
(15.) Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM.
GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC
Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for
Research on Cancer, 2010. Available at: http://Globocan.iarc.fr
(Accessed September 12, 2011).
(16.) Rotermann M. The impact of considering birthplace in analyses
of immigrant health. Health Rep 2011;22(4):37-43.
(17.) Auluck A, Hislop G, Bajdik C, Poh C, Zhang L, Rosin M. Trends
in oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer incidence of human
papillomavirus (HPV)related and HPV-unrelated sites in a multicultural
population: The British Columbia experience. Cancer
2010;116(11):2635-44.
(18.) Wang ZJ, Ramcharan S, Love EJ. Cancer mortality of Chinese in
Canada. Intl J Epidemiol 1989;18(1):17-21.
(19.) Luo W, Birkett NJ, Ugnat A-M, Mao Y. Cancer incidence
patterns among Chinese immigrant populations in Alberta. J Immigr Health
2004;6(1):41-48.
(20.) Yavari P, Hislop TG, Bajdik C, Sadjadi A, Nouraie M, Babai M,
Malekzadeh R. Comparison of cancer incidence in Iran and Iranian
immigrants to British Columbia, Canada. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
2006;7(1):86-90.
(21.) Hislop TG, Bajdik CD, Saroa SR, Yeole BB, Barroetavena MC.
Cancer incidence in Indians from three areas: Delhi and Mumbai, India,
and British Columbia, Canada. J Immigr Minor Health 2007;9(3):221-27.
(22.) Kliewer EV, Smith KR. Breast cancer mortality among
immigrants in Australia and Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst
1995;87(15):1154-61.
(23.) Kliewer EV, Smith KR. Ovarian cancer mortality among
immigrants in Australia and Canada. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
1995;4:453-58.
(24.) Parkin DM, Chen VW, Ferlay J, Galceran J, Storm HH, Whelan
SL. Comparability and Quality Control in Cancer Registration (IARC
Technical Report No.19). Lyon, France: IARC, World Health Organization
and International Association of Cancer Registries, 1994.
(25.) Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin
DM, Whelan S, Eds. International Classification of Diseases for
Oncology, Third Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2000.
(26.) Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader
N, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006. Bethesda, MD:
National Cancer Institute. Based on November 2008 SEER data submission,
posted to SEER website, 2009. Available at:
http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/ (Accessed June 15, 2012).
(27.) Canadian Cancer Registry System Guide - 2007 Edition.
Catalogue No. 82-225 X. Ottawa: Health Statistics Division, Statistics
Canada, 2008.
(28.) Statistics Canada. Profiles for Canada, Provinces,
Territories, Census Divisions, Census Subdivisions and Dissemination
Areas, 2006 Census. Catalogue 94581-XCB2006. Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
2008.
(29.) Carriere G, Peters PA, Sanmartin C. Area-based methods to
calculate hospitalization rates for the foreign-born population in
Canada, 2005/2006. Health Rep 2012;23(3):43-51.
(30.) Wilkins R, Khan S. PCCF + Version 5F User's Guide.
Catalogue No. 82F0086XDB. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2011. Available at:
http://abacus.library.ubc.ca/bitstream/10573/42442/3/msword.pccf5f.pdf
(Accessed June 9, 2011).
(31.) Esteve J, Benhamou E, Raymond L, Eds. Statistical Methods in
Cancer Research, Volume IV, Descriptive Epidemiology. Lyon:
International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC Scientific
Publications No. 128, 1994.
(32.) Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly
standardized rates: A method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med
1997;16(7):791-801.
(33.) Chen Y, Yi Q, Mao Y. Cluster of liver cancer and immigration:
A geographic analysis of incidence data for Ontario 1998-2002. Int J
Health Geogr 2008;7(28); doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-28.
(34.) Merican I, Guan R, Amarapuka D, Alexander M, Chutaputti A,
Chien R, et al. Chronic hepatitis B virus in Asian countries. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15(12):1356-61.
(35.) El-Serag HB, Davila JA, Petersen NJ, McGlynn KA. The
continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the
United States: An update. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:817-23.
(36.) Beshiri R, He J. Immigrants in Rural Canada: 2006. Rural and
Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin; Vol. 8, No. 2. Catalogue number
21-006-X. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2009.
