Manufacturing technologies and dynamics of hot-mix asphalt mixture production/Karstojo maisymo asfalto misinio gamybos technologijos ir kiekio dinamika.
Sivilevicius, Henrikas ; Sukevicius, Sarunas
1. Introduction
The sector of Lithuanian transport accounts for more than 10% of
the gross domestic product (GDP), and most of which is falling on road
transport. This may be explained by the density of road network as well
as the state and technical parameters of roads. Asphalt pavement of the
principal roads in the country makes 60.1%. Hot-mix asphalt mixture is
used for this purpose.
In most countries, the layers of motor road pavement are made of
bituminous mixes, with HMA mixture being the most popular material due
to its numerous advantages (Hunter 1997; Asphalt ... 2007; Roberts et
al. 1991). HMA mixture: a mixture of aggregate and asphalt cement
(bitumen) sometimes including modifiers, that is produced by mixing hot,
dried aggregate with heated asphalt in plant designed for the process
(McDaniel and Anderson 2001).
A number of researchers, e.g. Arambula et al. (2007),
Stroup-Gardiner and Brown (2000), Chen and Liao (2002), Seo et al.
(2007), Rybiew ([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 1969), Kotliarskij
([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 2004), Szydlo and Mackiewicz (2005),
Topal and Sengoz (2005), Shu and Huang (2008), Li and Metcalf (2005),
studied the structure of HMA mixture and asphalt concrete, trying to
find the ways for improving their properties. The researchers from the
Asphalt Institute (1993), as well as Roberts et al. (2002), Sanchez-Leal
(2007), Sivilevicius and Vislavicius (2008), Ogunro et al. (2004),
Aravind and Das (2007), Asi (2007), used deterministic and stochastic
methods to improve the design of hot asphalt mixture composition.
The investigations of Kennedy and Huber (1985), Petkevicius and
Sivilevicius (2008), Wu and Romero (2005), Sivilevicius (2005) are aimed
at developing methods of quality control for producing the designed HMA
mixture of optimal composition. Recently, feasibility study of using
reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in HMA mixture production has been made
by Huang et al. (2005), Widyatmoko (2008), Karlsson and Isacsson (2006).
The survey of the investigations shows that HMA mixture is the
material with complex structural, mechanical and rheological
characteristics, which has not been thoroughly investigated yet. The
structure of HMA mixture and its properties are being continuously
improved to achieve that the layers of road pavement made of it could
withstand the increasing axle loading of heavy vehicles and traffic
(Sivilevicius and Sukevicius 2007; Laurinavicius and Oginskas 2006;
Radziszewski 2007; Ziari and Khabiri 2007) as well as changing climatic
conditions.
In addition to developing methods of improving the quality of the
materials used in the production and composition design of HMA mixture,
the researchers and engineers are trying to improve the production
technology and equipment. All these works allow us to produce higher
quality HMA mixtures and, therefore, to obtain stronger and more durable
asphalt pavement with better surface structure.
The dynamics of HMA mixture output shows the rate of development
and maintenance of automobile roads, depending on the total area,
population and the number of vehicles of the country as well as density
of road network and the economic development of the state. According to
the data provided by Asphalt Institute (2007), 1.5 million tonnes of
petroleum asphalt were produced in the US in 1920, while in 1979 its
amount reached a record figure of 38 million tonnes, most of which were
used to build road pavement. In 1988, the amount of HMA mixture produced
in this country reached 500 million tonnes, which cost 10.5 billion US
dollars (Roberts et al. 1991). In the former USSR, about 60 million
tonnes of asphalt concrete mixture were produced in 1979 ([TEXT NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 1979).
In highly developed countries, the number of vehicles is
continuously growing. Therefore, new roads are being built and the old
ones are being reconstructed. The demand for bituminous mixes and the
requirements to their quality are also increasing, giving an incentive
to engineers to create new technologies of HMA mixture production and
appropriate asphalt mixing plants (AMP).
Surveying the historical development of road pavement (Jones 1986),
the author indicates that, since the end of the 19th century, road
engineers in Europe have begun to use for road pavement a dustless
material, known now as asphalt. After the World War II, both in the
United Kingdom and USA, road pavement was mainly made of hot-rolled
asphalt. In the 40-ies and the 50-ies, various types of AMP were used
for making HMA mixtures. However, they were not powerful enough. Later,
these plants were automated and electronic systems of proportioning and
control of the materials were introduced. Their capacity have grown from
20-30 tonnes of mixture per hour to 80-120 t/h, while controlled by a
single operator.
German Wibau SL developed dustless AMP, while drum mixers were only
in gestation period in the USA in 1975. The drum mixer was developing by
leaps and bounds in the USA (Jones 1986). In 1973, 27 % of all new AMP
were of drum-mixer type and by 1985 this had grown to 98%. In 1973, 27%
of all new AMP were of drum-mixer type and by 1985 this had grown to
98%. It is now estimated that there is a population of 4000 AMP in the
USA: of these 1500 are drum-mixers.
