"Wentworth, a barber at Oxford": adapting Columella for Persuasion.
Ford, Susan Allen
IN HIS "BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE" OF 1818, her brother Henry
refers to Jane Austen's "extensive reading and "extremely
tenacious" memory. Before defining her as "gratified" by
Richardson and "recoil[ing]" from Fielding, he presents her as
a novel reader driven by her critical faculties: "It is difficult
to say at what age she was not intimately acquainted with the merits and
defects of the best essays and novels in the English language"
(141). Jane Austen herself describes her pleasures in less guarded terms
as part of a family "who are great Novel-readers & not ashamed
of being so" (18-19 December 1798). These two ways of reading are
not necessarily mutually exclusive. Austen's letters provide plenty
of (though certainly not enough) documentation of both her judgment of
and pleasure in the novels she read.
The uses to which she put her reading--what Jocelyn Harris has
called her "abundant intertextualities" (188)--invite endless
investigation. A quarter of a century ago, Margaret Anne Doody observed,
"Novels were her most important reading; we may never know all she
read or find all the reworkings, momentary parodies, rethinkings, that
crowd her work" (362). Two recent essays have demonstrated the
depth and the playfulness of Austen's engagement with a novel that
has all but vanished from the shelves of readers, Richard Graves's
Columella; or, The Distressed Anchoret (see Beard; Ford). Austen uses
Columella, which appeared in only one edition, not merely in Sense and
Sensibility; this little-read novel reaches across her career as she
incorporates it even into Persuasion. Columella seems to have provided
Jane Austen with a playful gloss on Wentworth's name as well as an
inset tale that might have suggested some of the major elements of the
narrative.
The opening line of Persuasion, an accretion of proper
nouns--"Sir Walter Elliot, of Kellynch-hall, in Somersetshire"
(3)--announces the importance of names as they signify status, family,
country. As if to underscore the point, while the grammatical subject of
this sentence is Sir Walter Elliot, the direct object is the Baronetage,
repository of names and their histories. Throughout the novel, names
possess a fetishistic power for characters. Sir Walter's
"favourite volume always open[s]" to "ELLIOT OF
KELLYNCH-HALL" (3). Expecting marriage, Elizabeth surveys baronets
"from A to Z" (9). Her father reproves his agent, Mr.
Shepherd, for defining the former curate of Monkford, a Mr. Wentworth,
as a "'gentleman,'" adding, "'One wonders
how the names of many of our nobility become so common'" (26);
at the novel's conclusion, Frederick Wentworth's
"well-sounding name" assists in reconciling Sir Walter to the
marriage with his daughter (271). When the Bath paper announces
"the arrival of the Dowager Viscountess Dalrymple, and her
daughter, the Honourable Miss Carteret," the magic names
"'our cousins Lady Dalrymple and Miss Carteret;'
'our cousins, the Dalrymples,' sounded in [Anne's] ears
all day long" (160-61).
Disdain of persons easily transforms itself to disgust with their
names. The young Mr. Elliot writes to his friend Charles Smith, Esq.
(one of five Charleses in the novel), "'I wish I had any name
but Elliot. I am sick of it. The name of Walter I can drop, thank God!
and I desire you will never insult me with my second W.
again'" (220). Anne's immunity to the allure of the
Dalrymple name is countered by her father's severity over the name
competing for her attention:
"A Mrs. Smith. A widow Mrs. Smith,--and who was her husband?
One of the five thousand Mr. Smiths whose names are to be met with every
where.... A widow Mrs. Smith, lodging in Westgate-buildings! ...--a mere
Mrs. Smith, an every day Mrs. Smith, of all people and all names in the
world, to be the chosen friend of Miss Anne Elliot, and to be preferred
by her, to her own family connections among the nobility of England and
Ireland! Mrs. Smith, such a name!" (170-71)
Names have the power almost to trump physical presence. Even Anne
can succumb, however briefly, to the magical lure of a name. Despite her
constant love for Captain Wentworth, she is momentarily
"bewitched" by the "idea of becoming what her mother had
been; of having the precious name of 'Lady Elliot' first
revived in herself": the power of the name is "a charm which
she could not immediately resist" (173-74). (1)
Given the novel's fascination with naming, Jane Austen's
choices have attracted some critical attention, much of it to the name
of her hero. Maggie Lane points to the medieval and aristocratic
associations of Frederick and Wentworth (41, 42), suggesting that Austen
"allowed herself a little more leeway to be romantic with her
heroes' than with her heroines' names" (43). In A
Revolution Almost beyond Expression, Jocelyn Harris observes that
Debrett's Baronetage "actually singles out the name of
Wentworth as one of the 'exalted persons ... of blood and
character, equally ancient proud, and pure,' who first justified
the institution of the baronetcy" (67). She also looks specifically
at the Romantic historical resonance of Wentworth's name, in
particular its association with the Duke of Monmouth's doomed 1689
rebellion, which began with his landing at Lyme Regis (146).
