The model of forming competitive strategy of an enterprise under the conditions of oligopolic market/Imones konkurencines strategijos formavimo oligopolineje rinkoje modelis.
Ginevicius, Romualdas ; Krivka, Algirdas ; Simkunaite, Jolita 等
1. Introduction
Business strategy is a response to rapidly changing, hardly
forecasted environment of an enterprise; moreover, it is considered to
be a proper tool to affect the environment in a favourable manner in
order to achieve the performance meeting the expectations of business
owners. Theoretical sources of strategic management distinguish between
the two main levels of business strategy: corporate and competitive. The
former is related to large, diversified companies and includes the
strategic actions of operating a portfolio of business units (entering a
new market, withdrawing from a market, distributing resources among
business units); the latter encompasses the strategic actions of a
business unit or of a non-diversified enterprise to capture the
strategic position, achieve and maintain long-term competitive advantage
seeking for favourable financial performance in the certain market or
industry.
Competitive strategy is aimed at achieving long-term competitive
advantage due to superior, compared to competitors, strategic position
in the market (Porter 1979, 1998a, 1998b) or unique, valuable,
non-mobile resources and capabilities (Prahalad and Hamel 1990; Peteraf
1993; Grant 1991, 1996; Barney 1991; Teece et al. 1997). Modern
theoretical models of analyzing enterprise's competitive potential
and forming business strategy, coupled by empirical research of that
kind, are dominated by the balanced view of enterprise's
environment affecting business strategy (Ginevicius 2000; Ginevicius and
Podvezko 2004; Raudeliuniene 2007; Bivainis and Staskevicius 2004;
Korsakiene 2004; David 2007); although, some of them rely on resource
advantages or market positioning only (Casas 2000; Sekliuckiene 2006).
Scientific sources of strategic management propose a wide range of
variously classified business strategies, with their application
depending on objectives and strategic position of an enterprise: M.
Porter's cost leadership, differentiation and focus generic
strategies, I. Ansoff's growth strategies, strategies of vertical
integration and diversification, offensive and defensive strategies,
strategies implemented during specific stages of industry evolution
(growth, maturity, decline), strategies depending on enterprise's
relative position in the market (leader, challenger, follower, nicher),
etc (Porter 1998a, 1998b; Ansoff 1984; Thompson et al. 2005; David 2007;
Kotler and Keller 2006; Ginevicius 1998, 2009; Raudeliuniene 2007).
Generic (universal) business strategies, developed by the scholars
of strategic management, together with the analyzed models of exploring
enterprise strategic behaviour, proposed by the other authors, are not
related to the specific market or industry structure. The choice of
oligopoly as the market structure under research is motivated by its
common occurrence and considerable relative scale in Lithuanian economy
(Ginevicius and Krivka 2009b), complicated and ambiguous strategic
conduct of oligopolic enterprises, coupled by potential inefficiency of
oligopolic market structure (Ginevicius and Krivka 2008a, 2008b; Krivka
and Ginevicius 2009). Strategic decisions of oligopolic enterprises
might be simulated by applying game theory models: cartels and other
agreements on coordination of actions, the first and the second mover
advantage, competition of prices or quantities produced, entrance
deterrence (Von Neumann and Morgenstern 1953; Friedman 1969, 1971, 1988;
Ginevicius and Krivka 2008a; Raguseo 2009).
The scientific problem raised in the article is developing the
complex model of enterprise competitive strategy under the conditions of
oligopolic market, based on theoretical concepts of strategic management
and modern methods of quantitative evaluation, affording ground for
forming the competitive strategy that achieves goals and expected
performance of an enterprise.
The aim of the research is to design and apply in practice the
original, scientifically grounded model of forming the integrated
competitive strategy of oligopolic enterprise, enabling to assess the
strategic alternatives to be implemented and form the competitive
strategy meeting the expectations of business owners.
2. The model
The model of forming the integrated competitive strategy of
oligopolic enterprise is designed in three steps: with regard to
performed scientific literature analysis (references are given in the
introduction) the set of partial competitive strategies (the elements of
the integrated strategy) is generated, the system of enterprise
performance indicators (partial strategies' evaluation criteria) is
designed, and the methodology for quantitative assessment of partial
strategies is proposed.
2.1. Partial competitive strategies of oligopolic enterprise
The integrated competitive strategy of oligopolic enterprise is
considered to be a concerted set of partial (detailed) competitive
strategies, targeting the certain elements of internal and external
environment of an enterprise, determining its strategic position and
influencing performance. The analysis of strategic conduct in the
context of the integrated strategy, on one hand, reflects the conditions
of oligopolic market, where enterprise's reaction to changing
environment involves a wide range of factors, having considerable impact
on its strategic position and performance, with no single strategy able
to affect all the relevant elements of environment; on the other hand, a
simplified and forthright strategy would soon be identified by
competitors, and their response would diminish the results of strategy
application. Eighteen partial competitive strategies are proposed to be
included in the model of forming the integrated competitive strategy of
oligopolic enterprise:
1. Market expansion strategies (bringing new customers to join the
market, widening the range of purposes and occasions for consumption).
2. Entrance deterrence strategies.
3. Strategies targeting market segments (creating new market
segments, seeking for leadership in the specific segment).
4. Marketing and promotion strategies (creating and maintaining
brand names, advertising and other promotion measures, design and
packing of the product).
5. Product development strategies (modification and improvement of
goods or services, designing product batches).
6. Strategies aimed at creating the contingent of permanent
customers (stimulating customer loyalty, increasing switching costs,
improving after-sale service).
7. Strategies targeting suppliers (diversification of supply,
forming and maintaining long-term relations with reliable suppliers,
backward vertical integration or diversification).
8. Strategies targeting distribution channels (diversification of
distribution, forming and maintaining long-term relations with reliable
distributions channels, forward vertical integration or
diversification).
9. Strategies targeting complements of the product (cooperation
with producers of complements, diversification into complements'
markets).
10. Strategies of developing and maintaining human and managerial
resources.
11. Strategies of developing and maintaining technological
resources.
12. Strategies of developing and maintaining information systems.
13. Strategies aimed at gaining and maintaining a good name and
reputation of the enterprise.
14. Offensive strategies (price war and other forms of savage
competition).
15. Defensive strategies (defending market share, offence
deterrence).
16. Response strategies.
17. Collaboration and cooperation strategies.
18. Follower strategies (imitation of competitors' goods or
services, repeating the actions of successful competitors, following
competitors' pricing).
Partial competitive strategies comprise the unique integrated
competitive strategy of oligopolic enterprise with its exclusiveness
(and barriers protecting from imitation) based on two dimensions: the
set of the partial strategies implemented, and the scale of each partial
strategy (their relative weights in the structure of the integrated
strategy). Partial competitive strategies are selected and their scales
are determined with regard to their expected contribution to enterprise
financial performance.
2.2. Enterprise performance indicators
Enterprise performance is defined by the summarised financial
indicator, comprised of detailed performance indicators, directly
affected by partial strategies. To select the performance criteria,
traditional profit-loss analysis is assumed (Juozaitiene 2007; Gronskas
2005), while the integrated performance indicator is decomposed into the
following detailed indicators, characterising enterprise's residual
demand, its revenues from one unit of sales and costs to one litas of
sales:
1. The number of newly attracted customers indicates the results of
enterprise's competitive activities attracting new consumers that
join the market, or taking over competitors' clients.