Drum-mixer type AMP are being continuously improved to increase
their efficiency. Zhang (1986) describes and assesses the widely used
parallel-flow, single-diameter drum mixers and Venturi-type mixers, as
well as comparing the design features of early single-diameter drum,
double-drum and triple-drum models, including their heat transfer and
capacity of heating the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) to show the
advantages of cylinder-type systems to HMA mixture manufacturers and
contractors. He demonstrates that the smaller permissible flow rate
makes the single-diameter drum mixer's productivity by 35% lower
than that of the Venturi-type mixer. Including thermal energy carried by
superheated virgin aggregate, the triple-drum mixer possesses the
industry's greatest ability for running very high percentages of
RAP with moisture contents more than 5%.
The first G-1 (D-138) model of batch-type AMP with gravity drum
mixer was introduced in Lithuania in 1962. According to the data
provided by Petkevicius ([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 1986), 119
AMPs were used at 45 Lithuanian APS in 1982. They produced 1.95 m tonnes
of HMA mixture. 135 AMP operating at 48 APC in Lithuania produced as
much as 2.284 m tons of HMA mixture in 1984. At that time, Russian AMP
of low capacity (about 20-25 t/h) were replaced by German (GDR) AMP made
by Teltomat-5 technological equipment with the output of 80-100 t/h. In
1982, the number of these AMP was 5, while in 1984 it reached 14 items.
99 AMP with 93 batch-type mixers were used at APC at the end of 1999
(Sivilevicius 2000). According to rough calculations of the authors,
they had already produced 1.8-2.4 m tonnes of HMA mixture.
At that time (1999), HMA mixture in Lithuania was made by 64
inefficient Russian mixers (producing up to 25 t/h of HMA), 5 medium
efficiency AMP (40-100 t/h) as well as by 24 Teltomat-5 AMP of higher
output (up to 100 t/h) and by only 6 computer-aided AMP models AMO BS
200/RC 120, AE 150T, Teltomat-160, 160 Global H, Euro A 240, and MAP 155
E 190 L, with the production capacity ranging from 150 to 200 t/h, which
were produced by the companies Machinery, Benninghoven, Maschinen GmbH,
Ammann and Marini AMP. Most of these models are used now. The
manufacturers of HMA mixtures used to purchase new computer-aided
batch-type AMP to replace obsolete equipment.
There are currently 3 types of plant in use in the UK:
batch-heater, batch asphalt plant, drum-mixer (Jones 1986). In the USA
there are also 3 types of AMP, working according to the new USA standard
ASTM D995-95b (2004). These are batch plant, continuous mix plant and
drum-mix plant.
The statistical data provided by EAPA show that most of the
countries estimate the output of HMA mixture. In the survey for 2006,
Asphalt in Figures found on the EAPA website, the data of Lithuania are
missing. Therefore, the authors of the present paper have attempted for
the first time to estimate (based on the data elicited from
manufacturers) the amounts of HMA mixture produced by all Lithuanian AMP
during the last year, which could be added to the EAPA.
The present paper aims to analyse technological patterns of HMA
mixture production, as well as the development of AMP in Lithuania and
to provide the data on the dynamics of HMA mixture output during the
last 10 years.
2. Technologies of HMA mixture production
HMA mixture production technology defined as the specified sequence
of all production processes depends on AMP design. Famous world
companies, concerns and corporations (Ammann, Benninghoven, Wibau, CMJ,
Astec, Ermont, Marini, Lintec, Barber-Greene, Niigata, etc.) produce
modern complicated and high-output computer-aided technological
equipment. Most of the new AMP are versatile mixing plants, allowing the
production of HMA mixtures of various types and makes. They allow us to
weigh (measure) the granules of RAP and aggregates and to change the
composition of the produced HMA mixture quickly. They also allow
accurate weighing of materials and to improve the quality of their
mixing as well as storing the produced HMA mixture, maintaining the
required temperature and reducing energy consumption and emission of
pollutants.
According to the European (EN 536 1999) and US (ASTM D 995-95b)
standards, HMA mixture is produced by AMP of three types, i.e. batch
plants, as well as drum-mix and continuous plants. They have some
advantages and disadvantages (Hunter 1997), allowing manufacturers to
choose technological equipment depending on particular conditions. HMA
mixture's manufacturer usually wants to get a versatile AMP,
allowing him/her to provide customers with bituminous mixtures of every
type, as well as using RAP in HMA mixture's production.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
AMP designs vary depending on manufacturer because they are adapted
to a particular HMA production technology. Researchers and engineers are
improving AMP design and control system, increasing their universality
and reliability. In spite of great variety of AMP models, their design
matches one of HMA mixture production technologies given in Figs 1-4. A
dotted line denotes the available but not always performed technological
operation.
In European countries (including Lithuania), batch-type AMP are
most widely used for making HMA mixture. They are based on the
traditional technology (Fig. 1). Batch plant is a manufacturing facility
for producing bituminous paving mixtures that proportions the aggregate
and bituminous constituents into the mix by weighed batches, adds
bituminous material either by weight or volume, and mixes the blend.
