Effects of MHD and heat transfer on an oscillatory flow of Jeffrey fluid in a tube.
Kavitha, K. ; Prasad, K. Ramakrishna
Introduction
The study of oscillatory flow of a viscous fluid in cylindrical
tubes has received the attention of many researchers as they play a
significant role in understanding the important physiological problem,
namely the blood flow in arteriosclerotic blood vessel. Womersley [21]
have investigated the oscillating flow of thin walled elastic tube.
Detailed measurements of the oscillating velocity profiles were made by
Linford and Ryan [12]. Unsteady and oscillatory flow of viscous fluids
in locally constricted, rigid, axisymmetric tubes at low Reynolds number has been studied by Ramachandra Rao and Devanathan [14], Hall [8] and
Schneck and Ostrach [17]. Haldar [7] have considered the oscillatory
flow of a blood through an artery with a mild constriction. Several
other workers, Misra and Singh [13], Ogulu and Alabraba [14], Tay and
Ogulu [18] and Elshahed [6], to mention but a few, have in one way or
the other modeled and studied the flow of blood through a rigid tube
under the influence of pulsatile pressure gradient.
Many researchers have studied blood flow in the artery by
considering blood as either Newtonian or non-Newtonian fluids, since
blood is a suspension of red cells in plasma; it behaves as a
non-Newtonian fluid at low shear rate. Barnes et al. [1] have studied
the behavior of no-Newtonian fluid flow through a straight rigid tube of
circular cross section under the action of sinusoidally oscillating
pressure gradient about a non-zero mean. Chaturani and Upadhya [4] have
developed a method for the study of the pulsatile flow of couple stress
fluid through circular tubes. The Poiseuille flow of couple stress fluid
has been critically examined by Chaturani and Rathod [5]. Moreover, the
Jeffrey model is relatively simpler linear model using time derivatives
instead of convected derivatives for example the Oldroyd-B model does,
it represents rheology different from the Newtonian (Bird et al. [3]).
None of these studies considered the effect of body temperature on the
blood flow -prominent during deep heat muscle treatment.
The magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow between parallel plates is a
classical problem that occurs in MHD power generators, MHD pumps,
accelerators, aerodynamic heating, electrostatic precipitation, polymer
technology, petroleum industry, purification of crude oil and fluid
droplets and sprays. Especially the flow of non-Newtonian fluids in
channels is encountered in various engineering applications. For
example, injection molding of plastic parts involves the flow of
polymers inside channels. During the last few years the industrial
importance of non-Newtonian fluids is widely known. Such fluids in the
presence of a magnetic field have applications in the electromagnetic
propulsion, the flow of nuclear fuel slurries and the flows of liquid
state metals and alloys. Sarparkaya [16] have presented the first study
for MHD Bingham plastic and power law fluids. Effect of magnetic field
on pulsatile flow of blood in a porous channel was investigated by
Bhuyan and Hazarika [2]. Hayat et al. [9] have studied the Hall effects
on the unsteady hydromagnetic oscillatory flow of a second grade fluid
in a channel. Couette and Poiseuille flows of an Oldroyd 6-constant
fluid with magnetic field in a channel was investigated by Hayat et al.
[10]. Hayat et al. [11] have studied the influence of heat transfer in
an MHD second grade fluid film over an unsteady stretching sheet.
Vasudev et al. [19] have investigated the influence of magnetic field
and heat transfer on peristaltic flow of Jeffrey fluid through a porous
medium in an asymmetric channel. Vasudev et al. [20] have studied the
MHD peristaltic flow of a Newtonian fluid through a porous medium in an
asymmetric vertical channel with heat transfer.
In view of these, we studied the effects of magnetic field and heat
transfer on oscillatory flow of Jeffrey fluid in a circular tube. The
expressions for the velocity field and temperature field are obtained
analytically. The effects of various pertinent parameters on the
velocity field and temperature field studied in detail with the help of
graphs.
