期刊名称:DILEMATA : Revista Internacional de Éticas Aplicadas
电子版ISSN:1989-7022
出版年度:2016
卷号:0
期号:20
页码:33-48
语种:Spanish
出版社:Unidad Asociada de Éticas Aplicadas IFS/CSIC
摘要:Since the last decades of the twentieth century, two methodologies for applied bioethics have been popular – in fact, two methodologies for applied ethics in general – Principalism and casuistry. This essay is a comparison of the two with respect to their similarities and differences. The conclusion is that they are distinct methodological styles, each with its advantages and disadvantages, but not necessarily in conflict. The choice, then, depends on personal preferences.