Initially, cold mineral materials are continually proportioned, and,
finally, hot fractions obtained by additional screening of dried and
heated mixture are batch-weighed. Additional screening of hot aggregate
mixture is aimed at obtaining 4-6 hot fractions which are expected to be
less polluted by outside granules and more homogeneous than the initial
cold mineral materials. The granules of RAP in a batch plant can be fed
to 4 facilities: heated elevator (1), screened hot mix hopper (2),
hopper-type batch-weigher of hot fractions (3) and mixer (4). In this
type of AMP, job mixing formula of HMA mixture may be changed easily and
more often during the working day; actually, without any loss in
quality, which is usually required when HMA mixture is made for several
installations located in different places or cities.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Drum mix plant--a manufacturing facility for producing bituminous
paving mixtures that continuously proportions aggregates, heats and
dries them in a rotating drum, and simultaneously mixes them with a
controlled amount of bituminous material. The same plant may produce
cold-mixed bituminous paving mixtures without heating and drying the
aggregates.
A drum-mix plant is by 20% more efficient (400 t/h or more) than a
batch plant. It is also lower, though occupying a larger area. The
production pattern of HMA mixture used in it (see Fig. 2) shows that the
operation is continuous, while the cylinder drum is used as a drier,
heater, receptacle of aggregates, bitumen, mineral powders and RAP, as
well as a forced (e.g. double-drum type) or gravity (e.g. Venturi,
triple-drum type) mixer. To use a drum-mix plant for producing a
homogeneous HMA mixture, non-segregated mineral materials of stable
gradation should be employed, which is not always possible in
production. Without the additional screening of the mixture of mineral
materials, high-quality HMA mixture can hardly be made, even if
inhomogeneous hot aggregates are very accurately proportioned. It may be
assumed that, for this reason, drum-mix plants are not widely used in
Lithuania and other European countries. Very often, when HMA mixing is
interrupted during the working day, the quality of the mixture is
slightly decreased.
A continuous plant is used for making HMA mixture according to the
technological pattern shown in Fig. 3. Continuous mix plant is a
manufacturing facility for producing bituminous paving mixtures that
continuously proportions the aggregate and bituminous constituents into
the mix by a continuous volumetric proportioning system without definite
batch intervals. It is of simpler design than a batch plant because the
proportioning of cold and hot aggregate screened fractions are bitumen
is usually performed by volume systems (e.g. AMP D645-3). According to
LST EN 536 (2000), the mixture of hot aggregates should not be always
screened into fractions. A system of continuous proportioning of
materials by volume can hardly ensure the accuracy and stability of this
significant process. Batches of materials are mixed by twin-shaft
continuous forced mix plant.
In Lithuania, continuous plants are not used. They are not popular
in other countries either because of constantly increasing requirements
to the quality of HMA mixture production.
Since 1987, AMP of the type AMO BS 200/RC 120 has been used in
Lithuania to make HMA mixture according to the mixed batch-continuous
plant dustless technology (Fig. 4). This model was particularly useful
in the first years after the regaining of independence by Lithuania,
when the requirements to the environment protection had been increased.
Weighed batches of cold (and wet) mineral materials, imported filler and
hot bitumen are fed to the rotating twin-shaft mixer of forced mix type,
where HMA mixture batch is made and then poured into the intermediate
hopper. Then, by the flow of specified intensity, it is directed to the
parallel flow drying hopper from the intermediate hopper. When the water
is evaporating, the mixture is getting warmer, the bitumen between the
grains is fluidifying and turning into the films preventing from
separating and raising of dust and grains stuck to the mineral
constituents of the material. When cold wet mineral materials are mixed
with hot bitumen, the water which had not evaporated from grain surface
prevents from the binder's sticking to particle surface by strong
adhesive forces, covering the particles completely or partially with
films. HMA mixture made by AMP of the mixed (batch-continuous) type can
be used only for the lower layers of the pavement and the base. The
upper pavement layer of urban streets made of HMA mixture prepared at
this AMP proved to be not sufficiently strong and frost-resistant.
The quality of the considered AMP performance may be determined by
using multicriteria complex quality indicator K (Sivilevicius et al.
2008). The significance coefficients of its 9 criteria were determined
by expert methods, while the values of variable parameters were taken
from the laboratory tests, production reports and standards and
specifications.
3. The dynamics of HMA mixture production in the ES member-states
and other countries
In planning and managing the development of automobile transport it
is necessary not only to estimate annually the total number of vehicles
and the number of trucks, in particular, as well as the number of road
accidents and traffic intensity on particular road sections, but also to
determine the length of the roads used, changes in the type of pavement,
costs of road maintenance, repair and other indicators. The statistical
analysis of these data and their comparison to similar data of other
countries or periods of time allow us to determine the major trends of
development and to forecast to what extent road capacity corresponds to
the continuously growing number of vehicles.
In addition to the above indicators, most of the countries estimate
the amounts of materials used to build and maintain roads, showing the
dynamics of road transport development and improvement. The most
expensive materials include bituminous mixtures, with hot HMA mixture
making the largest part. The amounts of the mixture produced are
calculated every year and presented by the European Asphalt Pavement
Association (EAPA) (Table 1).
The analysis of HMA mixture production in the last 10 years in
various countries shows the annual increase of this mixture only in the
EU member-states. In some countries, HMA mixture output is not stable,
with the production ranging considerably (USA, Germany, Poland,
Portugal). The annual increase of HMA mixture production in the EU
member-states may be accounted for by the financial support provided to
the development of various production areas, including programmes and
projects of road network development. Great differences (range) between
the average annual amounts of HMA mixture produced in 10-year period
(1998-2007) as well as maximum and minimum amounts, and in the data on
its production in 2007 could be observed in various countries (Fig. 5).