(37.) Mitura V, Bollman RD. The Health of Rural Canadians: A
Rural-Urban Comparison of Health Indicators. Rural and Small Town Canada
Analysis Bulletin; Vol. 4, No.6. Catalogue 21-006-XIE2002006. Ottawa:
Statistics Canada, 2003.
(38.) Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. Population Health in
Canada's Largest Cities: A Cancer System Performance Spotlight
Report. Toronto, ON: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 2013.
Available at: http://www.cancerview.ca/systemperformancereport.
(Accessed September 30, 2013).
(39.) Li FX, Robson PJ, Chen Y, Qiu Z, Lo Siou G, Bryant HE.
Prevalence, trend and sociodemographic association of five modifiable
lifestyle risk factors for cancer in Alberta and Canada. Cancer Causes
Control 2009;20(3):395-407; doi 10.1007/s10552-008-9254-2.
(40.) Perez CE. Health status and health behaviours among
immigrants. Health Rep 2002;13(Suppl.):1-13.
(41.) Stirbu I, Kunst AE, Vlems FA, Visser O, Bos V, Deville W, et
al. Cancer mortality rates among first and second generation migrants in
the Netherlands: Convergence toward the rates of native Dutch
population. Int J Cancer 2006;119(11):2665-72.
(42.) Canadian Cancer Society's Steering Committee on Cancer
Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2012. Toronto: Canadian Cancer
Society, 2012.
Received: February 20, 2013
Accepted: October 29, 2013
Gisele M. Carriere, MA, [1] Claudia Sanmartin, PhD, [1] Heather
Bryant, MD, PhD, [2] Gina Lockwood, MMath [3]
Author Affiliations
[1.] Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON
[2.] Vice President, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto,
ON
[3.] Manager, Analytics and Surveillance and Senior
Biostatistician, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON
Correspondence: Gisele M. Carriere, Health Analysis Division,
Statistics Canada, Room 600, Library Square Tower, 300 West Georgia
Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 6C7, Tel: 604-666-5907, Fax: 604-666-6680,
E-mail:
[email protected]
Table 1. Standardized Cancer Incidence Rates (ASIR) * and
Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) for Site-specific Cancers,
by Area Tercile for Percentage Foreign-born Population
From 2001 to 2006, Canada Overall, and by Region
Cancer Site Area Low % Foreign-born
(tercile 1) ([dagger])
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 653,990 493 492-494
Atlantic 71,929 516 512-520
Quebec 191,388 510 508-512
Ontario 203,895 493 491-496
Prairies 118,753 479 476-482
British 66,560 464 461-468
Columbia
Lung Canada 98,382 74 74-75
Atlantic 10,812 77 76-79
Quebec 34,471 92 91-93
Ontario 27,735 67 66-68
Prairies 15,618 64 63-65
British 9486 66 64-67
Columbia
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 85,001 122 121-123
Colorectal Canada 84,812 64 64-64
Atlantic 10,292 74 72-75
Quebec 25,145 67 66-68
Ontario 26,280 63 63-64
Prairies 14,688 59 58-60
British 8156 57 55-58
Columbia
Prostate Canada 91,357 150 150-151
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 614 5 4-5
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 4434 33 32-34
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 11,346 86 84-87
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born
(tercile 2)
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 145,346 447 444-449
Atlantic 309 531 471-592
Quebec 26,885 476 471-482
Ontario 73,176 446 443-449
Prairies 16,302 427 420-433
British 28,674 435 430-440
Columbia
Lung Canada 18,164 57 56-57
Atlantic 44 77 59-100
Quebec 4051 72 69-74
Ontario 8509 53 52-54
Prairies 2049 57 54-59
British 3511 53 52-55
Columbia
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 20,285 115 113-117
Colorectal Canada 18,001 56 55-57
Atlantic 39 68 51-90
Quebec 3531 62 60-64
Ontario 8953 55 54-56
Prairies 1928 52 50-55
British 3550 54 52-55
Columbia
Prostate Canada 20,242 141 139-143
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 283 8 7-9
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 1626 51 48-53
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 4181 122 118-125
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born
(tercile 2)
IRR 95% CI
All sites Canada 0.91 0.90-0.91
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 1.03 0.92-1.15
Quebec 0.93 0.92-0.95
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.90 0.90-0.91
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.89 0.88-0.91
([double
dagger])
British 0.94 0.93-0.95
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Lung Canada 0.76 0.75-0.77