Monmouth's mistress was Lady Henrietta Maria Wentworth, who
"funded his invasion with her jewels" (154). Austen, Harris
suggests, calls attention to the connection as Mary Musgrove imagines
Henrietta might become "'Lady Wentworth'" (P 81),
evoking not only Lyme's "strikingly romantic history" but
also "women's participation in the public sphere" (154).
More recently, in Matters of Fact in Jane Austen, Janine Barchas submits
that Austen "winks knowingly at her reader" as she "names
her landless sailor for one of the nation's most prominent
landholding families" (27). That tactic, combined with culling from
the Navy List the names of her decadent aristocrats, Barchas proposes,
"complicates the novel's opposition between old and new, land
and sea" (206).
Harris and Barchas convincingly track "the persistent
historicist impulse behind [Austen's] choices of names and
settings" (Barchas 257), particularly in regard to Wentworth's
name. Indeed, Matters of Fact demonstrates that throughout her career
"Austen actively nurtured and embellished her childhood fascination
with the Wentworth family [Vernons, Fitzwilliams, Darcys, Woodhouses,
etc.], plucking name after name from its venerable ancestral tree"
(33). Jane Austen, Barchas shows, was "keen to prove her skill in
terms of recognizable plays on the social field of her time" (5).
(2)
But although the historicist argument is a convincing one, Jane
Austen's creative imagination is almost impossibly synthetic.
Columella surely makes a part of the "abundant
intertextualities" of which Harris speaks.
Columella; or, The Distressed Anchoret is a satiric novel of
sensibility, the story of Cornelius Milward, nicknamed Columella, who
retires "to the solitude and inactivity of country life" in
the West of England (1:8). The novel, described on the title page as
"a colloquial tale," is dominated by speakers narrating,
arguing, moralizing--including two school friends who visit Columella in
his rural retreat: Atkins (Atticus), now head of a college at Oxford,
and Horton (Hortensius), a successful lawyer in London. They discover
that Columella's retirement doesn't provide the anticipated
serenity: his indolent pursuit of anything but landscape improvement
prevents him from succeeding in farming; proud of his own refined
intellect and feelings, he shuns his social duties and is the butt of
neighborhood pranks; he has entered into a compromising relationship
with his housekeeper, Mrs. Betty.
Austen's allusion to Columella operates within this context.
While Atticus and Hortensius are advising Columella on his improper
"amour," they are interrupted by the sight of a post-chaise
carrying two ladies. The lozenge on the door indicates to Atticus that
it conveys the Duchess Dowager of Beaufort, but the picturesque tourists
instead turn out to be "a taylor's wife and daughter from Bath
... on a jaunt of pleasure" (2:83-84). Atticus, "scandalized
at the modern prostitution of those ensigns of honour," begins what
the narrator terms a "harangue" (2:89) on the misuse of family
arms, with a digression on the degeneration of family names:
No one ... has a greater contempt for family pride, unsupported by
personal merit, than I have; as the splendor of his ancestors
undoubtedly sets a worthless peer in the most contemptible light.
Yet I cannot but look upon the families of our ancient nobility,
our Howard's and our Seymour's, our Percy's and our Talbot's
(occasionally illustrated from time to time, by statesmen or
heroes, by learned or valiant individuals) I cannot but behold
them, I say, with a veneration similar to that which I view an
ancient castle, or Gothic cathedral, adorned with trophies and
monuments of different ages from the remotest period of our
history.
For which reason, as I am rather disagreeably affected whenever I
meet with those names to which I have affixed such venerable ideas,
polluted, as it were, by plebeians of the meaner trades and
occupations (such as *barbers, taylors, and +chimneysweepers); so I
cannot but be much more disgusted to see those antique ensigns of
honour (which have been granted from the crown as the reward of
some great achievement in arms or arts) so vilely prostituted as
they now are: and I am angry with the Heralds-Office for not
interfering, and putting a stop to our hackney-coach-men from
bearing coronets and supporters on their twelve-penny conveyances,
as they constantly have done for some years. (2:85-87).
The notes at the bottom of the page provide examples, notably the
bathetic "Wentworth, a barber at Oxford" (2:86). Atticus goes
on to suggest, in this "commercial state," recognition for
"'merit of every kind," including in the navy (2: 88-89).
