Development of a digital laser welding system for body-in-white.
Park, H.S. ; Lee, G.B.
Abstract: To increase the competitiveness of the products,
manufacturers try to replace conventional manufacturing system by new
technology. In automobile production field, laser welding system is the
ideal solution for building car body and the planning method for
designing manufacturing system. The main objective of this paper is to
present an implementation of laser welding system for automobile side
panels with digital manufacturing. The developed system is analyzed
using IDEF0 and UML diagram to generate a strategic plan for designing
and implementing laser welding system. Based on this plan, the
alternative systems are considered and the optimal one is decided by
using TOSIS method.
Keywords: Laser welding system, Digital Manufacturing, Layout
planning, TOPSIS method.
1. INTRODUCTION
In general, configuration of manufacturing system is accomplished
through three stages i.e. planning-, process- and operation level. All
requirements of product are grasped in planning level. To define
functions of system and relationships of system components based on
these requirements, IDEF0 diagram and ULM diagram are used in process
level. Using these results, system components are determined and modeled
using 3D CAD tools in operation level.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The selected components are allocated to execute the
functionalities of system in correct manner, and then various
alternative systems are proposed. The functionalities of alternative
systems are tested using OLP (Off-Line Programming) in digital
environment modeled with DELMIA. TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference
by Similarity to Ideal Solution) [4] method is used to select optimal
manufacturing system (Fig.1).
2. GROUPING LASER WELDING STITCHES THROUGH PRODUCT ANALYSIS
For the application of laser welding, the side panels which require
welding and sealing process have to be analyzed exactly for the welding
conditions. There are some areas or structures where the application of
laser welding not only difficult or even unacceptable , but also
generate more unnecessary jigs than that of the existing spot welding.
For solving these problems, spot welding is applied to the inapplicable
points such as 4 layers and the inappropriate points of the reduction of
the number of jigs. After identification of jig points and spot welding
points, laser welding stitches are generated in consideration of jig
points and spot welding points. Process parameters are chosen in order
to guarantee the quality of stitches and 7 groups of process parameters
were created
3. PROCESS MODELING FOR THE CONCEPT FOR THE LASER WELDING SYSTEM
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
For the configuration of manufacturing system, the UML (Unified
Modeling Language) and the IDEF0(ICAM Definition methodology) model are
chosen to describe dynamic and static relationships of the assembly
system of the car side panels. In IDEF0, the highest diagram describes
activity of the whole system. All boxes in the middle diagram present
the functions of each station. The lowest diagram details the processes
carrying out in the station by identifying the major information
involved in each process, i.e. process requirements and constraints,
practical welding know-how, existing system components and so on
(Fig.2). The activities of components of the assembly system are
expressed in the UML to execute the defined process of the stations. As
the results of process modeling using IDEF0 and UML, the task and
sequence of process for assembling the side panels were decided. After
that, the time table for the whole assembly system was generated based
on the cycle time and the time required for executing the task of each
process. With this data, the fixed process sequence and the available
space of working station, the required number of stations and robots was
calculated.
4. GENERATION OF THE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM FOR WELDING SIDE PANELS
In order to evaluate alternative system, MADM (Multiple Attribute
Decision Making) [4] method, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and
eigenvector method [4] were used, base on criteria divided into four
attribute groups such as cost, time, system and product. The evaluation
goal is stated first, and then the relative weight of the criteria is
determined in consideration of the comparison between the criteria was
applied. After finding out the weight of the criteria, Hwang and Yoon
introduced TOPSIS method, based on the concept that the chosen
alternative should have the shortest distance to the ideal point and the
furthest distance from the negative ideal point. The closeness (C) was
decided by the following equation
C = [S.sup.-]/[S.sup.-] - [S.sup.+] (1)
[S.sup.+]: the distance of the alternative system from the ideal
solution [S.sup.-]: the distance of the alternative system from the
negative ideal solution
The results of the distance [S.sup.+] and [S.sup.-] as well as the
closeness were presented a table. From the table, the alternative was
selected as optimal due to the high score in load balancing, the
simplification of system and the improvement of product quality
5. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
In order to find out the problems to be occurred when applying,
assembly system was implemented in the digital environment with the
commercial tool, DELMIA (figure 3).
To implement the digital laser welding system, the optimal
components which were selected were modeled by using 3D CAD tool, with
data collected from the participated automobile companies.
These 3D models of the components are stored in library and used
for new configuration of cells by calling back through a search [7][8].
In order to test the satisfaction of cycle time, insurance of welding
quality and minimization of transfer time for material flow, the OLP
(Off-Line Programming) technique is applied
6. CONCLUSION
With the purpose of reducing manufacturing cost and to improve the
product quality, automotive enterprises are on the effort to change the
conventional spot welding to the laser welding system. For the
application of this technique, the process varies depending on the shape
and material of product. As the result, the stitches needed for laser
welding were grouped according to the welding process parameters. The
most appropriate equipments were selected through the comparison between
the requirements and their capability for welding each group. With the
selected equipments, the assembly system for automobile side panels was
implemented by using digital manufacturing technology. Under the
consideration of the technical and functional requirements, the
alternative assembly systems were generated. The optimal assembly system
was selected by TOPSIS method for evaluation.
7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the MIC (Ministry of Information and
Communication), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research
Center) support program supervised by the IITA (Institute of Information
Technology Assessment).
8. REFERENCES
Anelle, J., 1998, Virtual Manufacturing for Design and Production,
Proceeding of 1998 Deneb User Group, 1/1:1-4.
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., 1999, The Unified Modeling
Language User Guide, Wesley Longman, Inc.
J.Rendell: The Digital Factory Decade, Automotive Manufacturing
Solution, Vol.12, 2001
Nor, S. D., Lee, K. I., Han, H. S, 2002, Using Virtual
Manufacturing Technologies for Continuous Verification of Products,
Process and Resources in Manufacturing Preparation of Automotive
Companies, The 35th CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing System,
1/1:245-252.
Ono, M, "Static and Fatigue Strength Characteristics of Laser
Welded Lap Joints", Journal of Japan Welding Society, Vol. 14, No.
3, pp. 586-591 (1996).
Ono, M, "Static and Fatigue Strength Characteristics of Laser
Welded Lap Joints", Journal of Japan Welding Society, Vol. 14, No.
3, pp.586-591 (1996).
Sen, P., Yang, J. B., 1998, Multiple Criteria Decision Support in
Engineering Design, Springer-Verlag, London.
Shalon, D., Gossard, D., Ulrich, K., and Fitzpatrick, D., 1992,
Representing Geometric Variations in Complex Structureal Assemblies on
CAD Systems, Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Advances in Design
Automation Conference, Vol. DE-44, No.2: 121-132