According to the annual output of HMA mixture, all the countries
may be divided into 2 groups: large producers, making more than 5 m
tonnes of the mixture per year (Fig. 6a) and small producers making less
than 5 m tonnes per year (Fig. 6b). The data on HMA output (in million
tonnes) in some countries, which are not the EU member-states, are given
for comparison in Table 2.
The linear correlation between the output of HMA mixture in 2007 in
the EU member-states and their area (Fig. 6) was obtained from the data
provided by EAPA. It is expressed by the regression equation as follows:
Q = 0.073*[10.sup.-3] * A - 0.157, [R.sup.2] = 0.586, (1)
where Q is HMA mixture output, tonnes; A is the state area,
[km.sup.2]; [R.sup.2] is determination coefficient.
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
The analysis made does not include the data on HMA mixture output
in small EU countries (e.g. Cyprus, Luxemburg, Malta) and some larger
countries (Bulgaria, Lithuania), the data on which are missing in EAPA
survey in 2007.
We would like to prove the assumption that the larger the country,
the greater the demand for HMA mixture for road building and
reconstruction, which, in turn, requires a larger amount of HMA mixture.
The regression line was drawn, and the determination coefficient
[R.sup.2] = 0.586 proved the validity of the assumption made. The
regression line shows the amounts of HMA mixture to be produced by
particular countries to match the average output figures. Only the data
on Slovenia's and Denmark's output correspond to the above
straight line, while the output data of Czech Republic, Greece and
France are approaching them. Other EU member states produce larger
(points above the straight line) or smaller (points below the straight
line) amounts of HMA mixture. The leaders in HMA mixture production are
Germany, Italy, UK and Spain, i.e. the largest EU member states.
Among the largest EU member states, the smallest output of HMA
mixture was found in Romania, Finland and Sweden. The data on asphalt
production in Romania are not surprising because it is the least
economically developed European country. On the contrary, Scandinavian
states belong to the most highly developed countries both in Europe and
the world. Therefore, low HMA mixture output in these states may be
accounted for by their extended territories.
The leader in HMA mixture output in the EU member states is
Germany. Taking into account high quality of its motor roads and
highways, it is evident that, if other countries like to achieve the
same level, they should produce several times more HMA mixture than the
average EU amount, corresponding to the regression line. Only highly
developed countries (except Finland and Sweden) produce more HMA mixture
than the EU average output, thereby ensuring high quality pavement of
their roads. The analysis made has confirmed that high-quality motor
roads are the indicator of a highly economically developed state.
4. The dynamics of HMA mixture production at Lithuanian plants
The data on HMA mixture production in Lithuania (and in 4 other EU
member-states) are not provided in the EAPA survey. In order to correct
this careless error, the authors of the present paper collected the
information about the output of HMA mixture at all Lithuanian AMP in the
last 10 years (Table 3). It was a hard work to collect these data
because not all manufacturers were eager to provide the information.
Now, 16 private (joint-stock) companies produce HMA mixture in
Lithuania. In 2007, they produced 98.6% of this mixture used for road
pavement layers out of the total amount of 1731 m tonnes. State-owned
enterprises produce only 1.4% of the total amount of this mixture.
The dynamics of HMA mixture output at all Lithuanian enterprises,
given in Fig. 7, shows that during the last 10 years it has increased
twice (from 0.8 m tonnes in 1998-2001 to 1.7 m tonnes in 2006-2008).
Taking into account that the whole amount of the produced HMA mixture
was used for road and airfield pavement, the growth of its output may be
associated with improving the existing and the construction of new
roads.
Lithuania pursues a policy of enhancing the infrastructure of road
network, allowing the roads to adapt to the continuously growing number
of vehicles and highly increased percentage of heavy trucks in the flow
of transport. The increased output of HMA mixture helped to build new
roads, by-pass highways and urban motorways. Moreover, dirt roads were
paved with asphalt, while the pavement of principal roads was
strengthened, thereby increasing their toughness index.
The average value of the pavement toughness index of Lithuanian
principal roads had been decreasing since 1992 to 2002-2003. It had
decreased from 1.00 to 0.83 for country roads and from 1.00 to 0.92 on
the main roads. The lowest index value was observed in 20022003, though
traffic intensity on Lithuanian roads had increased by 253% in the
period of 1992-2007 (Sivilevicius and Sukevicius 2007). Then, the
toughness index value began to grow, reaching 0.88 for country roads and
0.96 for the main roads in 2007. However, the value of 1992 had not been
reached yet. The growth of pavement toughness index was partly accounted
for by the increasing output of HMA mixture.
One of the Lithuanian joint-stock companies annually produces the
average amount of HMA mixture which can be calculated by the formula:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASII.] (2)
where [Q.sub.ij] is the amount of HMA mixture produced by ith
enterprise in the considered year, thousand tonnes; [n.sub.j] is the
number of enterprises considered ([n.sub.j] [less than or equal to] 16),
j is the year of HMA mixture production.