It's difficult not to imagine a pleased chuckle from an author
having settled--or even just settling--on the name of Wentworth for her
hero and then forging, in memory of a much loved novel, an economical
link between the name Wentworth and aristocratic decay:
"Wentworth? ... You misled me by the term gentleman. I thought
you were speaking of some man of property: Mr. Wentworth was nobody, I
remember; quite unconnected; nothing to do with the Strafford family.
One wonders how the names of many of our nobility become so
common." (26)
Sir Walter's languid "One wonders" avoids the force
of Atticus's "polluted," but his damning
"nobody" and "nothing" provide all the gloss
necessary for "common." If Atticus's Burkean respect for
lineage is mirrored in Lady Russell's "prejudices on the side
of ancestry," her "value for rank and consequence" (12),
that respect is magnified in the character of Sir Walter Elliot, who
objects to the navy partly as "'the means of bringing persons
of obscure birth into undue distinction, and raising men to honours
which their fathers and grandfathers never dreamt of'" (21),
and whose definition of naval "'danger'" is
"'being insulted by the rise of one whose father, his father
might have disdained to speak to'" (22). Also like Atticus,
Sir Walter remarks the arms emblazoned on carriages: even while rebuking
Anne for her attentions to Mrs. Smith, he mentions that on Lady
Russell's "'handsome equipage'" there are
"'no honours to distinguish her arms'" since Sir
Henry Russell was only a knight (171).
Jane Austen's allusion to Columella is not as random--or as
localized--as it might seem. The novel praises those who fulfill their
duties (in public service, farming, the church, the law, business). More
to the point, the inset story "The Generous Contest; or, the Story
of Miss Julia Arundel," narrated by Columella and Miss Leonora
Nonsuch, who later marries Atticus, provides an interesting point of
departure for Jane Austen's novel. (3)
This "fine romantic tale" (1:141) is the story of Julia
Arundel and young Barty, who, spending much time together while their
parents are engaged at whist, become mutually attached. Julia's
father, Mr. Arundel, is "a distant branch ... of the noble family
of that name" (1:151). When Mrs. Arundel imagines the possibility
of marriage between the two young people, she considers that Mr. Barty,
"a London merchant, of an extensive trade; very attentive to
business" (1:153), "would be proud of the alliance" to
the Arundel family, compensating for any difference in fortune. Mr.
Arundel is skeptical:
"Family!" cries Mr. Arundel, "who regards family
now-a-days ? what would a pedigree sell for at Jonathan's or the
exchange? Besides, though Barty cannot spell his own name, as many an
honest man cannot, yet he is probably of as good a family as I am; and
perhaps is as nearly related to the Ancaster or Abingdon families as I
am to the Arundels" (1:158).
When Barty rebuffs the Arundels, hoping to marry his son to a woman
of more financial substance, "the young people [are] strictly
forbidden by their respective parents to have any kind of private
intercourse, ... and of course admonished of the impropriety of such a
connection for the future" (1:160-61). Though young Barty
"vow[s] eternal constancy," saying that "he would wait in
hopes of some favourable event" (1:162), Miss Arundel tells him
that "she hoped, if he valued her esteem, he would never act
contrary to that filial duty, which ... every young person owed to his
parents" (1:163).
But Miss Arundel, after the death of her two brothers, is left the
heiress to 2,000 [pounds sterling] per year. For Mrs. Arundel, family
lineage now defines duty. She tells her daughter that she "was no
longer to consider herself as one of the younger branches; but as the
principal stem and representative of the family: that it was in some
measure a duty incumbent on her to support its dignity, by marrying
suitably to her rank and fortune" (1:168): a "title of some
kind was the least she now expected for Miss Arundel; though, as no one
of higher rank applied, she at length vouchsafed to think of a
neighboring Baronet, of considerable fortune, but of no other merit than
the inherent privilege of making his wife a lady, and giving her a small
degree of rank and precedence in publick places" (1:185).
This story about the false value placed on family lineage--with its
own nod toward the dispersal (or degradation) of ancient names--is also
a narrative about merit, risk, and constancy in love. Young Barty, in a
letter, announces his plan to embark for India, undertaking with a
generous spirit what Wentworth achieves in pride and resentment:
"If fortune should so far smile upon my undertaking, as she has
upon those of many other adventurers, and raise me in a few years to a
level with the expectations of your friends, ... I should return with
rapture, and throw myself at your feet" (182-83). (4) Five years
elapse, during which Barty makes a large fortune, and the lovers
communicate annually by letter. After an interruption to their
correspondence, however, Miss Arundel hears that Barty is engaged to the
Governor of--'s daughter, "sole presumptive heiress to above
an hundred thousand pounds" (1:200). Her father convinces her to
consider marriage to someone else, but she stipulates that she'll
wait until Barty reaches England so "that she might not give her
lover any plea for his inconstancy by her own example" (1:203).