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 1.00 0.74-1.35
Quebec 0.78 0.75-0.80
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.79 0.77-0.81
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.89 0.85-0.93
([double
dagger])
British 0.81 0.78-0.85
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 0.94 0.93-0.96
([double
dagger])
Colorectal Canada 0.87 0.86-0.89
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 0.93 0.68-1.28
Quebec 0.92 0.89-0.96
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.87 0.85-0.89
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.88 0.84-0.92
([double
dagger])
British 0.95 0.91-0.99
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Prostate Canada 0.94 0.92-0.95
([double
dagger])
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 1.83 1.59-2.11
([double
dagger])
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 1.51 1.43-1.60
([double
dagger])
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 1.42 1.37-1.47
([double
dagger])
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
# Cases ASIR
All sites Canada 69,481 388
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 7742 433
Ontario 47,739 389
Prairies 954 364
British 13,046 361
Columbia
Lung Canada 7935 46
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 1076 61
Ontario 5086 43
Prairies 127 53
British 1646 46
Columbia
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 9643 97
Colorectal Canada 8469 48
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 999 56
Ontario 5680 48
Prairies 96 37
British 1694 47
Columbia
Prostate Canada 9323 121
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 378 19
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 1187 67
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 3089 155
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
95% CI IRR
All sites Canada 385-391 0.79
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 423-442 0.85
([double
dagger])
Ontario 385-392 0.79
([double
dagger])
Prairies 341-388 0.76
([double
dagger])
British 355-367 0.78
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Lung Canada 45-47 0.62
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 57-65 0.66
([double
dagger])
Ontario 42-45 0.65
([double
dagger])
Prairies 44-62 0.83
([double
dagger])
British 44-48 0.70
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 95-99 0.80
([double
dagger])
Colorectal Canada 47-50 0.76
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 52-59 0.83
([double
dagger])
Ontario 47-49 0.75
([double
dagger])
Prairies 30-45 0.63
([double
dagger])
British 45-50 0.84
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Prostate Canada 118-123 0.80
([double
dagger])
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 17-21 4.20
([double
dagger])
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 63-71 2.00
([double
dagger])
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 149-160 1.81
([double
dagger])
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
95% CI
All sites Canada 0.78-0.79
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.83-0.87
Ontario 0.78-0.80
Prairies 0.71-0.81
British 0.76-0.79
Columbia
Lung Canada 0.60-0.63
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.62-0.71
Ontario 0.63-0.67
Prairies 0.69-0.99
British 0.67-0.74
Columbia
Female Breast ([setion]) Canada 0.78-0.81
Colorectal Canada 0.74-0.77
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.78-0.89
Ontario 0.73-0.78
Prairies 0.51-0.77
British 0.80-0.88
Columbia
Prostate Canada 0.79-0.82
Nasopharynx ([parallel]) Canada 3.69-4.78
Liver ([parallel]) Canada 1.88-2.14
Thyroid ([parallel]) Canada 1.74-1.88
* Age-standardized to the total 2006 population within the
low % foreign-born areas. Rates are expressed per 100,000
population, except for nasopharynx, liver, thyroid that are
reported per million population. Both sexes were combined
except for female breast and prostate. National figures
include northern territories, Nunavut.
([dagger]) Reference category.
([double dagger]) Significantly different compared to
reference category.
([section]) Sex-specific population denominators were used.
For breast cancer, figures are only shown for national
level. Figures for regions are shown in Table 3.
([parallel]) For prostate cancer, figures are only shown
for national level. Figures for regions are shown in
Table 2.
-- Not applicable, no high % foreign-born population
dissemination areas existed for this jurisdiction.
Sources: 2006 Census (20% sample), the Canadian Cancer
Registry, Statistics Canada.