2. The number of customers lost shows enterprise's abilities
to stimulate customer loyalty and repeated consumption, to defend from
competitors' actions aimed at taking over own clients.
3. Intensity of consumption indicates how often customers purchase
and consume enterprise's goods or services.
4. Material value of goods or services reflects the utility gained
from material features of goods or services consumed.
5. Consumer-realised non-material value of goods or services is
considered to be additional customer satisfaction from goods or
services, for which she is willing to pay more than assumed material
value: the prestige of a brand name or producer, correspondence to
fashion trends or individual preferences, etc.
6. Flexible pricing and price discrimination indicates
enterprise's abilities to set the prices of goods or services
freely (independent from other entities involved: competitors,
distribution channels, government) and flexibly; also the capabilities
to differentiate goods or services according to value and price
dimensions with regard to customer needs and paying ability.
7. Costs of sales to one litas of sales indicate the costs of
producing or purchasing (to resell) goods or services and depend on
enterprise's internal resources and capabilities, accompanied by
its relations with suppliers.
8. Distribution costs to one litas of sales depend on
enterprise's resources and capabilities in case it sells goods or
services itself, or on its relations with distribution channels.
9. General and administration costs to one litas of sales reflect
the efficiency of enterprise management, enterprise size and the effect
of scale economy, the abilities of controlling fixed costs.
The first three detailed indicators determine enterprise sales in
units of goods or the number of its clients, indicators 4 to 6 directly
influence the prices of goods or services set--all together, the
subsystem of indicators 1 to 6 determines enterprise revenues from
selling goods or services. The remaining indicators are associated with
costs of producing and selling goods (providing services)--with their
inclusion in the model, the summarised (integrated) enterprise
performance criterion is considered to be the ultimate financial result,
i.e. profit or loss.
2.3. Quantitative assessment of partial competitive strategies
The purpose of the quantitative assessment is, by applying
appropriate mathematical methods, to determine the set of favourable
detailed strategies to comprise enterprise's integrated competitive
strategy, and to estimate the scales of the partial strategies chosen.
The corresponding mathematical problem involves the assessment of
partial competitive strategies with regard to their influence on the
detailed performance indicators to solve a problem of that kind,
multicriteria evaluation methods, developed throughout the recent years
and widely applied in construction (e.g. Zavadskas et al. 1998, 2001,
2008, 2010; Ginevicius et al. 2008b), economics and management (e.g.
Ginevicius et al. 2005, 2008a; Ginevicius and Podvezko 2004, 2006,
2008b, c, 2009; Ginevicius and Zubrecovas 2009; Ginevicius and Krivka
2009a; Bivainis and Zinkeviciute 2006), seem to be the appropriate tool.
The alternatives under evaluation are the partial competitive
strategies, selected to be implemented by the enterprise--each of them
is assessed with regard to the impact on the detailed performance
indicators (Table 1).
The expected impact of the partial competitive strategy j (j = 1,
..., n) on the detailed performance indicator i (i = 1, ..., m) is
measured by points: ranging from -3 to 3, depending on the direction and
the strength of the effect:--positive and negative weak impact
respectively, 2/-2--medium-strength impact, 3/-3--strong impact, 0
neutral impact. The coefficients of potential influence of
enterprise's internal and external environment on the application
of each partial strategy are estimated as follows: 2--environment is
favourable for implementing the strategy, 1--environment is neutral,
0.5--environment is unfavourable.
The positive values (from 1 to 3) of partial strategies'
impact on performance criteria are multiplied by the coefficients above,
while the negative values are divided: it is assumed that favourable
environment strengthens the positive effect of the implemented strategy
and weakens the negative effect, and vice-versa. To estimate weights
[[omega].sub.i] of the performance indicators, the method of direct
expert evaluation is applied, with respect
to condition [m.summation over(i=1)][[omega].sub.i] = 1 (Ginevicius
et al. 2005, 2008a; Ginevicius and Podvezko 2008b).
The result of multicriteria evaluation is the ranking of strategic
alternatives, enabling to form the integrated competitive strategy and
estimate the scale [s.sub.j] of each partial strategy chosen, i.e. their
relative weights in the structure of the integrated strategy.
The experience of recent research (e.g. Ginevicius and Podvezko
2008b, 2009; Ginevicius et al. 2008a, 2008b; Ginevicius and Zubrecovas
2009; Ginevicius and Krivka 2009a) suggests that the phenomenon under
analysis is to be assessed by applying several multicriteria methods
seeking for higher reliability of results; moreover, in order to
minimize the subjectivity of the specific method, the average ranks are
accepted to be the ultimate result. To efficiently combine several
multicriteria evaluation methods, it is important to form a
"bunch" of correlating methods (Ginevicius and Podvezko
2008a). SAW, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are selected for the assessment of
partial competitive strategies, refusing three other widely applied
multicriteria techniques: Sum of Ranks and Geometric Average are
rejected because of ignoring weights of criteria (that would distort the
results of evaluation); COPRAS is inappropriate because all the criteria
are assumed to be maximizing.
SAW method calculates the sum [S.sub.j] of normalized weighted
values [[??].sub.ij] of all criteria for each j-th alternative
(Ginevicius et al. 2005, 2008a, 2008b; Ginevicius and Podvezko 2008c):
[S.sub.j] = [m.summation over(i=1)][[omega].sub.i][[??].sub.ij].
(1)
TOPSIS indicates the best and the worst solutions with regard to
each criteria (Opricovic and Tzeng 2004; Ginevicius et al. 2008a, 2008b;
Ginevicius and Podvezko 2006, 2008b, 2009; Ginevicius 2008):
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], (2)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], (3)
where: [I.sub.1] is a set of maximizing criteria, [I.sub.2] is a
set of minimizing criteria, [[??].sub.ij] is a normalized value of -th
criterion for j-th object. The distance of each alternative to the best
and the worst solutions is calculated:
[D.sup.*.sub.j] = [square root of [m.summation
over(i=1)][([[omega].sub.i] [[??].sub.ij] - [V.sup.*.sub.i]).sup.2]],
(4)
[D.sup.-.sub.j] = [square root of [m.summation
over(i=1)][([[omega].sub.i] [[??].sub.ij] - [V.sup.-.sub.i]).sup.2]],
(5)
followed by the TOPSIS criterion, which maximum value corresponds
to the best alternative:
[C.sup.*.sub.j] = [D.sup.-.sub.j]/[D.sup.*.sub.j] + [D.sup.-.sub.j]
. (6)
VIKOR is based on three evaluation criteria [S.sub.j], [R.sub.j]
and [Q.sub.j], calculated by the following formulas (Opricovic and Tzeng
2004; Ginevicius et al. 2008a, 2008b; Ginevicius and Podvezko 2006,
2008b; Ginevicius 2008):
[S.sub.j] = [m.summation over (i=1)][[omega].sub.i] [[??].sub.ij],
(7)
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], (8)
[Q.sub.j] = [S.sub.j] - [S.sup.*]/[S.sup.-] - [S.sup.*] + (1-v)
[R.sub.j] - [R.sup.*]/[R.sup.-] - [R.sup.*], (9)
where: [[??].sub.ij] is a normalized value of i-th criterion for
j-th object, [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] is the
majority criterion, equalled to 0.5 in empirical research (e.g.