To check if the amount of HMA mixture produced by particular
enterprises is evenly distributed, standard deviation is calculated as
follows:
[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASII.] (3)
The calculated values of [[bar.Q].sub.j] and sq (Fig. 8.) show that
one Lithuanian joint-stock company annually produced on the average
[[bar.Q].sub.j] = 46-73 thous. tonnes (1998-2002) and [[bar.Q].sub.j] =
73-107 thous. tonnes (2003-2007) of HMA mixture. The output of this
mixture at particular enterprises varies considerably. The spread is
shown by [s.sub.Qj] =38--46 thous. tonnes (1998-2002) and [s.sub.Qj] =
50-70 thous. tonnes (2003-2007). During the second 5-year period
(2003-2007), not only the average output of HMA mixture at a particular
enterprise, [[bar.Q].sub.j], but their ranging ([s.sub.Q]) has also
increased. This indicates the domination of large manufacturers of HMA
mixture on the market. Longer experience of these companies, better
equipment, higher qualification of their workers and, often, lower cost
of HMA mixture ensure a better quality of asphalt pavement of the roads
built. Usually, the workers of the AMP producing HMA mixture place and
compact it on the road to make the pavement. The amounts of HMA mixture
sold to other customers are very small.
[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]
5. The dynamics of quality improvement of asphalt mixing plants in
Lithuania
Records of AMP, producing HMA mixture at Lithuanian APC, and the
analysis of their performance have not been regularly performed.
Actually, they were made only by the initiative of some researchers.
When the requirements to HMA mixture quality and environment protection
were getting more rigorous and efforts were being made to increase AMP
efficiency and the control of technological operations, while making the
mixing process continuous, old AMP models were being replaced by the new
ones according to the development plans and depending on financing.
Before Lithuania had regained independence in 1990, only Russian
AMP models (D-597A, D-508-2A, DS-117-2K, DS-117-2E, DS-158, D-617-2 and
D-645-2) and GDR (Teltomat-5) (Table 4) were used. In 1987, AMP of the
type AMO BS 300/RC 120 made in Finland, producing HMA mixture according
to dustless technology (Fig. 4), was purchased. Later they were replaced
by new AMP made in Finland, Germany and Italy. In 1998, a new generation
computer-aided AMP EURO A-240 made by Ammann company was installed in
Vilnius. Since then, various joint-stock companies have been regularly
replacing old AMP with new powerful facilities (with the output of
160-320 t/h) for making HMA mixture. Some of them are provided with RAP
batch weighing facilities (Table 5). They are mainly installed in large
cities of Lithuania, e.g., Vilnius, Kaunas, Klaipeda, Siauliai,
Panevezys, Alytus, and are batch-type AMP.
Lithuania has principal roads of the total length of 21 328 km and
a dense network (6.3 km for 1000 inhabitants; 326.6 km for 1000 km2),
which requires the continuous improvement and strengthening of pavement,
as well as asphalting the dirty roads, building of by-pass highways and
reconstructing of the existing roads. The volume of annually performed
asphalting work depends on the investments in road network development.
The capacity of the available AMP allows us to produce much more HMA
mixture than required by the projects developed for annual work. AMP of
the new types are capable of producing HMA mixtures of all 19 grades
specified by the regulation R 35-01 and TRA ASFALTAS 08.
AMP operating in the largest Lithuanian cities fully satisfy the
need for HMA mixture required for paving motor roads to be built in the
areas of their service. In Lithuanian regions, the old type AMP are also
being replaced with new mixing facilities, allowing the quality of HMA
mixture to be improved considerably.
6. Conclusions
1. For managing the national transport system, as well as assessing
and improving its performance and predicting future trends of
development, statistical data are collected, analysed and generalized.
Most of the countries provided the data on HMA mixture output in recent
years to the European Asphalt Pavement Association (EAPA). However,
these data had not been collected in Lithuania, therefore, they are
missing in the EAPA survey (along with the data on 3 other European
countries). The authors of the present paper were the pioneers in
collecting the information about the amounts of HMA mixture produced by
particular Lithuanian enterprises and the total amount of this mixture
produced in the last 10 years (1997-2007). The data collected could be
added to the information provided on the EAPA website.
2. Over the last 10 years, the number of AMP operating in Lithuania
has been reduced to one-third of the former value. However, their
capacity and technological features were greatly improved, while
processes associated with HMA mixture production became more stable and
accurate, and their harmful effect on the environment has been
decreased. Some decades ago, 4 or 5 AMP of low capacity (25 t/h) were
used at an asphalt production companies (APC). Now, most of these APC
use only one, or, sometimes, 2 powerful batch-type facilities (producing
160-320 t/h of HMA mixture). They are usually located near big cities,
producing HMA mixture, when it is needed for asphalt paving of new
roads, urban highways and airfields in the areas served by them.
DOI: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.169-179
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Zigmantas Perveneckas, the head of the
road department of the Board of Directors of Lithuanian Automobile Roads
at the Ministry of Means of Communication, for his help in getting from
manufacturers the data on the dynamics of HMA mixture production.
Received 15 Jan 2009; accepted 11 May 2009
References
Asphalt in figures 2007. European Asphalt Pavement Association
(EAPA). Available from Internet: <http://www.eapa.org/>.
Asi, J. M. 2007. Performance evaluation of Superpave and Marshall
asphalt design to suit Jordan climatic and traffic conditions,
Construction and Building Materials 21(8): 1732-1740.
Arambula, E.; Masad, E.; Martin, A. E. 2007. Influence of air void
distribution on the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes, Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering 19(8): 655-664.