Table 2. Standardized Cancer Incidence Rates (ASIR) * and
Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) for Site-specific Cancers for
Males, by Area Tercile for Percentage Foreign-born Population
From 2001 to 2006, Canada Overall and by Region
Cancer Site Area Low % Foreign-born
(tercile 1) ([dagger])
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 345,065 571 569-573
Atlantic 38,933 615 609-621
Quebec 99,180 594 590-598
Ontario 107,370 566 562-569
Prairies 63,057 558 553-562
British 35,773 530 524-535
Columbia
Lung Canada 55,452 93 92-93
Atlantic 6360 101 99-104
Quebec 20,492 124 122-125
Ontario 15,129 80 79-82
Prairies 8351 75 74-77
British 4973 74 72-76
Columbia
Prostate Canada 91,357 150 150-151
Atlantic 10,517 164 160-167
Quebec 20,321 121 119-123
Ontario 31,574 165 164-167
Prairies 18,767 168 165-170
British 10,045 147 144-150
Columbia
Colorectal Canada 45,962 77 76-77
Atlantic 5520 88 86-91
Quebec 13,512 81 80-83
Ontario 14,171 75 74-77
Prairies 8101 72 71-74
British 4513 67 65-69
Columbia
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 407 6 6-7
Liver ([section]) Canada 3330 55 53-56
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 2641 41 39-43
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born
(tercile 2)
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 73,805 510 507-514
Atlantic 153 623 523-723
Quebec 13,345 540 531-549
Ontario 37,190 509 504-514
Prairies 8254 495 484-506
British 14,863 499 491-507
Columbia
Lung Canada 9886 70 68-71
Atlantic 23 95 64-135
Quebec 2326 94 90-98
Ontario 4612 65 63-66
Prairies 1099 70 66-74
British 1826 62 59-65
Columbia
Prostate Canada 20,242 141 139-143
Atlantic 47 195 151-250
Quebec 2652 108 104-112
Ontario 10,893 151 148-153
Prairies 2300 142 136-148
British 4350 147 142-151
Columbia
Colorectal Canada 9628 67 66-69
Atlantic 24 99 68-141
Quebec 1862 75 72-79
Ontario 4833 67 65-69
Prairies 1044 64 60-68
British 1865 63 60-66
Columbia
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 201 13 11-14
Liver ([section]) Canada 1199 80 76-85
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 905 56 52-59
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born
(tercile 2)
IRR 95% CI
All sites Canada 0.89 0.89-0.90
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 1.01 0.86-1.19
Quebec 0.91 0.89-0.93
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.90 0.89-0.91
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.89 0.87-0.91
([double
dagger])
British 0.94 0.92-0.96
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Lung Canada 0.75 0.74-0.77
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 0.93 0.62-1.41
Quebec 0.76 0.73-0.79
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.81 0.78-0.83
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.93 0.87-0.99
([double
dagger])
British 0.84 0.80-0.89
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Prostate Canada 0.94 0.92-0.95
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 1.19 0.89-1.59
Quebec 0.89 0.85-0.93
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.91 0.89-0.93
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.85 0.81-0.89
([double
dagger])
British 1.00 0.96-1.03
Columbia
Colorectal Canada 0.88 0.86-0.90
([double
dagger])
Atlantic 1.12 0.75-1.68
Quebec 0.92 0.88-0.97
([double
dagger])
Ontario 0.89 0.86-0.92
([double
dagger])
Prairies 0.88 0.82-0.94
([double
dagger])
British 0.94 0.89-0.99
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 1.98 1.67-2.34
([double
dagger])
Liver ([section]) Canada 1.47 1.38-1.57
([double
dagger])
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 1.36 1.26-1.46
([double
dagger])
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
# Cases ASIR
All sites Canada 34,604 439
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 3787 495
Ontario 23,706 439
Prairies 496 419
British 6615 409
Columbia
Lung Canada 4589 60
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 650 85
Ontario 2960 57
Prairies 74 68
British 905 57
Columbia
Prostate Canada 9323 121
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 697 93
Ontario 6789 128
Prairies 109 93
British 1728 109
Columbia
Colorectal Canada 4462 57
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 517 69