Ginevicius et al. 2008a; Ginevicius and Krivka 2009a). The lowest values
of [Q.sub.j] indicate the best alternatives.
Where negative values are involved in multicriteria assessment,
they are transformed to positive by applying the shifting constant
[b.sub.i] to each i-th criterion having at least one negative [r.sub.ij]
value (Ginevicius and Cirba 2005; Podvezko 2008):
[[bar.r].sub.ij] = [r.sub.ij] + [b.sub.i]. (10)
For the shifting procedure to have the least possible effect on
evaluation results, the minimum values of the shifting constant are
considered, calculated as follows:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (11)
3. Empirical application of the model
The designed model of forming the integrated competitive strategy
is applied to three enterprises operating in different oligopolic
markets: enterprise A, enterprise B and enterprise C. The
questionnaires, submitted to the enterprises under research, apply for
the following data:
1) by the method of direct evaluation to estimate weights of the
detailed performance indicators (evaluation criteria);
2) to choose the partial competitive strategies the enterprise
intends to implement (potentially beneficial strategic alternatives)
from the list of eighteen partial strategies assumed in the model;
3) to estimate the impact of enterprise's internal and
external environment on application of each partial strategy chosen
(favourable, unfavourable, neutral);
4) to estimate the expected impact of each partial strategy chosen
on the detailed performance indicators (positive or negative weak,
medium-strength, strong or neutral).
The questionnaires for estimating weights of the performance
indicators were additionally submitted to 35 enterprises, acting in
oligopolic markets. Five answers were received, making the total number
of eight experts to have estimated weights of the evaluation criteria
(together with enterprises A, B and C, Table 2).
To test the degree of agreement of expert estimates, the ranks of
the evaluation criteria are determined: the most important indicator
(having the highest relative weight) in case of each k-th expert (k = 1,
..., r) is granted with rank 1, the second best criterion--with rank 2,
etc; while the least important indicator has the rank of m (Table 3).
Equivalent indicators have equal ranking--the mean of their consequent
rank values (Podvezko 2005).
The coefficient of concordance is applied for testing, calculated
by the formula (Podvezko 2005; Ginevicius et al. 2008a, 2008b):
W = 12S/[r.sup.2]m([m.sup.2]-1). (12)
The value S is calculated by summing squared deviations between the
sum [c.sub.i] of all r experts' ranks for each i-th criterion (i =
1, ..., m) and the average [bar.c] of sums of ranks, by applying the
formula:
S = [m.summation over(i=1)][([c.sub.i] - [bar.c]).sup.2], (13)
while:
[c.sub.i] = [r.summation over(k=1)] [c.sub.ik], (i = 1, ..., m),
(14)
[bar.c] = [m.summation over(i=1)][c.sub.i]/m. (15)
The consistency of estimates is tested by [chi square] distribution
with v = m -1 degrees of freedom:
[chi square] = Wr (m -1)= 12S/rm(m+1). (16)
In our case [bar.c] = 40, S = 1078 and W = 0.281. Whereas the
calculated value of [chi square] = 17.97 is larger than the critical
value of [[chi square].sub.cr] = 15.51 (with the significance level of
[alpha] = 0.05), expert estimates are considered to be in agreement,
while the average weight estimates are employed for multicriteria
evaluation of partial competitive strategies.
3.1. Forming the integrated competitive strategy of enterprise A
Enterprise A indicated 10 partial competitive strategies in the
questionnaire as intended to be implemented (see Appendix 1)--those are
compared (ranked) according to their expected impact on the detailed
performance indicators (Table 4). Strong correlation between the results
obtained by SAW and other multicriteria methods applied (Table 5)
confirms their compatibility, while the ranking of strategic
alternatives is derived from the average ranks.
It has to be stressed though, that application of the model is not
to provide an unambiguous answer or the only right recipe on the
composition of the integrated strategy, for the results of multicriteria
assessment require additional analysis and interpretation.
The final decision on business strategy is always the prerogative
of the office and chief executive of the enterprise, while application
of the model allows providing scientifically grounded, based on
calculations proposal on the composition of the integrated competitive
strategy, according to:
1) the ranking of partial competitive strategies (ratings of
strategic alternatives with regard to their expected impact on
performance);
2) the values of SAW criterion [S.sub.j] (quantitative and
comparable estimates of strategic alternatives' expected impact on
performance).
The integrated competitive strategy of enterprise A is proposed to
be composed of six groups of partial competitive strategies (indicated
with italic font in Table 4): marketing and promotion strategies (rank
1, [S.sub.j] = 0.258), strategies targeting distribution channels (rank
2, [S.sub.j] = 0.183), strategies targeting market segments (rank 3,
[S.sub.j] = 0.130), strategies aimed at creating the contingent of
permanent customers (rank 4, [S.sub.j] = 0.113), strategies of
developing and maintaining human and managerial resources (rank 5,
[S.sub.j] = 0.107), and product development strategies (rank 6,
[S.sub.j] = 0.070). The remaining four strategic alternatives, with
regard to their ratings (7-10) and the values of criterion [S.sub.j]
(between 0.026 and 0.048), are suggested not to be included in the
integrated competitive strategy.
SAW method estimates are considered to be the basis for calculating
the scales of partial competitive strategies (relative weights in the
integrated strategy): with the integrated competitive strategy of
enterprise A being composed of six groups of partial strategies, having
the most significant impact on performance, the normalised values of
criterion [S.sub.j] ([6.summation over(j=1)][[??].sub.j] = 1) enable to
quantitatively evaluate the scales of partial strategies and form the
structure of enterprise A integrated competitive strategy (Fig. 1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The structure of the integrated competitive strategy, on one hand,
reflects the expected contribution of every detailed strategy to
enterprise performance; on the other hand, the shares of partial
competitive strategies are considered to be the quantitative indicators
for the purpose of setting up long-term goals and choosing the main
directions of business strategy of an enterprise, distributing
financial, human and other resources for strategic actions to be
designed and implemented.
3.2. Forming the integrated competitive strategy of enterprise B
Enterprise B indicated 13 partial competitive strategies in the
questionnaire as intended to be implemented (see Appendix 2). The
strategies chosen are ranked according to their expected impact on the
detailed performance indicators (Table 6), checking the compatibility of
the results obtained by the multicriteria methods applied (Table 7).
Correlation analysis discloses the diverging results of VIKOR, with
the correlation coefficient (modulus value) with SAW being less than
0.8. Thus, only SAW and TOPSIS methods are considered for ranking the
strategic alternatives in case of enterprise B. With regard to the
ranking of partial strategies and the values of SAW method criterion
[S.sub.j], the integrated competitive strategy of enterprise B is
proposed to be composed of nine groups of partial competitive strategies
(indicated with italic font in Table 6): strategies targeting market
segments (rank 1, [S.sub.j]- = 0.156), response strategies (rank 2-3,
[S.sub.j] = 0.131), strategies of developing and maintaining
technological resources (rank 2-3, [S.sub.j] = 0.120), marketing and
promotion strategies (rank 4, [S.sub.j] = 0.093), strategies targeting
suppliers (rank 5, [S.sub.j] = 0.071), strategies of developing and
maintaining human and managerial resources (rank 6, [S.sub.j] = 0.095 ),
market expansion strategies (rank 7, [S.sub.j] = 0.063), strategies
targeting distribution channels (rank 8-9, [S.sub.j] = 0.067), and
strategies of developing and maintaining information systems (rank 8-9,
[S.sub.j] = 0.062 ). The remaining four strategic alternatives, with
regard to their ratings (10-13) and the values of criterion [S.sub.j]
(between 0.023 and 0.045), are suggested not to be included in the
integrated strategy. The structure of the integrated competitive
strategy of enterprise
B is designed by normalising the values of SAW criterion [S.sub.j]
([9.summation over(j=1)] [[??].sub.j] = 1) for nine partial strategies
chosen (Fig. 2). j=1
3.3. Forming the integrated competitive strategy of enterprise C
Enterprise C indicated 13 partial competitive strategies in the
questionnaire as intended to be implemented (see Appendix 3).
