Stability of transversal vibrations in high-speed drilling and the influence on the processing precision.
Popescu, Daniel ; Cherciu, Mirela
1. INTRODUCTION
Gyroscopic systems include as examples translating and rotating
strings, beams, membranes and plates. These systems posses combinations
of system parameters that produce vanishing eigenvalues. Such
combination of system parameters are designated herein as critical
system parameters and their vanishing eigenvalues and the corresponding
eigenfunctions as critical eigenvalues and critical eigenfunctions.
One interesting phenomenon for gyroscopic dynamic systems is that
unstable conservative systems can be stabilized by increasing the
gyroscopic forces. Criteria to determine reasonably small gyroscopic
forces for stabilization are important for practical problems. Stability
criteria for gyroscopic systems have been formulated for both discrete
and continuous systems. For discrete systems, the criteria usually
relate the definiteness of a combination of the coefficient matrices in
the equation of motion to the stability of the system (Huseyin et al.,
1983; Huseyin, 1991). The extension of these criteria to continuous can
only ensure stability when the system stiffness operator is positive
definite (Shieh, 1971; Wickert & Mate, 1990).
Other stability criteria have been developed to examine continuous
systems whose operator is not definite, but these criteria usually
require knowledge of the system eigenfunctions (Shieh, 1971), which is
normally as difficult to obtain as the eigenvalues themselves.
2. THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL
It is considered the general equation of continuous gyroscopic
systems (Renshaw, 1996):
Mii + Gu + Ku = f (1)
where: M, G, K--differential linear matrices in spatial domain
u--displacements
f--forcing term
In order to obtain the mathematical model for the main spindle
vibrations, the following assumptions are made:
a. there are no distributed superficial forces on the external
spindle surface
b. there are no additional fulcrums or joints that can produce
shocks
c. the initial state of the spindle is unstrained
d. a plane section normal on the spindle axis before deformation
remains plane without keeping perpendicularity
Under these assumptions, for the mathematical model of transversal
vibrations given by (1):
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)
where: [u.sub.1](x), [u.sub.2](x)--transversal deformation of the
spindle on two perpendicular axes; [f.sub.1](x), [f.sub.2](x)--external
load; [OMEGA]--spindle angular speed; p(x), c(x)--coefficients depending
on section characteristics and spindle material. We have:
p(x) = I(x)/A(x);[c.sup.2](x) = EI(x)/[rho]A(x) (3)
The limit conditions in this case are:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (5)
In this case larger deformations are allowed and applying the
finite Fourier transform gives:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (6)
If the angular speed of the spindle is smaller than the critical
value:
[[OMEGA].sub.cr] = [[pi].sup.2]/4 x [square root of E/[rho]] x
d/[l.sup.2] (7)
then the spindle vibrations remain stable.
3. CASE STUDY
Is considered a steel drill with d = 4 x [10.sup.-3] m, l = 0.1 m;
[[OMEGA].sub.cr] = 5120 [s.sup.-1] corresponding to [n.sub.cr] = 48895
rpm.
The system is stable and initially the transversal vibrations on
the two axes present maximum values:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (8)
where:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (9)
4. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
In the example presented it was determined the critical angular
speed for a d = 4 x [10.sup.-3] m drill. The next figure presents the
variation of the critical angular speed as function of the diameter and
length of the drill.
The dependency relation is:
[[OMEGA].sub.cr] = 12803 x d/[l.sup.2] (10)
where d [member of] (0.001/0.01)m; l [member of] (0.05/0.15)m
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
It can be observed that the critical speed increases proportionally
with the drill diameter and decreases with its length square.
Using (8), (9) we can determine the amplitudes of transversal
vibrations at the surface of the work material. For example, for a
drilling process with l = 0.1 m, [l.sub.0] = 0.01 m, d = 0.01 m, F =
1550 N it is obtained:
[u.sub.max]([l.sub.0]) = [square root of [u.sup.2.sub.lmax] +
[u.sup.2.sub.2max]] = 0.554 x [10.sup.-6]m (11)
Consequently, for this process the influence of transversal
vibrations on the processing precision is insignificant.
5. REFERENCES
Huseyin, K.; Hagedorn, P. & Teschner, W. (1983). On the
Stability of Linear conservative Gyroscopic Systems, In: Journal of
Applied Mathematics and Physics, vol. 34, pp. 807-815.
Huseyin, K. (1991). On the Stability Criteria for Conservative
Gyroscopic Systems, In: Journal of Vibration and Acoustic, vol 113, pp.
58-61.
Renshaw, A.A. & Mote, C.D. (1996). Local Stability of
Gyroscopic Systems Near Vanishing Eigenvalues, In: ASME Journal of
Applied Mechanics, vol. 63, pp. 116-120.
Shieh, R.C. (1971). Energy and Variational Principles for
Generalized (Gyroscopic) Conservative problems, In: International
Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 5, pp. 495-509.
Wickert, J.A. & Mote, C.D. (1990). Classical Vibration Analysis
of Axially Moving Continua, In: ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol.
57, pp. 738-744.