When Barty's ship vanishes, "Miss Arundel griev[es] more for
his death than for his supposed infidelity," but after a year she
agrees to marry "Lord A--B--, a nobleman of very amiable character,
as well as the presumptive heir to an Earldom" (1:204, 206). In
contrast, Austen celebrates but also ironizes Anne Elliot's
"musings of high-wrought love and eternal constancy," which
are "almost enough to spread purification and perfume" through
the streets of Bath (208). By the time a very much alive and very
constant Barty reaches England, Miss Arundel is ill and her wedding
postponed. Barty presents himself and also a sapphire given him by
"the Raijah of T--... as a pledge that she was never out of his
thoughts" (1:229).
Besides the situation of constant lovers separated by a particular
kind of family pride and an approximately seven-year overseas absence,
Austen may have recalled other elements of the story of Miss Julia
Arundel and young Barty.
The constancy of the lovers is rewarded not merely by their
happiness and financial security but by their physical growth over the
seven years of absence. The initial description of Barty (from Mr.
Arundel's perspective) is not particularly romantic: "from
being a very slender and fair youth, he was now become a very jolly,
tho' rather a swarthy young man" (1:220). But a lover's
eyes see differently: "Miss Arundel found Mr. Barty rather improved
in his person, his complexion having received a rich bronze from the
climate, and the vernal beauties of youth being grown to maturity, and
heightened by a manly grace" (1:228). Austen is,
characteristically, somewhat less specific and more suggestive. The
young Wentworth is only "a remarkably fine young man, with a great
deal of intelligence, spirit and brilliancy" (28). His (supposed)
bronzed reappearance is anticipated by Sir Walter's concerns about
faces "'the colour of mahogany'" or that Admiral
Croft's might be "'about as orange as the cuffs and capes
of my livery'" (22, 24): Anne responds to Wentworth's
"glowing, manly, open look" (65). Lady Dalrymple and even
Elizabeth mark, rather than "manly grace," Wentworth's
"air" (204, 245); Sir Walter, seeing Wentworth
"repeatedly by daylight and ey[ing] him well,' is at the
novel's conclusion "very much struck by his personal claims,
... his superiority of appearance" (271).
Austen also plays with the problem of the aging heroine. In
Graves's tale, beauty depends on the beholder. When Columella
describes Miss Arundel as "very handsome," Leonora objects:
"I am sure you cannot call her handsome; she has a good complexion,
and is a good height" (1:150-51). But in Barty's eyes, time
develops a mature beauty: "Barty was agreeably surprised to see
Miss Arundel's charms so far from being diminished by a few years,
or even by her late illness, that from a mere well-grown girl, she was
now improved into a graceful person, and a fine woman" (1:228).
Austen develops and complicates Graves's play with point of
view. From the first chapter, Anne's "vanished" bloom is
emphasized; she is "faded and thin" (6). Although the context
for this description is Sir Walter's lack of admiration for
"her delicate features and mild dark eyes" (6), it has weight,
particularly since references to her beauty are so firmly situated in
the past: she had been "a very pretty girl" (6)--or, when she
first meets Wentworth, "an extremely pretty girl, with gentleness,
modesty, taste, and feeling" (28). And of course when Wentworth
returns, he thinks her "wretchedly altered." That sentiment,
however, is immediately explained: "He had not forgiven Anne
Elliot. She had used him ill" (66). Other, later perspectives
present Anne's beauty in more positive terms though still defined
by the individual viewer: at Lyme, Mr. Elliot is attracted by "her
very regular, very pretty features, having the bloom and freshness of
youth restored by the fine wind which had been blowing on her
complexion"; Anne herself interprets Wentworth's glance as
saying, "Even I, at this moment, see something like Anne Elliot
again" (112). When Anne visits Mrs. Smith, the narrative, though
recalling "the blooming, silent, unformed girl of fifteen,"
presents "the elegant little woman of seven and twenty, with every
beauty excepting bloom, and with manners as consciously right as they
were invariably gentle" (166). After the "revival of his warm
attachment," Wentworth tells her that "'to my eye you
could never alter'" (264)--a sentiment that draws a smile from
Anne, and from the reader.