Ontario 2999 57
Prairies 49 42
British 897 56
Columbia
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 267 28
Liver ([section]) Canada 883 107
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 577 62
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
95% CI IRR
All sites Canada 434-444 0.77
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 479-511 0.83
([double
dagger])
Ontario 433-445 0.78
([double
dagger])
Prairies 381-457 0.75
([double
dagger])
British 399-419 0.77
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Lung Canada 58-62 0.65
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 78-92 0.69
([double
dagger])
Ontario 55-59 0.71
([double
dagger])
Prairies 52-83 0.90
([double
dagger])
British 53-61 0.78
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Prostate Canada 118-123 0.80
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 86-100 0.77
([double
dagger])
Ontario 125-132 0.78
([double
dagger])
Prairies 75-111 0.56
([double
dagger])
British 104-114 0.74
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Colorectal Canada 56-59 0.75
([double
dagger])
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 63-74 0.84
([double
dagger])
Ontario 54-59 0.75
([double
dagger])
Prairies 32-54 0.58
([double
dagger])
British 52-60 0.83
Columbia ([double
dagger])
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 25-32 4.47
([double
dagger])
Liver ([section]) Canada 100-115 1.97
([double
dagger])
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 57-67 1.52
([double
dagger])
Cancer Site Area High %
Foreign-born
(tercile 3)
95% CI
All sites Canada 0.76-0.78
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.81-0.86
Ontario 0.77-0.79
Prairies 0.69-0.82
British 0.75-0.79
Columbia
Lung Canada 0.63-0.67
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.64-0.74
Ontario 0.68-0.74
Prairies 0.71-1.13
British 0.72-0.83
Columbia
Prostate Canada 0.79-0.82
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.71-0.83
Ontario 0.76-0.80
Prairies 0.46-0.67
British 0.70-0.78
Columbia
Colorectal Canada 0.73-0.77
Atlantic --
Quebec 0.77-0.92
Ontario 0.72-0.78
Prairies 0.43-0.77
British 0.78-0.90
Columbia
Nasopharynx ([section]) Canada 3.80-5.20
Liver ([section]) Canada 1.83-2.12
Thyroid ([section]) Canada 1.38-1.66
* Age-standardized to the total 2006 population within the
low % foreign-born area. Rates are expressed per 100,000
population except for nasopharynx, liver, thyroid that are
reported per million population. Canada figures include the
two northern territories and Nunavut.
([dagger]) Reference category.
([double dagger]) Significantly different compared to
reference category.
([section]) Sex-specific population denominators were used.
-- Not applicable, no high % foreign-born population
dissemination areas existed for this jurisdiction.
Sources: 2006 Census (20% sample), the Canadian Cancer
Registry, Statistics Canada.
Table 3. Standardized Cancer Incidence Rates (ASIR) * and
Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) for Site-specific Cancers for
Females, by Area Tercile for Percentage Foreign-born
Population From 2001 to 2006, Canada Overall and by Region
Cancer Site Area Low % Foreign-born
(tercile 1) ([dagger])
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 308,925 436 434-438
Atlantic 32,996 440 435-445
Quebec 92,208 451 448-454
Ontario 96,525 439 436-442
Prairies 55,696 421 418-425
British Columbia 30,787 416 412-421
Lung Canada 42,930 61 60-61
Atlantic 4452 59 57-61
Quebec 13,979 68 67-69
Ontario 12,606 57 56-58
Prairies 7267 56 55-57
British Columbia 4513 60 59-62
Female breast Canada 85,001 122 121-123
([section]) Atlantic 8903 121 119-124
Quebec 25,293 127 125-128
Ontario 26,620 124 122-125
Prairies 15,372 118 116-119
British Columbia 8599 119 116-121
Colorectal Canada 38,850 53 53-54
Atlantic 4772 61 59-63
Quebec 11,633 55 54-56
Ontario 12,109 53 52-54
Prairies 6587 49 48-50
British Columbia 3643 48 46-49
Nasopharynx Canada 207 3 3-3
([section])
Liver Canada 1104 15 14-16
([section])
Thyroid Canada 8705 129 127-132
([section])
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born
(tercile 2)
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 71,541 400 397-403
Atlantic 156 456 384-529
