The experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of recently deposited soils in the southern area of Jiangsu province in China.
Guoxing, Chen ; Xuezhu, Liu ; Dinghu, Zhu 等
Site soils in the southern area of Jiangsu province in China belong
to washland sediment or limnetic facies sediment. The components of
sediment are very complex and the process of sedimentation is in
disorder. This paper analyzes the test results of free vibration column
apparatus on 155 undisturbed samples of recently deposited soils taken
from the southern area of Jiangsu province in China, including mucky silty clay, clay, silty clay, silty clay and silty sand interbedded
strata, silt, silty sand, fine sand and medium coarse sand, during last
four years. The fitting curves of the average relation between dynamic
shear modulus ratio G/[G.sub.max] and damping ratio versus shear strain amplitude [gamma] and their parameters in the empirical formula of
G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~[gamma] curves for 8 types of soils
mentioned above are presented. The results in this paper will make us
understand more about dynamic characteristics of recently deposited
soils in this area.
INTRODUCTION
The southern area of Jiangsu province refers to the south flank of
the Yangtze Delta and the Taihu Lake region within Jiangsu province,
China, mainly including the cities of Zhengjiang, Changzhou, Wuxi and
Suzhou. In recent years, large numbers of major projects in this area,
such as Jiangyin Bridge, Sutong Bridge and Runyang Bridge on the Yangtze
River, one after another is being constructed or has been completed. In
the Tenth Five-Year Plan period (2001-2005), many important projects
including lifeline engineering projects are being at the stage of
programming or construction in the southern area of Jiangsu province,
such as freeways, intercity passenger trains, harbors, docks, electric
power facilities, water supply works, and so on. The sites of these
important engineering projects are located on washland, delta or
limnetic facies recently deposited soils in the southern area of Jiangsu
province.
The recently deposited soils were formed in the medium or later
term of the Holocene Epoch. Generally speaking, the recently deposited
soils belong to underconsolidated soils and its strength is quite lower.
With different depositional environments, the strength of recently
deposited soils differs greatly. As a special type of soils, the
engineering geologic property of recently deposited soils is worse with
its special engineering characteristic. The concept and classification
method of recently deposited soils are often adopted in the realm of
Geotechnical engineering and have already been brought into the China
Code for the Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering GB50021-2001.
The southern area of Jiangsu province belongs to the delta plain of
the Yangtze River or low mountain mound terrain. Soft soils distribute
widely in this area. Especially, the component of sediments is very
complicated and asymmetrical greatly, and the underground water level is
close to ground surface in this area. Based on the typical geologic
section on recently deposited soils of the Yangtze delta plain in the
southern area of Jiangsu province, from the bottom up, sediment strata
are divided into riverbed facies, washland-firth facies and deltaic
facies sediment, including medium sand, fine sand and sandy clay with
horizontal bedding and cross bedding. Especially, clayey fine sand
widely distributes in the south flank of the Yangtze Delta.
The dynamic characteristic of soils is a major factor affecting
ground motion characteristic. Dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of
soils, i.e., [G.sub.max], G/[G.sub.max] ~[gamma] and D ~ [gamma], as two
parameters of the soil dynamic characteristic, are utilized in the site
seismic response analysis when the equivalent linearization model of
soils is adopted. Similarly, dynamic shear modulus and damping of soils
are indispensable for the seismic safety evaluation of engineering
sites. Whether a selection of soil dynamic characteristic parameters
matches a practical site condition, there will be a great influence on
the reliability of numerical analysis results (Chen guoxing et al.1995).
So, whether these parameters are rational or not, they will directly
effect on safety and economical efficiency of important projects.
FOUNDATION OF THE STUDY
According to the analysis of the test results of free-vibration
columniation apparatus for soil samples of six sorts including clay,
silty clay, silty clay and fine sand interbedded strata of recently
deposited soils in the Nanjing and its neighboring cites, the dynamic
shear modulus and damping ratio were investigated primarily (Chen
guoxing and Liu xuezhu 2004). Based on the research results of Chen
guoxing and Liu xuezhu (2004), through the test study and theoretical
analysis for seven sorts of recently deposited soils from 15 cities in
the lower reaches of the Yangtze River including some cities in the
southern area of Jiangsu province, the elementary regularity of dynamic
shear modulus ratio G/[G.sub.max] and damping ratio D versus shear
strain amplitude [gamma] was presented (Chen guoxing et al. 2005).