The strategies chosen are ranked according to their expected impact
on the detailed performance indicators (Table 8), while the strong
correlation between the results obtained (modulus of correlation
coefficients exceed 0.8) confirms the compatibility of the multicriteria
methods applied (Table 9).
With regard to the ranking of partial strategies and the values of
SAW method criterion [S.sub.j], the integrated competitive strategy of
enterprise C is proposed to be composed of eight groups of partial
competitive strategies (indicated with italic font in Table 8): product
development strategies (rank 1, [S.sub.j] = 0.115), strategies targeting
distribution channels (rank 2, [S.sub.j] = 0.146), collaboration and
cooperation strategies (rank 3, [S.sub.j] = 0.106), strategies of
developing and maintaining technological resources (rank 4, [S.sub.j] =
0.112), strategies aimed at gaining and maintaining a good name and
reputation of the enterprise (rank 5, [S.sub.j] = 0.086 ), strategies of
developing and maintaining human and managerial resources (rank 6,
[S.sub.j] = 0.075 ), strategies targeting suppliers (rank 7, [S.sub.j] =
0.074), and marketing and promotion strategies (rank 8, [S.sub.j] =
0.073). The remaining five strategic alternatives, with regard to their
ratings (9-13) and the values of criterion [S.sub.j] (between 0.018 and
0.057), are suggested not to be included in the integrated strategy. The
structure of the integrated competitive strategy of enterprise C is
designed by normalising the values of SAW criterion [S.sub.j]
([8.summation over(j=1)] [[??].sub.j] = 1) for eight partial strategies
chosen (Fig. 3).
4. Conclusions
The article proposes scientifically brand new, complex approach to
forming competitive strategy, based on the assumption that oligopolic
enterprise implements strategic actions of various purposes and
directions, treated as composite elements of the integrated competitive
strategy, i.e. partial competitive strategies. The strategy of
oligopolic enterprise is multiple and complex, therefore it should be
divided (decomposed) into partial competitive strategies in order to
estimate the impact of certain strategic activities on performance, to
make suggestions for business strategy development and modification. The
results of the research, presented in the article, are summarised by the
following conclusions:
1. According to the model proposed, forming competitive strategy of
oligopolic enterprise involves the selection of the strategic
alternatives (partial competitive strategies) intended to be
implemented, and the comparative assessment of their expected impact on
performance indicators in order to identify the most favourable
strategic alternatives to comprise the integrated strategy, and to
determine their scales (relative weights in the integrated strategy).
Multicriteria methods are applied for quantitative assessment, where the
partial competitive strategies are the alternatives under evaluation,
while the criteria for evaluation are represented by the system of
enterprise performance indicators, aimed at the ultimate financial
result--profit or loss.
2. The main results of model application are scientifically
grounded proposals on forming the competitive strategies of the
enterprises under research. However, it is stressed that the decision on
selecting the strategic alternatives is the prerogative of the office
and chief executive of an enterprise, while the model is considered to
be a tool to perform the necessary calculations and generate a
well-founded proposal on forming the integrated strategy.
3. The structures of the integrated competitive strategies,
designed by applying the model, enable to quantitatively compare the
expected efficiency of various strategic alternatives, to indicate the
main priorities of enterprise business strategy, to distribute
financial, human and other resources for strategic actions to be
designed and implemented.
4. The factors, influencing the results of model application, the
possibilities to extend the model or apply it more flexibly, together
with the niches for further research, are indicated:
4.1. The list of partial strategies to form the integrated
competitive strategy is generally based on a wide scope of scientific
sources of strategic management and theoretical oligopoly models.
However, the model could be flexibly complimented with the specific
strategic alternatives, intended to be implemented by the particular
enterprise, on condition that newly included partial strategies
influence the detailed performance indicators, and thus, could be
assessed with regard to the designed system of evaluation criteria.
4.2. Profit-loss analysis was assumed to generate the system of
partial strategies' evaluation criteria, where the detailed
performance indicators reflect enterprise's residual demand, its
revenues from one unit of sales and costs to one litas of sales;
moreover, the number of indicators was limited due to practical
considerations (for the research questionnaire to be of adequate size).
Practical application of the model could involve additional performance
indicators, necessary for the assessment of strategic alternatives in
case of the particular enterprise, although, it is recommended to keep
the whole set of detailed indicators aimed at the ultimate financial
result, as the main goal of business owners.
4.3. The scale for assessing the impact of enterprise's
environment on application of partial competitive strategies
(favourable, unfavourable, neutral) and the impact of partial strategies
on performance indicators (measured by points from -3 to 3) could be
supplemented with the methodology of applying the scales (e.g. numeric
values of the indicators, corresponding to the particular point-values
of strategies' impact; the questionnaires for enterprise
environment-conduct analysis, enabling to estimate the impact of
environment on the certain partial strategy, etc)--this possibility to
extend the model is proposed as a niche for further research.
doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.18
APPENDIX 1
The research questionnaire of enterprise A
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive External
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting x
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product Strategies of
developing and
10 maintaining human and x
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems Strategies
aimed at gaining and
13 maintaining a good name x
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive Internal
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting x
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product Strategies of
developing and
10 maintaining human and x
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems Strategies
aimed at gaining and
13 maintaining a good name x
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
The number
of newly The number
attracted of customers Intensity of
customers lost consumption
Partial competitive
strategies 1 2 3
No Description 0.154 0.121 0.168
1 Market expansion
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 3 0 1
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 3 2 2
strategies
5 Product development 3 2 1
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 0 3 2
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 2 1 1
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product Strategies of
developing and
10 maintaining human and 2 2 1
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 1 1 0
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 1 1 1
developing and
maintaining information
systems Strategies
aimed at gaining and
13 maintaining a good name 2 2 0
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies 1 2 0
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Consumer-
realised
Material non-material Flexible
value of value of pricing and
goods or goods or price
services services discrimination
Partial competitive
strategies 4 5 6
No Description 0.073 0.138 0.083
1 Market expansion
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 1 3 3
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 0 2 3
strategies
5 Product development 0 1 3
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 1 2 1
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 1 2 1
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product Strategies of
developing and
10 maintaining human and 1 2 0
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 1 2 1
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 0 0 3
developing and
maintaining information
systems Strategies
aimed at gaining and
13 maintaining a good name 0 1 0
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies 2 2 1
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Costs of Distribution General and
sales to one costs to one administration
litas of litas of costs to one
sales sales litas of sales
Partial competitive
strategies 7 8 9
No Description 0.135 0.071 0.059
1 Market expansion
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 1 0 0
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 1 -2 0
strategies
5 Product development 1 -1 0
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at -1 -1 0
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 0 1 -2
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product Strategies of
developing and
10 maintaining human and 0 1 -2
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 1 0 -3
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 0 1 -3
developing and
maintaining information
systems Strategies
aimed at gaining and
13 maintaining a good name 0 1 -2
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies -1 -2 0
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
APPENDIX 2
The research questionnaire of enterprise B
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive External
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion x
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting x
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting x
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at x
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies x
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive Internal
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion x
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting x
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting x
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at x
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies x
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
The number
of newly The number
attracted of customers Intensity of
customers lost consumption
Partial competitive
strategies 1 2 3
No Description 0.154 0.121 0.168
1 Market expansion 2 0 2
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 3 0 2
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 3 0 2
strategies
5 Product development 1 0 1
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 2 2 2
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 1 0 0
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 2 0 1
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of 1 0 0
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 2 0 1
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 2 0 0
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at 2 0 0
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies 1 1 1
16 Response strategies 2 1 1
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Consumer-
realised
Material non-material Flexible
value of value of pricing and
goods or goods or price
services services discrimination
Partial competitive
strategies 4 5 6
No Description 0.073 0.138 0.083
1 Market expansion 1 1 0
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 2 2 2
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 2 3 1
strategies
5 Product development 1 1 1
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 0 0 1
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 0 0 1
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 1 1 1
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of 0 0 0
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 1 2 1
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 0 0 0
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at 0 1 1
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies -1 -1 0
16 Response strategies 0 0 0
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Costs of Distribution General and
sales to one costs to one administration
litas of litas of costs to one
sales sales litas of sales
Partial competitive
strategies 7 8 9
No Description 0.135 0.071 0.059
1 Market expansion 1 0 0
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting 0 0 0
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 1 0 0
strategies
5 Product development 0 0 0
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 0 0 0
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 2 0 0
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 1 1 0
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of 0 1 2
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 1 0 0
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 0 2 0
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at 0 0 0
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies -1 1 0
16 Response strategies -1 -1 0
17 Collaboration and
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
APPENDIX 3
The research questionnaire of enterprise C
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive External
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion x
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting x
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at x
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies x
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and x
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Environment impact estimates
Partial competitive Internal
strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion x
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion x
strategies
5 Product development x
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at x
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting x
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting x
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of x
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at x
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies x
16 Response strategies x
17 Collaboration and x
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
The number
of newly The number
attracted of customers Intensity of
customers lost consumption
Partial competitive
strategies 1 2 3
No Description 0.154 0.121 0.168
1 Market expansion 3 2 2
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 1 2 1
strategies
5 Product development 2 2 2
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 2 3 3
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 1 1 1
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 3 2 1
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of 2 2 2
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 3 3 3
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 1 2 1
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at 2 2 2
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies 1 3 1
16 Response strategies 1 2 1
17 Collaboration and 2 2 2
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Consumer-
realised
Material non-material Flexible
value of value of pricing and
goods or goods or price
services services discrimination
Partial competitive
strategies 4 5 6
No Description 0.073 0.138 0.083
1 Market expansion 2 2 -3
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion 1 3 2
strategies
5 Product development 3 2 2
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 3 2 2
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 2 1 2
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 2 1 2
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of 0 2 2
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of 3 3 1
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of 0 1 -1
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at 1 3 1
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies 1 1 1
16 Response strategies 1 1 1
17 Collaboration and 2 2 2
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, average weight)
Costs of Distribution General and
sales to one costs to one administration
litas of litas of costs to one
sales sales litas of sales
Partial competitive
strategies 7 8 9
No Description 0.135 0.071 0.059
1 Market expansion -2 -3 -1
strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting
market segments
4 Marketing and promotion -1 1 -1
strategies
5 Product development 2 2 0
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at 2 1 -1
creating the contingent
of permanent customers
7 Strategies targeting 2 0 0
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting 3 2 3
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the
product
10 Strategies of -1 -1 -1
developing and
maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of -2 0 -1
developing and
maintaining
technological resources
12 Strategies of -2 1 -2
developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at -1 1 -1
gaining and maintaining
a good name and
reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies -2 -1 -1
16 Response strategies -2 -1 -1
17 Collaboration and 2 1 -1
cooperation strategies
18 Follower strategies
Received 20 August 2009; accepted 15 June 2010
References
Ansoff, I. H. 1984. Implanting Strategic Management. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall International.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive
Advantage, Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
Bivainis, J.; Staskevicius, A. T. 2004. Imones daugiakomponentes
strategijos modeliavimas [Modelling of enterprise multicomponent
strategy], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and Practice]
5(4): 152-156 (in Lithuanian).
Bivainis, J.; Zinkeviciute, V. 2006. Verslo strateginiu sprendimu
pasirinkimo pagrindimas [Reasoning of business strategic decisions
selection], Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(2):
99-107 (in Lithuanian).
Casas, R. 2000. Imoniu konkuravimo strategiju saltiniu atpazinimas
ir ivertinimas Lietuvos rinkoje [Indication and evaluation of the
sources of enterprise competitive strategies in Lithuanian market].
Doctoral Dissertation. Vilnius: VU. 196 p. (in Lithuanian).
David, F. F. 2007. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. 11th
Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Friedman, J. W. 1969. Symposium on experimental economics: on
experimental research in oligopoly, Review of Economic Studies 36(108):
399-415. doi:10.2307/2296467
Friedman, J. W. 1971. A noncooperative view of oligopoly,
International Economic Review 12(1): 106-122. doi:10.2307/2525500
Friedman, J. W. 1988. On the strategic importance of prices versus
quantities, RAND Journal of Economics 19(4): 607-622.
doi:10.2307/2555460
Ginevicius, R. 1998. Imoniu veiklos diversifikacija
[Diversification of Enterprise Activities]. Vilnius: Technika. 152 p.
(in Lithuanian).
Ginevicius, R. 2000. Imoniu prisitaikymo prie isores aplinkos
strategijos [Strategies of adaptation of enterprises to the
environment], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and
Practice] 1(1): 10-17 (in Lithuanian).
Ginevicius, R. 2008. Normalization of quantities of various
dimensions, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(1): 79-86.
doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.79-86
Ginevicius, R. 2009. Quantitative evaluation of unrelated
diversification of enterprise activities, Journal of Civil Engineering
and Management 15(1): 105-111. doi:10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.105-111
Ginevicius, R.; Cirba, S. 2005. Rodikli? reiksmiu transformavimas
atliekant daugiakriterinius vertinimus [Normalization of the Criteria
Values in Multicriteria Evaluation], Verslas: teorija ir praktika
[Business: Theory and Practice] 6(3): 125-130 (in Lithuanian).
Ginevicius, R.; Krivka, A. 2008a. Application of game theory for
doupoly market analysis, Journal of Business Economics and Management
9(3): 207-217. doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.207-217
Ginevicius, R.; Krivka, A. 2008b. Optimali rinkos struktura: laisva
konkurencija ir vartotoju suverenumas [Optimal market structure: free
competition and consumer sovereignty], Verslas: teorija ir praktika
[Business: Theory and Practice] 9(4): 306-312 (in Lithuanian).
doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2008.9.306-312
Ginevicius, R.; Krivka, A. 2009a. Konkurencines aplinkos
oligopolineje rinkoje daugiakriterinis vertinimas [Multicriteria
evaluation of the competitive environment in the oligopolic market],
Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and Practice] 10(4):
247-258 (in Lithuanian). doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.247-258
Ginevicius, R.; Krivka, A. 2009b. Verslo koncentracijos Lietuvos
ekonomikoje tyrimas [The research on business concentration in
Lithuanian economy], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and
Practice] 10(3): 191-203 (in Lithuanian).
doi:0.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.191-203
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004. Imoniu strateginio potencialo
kiekybinis ivertinimas [Quantitative evaluation of the strategic
potential of enterprises], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business:
Theory and Practice] 5(1): 3-9 (in Lithuanian).