Quebec 13,540 432 425-440
Ontario 35,986 400 396-404
Prairies 8048 376 367-384
British Columbia 13,811 387 381-394
Lung Canada 8278 46 45-47
Atlantic 21 64 43-94
Quebec 1725 54 52-57
Ontario 3897 44 42-45
Prairies 950 47 44-50
British Columbia 1685 47 45-49
Female breast Canada 20,285 115 113-117
([section]) Atlantic 41 122 92-159
Quebec 3643 121 117-125
Ontario 10,331 116 114-118
Prairies 2305 106 102-110
British Columbia 3965 114 111-118
Colorectal Canada 8373 46 45-47
Atlantic 15 39 24-62
Quebec 1669 50 48-53
Ontario 4120 45 44-46
Prairies 884 43 40-45
British Columbia 1685 46 43-48
Nasopharynx Canada 82 5 4-6
([section])
Liver Canada 427 24 21-26
([section])
Thyroid Canada 3276 187 180-193
([section])
Cancer Site Area Medium % Foreign-born (tercile 2)
IRR 95% CI
All sites Canada 0.92 ([double dagger]) 0.91-0.92
Atlantic 1.04 ([double dagger]) 0.88-1.22
Quebec 0.96 ([double dagger]) 0.94-0.98
Ontario 0.91 ([double dagger]) 0.90-0.92
Prairies 0.89 ([double dagger]) 0.87-0.91
British Columbia 0.93 ([double dagger]) 0.91-0.95
Lung Canada 0.77 ([double dagger]) 0.75-0.79
Atlantic 1.09 0.70-1.68
Quebec 0.80 ([double dagger]) 0.76-0.84
Ontario 0.76 ([double dagger]) 0.74-0.79
Prairies 0.84 ([double dagger]) 0.78-0.90
British Columbia 0.78 ([double dagger]) 0.74-0.82
Female breast Canada 0.94 ([double dagger]) 0.93-0.96
([section]) Atlantic 1.01 0.74-1.37
Quebec 0.95 ([double dagger]) 0.92-0.99
Ontario 0.93 ([double dagger]) 0.92-0.96
Prairies 0.90 ([double dagger]) 0.86-0.94
British Columbia 0.96 0.93-1.00
Colorectal Canada 0.86 ([double dagger]) 0.84-0.88
Atlantic 0.64 0.38-1.08
Quebec 0.91 ([double dagger]) 0.86-0.96
Ontario 0.85 ([double dagger]) 0.82-0.88
Prairies 0.87 ([double dagger]) 0.81-0.94
British Columbia 0.95 0.90-1.01
Nasopharynx Canada 1.55 ([double dagger]) 1.20-2.01
([section])
Liver Canada 1.56 ([double dagger]) 1.39-1.74
([section])
Thyroid Canada 1.44 ([double dagger]) 1.39-1.50
([section])
Cancer Site Area High % Foreign-born (tercile 3)
# Cases ASIR 95% CI
All sites Canada 34,877 352 349-356
Atlantic -- -- --
Quebec 3955 390 377-402
Ontario 24,033 353 349-358
Prairies 458 320 290-350
British Columbia 6431 328 320-336
Lung Canada 3346 34 33-36
Atlantic -- -- --
Quebec 426 41 37-45
Ontario 2126 32 31-34
Prairies 53 40 29-51
British Columbia 741 38 35-41
Female breast Canada 9643 97 95-99
([section]) Atlantic -- -- --
Quebec 1007 104 97-110
Ontario 6701 98 95-100
Prairies 120 83 68-98
British Columbia 1815 94 90-98
Colorectal Canada 4007 41 40-42
Atlantic -- -- --
Quebec 482 46 41-50
Ontario 2681 40 39-42
Prairies 47 33 25-42
British Columbia 797 40 37-43
Nasopharynx Canada 111 11 9-13
([section])
Liver Canada 304 31 28-35
([section])
Thyroid Canada 2512 246 236-255
([section])
Cancer Site Area High % Foreign-born (tercile 3)
IRR 95% CI
All sites Canada 0.81 ([double dagger]) 0.80-0.82
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 0.86 ([double dagger]) 0.84-0.89
Ontario 0.80 ([double dagger]) 0.79-0.82
Prairies 0.76 ([double dagger]) 0.69-0.84
British Columbia 0.79 ([double dagger]) 0.77-0.81
Lung Canada 0.57 ([double dagger]) 0.55-0.59
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 0.61 ([double dagger]) 0.55-0.67
Ontario 0.57 ([double dagger]) 0.54-0.59
Prairies 0.72 ([double dagger]) 0.55-0.95
British Columbia 0.63 ([double dagger]) 0.59-0.68
Female breast Canada 0.80 ([double dagger]) 0.78-0.81
([section]) Atlantic -- --
Quebec 0.82 ([double dagger]) 0.77-0.87
Ontario 0.79 ([double dagger]) 0.77-0.81
Prairies 0.71 ([double dagger]) 0.59-0.85
British Columbia 0.79 ([double dagger]) 0.75-0.83
Colorectal Canada 0.77 ([double dagger]) 0.74-0.79
Atlantic -- --
Quebec 0.83 ([double dagger]) 0.75-0.91
Ontario 0.76 ([double dagger]) 0.73-0.79
Prairies 0.68 ([double dagger]) 0.50-0.91
British Columbia 0.85 ([double dagger]) 0.78-0.91
Nasopharynx Canada 3.61 ([double dagger]) 2.87-4.56
([section])
Liver Canada 2.05 ([double dagger]) 1.80-2.33
([section])
Thyroid Canada 1.90 ([double dagger]) 1.82-1.99
([section])
* Age-standardized to the total 2006 population within the low %
foreign-born area. Rates are expressed per 100,000 population,
except for nasopharynx, liver, thyroid that are reported per
million population.