Mathematical formulation
We consider an oscillatory flow of a Jeffrey fluid through in a
heated uniform cylindrical tube of constant radiusR. A uniform magnetic
field [B.sub.0] is applied in the transverse direction to the flow. The
wall of the tube is maintained at a temperature [T.sub.w]. We choose the
cylindrical coordinates (r,[theta,z)such that r = 0 is the axis of
symmetry. The flow is considered as axially symmetric and fully
developed. The geometry of the flow is shown in Fig. 1.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The constitute equation of S for Jeffrey fluid is
S = [mu] / 1 + [[lambda].sub.1] ([??] + [[lambda].sub.2] [??])
(2.1)
where [mu] is the dynamic viscosity, [[lambda].sub.1] is the ratio
of relaxation to retardation times, [[lambda].sub.2] is the retardation
time, [??] is the shear rate and dots over the quantities denote
differentiation with time.
The equations governing the flow are given by
P = [partial derivative] / [partial derivative]t = - [partial
derivative]p / [partial derivative]z + [[partial derivative]S.sub.rZ] /
[partial derivative]r - [sigma] [B.sup.2.sub.0]w + pg[beta] (T -
[T.sub.w]) (2.2)
[pc.sub.p] [partial derivative]T / [partial derivative]T =
[k.sub.0] ([[partial derivative].sup.2]T / [[partial derivative].sup.2]
+ 1[partial derivative]T / r [partial derivative]r) (2.3)
where [rho] is the fluid density, [mu] is the fluid viscosity, p is
the pressure, w is the velocity component in z - direction, g is the
acceleration due to gravity, [sigma] is the electrical conductivity of
the fluid, [beta] coefficient of thermal expansion, T is the
temperature, [k.sub.0] is the thermal conductivity and [c.sub.p] is the
specific heat at constant pressure.
The appropriate boundary conditions are
w = 0, T = [T.sub.w] at r = R [partial derivative]w / [partial
derivative]r = 0, T = [T.sub.[infinity]] at r = 0 (2.4)
Introducing the following non-dimensional variables
[bar.r] = r / R, [bar.z] = z / R, [bar.t] = [bar.t] = [w.sub.0]t /
R, [[alpha].sup.2] = [rho][R.sup.2] / [mu], [lambda] = R / [w.sub.0],
[bar.w] = w / [w.sub.0]
[bar.p] = p - [p.sub.w] / [mu], [theta] = T - [T.sub.w] / [T.sub.w]
- [T.sub.[infinity]] Pr = [[micro]c.sub.p] / [k.sub.0], Re = p[w.sub.0]R
/ [mu]
into the Eqs. (2.2) - (2.4), we get (after dropping bars)
Re [partial derivative]w / [partial derivative]t = -[lambda] dp /
dz + 1 / 1 + [[lambda].sub.1] [[[partial derivative].sup.2]w / [[partial
derivative].sup.2]r + 1 / r [partial derivative]w / [partial
derivative]r] - [M.sup.2]w + Gr / Re [theta] (2.5)
PrRe [partial derivative][theta] / [partial derivative]t =
[[partial derivative].sup.2][theta] / [[partial derivative]r.sup.2] + 1
[partial derivative][theta] / [partial derivative]r (2.6)
where Pr is the Prandtl number, M = [RB.sub.0] [square root of
([sigma] / [mu])] is the Hartmann number, Gr = [rho]g[beta][R.sup.2]
([T.sub.w] - [T.sub.[infinity]]) / [w.sub.0][mu] is the Grashoff number
and Re is the Reynolds number.
The corresponding non-dimensional boundary conditions are
w = 0, T = 1 at r = 1
[partial derivative]w / [partial derivative]r = 0, T = 0 at r = 0
(2.7)
Solution
It is fairly unanimous that, the pumping action of the heart
results in a pulsatile blood flow so that we can represent the pressure
gradient (pressure in the left ventricle) as
- dp / dz = [p.sub.0][e.sup.i[omega]t] (3.1)
where and flow variables expresses as
[theta](y, t) = [[theta].sub.0] (r)[e.sup.i[omega]t] (3.2)
w(y, t) = [w.sub.0] (r)[e.sup.i[omega]t] (3.3)
Substituting Eqs. (3.1) - (3.2) into Eqs. (2.5) and (2.6) and
solving the resultant equations subject to the boundary conditions in
(2.7), we obtain
[[theta].sub.0] = [I.sub.0]([OMEGA]r) / [I.sub.0]([OMEGA]h) (3.4)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3.5)
here [[OMEGA].sup.2] = i[omega] Pr Re and [[beta].sup.2.sub.1] = (1
/ Da + i[omega]Re (1 + [[lambda].sub.1]).