Even the method of Austen's conclusion might pay a silent
homage to the story of Miss Arundel and Barty. At the tale's
climax, Leonora pulls back: "An interview of this kind ... between
two fond lovers, after seven years absence, is beyond my powers of
description; and must be left to the imagination. And indeed, I have
always thought it a kind of indelicacy, if not a profanation, to unveil
the mysteries of so delicate a passion; at least I could never read,
without blushing to myself, the many rapturous expressions which one
meets with in romances on these occasions" (1:227). Austen's
lovers exchange "words enough" to head to the gravel-walk,
"where the power of conversation would make the present hour a
blessing indeed; and prepare it for all the immortality which the
happiest recollections of their own future lives could bestow"
(261).
In Persuasion, what seems a private allusion--a joke on
Wentworth's name at Sir Walter's expense--opens not merely
into a central pattern of the novel, its obsession with names and
families, but also into a more systematic adaptation of "The
Generous Contest." Columella's characters disagree whether the
tale is about industry, constancy, or parental foolishness (1:232).
Persuasion is about all of these, and more. Graves's story ends
with a provocative detail: "they say ... young Barry is to purchase
a Baronet's title, and make his wife a Lady" (1:231).
Examining the cancelled chapters, Jocelyn Harris points out that as
"a wicked, improbable afterthought" Austen revises Mary's
competitive worry that Captain Wentworth might be "Knighted"
to a hope that he might not be "made a baronet" (P 272), with
the consequence that "one day
Sir Frederick might rank alongside Sir Walter, the man who thought
him unworthy to marry his daughter" (67). The notion is wicked,
delicious--but, given what Jane Austen had been reading, perhaps not
entirely improbable.
WORKS CITED
Austen, Henry. "Biographical Notice of the Author." 1818.
A Memoir of dane Austen and Other Family Recollections. Ed. Kathryn
Sutherland. Oxford: OUP, 2002. 135-43.
Austen, Jane. Jane Austen's Letters. 3rd ed. Ed. Deirdre Le
Faye. Oxford: OUP, 1997.
--. Persuasion. Ed. Janet Todd and Antje Blank. Cambridge: CUP,
2006.
Barchas, Janine. Matters of Fact in Jane Austen: History, Location,
and Celebrity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2012.
Beard, Pauline. "The English Columella, or Pigs in the
Primroses and Periwinkles." Persuasions On-Line 33.1 (2012).
Doody, Margaret Anne. "Jane Austen's Reading." The
Jane Austen Companion. Ed. J. David Grey, A. Walton Litz, and Brian
Southam. New York: Macmillan, 1986. 347-63.
Dow, Gillian, and Katie Halsey. "Jane Austen's Reading:
The Chawton Years." Persuasions On-Line 30.2 (2010).
Ford, Susan Allen. "Mrs. Dashwood's Insight: Reading
Edward Ferrars and Columella; or, The Distressed Anchoret."
Persuasions 33 (2011): 75-88.
[Graves, Richard]. Columella; or, The Distressed Anchoret. A
Colloquial Tale. 2 vols. London, 1779.
Harris, Jocelyn. A Revolution Almost beyond Expression: Jane
Austen's Persuasion. Newark: U Delaware P, 2007.
Lane, Maggie. Jane Austen and Names. Bristol: Blaise Books, 2002.
Raft, Sarah. "'Procrastination," Melancholia, and
the Prehistory of Persuasion." Persuasions 29 (2007): 174-79.
NOTES
(1.) Mr. Elliot too recognizes and employs this fascination in his
attempt to captivate Anne: "'The name of Anne Elliot,"
said he, 'has long had an interesting sound to me. Very long has it
possessed a charm over my fancy; and, if I dared, I would breathe my
wishes that the name might never change'" (204).
(2.) In an 1804 edition of the Baronetage, part of the collection
at Godmersham, the Bridges entry is heavily annotated: one insertion is
the marriage of Elizabeth Bridges to Edward Austen. Dow and Halsey
speculate that these annotations "might have suggested Sir
Walter's additions."
(3.) For the workings of other fictional intertexts to the story of
Anne and Wentworth, see Raff's enlightening analysis of George
Crabbe's "Procrastination" and Harris's exploration
of Sarah Scott's Millenium Hall and a tale from Oliver
Goldsmith's Life of Nash (30-35).
(4.) At the end of the novel, Wentworth recognizes his culpability:
"I was proud, too proud to ask again.... Six years of separation
and suffering might have been spared'" (268).
Susan Allen Ford is Editor of Persuasions and Persuasions On-Line
and Professor of English at Delta State University. She is at work on a
book on what Austen's characters are reading.