Similarly, the recommend values of the parameters were also presented
and they may be used in more areas. Furthermore, for attempting to
provide nationwide curves of dynamic shear modulus ratio G/[G.sub.max]
and damping ratio D versus shear strain amplitude [gamma] for various
soils, only using some limited test data, its representation and
creditability ought to be deliberate (Chen guoxing et al. 2005). As a
whole, regional mean curves of G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~ [gamma]
various soils through large numbers of experimental investigation should
be more credible and referenced. Consequently, with further
consideration of the regional character of soils and similarity of
depositional environment of soils, this paper investigated detailedly
the dynamic characteristic of recently deposited soils in the southern
area of Jiangsu province, based on the research results of Chen guoxing
and Liu xuezhu (2004) and Chen guoxing et al. (2005). Those results have
been applied in the site seismic safety evaluation for some important
projects in the southern area of Jiangsu province, such as across
Yangtze River bridges, orbit transportation and electric establishments
etc.
THE EMPIRICAL FORMULA OF DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULUS RATIO AND DAMPING
RATIO ON RECENTLY DEPOSITED SOILS IN THE SOUTHERN AREA OF JIANGSU
PROVINCE
The relationship of dynamic shear modulus ratio versus the
amplitude of shear strain is expressed as (Martin P.P. and Seed H.B
1982):
G/[G.sub.max] = 1 - H([gamma]) (1)
H([gamma)] = [{([gamma]/[[gamma]).sub.0].sup.2B]/1 +
([gamma]/[([gamma].sub.0]).sup.2B]}.sup.A] (2)
where A, B and [[gamma].sub.0] are fitting parameters related with
soil behavior.
The damping ratio of soils D varies with shear strain amplitude.
The empirical equation of damping ratio is recommended in this paper as
follows:
D = [D.sub.min] + [D.sub.0] + [D.sub.0] [(1 - G/[G.sub.max]).sup.n]
(3)
Where n and [D.sub.0] are fitting parameters related with soil
behavior. [D.sub.min] is the minimum damping ratio relative to the
initial dynamic shear modulus [G.sub.max]. Limited to existing test
technique, instrument accuracy and experiment condition, it is difficult
to measure accurately minimum damping ratio relative to the initial
dynamic shear modulus. So, [D.sub.min] can be treated as fitting
parameters related with soil behavior.
These tests were operated with self-developed free vibration column
test machine (Chen guoxing et al. 2003). The undisturbed samples of
recently deposited soils came from the southern area of Jiangsu
province, such as Zhenjiang, Changzhou, Wuxi and Suzhou including mucky
silty clay, clay, silty clay, silty clay and silt interbedded strata,
silt, silty sand, fine sand and medium coarse sand, and the total number
of soil samples is equal to 155. The amount and distribution of soil
samples are listed in Table 1.
The test results of G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] curves can be fitted
well by empirical Eq.(1) and Eq.(2) (Chen guoxing et al. 2005). In this
paper, the test results on G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] of recently deposited
soils are also fitted by empirical Eq.(1) and Eq.(2), and the test
results on D ~ [gamma] of recently deposited soils are fitted by
empirical equation (3). In addition, the fitting parameters on
G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~ [gamma] curves are listed in Table 2.
Figure 1 indicates that the fitting results on G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma]
and D ~ [[gamma] curves are more appropriate under small strain range.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the free vibration column test results of 155 undisturbed
soil samples of recently deposited soils taken from the southern area of
Jiangsu province, the fitting parameters of the mean relationship curves
between dynamic shear modulus ratio G/[G.sub.max] and damping ratio
versus shear strain amplitude [gamma] are suggested by means of Eq.(1)
and Eq.(2) and the recommended empirical equation of damping ratio in
this paper. The results will make us understand more about dynamic
characters of recently deposited soils in the southern area of Jiangsu
province and provide some essential data for seismic safety evaluation
of general engineering sites in this area.
