Experimental stand with automation for gears grinding process.
Carabas, Iosif ; Sticlaru, Carmen
1. INTRODUCTION
Grinding can be defined as the rapid removal of material from a
sample either to reduce it to a suitable size or to remove large
irregularities from the surface.The quality of a grinding operation
depends on the behaviour of the grinding wheel in the grinding process.
Understanding the performance of a grinding wheel is required for
control of the grinding process (Bogdan, 1998). To judge the future of
grinding the process and machine developments have to be taken into
account. Actually the industrial experimental stands for gears are
equipped so that allows the grinding process and measuring of the gears
efficiency in the same time (Xun&Brian, 1996). The grinding process
is organized in such a matter so that this process depends on the
desired efficiency value for the gears. Typically grinding is applied to
hard metals such as high carbon steels where rapid removal is essential
and subsurface damage is not a critical parameter.
Gear lapping is the process of imparting a very fine finish and
high degree of accuracy to gear teeth. Lapping typically improves the
wear properties of gear teeth. To ensure smooth and quiet running, the
Gears and Pinions are lapped after hardening. Lapping is accomplished by
running mating pairs together in a gear lapping machine and feeding a
liquid abrasive compound under pressure into the gear pair. The compound
removes small amounts of metal as the gears rotate, thus refining the
tooth surface and achive desired contact pattern.
Some of the grinding equipments are functioning so that are
simulating the real working conditions. The most of the experimental
stands have facilities to modify the values of some factors that are
influening the resistance and durability of tested gears (Xun, 1998).
The experimental stand was designed for testing gears in closed
circuit (Carabas, 1998). The kinematics scheme is presented in figure 1.
The components are:
1. electrical three-phase motor with: --rotational speed n = 1500
[rev/min], power P = 7.5 [kW];
2. various speed duo with a range of 800--2000 [rev/min];
3. gear for closing the circuit with transmission report i = 1;
4. measuring instrument for loading moment for tested gear;
5. gear for closing the circuit--transmission ratio i = 1;
6. inertial loading system (figure 2).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The device design and the calculation of the relationship for
loading moment is done according to (Carabas, 1998), figure 2.
Between the two parts of the device must be a mechanical
connection. This connection is made by two parts of a coupling --that
attaches two aligned shafts (the gears 1 and 1' are flow
constriction mounted on the shafts).
Unbalanced masses m is rigidly connected with the gears 2 and
2'. The distance between the gravity and gears centres is l. In
order to obtain an equilibrate static rotor, the numbers of mass m are n
> 1, so the loads that are acting upon the fixed element are at lower
values.
2. THEORETICAL ASPECTS
If the device is rotating with angular velocity co, upon the mass m
acts the inertial load Fc,:
[F.sub.c] = m x [[omega].sup.2] x [rho] (1)
The torsion moment has the expression (2) (n--number of masses m;
i--transmission ratio between 1 (1') and 2 (2') gears;
[lambda] = r/1 - notation for geometrical dimensions).
[M.sub.t] = n x i x m x [[omega].sup.2] x [r.sup.2] x sin [alpha]
x(cos [alpha] + 1/[lambda] x [square root of 1 - [[lambda].sup.2] x
[sin.sup.2] [alpha]]) (2)
The torsion moment M0 of the device depends only on the geometry of
the equipment and it is calculated for n = 1, m = 1, [omega] = 1, r = 1,
i = 1 in expression (3).
[M.sub.0] = sin [alpha] x (cos [alpha] + 1/[lambda] x [square root
of 1 - [[lambda].sup.2] x [sin.sup.2] [alpha]]) (3)
Between the axial displacements of the speed variating device mobil
disc there is a direct relation; [s.sub.x] represents the axial
displacement between a minimum and maximum values, the expression for
[s.sub.x] is given by relation (4).
[s.sub.x] = [D.sub.p min] x ([D.sub.px / [D.sub.p min] - 1) (4)
The angular velocity of the driven shaft has the (5) expression:
[[omega].sub.2x] = [[omega].sub.2min] x (1 + [s.sub.x] / [D.sub.p
min] x tg [alpha]/2) (5)
The loading moment is a function [M.sub.t] = [M.sub.t]
([[omega].sup.2.sub.2x]) that can have a general expression (6):
[M.sub.t] = A x [[omega].sup.2.sub.2x] + B x [[omega].sub.2x] + C
(6)
where: A, B and C are inertial loading system constants.
For the device presented in figure 2 the relation (6) is:
[M.sub.t] = A x [[omega].sup.2.sub.2x] (7)
In this case, the torsional moment gets the (2') expression.