Aravind, A.; Das, A. 2007. Pavement design with central plant
hot-mix recycled asphalt mixes, Construction and Building Materials
21(5): 928-936.
Automobiliii keh'n asfalto misinhj techninin reikalavimn
aprasas TRA ASFALTAS 08 [The specification of technical requirements for
autobobiles roads asphalt mixtures TRA ASFALTAS 08]. Vilnius: LAKD,
2009. 61 p.
Chen, J. S.; Liao, M. C. 2002, Evaluation of internal resistance in
hot-mix asphalt (HMA mixture) concrete, Construction and Building
Materials 16(4): 313-319.
EN 536. 1999. Road construction machines--asphalt mixing
plants--safety requirements. Brussels: European Committee for
Standardization. 32 p.
Huang, B.; Li, G.; Vukosavljevic, D.; Shu, X.; Egan, B. K. 2005.
Laboratory investigation of mixing hot-mix asphalt with reclaimed
asphalt pavement, Transportation Research Record. Journal of the
Transportation Research Board 1929. Bituminous Paving Mixtures, 37-45.
Hunter, R. N. 1997. Bituminous mixtures in road construction.
London: Thomas Telford. 441 p.
Jones, L. 1986. Recent developments in coating plant technology,
Quarry Management 23(10): 25-30.
Karlsson, R.; Isacsson, U. 2006. Material-related aspects of
asphalt recycling--state-of-the art, Journal of Materials in Civil
Engineering 18(1): 81-92.
Kennedy, T. W.; Huber, G. A. 1985. Effect of mixing temperature and
stocklipe moisture in asphalt mixtures, Transportation Research Record
1034 : 35-46.
Laurinavicius, A.; Oginskas, R. 2006. Experimental research on the
development of rutting in asphalt concrete pavements reinforced with
geosynthetic materials, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
12(4): 311-317.
Li, Y.; Metcalf, J. B. 2005. Two-step approach to prediction of
asphalt concrete modulus for 2-phase micromechanical models, Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering 17(4): 407-415.
McDaniel, R.; Anderson, R. M. 2001. Recommended use of reclaimed
asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method: technician's
manual. NCHRP Report 452, TRB-National Research Council. Washington,
D.C. 49 p.
Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types.
Manual series No. 2 (MS-2). Lexington: Asphalt Institute. 1993. 141 p.
Ogunro, V. O.; Inyang, H.J.; Hooper, F.; Young, D.; Oturkar, A.
2004. Gradation control of bottom ash aggregate in superpave bituminous
mixes, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 16(6): 604-613.
Petkevicius, K.; Sivilevicius, H. 2008. Necessary measures for
ensuring the quality of hot mix asphalt in Lithuania, The Baltic Journal
of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(1): 29-37.
Radziszewski, P. 2007. Modified asphalt mixtures resistance to
permanent deformations, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
13(4): 307-315.
Roberts, F. L.; Kandahal, P. S.; Brown, E. R.; Lee, D. Y.; Kenedy,
T. W. 1991. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction.
Maryland: NAPA Education Foundation. 490 p.
Roberts, F. L.; Mahammad, L. N.; Wang, L. B. 2002. History of
hot-mix-asphalt mixture design in the United States, Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering 14(4): 279-293.
Sanchez-Leal, F. J. 2007. Gradation chart for asphalt mixes:
development, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19(2): 185-197.
Seo, Y.; El-Haggan, O.; King, M.; Lee, S. J.; Kim, Y. R. 2007. Air
void models for the dynamic modulus, fatique cracking, and rutting of
asphalt concrete, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19(10):
874-883.
Shu, X.; Huang, B. 2008. Dynamic modulus prediction of HMA
mixtures, based on the viscoelastic micromechanical model, Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering 20(8): 530538.
Sivilevicius, H. 2000. Lietuvoje naudojamu asfaltbetonio maisytuvii
analize ir kokybes jvertinimas [The analysis and quality estimation of
asphalt concrete mixers used in Lithuania], Miestu pletra ir keliai:
Mokslo zurnalo "Statyba" priedas: 60-71.
Sivilevicius, H. 2005. The analysis of the new asphalt concrete
mixing plant batchers and their smart control systems, in The 6th
International Conference on Environmental Engineering. Selected papers.
Vol. 2. Ed. Cygas, D.; Froehner, K. D. Urban Transport Systems Roads and
Railways Technologies of Geodesy and Cadastre, Vilnius, May 26-27.
Vilnius: Technika, 775-782.
Sivilevicius, H.; Sukevicius, S. 2007. Dynamicss of vehicle loads
on the asphalt pavement of European roads which cross Lithuania, The
Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering II(4): 147-154.
Sivilevicius, H.; Vislavicius, K. 2008. Stochastic simulation of
the influence of variation of mineral material and dose weight on the
homogenity of hot-mix asphalt, Construction and Building Materials
22(9): 2007-2014.
Sivilevicius, H.; Zavadskas, E.; Turskis, Z. 2008. Quality
attributes and complex asessment methodology of asphalt mixing plant,
The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 3(3): 161-166.
Standard Specification for Mixing Plants for Hot-Mixed, Hot-Laid
Bituminous Paving Mixtures. Designation: D 995-95b (Reapproved 2002).