In Eqs. (3.4) and (3.5), [I.sub.0] (x) is the modified Bessel
function of first kind of order zero.
Hence the temperature distribution and the axial velocity are given
by
[theta] = [I.sub.0]([OMEGA]r) / [I.sub.0] ([OMEGA]H)
[e.sup.i[omega]t] (3.6)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3.7)
Discussion of the Results
Fig. 2 depicts the effects of material parameter [[lambda].sub.1]
on w for Da = 0.1, p = 1, [omega] = 10, [lambda] = 0.5,Pr = 2, Gr = 1,Re
= 1and t = 0.1. It is observed that, the axial velocity w increases at
the axis of tube with increasing material parameter [[lambda].sub.1].
In order to see the effects of Hartmann number M on w for
[[lambda].sub.1] = 0.3, p = 1, [omega] = 10, [lambda] = 0.5, Pr = 2, Gr
= 1,Re = 1 and t = 0.1 we plotted Fig. 3. It is found that, the axial
velocity w decreases with an increase in Hartmann number M .
Fig. 4 shows the effects of Prandtl number Pr on w for
[[lambda].sub.1] = 0.3, p = 1, [omega] = 10, [lambda] = 0.5, Da = 0.1,
Gr = 1,Re = 1and t = 0.1. It is noted that, an increase in the Prandtl
number Pr decreases the axial velocity w.
Fig. 5 illustrates the effects of Grashof number Gr on w for
[[lambda].sub.1] = 0.3, p = 1, [omega] = 10, [lambda]] = 0.5, Pr = 2, Da
= 0.1,Re = 1 and t = 0.1. It is observed that, the axial velocity w
increases with an increase in Grashof number Gr .
Fig. 6 shows the effects of Reynolds number Re on w for
[[lambda].sub.1] = 0.3, p = 1, [omega] = 10, [lambda] = 0.5,Pr = 2,Da =
0.1,Re = 1and t = 0.1. It is found that, the axial velocity w decreases
on increasing Reynolds number Re.
In order to see the effects of [lambda] on w for [[lambda].sub.1] =
0.3, Da = 0.1, Pr = 2, Gr = 1, p = 1, [omega] = 10, Re = 1 and t = 0.1
we plotted Fig. 7. It is observed that, the axial velocity increases
with increasing [lambda] .
Fig. 8 shows the effects of [omega] on w for [[lambda].sub.1] =
0.3, Da = 0.1, Pr = 2, Gr = 1, p = 1, [lambda] = 0.5 , Re = 1 and t =
0.1 is shown in Fig. 7. It is observed that, the axial velocity
decreases on increasing [omega].
Fig. 9 depicts the effects of Prandtl number Pr on [theta] for
[omega] = 10,Re = 1and t = 0.1. It is found that, the temperature 0
decreases with increasing Prandtl number Pr .
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]
Conclusions
In this paper, we studied the effects of magnetic field and heat
transfer on oscillatory flow of Jeffrey fluid in a circular tube. The
expressions for the velocity field and temperature field are obtained
analytically. It is observed that, the axial velocity increases with
increasing [[lambda].sub.1], Gr and [lambda], while it decreases with
increasing M , Pr, Re and [lambda]. The temperature field decreases with
increasing Pr .
References
[1] Barnes, H. A., Townsend, P. and Walters, K., 1971, On pulsatile
flow of non-Newtonian liquids, Rheol. Acta, 10, pp. 517-527.
[2] Bhuyan, B. C. and Hazarika, G. C., 2001, Effect of magnetic
field on pulsatile flow of blood in a porous channel, Bio-Sci Res. Bull.