For seismic response analysis of general engineering sites in the
southern area of Jiangsu province, when there is a lack of relationship
curves of G/[G.sub.max] [gamma] and D ~ [gamma] test data of soils, the
typical values of the mean relationship curves of G/[G.sub.max] ~
[gamma] and D ~ [gamma] recommended in this paper can be used. But,
because of comparatively complex depositional environment of soils in
the southern area of Jiangsu province, there are some dispersion in the
test results of given site soils comparing with the mean relationship
curves of G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~ [gamma] curves. So, quoting
the mean relationship curves of G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~ [gamma]
in this paper should be deliberative for important projects in this
area. In order to insure the result reliability of site seismic response
analysis, model parameters or representative value on the curves of
G/[G.sub.max] ~ [gamma] and D ~ [gamma] for engineering site soils
should be obtained by experiment with free vibration column apparatus or
dynamic triaxial apparatus.
REFERENCES
Chen guoxing, Xie junfei and Zhang kexu (1995). "The empirical
of soil modulus and damping ratio for dynamic analysis". Earthquake
engineering and engineering vibration, Vol. 15, No. 1, 73-84.
Chen guoxing and Liu xuezhu (2004). "Testing study on ratio of
dynamic shear modulus and ratio of damping for recently deposited soils
in Nanjing and its neighboring areas". Chinese Journal of Rock
Mechanics and Engineering, Vol.23, No.8, 1403-1410.
Chen guoxing, Chen jihua and Liu xuezhu, et al. (2005).
"Experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping
ratio of recently deposited soils in the lower reaches of the Yangtze
river". Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering.
Vol. 1, 49-57.
Martin P.P. and Seed H.B (1982). " One dimensional dynamic
ground response analysis". Journal of geotechnical engineering.
ASCE, Vol.108, No.7, 935-954.
Chen guoxing, Zhu dinghua and He qizhi (2003). "Development
and property test of GZZ-1 free vibration column test system".
Earthquake engineering and the engineering vibration, Vol. 1, 110-114.
CHEN GUOXING
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing University of
Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
LIU XUEZHU, ZHU DINGHU, HU QINGXING
Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing University of
Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Table 1. Locations of recently deposited soil samples from the
southern area of Jiangsu province
Quantity of samples in
Soils different areas Amount
Zhenjiang Changzhou Wuxi Suzhou
Mucky silty clay 4 4 6 5 19
Clay 2 2 3 9 16
Silty clay 16 4 7 26 49
Silty clay and silt 3 -- 4 6 13
interbedded strata
Silt 3 3 2 11 16
Silty sand 4 6 3 12 21
Fine sand -- 4 3 7 14
Medium coarse sand 1 3 -- 4 8
Table 2. Parameters of eight recently deposited soils in
the southern area of Jiangsu province
Soils A B [[gamma].sub.0]
(x [10.sup.-14])
Mucky silty clay 1.06 0.47 2.7
Clay 1.10 0.44 3.4
Silty clay 1.09 0.44 3.0
Silty clay and silt 1.06 0.44 2.9
interbedded strata
Silt 1.03 0.43 3.3
Silty sand 0.93 0.43 5.5
Fine sand 0.99 0.34 6.9
Medium sand 0.90 0.45 5.6
Parameters
Soils n [D.sub.0] (%)
Mean Range
Mucky silty clay 1.06 20.9 19.8 ~ 23.6
Clay 0.90 19.1 17.4 ~ 22.1
Silty clay 0.95 18.4 15.6 ~ 23.7
Silty clay and silt 1.09 19.3 18.2 ~ 23.3
interbedded strata
Silt 1.02 19.1 17.9 ~ 23.7
Silty sand 0.91 19.5 17.9 ~ 23.3
Fine sand 0.98 19.8 18.2 ~ 22.2
Medium sand 0.98 18.4 18.0 ~ 21.0
Parameters
Soils [D.sub.min] Amount
(%)
Mucky silty clay 1.06 19
Clay 1.16 16
Silty clay 1.25 47
Silty clay and silt 1.27 12
interbedded strata
Silt 1.09 14
Silty sand 0.49 19
Fine sand 0.80 14
Medium sand 0.63 8