2004 Annual Books of ASTM
Standards. Section 4. Construction Volume 04.03. Road and Paving
Materials; Vehicle--Pavement Systems. Revision Issued Annually, 108-113.
Stroup-Gardiner, M.; Brown, E. R. 2000. Segregation in hot mix
asphalt pavements. National cooperative highway research program
(NCHRP). Report 441. Transportation Research Board, National Research
Council, Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. 95 p.
Szydlo, A.; Mackiewicz, P. 2005. Asphalt mixes deformation
sensivity to change in reological parameters, Journal of Materials in
Civil Engineering 17(1): 1-9.
The Asphalt Handbook 2007. Manual series No. 4 (MS-4). Lexington:
Asphalt Institute. 788 p.
Topal, A.; Sengoz, B. 2005. Determination of fine aggregate
angularity in relation with the resistance to rutting of hot-mix
asphalt, Construction and Building Materials 19(2): 155-163.
Widyatmoko, J. 2008. Mechanistic-empirical mixture design for hot
mix asphalt pavement recycling, Construction and Building Materials
22(2): 77-87.
Wu, J. X.; Romero, P. 2005. Performance testing of segregated
hot-mix asphalt samples to evaluate segregation models, Transportation
Research Board 1907: 118-127.
Zhang, J. 1986. Keys to success in drum mix plant market in
southern states, CMJ news. CMJ Corporation, Oklahoma City, USA, 18-23.
Ziari, H.; Khabiri, M. M. 2007. Interface condition influence on
prediction for flexible pavement live, Journal of Civil Engineering and
Management 13(1): 71-76.
[TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] B. 1979. [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE
IN ASCII.] [Koroliov, I. V. Production of bituminous concrete--to
industrial foundation], [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] [Automobile
roads] 4: 9-10.
[TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.], E. B. 2004. [TEXT NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] [Kotliarskij, E. V. Build in-technical
properties of road asphalt concrete]. [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.].
194 p.
[TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.], K. H. 1986. [TEXT NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] [Petkevicius, K. N. The inspection and control
of process production of asphalt concrete mixture]: [TEXT NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 334 c.
[TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.]. A. 1969. [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE
IN ASCII.] [Rybjiev, J. A. Road asphalt concretes]. [TEXT NOT
REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] 399 c.
Henrikas SIVILEVICIUS, Doctor Habil, Professor at Transport
Technological Equipment Department, Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University. Member of Lithuanian Scientific Society (LSS), chairman at
LSS department "Technika". Author of more than 150 scientific
articles. Field of research: modeling of hot mix asphalt (HMA)
homogeneity, HMA production quality control methods improvement, HMA
composition optimization and control statistical methods also asphalt
pavement recycling technologies development.
Sarunas SUKEVICIUS, PhD student from 2005 at Transport
Technological Equipment Department, Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University. Field of research: modeling of hot mix asphalt (HMA)
homogeneity and HMA composition optimization.
Henrikas Sivilevicius (1), Sarunas Sukevicius (2)
Dept of Transport Technological Equipment, Vilnius Gediminas
Technical University, Plytines g. 27, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
E-mail: (1)
[email protected], (2)
[email protected]
Table 1. The abbreviations of 27 EU member-states according
to ISO-3166-1 and the data on HMA mixture production provided
by EAPA
AT Austria Yes LV Latvia Yes
BE Belgium Yes LT Lithuania No
BG Bulgaria No LU Luxemburg No
CY Cyprus No MT Malta No
CZ Czech Republic Yes NL Netherlands Yes
DK Denmark Yes PL Poland Yes
EE Estonia Yes PT Portugal Yes
FI Finland Yes RO Romania Yes
FR France Yes SK Slovakia Yes
DE Germany Yes SI Slovenia Yes
GR Greece Yes ES Spain Yes
HU Hungary Yes SE Sweden Yes
IE Ireland Yes UK United Kingdom Yes
IT Italy Yes
Table 2. The dynamics of HMA mixture production in the EU and
other countries, m tonnes
Country 1998-2007 period 2007
Min Avg Max
USA 465 504.0 545 500
