The FitzGeralds and the rising.
Mulligan, William H., Jr.
DESMOND FITZGERALD.
Desmond's Rising: Memoirs 1913 to Easter 1916.
Foreword by Garret FitzGerald.
Dublin: Liberties Press. Chester Springs, PA: Dufour Editions, 2006
THIS IS A NEW EDITION of a work that was first published in 1968.
This edition has an introduction by Desmond's (to avoid confusion
with his son and wife, I will use first names) youngest son, former
Taoiseach Garret FitzGerald, 'and several appendices, including
earlier, brief reflections on the 1916 Rising by Desmond FitzGerald,
correspondence between his wife, Mabel, and George Bernard Shaw, and
correspondence between the Fitzgeralds while Desmond was in Mountjoy
Prison. FitzGerald's memoir is an important part of the literature
on the 1916 Rising and the events that preceded it. This new edition
will be welcome by scholars, students, and those generally interested in
Irish history. Desmond FitzGerald is among the higher-ranking leaders of
the Irish Volunteers who were able to write a memoir for future
historians to utilize and who did so.
In the introduction, Garrett FitzGerald provides some background
information on how his father came to write his memoir, as well as how
it came eventually to be published after the manuscript was lost for
some years. He also discusses his father's reluctance both to write
a memoir and, more importantly, to criticize former colleagues in any
public forum. It is safe to say that Desmond was a reluctant memoirist
and set rather severe limitations on himself in writing a memoir not
only with his respect for former colleagues but with his decision to
limit himself to discussing only those things of which he had first hand
knowledge. Rumors of the time or information later gained do not appear
here. These might seem like limiting premises for a memoir, but his
candor and deep familiarity with those aspects of 1916 and events
leading up it that he does discuss produces a remarkably engaging
document, which offers myriad insights into the motivations and mindset of those who rose against British rule and insurmountable odds in 1916.
Among other things, Desmond FitzGerald emerges as a reluctant supporter
of the Easter Rising, convinced it had no chance of success. Yet he
showed up and committed his life with no real hope for success. While
not within the highest levels of either the IRB or the Volunteers on the
national level, Desmond was an organizer first in Kerry and then in
Wicklow--after authorities forced him and his family to relocate to one
of several designated zones. The memoir brings out the constant pressure
and various harassment techniques British authorities subjected those
involved with the IRB and the Volunteers-arrest, frequent police visits
or obvious observation, limitations on where individuals could live, and
other harassment, some quite petty and others major.
Desmond FitzGerald offers a remarkable, series of insights into the
thinking of those involved in the Irish Volunteers and the development
of the organization between 1913 and the Rising as well as the
interaction of Irish Volunteer leaders with British authorities. There
is the added element of his relationship with his wife who was not only
a committed nationalist but appears to have clearly been more committed
to the 1916 Rising as it was developing than her husband, although he
alone was the direct target of arrest and harassment. Her correspondence
with George Bernard Shaw, for whom she had worked briefly as a
secretary, included in an Appendix, reflects not only her knowledge of
contemporary politics, but a strong commitment to advanced nationalist
views. She was also ardently anti-treaty, criticizing de Valera for
establishing Fianna Fail, and opposed the Cosgrave government while her
husband was a minister in it. Unfortunately, she did not write a memoir
of her own. There is much here that will repay a careful reading, but to
summarize it would require many more words than are allowed.
Desmond's Rising is a compelling, convincing memoir by an
author who appears to have no agenda other than to set out what he did
and why he did it as best he could. The publishers should be thanked for
making it available again.
--Murray State University