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Assessing the financial state of
construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of
Economy 12(3): 188-194.
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008a. Daugiakriterinio vertinimo budu
suderinamumas [The problem of compatibility of various multiple criteria
evaluation methods], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and
Practice] 9(1): 73-80 (in Lithuanian).
doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2008.9.73-80
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008b. Multicriteria evaluation of
Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients,
Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(4): 257-267.
doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008c. Multicriteria
graphical-analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction
enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4):
452-461. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.452-461
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Evaluating the changes in
economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple
criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy
15(3): 418-436. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436
Ginevicius, R.; Zubrecovas, V. 2009. Selection of the optimal real
estate investment project basing on multiple criteria evaluation using
stochastic dimensions, Journal of Business Economics and Management
10(3): 261-270. doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.261-270
Ginevicius, R.; Butkevicius, A.; Podvezko, V. 2005. Nauju Europos
Sajungos saliu ekonomines pletros daugiakriterinis ivertinimas
[Multicriteria evaluation of economic development of new EU
memberstates], Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and
Practice] 6(2): 85-93 (in Lithuanian).
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Bruzge, S. 2008a. Evaluating the
effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods, Journal of
Business Economics and Management 9(3): 167-180.
doi:10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.167-180
Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Raslanas, S. 2008b. Evaluating the
alternative solutions of wall insulation by multicriteria methods,
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(4): 217-226.
doi:10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.20
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive
advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management
Review 33(3): 114-135.
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm,
Strategic Management Journal 17: 109-122.
Gronskas, V. 2005. Ekonomine analize [Economic analysis]. Kaunas:
Technologija (in Lithuanian).
Juozaitiene, L. 2007. Imones finansai: analize ir valdymas
[Enterprise finance: analysis and management]. Siauliai: VsI Siauliu
universiteto leidykla (in Lithuanian).
Korsakiene, R. 2004. Konkurencinis pranasumas: dvieju poziuriu
sinteze [Competitive advantage: the synthesis of two approaches],
Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and Practice] 5(2): 52-58
(in Lithuanian).
Kotler, P.; Keller, K. L. 2006. Marketing Management. 12th Ed. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Krivka, A.; Ginevicius, R. 2009. Rinkos struktura konkurencines
strategijos formavimo kontekste [Market structure in the context of
developing competitive strategy], Mokslas--Lietuvos ateitis [Science
--Future of Lithuania] 1(3): 34-37 (in Lithuanian).
Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:
a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of
Operational Research 156(2): 445-155. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a
resource-based view, Strategic Management Journal 14: 179-191.
doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303
Podvezko, V. 2005. Ekspertu iverciu suderinamumas [Agreement of
Expert Estimates], Technological and Economic Development of Economy
11(2): 101-107 (in Lithuanian).
Podvezko, V. 2008. Sudetingu dydziu kompleksinis vertinimas
[Comprehensive evaluation of complex quantities], Verslas: teorija ir
praktika [Business: Theory and Practice] 9(3): 160-168 (in Lithuanian).
doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2008.9.160-168
Porter, M. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy, Harvard
Business Review 57(2): 137-145.
Porter, M. 1998a. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining
Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M. 1998b. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing
Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K.; Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the
corporation, Harvard Business Review 68(3): 79-91.
Raguseo, D. 2009. Static and dynamic quantity-setting games: an
in-class experiment, Verslas: teorija ir praktika [Business: Theory and
Practice] 10(4): 308-314. doi:10.3846/1648-0627.2009.10.308-314
Raudeliuniene, J. 2007. Imoniu konkuravimo strateginiu sprendimu
formavimas [Formation of competitive strategic decisions]. Doctoral
Dissertation. Vilnius: VGTU. 150 p. (in Lithuanian).
Sekliuckiene, J. 2006. Organizacijos istekliu iveiklinimo siekiant
konkurencinio pranasumo modelis [Model of leveraging organizational
resources to achieve competitive advantage]. Doctoral Dissertation.
Kaunas: KTU. 160 p. (in Lithuanian).
Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and
Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Thompson, A.; Strickland, A. J.; Gamble, J. E. 2005. Crafting and
Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and
Cases. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. 1953. Theory of Games and Economic
Behavior. 3rd Ed. London: Oxford University Press.
Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Banaitiene, N. 2001. Pastato
gyvavimo proceso daugiakriterine analize [Multicriteria analysis of the
state of construction]. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J.
2008. Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying
attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering
and Management 14(2): 85-93. doi:10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3
Zavadskas, E. K.; Simanauskas, L.; Kaklauskas, A. 1998. Sprendimu
paramos sistemos statyboje [Decision Supporting Systems in
Construction]. Vilnius: Technika (in Lithuanian).
Zavadskas, E. K.; Vilutiene, T.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J.
2010. Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-G and
TOPSIS GREY techniques, Journal of Business Economics and Management
11(1): 34-55. doi:10.3846/jbem.2010.03
Romualdas Ginevicius (1), Algirdas Krivka (2), Jolita Simkunaite
(3)
(1,2,3) Department of Economics and Management of Enterprises,
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223
Vilnius, Lithuania
E-mails: (1)
[email protected]; (2)
[email protected];
(3)
[email protected]
Romualdas GINEVICIUS. Professor, Dr Habil, Head of the Department
of Enterprise Economics and Management, construction engineer and
economist. The author of more than 350 research papers and over 20
scientific books; editor-in-chief of the "Journal of Business
Economics and Management" (located in ISI database "Web of
Science") and the journal "Business: Theory and
Practice". Research interests: organization theory, complex
quantitative evaluation of social processes and phenomena.
Algirdas KRIVKA. PhD student at Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University (VGTU), Department of Economics and Management of
Enterprises. Research interests: market structures, oligopoly,
competitive strategies.
Jolita SIMKUNAITE. Head of the department of Quality Management,
Master of Business Management. Research interests: market concentration,
quality management, organization theory.
Table 1. The scheme table of multicriteria evaluation of partial
competitive strategies
Environment impact
estimates
External
Partial competitive strategies environment
No Description favourable unfavourable
1 Market expansion strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market
segments
4 Marketing and promotion
strategies
5 Product development
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies
17 Collaboration and cooperation
strategies
18 Follower strategies
Environment impact
estimates
External Internal
Partial competitive strategies environment environment
No Description neutral favourable
1 Market expansion strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market
segments
4 Marketing and promotion
strategies
5 Product development
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies
17 Collaboration and cooperation
strategies
18 Follower strategies
Environment impact
estimates
Internal
Partial competitive strategies environment
No Description unfavourable neutral
1 Market expansion strategies
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market
segments
4 Marketing and promotion
strategies
5 Product development
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies
17 Collaboration and cooperation
strategies
18 Follower strategies
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, weight)
The number of
newly attracted The number of
customers customers lost
Partial competitive strategies 1 2
No Description [[omega].sub.1] [[omega].sub.2]
1 Market expansion strategies [r.sub.1,1]
2 Entrance deterrence [r.sub.1,2] ...
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market ...
segments
4 Marketing and promotion ...
strategies
5 Product development ...
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating ...