Japan 54.9 64.27 71.4 54.9
Turkey 9.5 14.06 22.2 22.2
Australia 6.5 7.07 7.7 7.7
Norway 3.9 4.67 5.9 5.9
Canada (Ontario) 11 13.24 14.5 13.2
European Union 238.8 284.5 341.6 304.1
Table 3. The dynamics of HMA mixture production at Lithuanian
enterprises in the last 10 years
Hot mix asphalt production per year by thousand tonnes
Code 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Joint Stock companies
AK 112.5 134.0 87.5 92.0 130.1 124.5 165.8
AT 24.8 34.2 36.9 19.6 25.9 55.6 52.9
EL -- 30.0 25.0 35.0 40.0 48.0 59.0
FG 21.0 85.6 75.0 71.2 75.3 115.9 136.0
KD 42.8 61.3 72.6 32.3 36.1 52.3 62.5
KK -- -- -- 40.9 39.2 48.1 62.1
KT 122.0 101.0 158.0 151.0 170.0 180.0 180.0
LL 77.9 39.7 32.7 57.3 67.4 105.9 112.2
MK -- -- -- 15.4 22.4 26.5 42.5
PK 149.4 155.5 134.2 67.7 98.0 138.1 163.9
PR -- -- -- -- -- -- --
SG 46.0 28.0 27.0 19.0 17.0 16.0 18.0
SP -- -- 84.1 40.3 92.4 93.3 160.1
TK -- -- 6.0 13.3 17.4 17.0 21.4
UK 70.8 59.3 28.3 16.8 18.7 30.5 55.0
ZK 65.5 53.6 58.1 14.5 51.6 36.8 53.7
State-owned companies
AR 3.4 4.7 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.7
KR 14.2 18.1 7.2 5.7 11.4 14.8 11.2
SR 8.0 8.8 5.5 9.1 16.0 16.3 11.3
Total 758.3 813.8 839.4 703.0 930.7 1121.6 1370.2
Hot mix asphalt production per year
by thousand tonnes
Code 2005 2006 2007
Joint Stock companies
AK 142.0 159.5 188.0
AT 56.2 43.4 63.2
EL 82.0 85.0 105.0
FG 145.3 189.6 164.5
KD 72.0 68.7 94.3
KK 58.7 46.4 62.8
KT 211.0 230.0 180.0
LL 150.6 165.5 196.7
MK 47.5 46.6 44.9
PK 187.4 190.3 194.6
PR -- 42.7 80.0
SG 26.0 30.0 36.0
SP 165.3 170.3 130.3
TK 34.2 23.2 19.3
UK 64.1 47.3 55.2
ZK 69.4 94.1 92.7
State-owned companies
AR 2.5 2.1 1.7
KR 8.1 17.5 11.1
SR 13.8 11.6 11.1
Total 1536.1 1663.7 1731.4
Table 4. Types and number of asphalt mixing plants operating
in Lithuania in 1999 (Sivilevicius 2000)
Model of AMP mixer Manufacturer Output t/h Number
D-138 (G-1) Russia 12-18 5
D-597A Russia 25 12
D-508-2A Russia 25 26
DS-117-2K Russia 32 9
DS-117-2E Russia 25 12
DS-158 Russia 40 3
D-617-2 Russia 50 1
Teltomat-5 GDR 100 24
AMO BS 200/RC120 Finland 200 1
D-645-2 Russia 100 1
Benninghoven AE 150T Germany 150 1
Teltomat-160 Germany 160 1
Ammann 160 Global H Germany 160 1
Ammann Euro A-240 Germany 240 1
Marini MAP 155E 190L Italy 155 1
Total: 99
Table 5. Types and numbers of central mixing plants operating
in Lithuania in 2008
Model of AMP Manufacturer Output t/h Number
D-597 Russia 25 1
DC-117-2K Russia 32 3
D-645-2 Russia 100 1
Teltomat-5/3S GDR 100 9
Teltomat-160 Germany 160 1
Marini Italy 155 1
MAP 155E 190L
Ammann Euro A 240 Germany 240 1
Ammann Global 160 Germany 160 2
Amomatic VS 180 S Finland 180 2
Benninghoven Germany 160 1
TBA-160-K
Benninghoven Germany 160 1
Compact TBA-160-K
Benninghoven Germany 160 1
TBA-160
Benninghoven Germany 240 1
Concept TBA 240/3
Benninghoven
Concept TBA 200- Germany 240 1
240U
Benninghoven Germany 240 1
Concept TBA-240U
Benninghoven Germany 320 1
TBA-320
Total: 28
Fig. 5. Minimum, average annual and maximum output of
HMA mixture in 1998-2007 in the EU member-states and
the amount obtained in 2007 in the countries: a) producing
more than 5 m tonnes of HMA mixture on average;
b) producing less than 5 m tonnes of HMA mixture on
average
a) Production of HMA in million tonnes
Max Averg.
Country 2007 Min
Germany 68,5 51,0
Italy 46,0 35,1
France 42,3 38,0
Spain 49,9 25,7
United Kingdom 27,9 25,5
Poland 18,0 8,0
Austria 10,0 5,9
Netherlands 10,2 7,5
Portugal 12,5 5,5
Sweden 8,5 6,3
Greece 8,0 5,8
b) Production HMA in million tones
Max Averg.
Country 2007 Min
Czech Republic 7,4 4,3
Belgium 5,2 4,2
Finland 5,9 3,6
Denmark 3,6 2,8
Hungary 4,4 2,4
Ireland 3,5 2,4
Romania 3,2 1,5
Slovenia 2,2 1,4
Slovakia 2,2 1,0
Estonia 1,5 0,5
Latvia 0,7 0,4
Note: Table made from bar graph.
Fig. 7. The dynamics of HMA mixture production at various
periods of time in Lithuanian Republic: a--1975-1984,
b--1998-2007
a)
Communal Economy Ministry Automotive transport and
and subordinate enterprises highways Ministry and
subordinate enterprises
1975 1200
1976 1295
1977 1349
1978 1387
1979 1416
1980 331 1432
1981 375 1484
1982 381 1569
1983 436 1646
1984 439 1845
b)
State Joint Stock
Companies Companies
1998 26 733
1999 32 782
2000 14 825
2001 17 886
2002 29 901
2003 33 1089
2004 25 1345
2005 24 1512
2006 31 1632
2007 24 1707
Note: Table made from bar graph.