Canada figures include the two northern territories and Nunavut.
([dagger]) Reference category.
([double dagger]) Significantly different compared to reference
category.
([section]) Sex-specific population denominators were used.
--Not applicable, no high % foreign-born population dissemination
areas existed for this jurisdiction. Sources: 2006 Census (20%
sample), the Canadian Cancer Registry, Statistics Canada.
Table 4. Area Population Characteristics by Tercile of the
Foreign-born Population, by Province or Region, Canada 2006
% Foreign-born Tercile Canada Atlantic Quebec
%
High foreign-born (tercile 3)
Foreign-born 63.8 -- 62.5
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 17.1 -- 22.3
resident
Place of birth was Asia 37.7 -- 24.4
Place of birth was Europe 11.6 -- 14.5
Place of birth was Africa 3.5 -- 9.2
Low income after taxes 19.9 -- 32.3
Completed university degree 28.4 -- 28.6
Medium foreign-born (tercile 2)
Foreign-born 37.6 35.3 37.7
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 7.9 18.6 9.3
resident
Place of birth was Asia 14.8 12.9 10.0
Place of birth was Europe 12.9 5.4 12.3
Place of birth was Africa 2.4 1.2 5.4
Low income after taxes 12.6 22.0 17.9
Completed university degree 28.3 45.1 28.5
Low foreign-born (tercile 1)
Foreign-born 9.8 3.9 5.8
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 1.5 0.8 1.4
resident
Place of birth was Asia 1.9 0.7 1.1
Place of birth was Europe 5.2 1.7 2.4
Place of birth was Africa 0.5 0.2 0.7
Low income after taxes 7.4 8.1 8.8
Completed university degree 17.2 15.1 16.4
% Foreign-born Tercile Ontario Prairies British
Columbia
%
High foreign-born (tercile 3)
Foreign-born 64.3 59.0 63.0
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 16.8 23.2 15.3
resident
Place of birth was Asia 36.5 40.2 48.4
Place of birth was Europe 12.7 4.1 6.7
Place of birth was Africa 3.3 4.4 1.4
Low income after taxes 18.0 18.4 21.9
Completed university degree 28.3 28.7 28.7
Medium foreign-born (tercile 2)
Foreign-born 38.1 34.7 38.5
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 6.9 9.8 7.9
resident
Place of birth was Asia 13.0 18.6 20.6
Place of birth was Europe 15.5 7.8 10.3
Place of birth was Africa 1.9 2.5 1.3
Low income after taxes 10.8 12.1 13.8
Completed university degree 29.0 24.7 28.4
Low foreign-born (tercile 1)
Foreign-born 13.3 10.5 14.9
Recent immigrant/non-permanent 1.4 2.0 1.7
resident
Place of birth was Asia 2.1 2.7 3.1
Place of birth was Europe 8.2 4.7 8.3
Place of birth was Africa 0.4 0.5 0.4
Low income after taxes 6.0 7.3 8.1
Completed university degree 18.7 17.5 16.6
--Not applicable, no high % foreign-born population dissemination
areas existed within this jurisdiction.
Sources: 2006 Census (20% sample), Statistics Canada.