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting ...
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting ...
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting [r.sub.1,j] ...
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing ...
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and ...
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and ...
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining ...
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies ...
15 Defensive strategies ...
16 Response strategies ...
17 Collaboration and cooperation [r.sub.1,17] ...
strategies
18 Follower strategies [r.sub.1,18] [r.sub.2,18]
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, weight)
Material value
Intensity of of goods or
consumption services
Partial competitive strategies 3 4
No Description [[omega].sub.3] [[omega].sub.4]
1 Market expansion strategies ... ...
2 Entrance deterrence
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market
segments
4 Marketing and promotion
strategies
5 Product development
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting ... ...
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies
17 Collaboration and cooperation
strategies
18 Follower strategies ... ...
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, weight)
Consumer-
realised Flexible
non-material pricing
value of goods and price
or services discrimination
Partial competitive strategies 5 6
No Description [[omega].sub.5] [[omega].sub.6]
1 Market expansion strategies [r.sub.i,1] ...
2 Entrance deterrence ...
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market ...
segments
4 Marketing and promotion ...
strategies
5 Product development ...
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating ...
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting ...
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting ...
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting [r.sub.ij] ...
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing ...
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and ...
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and ...
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining ...
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies ...
15 Defensive strategies ...
16 Response strategies ...
17 Collaboration and cooperation ...
strategies
18 Follower strategies [r.sub.i,18] ...
Criteria for assessing partial
competitive strategies
(description, number, weight)
Costs of sales Distribution of
to one litas costs to one
of sales litas of sales
Partial competitive strategies 7 8
No Description [[omega].sub.7] [[omega].sub.8]
1 Market expansion strategies ... [r.sub.8,1]
2 Entrance deterrence ...
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market
segments
4 Marketing and promotion
strategies
5 Product development
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting ... ...
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies
15 Defensive strategies
16 Response strategies
17 Collaboration and cooperation ...
strategies
18 Follower strategies ... [r.sub.8,18]
Criteria for
assessing
partial
competitive
strategies
(description,
number, weight)
The scale of
General and the partial
administration competitive
costs to one strategy
litas of sales (relative
weight in the
Partial competitive strategies 9 structure of
the integrated
No Description [[omega].sub.9] strategy
1 Market expansion strategies [r.sub.9,1] [s.sub.1]
2 Entrance deterrence [r.sub.9,2] [s.sub.2]
strategies
3 Strategies targeting market ... ...
segments
4 Marketing and promotion ... ...
strategies
5 Product development ... ...
strategies
6 Strategies aimed at creating ... ...
the contingent of permanent
customers
7 Strategies targeting ... ...
suppliers
8 Strategies targeting ... ...
distribution channels
9 Strategies targeting [r.sub.9,j] [s.sub.j]
complements of the product
10 Strategies of developing ... ...
and maintaining human and
managerial resources
11 Strategies of developing and ... ...
maintaining technological
resources
12 Strategies of developing and ... ...
maintaining information
systems
13 Strategies aimed at gaining ... ...
and maintaining a good name
and reputation of the
enterprise
14 Offensive strategies ... ...
15 Defensive strategies ... ...
16 Response strategies ... ...
17 Collaboration and cooperation [r.sub.9,17] [s.sub.17]
strategies
18 Follower strategies [r.sub.9,18] [s.sub.18]
Table 2. Expert estimates of evaluation criteria weights
Evaluation criteria Experts and their
(performance indicators) estimates
No Description 1 2 3
1 The number of newly attracted customers 0.08 0.20 0.10
2 The number of customers lost 0.08 0.30 0.10
3 Intensity of consumption 0.14 0.20 0.15
4 Material value of goods or services 0.09 0.02 0.02
5 Consumer-realised non-material value of 0.24 0.02 0.25
goods or services
6 Flexible pricing and price 0.09 0.02 0.15
discrimination
7 Costs of sales to one litas of sales 0.18 0.14 0.12
8 Distribution costs to one litas of sales 0.06 0.05 0.08
9 General and administration costs to one 0.04 0.05 0.03
litas of sales
Totals 1.00 1.00 1.00
Evaluation criteria Experts and their
(performance indicators) estimates
No Description 4 5 6
1 The number of newly attracted customers 0.10 0.20 0.10
2 The number of customers lost 0.05 0.15 0.08
3 Intensity of consumption 0.20 0.15 0.25
4 Material value of goods or services 0.10 0.09 0.06
5 Consumer-realised non-material value of 0.10 0.11 0.13
goods or services
6 Flexible pricing and price 0.05 0.07 0.15
discrimination
7 Costs of sales to one litas of sales 0.20 0.09 0.05
8 Distribution costs to one litas of sales 0.10 0.08 0.08
9 General and administration costs to one 0.10 0.06 0.10
litas of sales
Totals 1.00 1.00 1.00
Evaluation criteria Experts and their
(performance indicators) estimates
No Description 7 8 Averages
1 The number of newly attracted customers 0.30 0.15 0.154
2 The number of customers lost 0.01 0.20 0.121
3 Intensity of consumption 0.20 0.05 0.168
4 Material value of goods or services 0.10 0.10 0.073
5 Consumer-realised non-material value of 0.10 0.15 0.138
goods or services
6 Flexible pricing and price 0.03 0.10 0.083
discrimination
7 Costs of sales to one litas of sales 0.20 0.10 0.135
8 Distribution costs to one litas of sales 0.02 0.10 0.071
9 General and administration costs to one 0.04 0.05 0.059
litas of sales
Totals 1.00 1.00 1.000
Table 3. Ranks of expert estimates of evaluation criteria weights
Ranks of expert estimates
Sum of
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ranks
1 6.5 2.5 5.5 5 1 4.5 1 2.5 28.5
2 6.5 1 5.5 8.5 2.5 6.5 9 1 40.5
3 3 2.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 1 2.5 8.5 24
4 4.5 8 9 5 5.5 8 4.5 5.5 50
5 1 8 1 5 4 3 4.5 2.5 29
6 4.5 8 2.5 8.5 8 2 7 5.5 46
7 2 4 4 1.5 5.5 9 2.5 5.5 34
8 8 5.5 7 5 7 6.5 8 5.5 52.5
9 9 5.5 8 5 9 4.5 6 8.5 55.5
Totals 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 360
Table 4. The results of multicriteria evaluation of "Partial
competitive strategies", enterprise A
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
SAW
No Partial competitive strategies [S.sub.j] R
1 Strategies targeting market segments 0.130 3
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.258 1
3 Product development strategies 0.070 6
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.113 4
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting distribution 0.183 2
channels
6 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.107 5
human and managerial resources
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.033 8
technological resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.048 7
information systems
9 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.032 9
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
10 Response strategies 0.026 10
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
TOPSIS
No Partial competitive strategies [C.sub.j] R
1 Strategies targeting market segments 0.437 3
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.802 1
3 Product development strategies 0.260 6
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.395 4
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting distribution 0.577 2
channels
6 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.359 5
human and managerial resources
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.165 8
technological resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.187 7
information systems
9 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.153 9
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
10 Response strategies 0.116 10
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
VIKOR
No Partial competitive strategies [Q.sub.j] R
1 Strategies targeting market segments 0.542 3
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.000 1
3 Product development strategies 0.785 6
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.734 5
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting distribution 0.244 2
channels
6 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.593 4
human and managerial resources
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.989 9
technological resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.845 7
information systems
9 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.986 8
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
10 Response strategies 1.000 10
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
Averages
Sum of Ultimate
No Partial competitive strategies ranks ranks