[M.sub.t] = n x m x i x [r.sup.2] x [M.sub.0d] x
[[omega].sup.2.sub.2min] x (1 + [s.sub.x] / [D.sub.p min] x tg [alpha]
/2) (2')
Using the notations:
E = n x m x i x [r.sup.2] x [M.sub.0d] x [[omega].sup.2.sub.min] =
ct, (8)
F = 2 x D/[D.sub.p min] x tg [alpha]/2 = ct; G = E/[([D.sub.p min]
x tg [alpha]/2).sup.2] = ct (9)
the relation (7) has a general form (10)
[M.sub.t] = G x [s.sup.2.sub.x] + F x [s.sub.x] + E (10)
This is the relationship between the torsion moment [M.sub.t] and
the axial displacement of the speed variating device mobile disc and it
is a quadratic equation with the unknown [s.sub.x]. When the values for
torsional moment in time are known, that can be calculate the
displacement [s.sub.x i] = [s.sub.xi] ([t.sub.i]), i = 1 ... n, where n
is the number of [M.sub.t] values. These values [s.sub.xi] are the
entrance dimensions for a hydraulic drive system that realize the
displacement of the mobile disc.
3. THE HYDRO DRIVE SYSTEM
The hydraulic driving system can be designed in classical way that
means a hydraulic engine power or a rotative hydraulic engine with a
classical hydraulic distributor. This method doesn't allow a
continuous and quick track of the driven element only a sequential
track.
The system proposed by this paper contains a proportional
control--in this case the system has a proportional driven element such
as electrohydraulic driven valve.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The command of the driven valve is given by an electrical signal
that acts a magnetic system. This system establishes the displacement of
a central plunge. The reduced values for inertia and nonliniarity are
very important for the quick response of the system. The driving system
is correlated with the mechanical part, the driven and control systems.
When the system is equipped with position and load sensors results a
complex system with position and load reaction in closed circuit for all
degree of freedom. The hydraulic scheme is presented in fig. 3.
The notation used in fig. 3 are: P--hydraulic pump with constant
volume; SP--pressure safety valve, AC--hydraulic accumulator, SV--driven
valve, MHL--linear hydraulic engine, DM--mobil disc, TM--mechanical
transmission, TP--position transducer, CP--program reader, A--amplifier,
[C.sub.1,2]--comparator.
The drivenvalve transforms a command current into a flow Q that
means a displacement of the linear hydraulic engine piston (MHL) and
also of the mobile disc (DM) with [s.sub.x]. The assembly driven
valve--hydraulic engine is in figure 3. The instantaneous position
[s.sub.x] is detected by the position transducer (TP) and transformed in
a tension voltage [U.sub.p] that is totalized in the comparator [C.sub.1] with the tension voltage [U.sub.M] given by the load
transducer. The obtained value for the voltage tension is U. The
comparator [C.sub.1] compares the imposed value [U.sub.PR] with U
([U.sub.SV]=[U.sub.PR]-U), so the value for amplified tensiun for the
amplifier A it is obtained. From this value results the command current
I for the driven valve.
4. CONCLUSION
The use of the described equipment allows the complete automation
of the actioning system and automatic emphasize of the experimental
measuring results. The equipment is simply and doesn't need special
components. The dynamic analyze of such an element is given by the
dynamic analyze of the assembly driven valve-engine. The designed
equipment can be used in small test laboratories. This equipment will be
used in working with students, it will be improwed to obtain a grinding
maschine at low costs.
5. REFERENCES
Baron, T. (1988) Quality and reliability, Manual practice, Editura
Tehnica Bucuresti, 1988
Bogdan W., Kruszynski, Stanislaw M. and Jan Kaczmarek (1998) Forces
in Generating Gear Grinding-Theoretical and Experimental Approach,
Manufacturing Technology Volume 47, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 287-290
Carabas I. (1998) Experimental stand for testing gears, COMEFIM 5,
The National Conference of Precision Mechanics and Mechatronics
Timisoara Romania 22-24 oct. 1998 The Romanian Review of Precision
Mechanics&Optics, supliment 2/1998 ISSN 1220-6830
Xun, C, Brian R. W.,(1996) Analysis and simulation of the grinding
process. Part III: Comparison with experiment, International Journal of
Machine Tools and Manufacture, Volume 36, Issue 8, August 1996, Pages
897906
Xun, C., Allanson D. R. and Rowe W. B. (1998), Life cycle model of
the grinding process, Computers in Industry Volume 36, Issues 1-2, 30
April 1998, Pages 5-11