17(2), pp. 105-112.
[3] Bird, R.B., Stewart, W. E. and Lightfoot, E. N., 1960,
Transport phenomena, New York, Wiley.
[4] Chaturani, P. and Upadhya, V. S., 1978, Pulsatile flow of a
couple stress fluid through circular tubes with application to blood
flow, Biorheology, 15, pp. 193-201.
[5] Chaturani, P. and Rathod, V. P., 1981, A critical study of
Poiseuille flow of couple stress fluid with applications to blood flow,
Biorheology, 18, pp. 235-244.
[6] Elshahed, M., 2003, Pulsatile flow of blood through a stenosed porous medium under periodic body acceleration, Appl. Mathematics and
Computation, 138, pp. 479-488.
[7] Haldar, K., 1987, Oscillatory flow of blood in a stenosed
artery, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 49, pp. 279-287.
[8] Hall, P., 1974, Unsteady viscous flow in a pipe of slowly
varying cross section, J. Fluid Mech. 64, pp. 209-226.
[9] Hayat, T., Wang, Y. and Hutter, K., 2004, Hall effects on the
unsteady hydromagnetic oscillatory flow of a second grade fluid, Int. J.
Non-Linear Mech., 39, pp. 1027-1037.
[10] Hayat, T., Masood Khan and Ayub, M., 2004, Couette and
Poiseuille flows of an Oldroyd 6-constant fluid with magnetic field, J.
Math. Anal. Appl., 298, pp. 225-244.
[11] Hayat, T., Saif, S. and Abbas, Z., 2008, The influence of heat
transfer in an MHD second grade fluid film over an unsteady stretching
sheet, Physics Letters A, 372, pp. 5037-5045.
[12] Linford, R.G. and Ryan, N. W., 1965, Pulsatile flow in rigid
tube, J. Applied Physiology, 20, pp. 1078-1082.
[13] Misra, J. C. and Singh, S. I., A study on the non-linear flow
of blood through arteries, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 49(1987),
257-277.
[14] Ogulu, A. and Alabraba, M. A., 1992, Magnetic effect on low
Reynolds number flow in heated tube of slowly varying section, Acta
Physica Hungarica, 72, pp. 223-234.
[15] Ramachandra Rao, A. and Devanathan, R. Pulsatile flow in tubes
of varying cross-sections, ZAMP, 24, pp. 203-213.
[16] Sarpakaya, T., 1961, Flow of non-Newtonian fluids in a
magnetic field, AIChE J., 7, pp. 324-328.
[17] Schneck, D. J. and Ostrach, S., 1975, Pulsatile blood flow in
a channel of small exponential divergence-I: The linear approximation
for low Reynolds number, J. Fluids Engineering, 97, pp. 353-360.
[18] Tay, G. and Ogulu, A. Low Reynolds number flow in a
constricted tube under a time-dependent pressure gradient, Journal Fizik
Malaysia, 18, pp. 105-112.
[19] Vasudev, C., Rajeswara Rao, U., Subba Reddy, M. V. and
Prabhakara Rao, G., 2010, Influence of magnetic field and heat transfer
on peristaltic flow of Jeffrey fluid through a porous medium in an
asymmetric channel, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
5(12), pp. 87-103.
[20] Vasudev, C., Rajeswara Rao, U., Subba Reddy, M. V. and
Prabhakara Rao, G., 2011, MHD peristaltic flow of a Newtonian fluid
through a porous medium in an asymmetric vertical channel with heat
transfer, International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology,
1(3), pp. 1-11.
[21] Womersley, J.R., 1955, Oscillatory motion of a viscous fluid
in a thin walled elastic tube-I: The linear approximation for long
waves, Phil. Mag., 46, pp. 199-221.
K. Kavitha (1) * and K. Ramakrishna Prasad (2)
(1) Department of Mathematics, Tirumala Engineering College,
Hyderabad, A.P., India.
(2) Department of Mathematics, S.V. University, Tirupati-517 502,
A.P., India.
* Corresponding Author E-mail:
[email protected]