1 Strategies targeting market segments 9 3
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 3 1
3 Product development strategies 18 6
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 13 4
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting distribution 6 2
channels
6 Strategies of developing and maintaining 14 5
human and managerial resources
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 25 8
technological resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 21 7
information systems
9 Strategies aimed at gaining and 26 9
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
10 Response strategies 30 10
Table 5. Correlation of the results of
multicriteria evaluation, enterprise A
TOPSIS VIKOR
SAW 0.999 -0.987
Table 6. The results of multicriteria evaluation of partial
competitive strategies, enterprise B
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
SAW
No Partial competitive strategies [S.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 0.063 8
2 Strategies targeting market segments 0.156 1
3 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.093 5
4 Product development strategies 0.045 10
5 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.041 11
contingent of permanent customers
6 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.071 6
7 Strategies targeting distribution 0.067 7
channels
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.095 4
human and managerial resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.120 3
technological resources
10 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.062 9
information systems
11 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.023 13
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
12 Defensive strategies 0.033 12
13 Response strategies 0.131 2
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
TOPSIS
No Partial competitive strategies [C.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 0.279 6
2 Strategies targeting market segments 0.516 1
3 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.362 4
4 Product development strategies 0.179 10
5 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.138 11
contingent of permanent customers
6 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.344 5
7 Strategies targeting distribution 0.239 9
channels
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.244 8
human and managerial resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.440 2
technological resources
10 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.266 7
information systems
11 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.093 13
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
12 Defensive strategies 0.126 12
13 Response strategies 0.439 3
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
VIKOR
No Partial competitive strategies [Q.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 0.341 5
2 Strategies targeting market segments 0.000 1
3 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.231 3
4 Product development strategies 0.611 7
5 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.821 8
contingent of permanent customers
6 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.840 9
7 Strategies targeting distribution 0.392 6
channels
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.900 12
human and managerial resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.135 2
technological resources
10 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.872 11
information systems
11 Strategies aimed at gaining and 0.984 13
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
12 Defensive strategies 0.851 10
13 Response strategies 0.285 4
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
Averages
(SAW and TOPSIS)
Sum of Ultimate
No Partial competitive strategies ranks ranks
1 Market expansion strategies 14 7
2 Strategies targeting market segments 2 1
3 Marketing and promotion strategies 9 4
4 Product development strategies 20 10
5 Strategies aimed at creating the 22 11
contingent of permanent customers
6 Strategies targeting suppliers 11 5
7 Strategies targeting distribution 16 8-9
channels
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 12 6
human and managerial resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 5 2-3
technological resources
10 Strategies of developing and maintaining 16 8-9
information systems
11 Strategies aimed at gaining and 26 13
maintaining a good name and reputation
of the enterprise
12 Defensive strategies 24 12
13 Response strategies 5 2-3
Table 7. Correlation of the results of
multicriteria evaluation, enterprise B
TOPSIS VIKOR
SAW 0.946 -0.763
Table 8. The results of multicriteria evaluation of partial
competitive strategies, enterprise C
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
SAW
No Partial competitive strategies [S.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 0.018 13
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.073 8
3 Product development strategies 0.115 2
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.038 12
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.074 7
6 Strategies targeting distribution 0.146 1
channels
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.075 6
human and managerial resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.112 3
technological resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.048 11
information systems
10 Strategies aimed at gaining and
maintaining a good name and reputation 0.086 5
of the enterprise
11 Defensive strategies 0.057 9
12 Response strategies 0.052 10
13 Collaboration and cooperation strategies 0.106 4
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
TOPSIS
No Partial competitive strategies [C.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 0.051 13
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.372 8
3 Product development strategies 0.593 2
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.184 12
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.396 7
6 Strategies targeting distribution 0.637 1
channels
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.410 6
human and managerial resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.567 4
technological resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.236 11
information systems
10 Strategies aimed at gaining and
maintaining a good name and reputation 0.459 5
of the enterprise
11 Defensive strategies 0.291 9
12 Response strategies 0.241 10
13 Collaboration and cooperation strategies 0.567 3
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
VIKOR
No Partial competitive strategies [Q.sub.j] R
1 Market expansion strategies 1.000 13
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 0.540 7
3 Product development strategies 0.047 1
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 0.847 12
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting suppliers 0.596 8
6 Strategies targeting distribution 0.375 4
channels
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.446 6
human and managerial resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.266 3
technological resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 0.680 11
information systems
10 Strategies aimed at gaining and
maintaining a good name and reputation 0.392 5
of the enterprise
11 Defensive strategies 0.625 9
12 Response strategies 0.659 10
13 Collaboration and cooperation strategies 0.083 2
The results of
evaluation
(method, estimate
values, ranks)
Averages
Sum of Ultimate
No Partial competitive strategies ranks ranks
1 Market expansion strategies 39 13
2 Marketing and promotion strategies 23 8
3 Product development strategies 5 1
4 Strategies aimed at creating the 36 12
contingent of permanent customers
5 Strategies targeting suppliers 22 7
6 Strategies targeting distribution 6 2
channels
7 Strategies of developing and maintaining 18 6
human and managerial resources
8 Strategies of developing and maintaining 10 4
technological resources
9 Strategies of developing and maintaining 33 11
information systems
10 Strategies aimed at gaining and
maintaining a good name and reputation 15 5
of the enterprise
11 Defensive strategies 27 9
12 Response strategies 30 10
13 Collaboration and cooperation strategies 9 3
Table 9. Correlation of the results of
multicriteria evaluation, enterprise C
TOPSIS VIKOR
SAW 0.980 -0.863
Fig. 1. The structure of the integrated competitive strategy of
enterprise A
Human and managerial resources strategies 12.4%
Marketing and promotion strategies 30.0%
Strategies targeting market segments 15.1%
Product development strategies 8.2%
Permanent customers contingent strategies 13.1%
Strategies targeting distribution 21.2%
Note: Table made from pie chart.
Fig. 2. The structure of the integrated competitive strategy of
enterprise B
Market expansion strategies 7.3%
Strategies targeting market segments 18.2%
Marketing and promotion strategies 10.8%
Strategies targeting suppliers 8.3%
Strategies targeting distribution 7.8%
Technological resources strategies 14.0%
Human and managerial resources strategies 11.1%
Information systems strategies 7.2%
Response strategies 15.32%
Note: Table made from pie chart.
Fig. 3. The structure of the integrated competitive strategy of
enterprise C
Marketing and promotion strategies 9.3%
Product development strategies 14.6%
Strategies targeting suppliers 9.4%
Strategies targeting distribution 18.5%
Technological resources strategies 14.2%
Human and managerial resources strategies 9.5%
Good name and reputation strategies 11.0%
Collaboration and cooperation strategies 13.5%
Note: Table made from pie chart.